Table 1.a Percent of Professional Staff from Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Prof. Staff Prof. Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ___________ ___________ __________ 1 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 17.69% 17.97% .28% 2 GUELPH 16.89% 18.11% 1.22% 3 ALBERTA 22.35% 19.33% -3.03% 4 MCMASTER 18.28% 19.35% 1.08% 5 WESTERN ONTARIO 19.57% 19.49% -.08% 6 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 20.93% 19.88% -1.05% 7 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 21.74% 20.00% -1.74% 8 COLORADO STATE 23.31% 20.34% -2.97% 9 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 18.78% 20.66% 1.88% 10 VPI & SU 19.90% 20.67% .77% 11 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 22.49% 21.14% -1.35% 12 HOUSTON 21.30% 21.40% .10% 13 CHICAGO 21.45% 21.56% .11% 14 NOTRE DAME 22.17% 21.59% -.58% 15 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 22.02% 21.64% -.38% 16 QUEEN'S 22.28% 21.67% -.60% 17 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 21.56% 21.88% .32% 18 UTAH 22.15% 22.01% -.14% 19 YORK 21.34% 22.17% .84% 20 WATERLOO 23.46% 22.22% -1.24% 21 CORNELL 22.15% 22.41% .27% 22 MICHIGAN STATE 21.09% 22.61% 1.52% 23 MICHIGAN 24.28% 22.82% -1.47% 24 IOWA STATE 21.72% 23.11% 1.39% 25 WASHINGTON STATE 22.09% 23.21% 1.12% 26 TEXAS A&M 26.90% 23.26% -3.64% 27 SUNY-STONY BROOK 22.99% 23.32% .32% 28 MINNESOTA 23.13% 23.32% .19% 29 FLORIDA STATE 24.35% 23.33% -1.01% 30 GEORGIA 23.63% 23.35% -.28% 31 LOUISIANA STATE 23.50% 23.42% -.08% 32 TEXAS 23.31% 23.54% .23% 33 KENT STATE 22.61% 23.66% 1.05% 34 RUTGERS 23.95% 23.95% .00% 35 MISSOURI 23.65% 23.98% .33% 36 SASKATCHEWAN 24.42% 24.00% -.42% 37 OHIO STATE 24.88% 24.05% -.83% 38 NEBRASKA 24.20% 24.07% -.13% 39 DELAWARE 23.74% 24.22% .47% 40 PURDUE 24.25% 24.34% .09% 41 MCGILL 25.40% 24.36% -1.04% 42 COLORADO 24.71% 24.41% -.30% 43 NEW MEXICO 23.51% 24.51% 1.00% 44 OREGON 24.55% 24.55% .00% 45 TENNESSEE 24.34% 24.62% .28% 46 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 21.43% 24.71% 3.28% 47 BOSTON 25.10% 24.90% -.20% 48 ARIZONA 23.99% 25.07% 1.08% 49 PITTSBURGH 25.48% 25.41% -.07% 50 HAWAII 25.86% 25.60% -.26% 51 TORONTO 25.16% 25.73% .57% 52 MANITOBA 24.54% 25.89% 1.35% 53 BRITISH COLUMBIA 25.37% 25.94% .57% 54 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 26.94% 25.98% -.95% 55 LAVAL 25.19% 26.48% 1.29% 56 TULANE 28.35% 26.50% -1.85% 57 VIRGINIA 25.35% 26.72% 1.37% 58 MARYLAND 27.08% 26.90% -.18% 59 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 26.81% 26.98% .17% 60 VANDERBILT 28.86% 27.18% -1.68% Table 1.a Percent of Professional Staff from Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Prof. Staff Prof. Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ___________ ___________ __________ 61 DARTMOUTH 27.72% 27.32% -.39% 62 ARIZONA STATE 27.25% 27.42% .18% 63 SUNY-ALBANY 26.97% 27.49% .52% 64 MASSACHUSETTS 28.02% 27.57% -.45% 65 WASHINGTON 27.12% 27.62% .49% 66 AUBURN 26.42% 27.68% 1.26% 67 FLORIDA 27.53% 27.69% .17% 68 CINCINNATI 26.43% 27.74% 1.31% 69 CONNECTICUT 25.78% 27.92% 2.14% 70 JOHNS HOPKINS 28.81% 27.97% -.83% 71 OKLAHOMA 27.96% 28.18% .22% 72 PENNSYLVANIA 27.97% 28.23% .26% 73 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 28.62% 28.27% -.35% 74 MIAMI 28.52% 28.29% -.23% 75 OKLAHOMA STATE 27.72% 28.33% .62% 76 NORTH CAROLINA 28.30% 28.37% .07% 77 SOUTH CAROLINA 29.80% 28.40% -1.39% 78 NORTHWESTERN 27.50% 28.69% 1.19% 79 OHIO . 28.71% . 80 WISCONSIN 28.76% 28.73% -.03% 81 INDIANA 28.60% 28.90% .30% 82 EMORY 29.93% 29.18% -.75% 83 SYRACUSE 28.98% 29.20% .22% 84 KANSAS 31.35% 29.73% -1.62% 85 ALABAMA 31.09% 29.79% -1.30% 86 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 30.97% 30.08% -.88% 87 KENTUCKY 29.72% 30.12% .40% 88 ILLINOIS, URBANA 29.81% 30.13% .32% 89 HOWARD 31.93% 30.20% -1.73% 90 WAYNE STATE 30.77% 30.37% -.40% 91 NEW YORK 31.95% 30.43% -1.52% 92 GEORGETOWN 33.33% 30.77% -2.56% 93 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 26.90% 30.88% 3.98% 94 PRINCETON 30.13% 31.05% .93% 95 STANFORD 29.96% 31.31% 1.34% 96 TEMPLE 31.17% 31.47% .30% 97 DUKE 31.75% 31.71% -.04% 98 COLUMBIA 30.94% 31.89% .95% 99 YALE 31.59% 33.01% 1.42% 100 IOWA 31.21% 33.01% 1.80% 101 BROWN 32.54% 33.47% .93% 102 BRIGHAM YOUNG 34.56% 34.35% -.21% 103 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 33.33% 35.83% 2.50% 104 HARVARD 36.02% 35.91% -.11% 105 ROCHESTER 29.52% 36.67% 7.14% 106 MIT 37.00% 37.73% .72% 107 RICE 37.82% 37.93% .12% 108 SUNY-BUFFALO 37.25% 38.19% .93% 109 GEORGIA TECH 43.33% 42.74% -.60% Mean 26.47% 26.63% .13% StdDev 4.60% 4.71% 1.37% Table 1.b Percent of Professional Staff from Total Staff sorted by Difference in the Percentage between 1995 and 1996 Percent Percent Difference Prof. Staff Prof. Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ___________ ___________ __________ . OHIO . 28.71% . 1 TEXAS A&M 26.90% 23.26% -3.64% 2 ALBERTA 22.35% 19.33% -3.03% 3 COLORADO STATE 23.31% 20.34% -2.97% 4 GEORGETOWN 33.33% 30.77% -2.56% 5 TULANE 28.35% 26.50% -1.85% 6 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 21.74% 20.00% -1.74% 7 HOWARD 31.93% 30.20% -1.73% 8 VANDERBILT 28.86% 27.18% -1.68% 9 KANSAS 31.35% 29.73% -1.62% 10 NEW YORK 31.95% 30.43% -1.52% 11 MICHIGAN 24.28% 22.82% -1.47% 12 SOUTH CAROLINA 29.80% 28.40% -1.39% 13 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 22.49% 21.14% -1.35% 14 ALABAMA 31.09% 29.79% -1.30% 15 WATERLOO 23.46% 22.22% -1.24% 16 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 20.93% 19.88% -1.05% 17 MCGILL 25.40% 24.36% -1.04% 18 FLORIDA STATE 24.35% 23.33% -1.01% 19 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 26.94% 25.98% -.95% 20 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 30.97% 30.08% -.88% 21 JOHNS HOPKINS 28.81% 27.97% -.83% 22 OHIO STATE 24.88% 24.05% -.83% 23 EMORY 29.93% 29.18% -.75% 24 QUEEN'S 22.28% 21.67% -.60% 25 GEORGIA TECH 43.33% 42.74% -.60% 26 NOTRE DAME 22.17% 21.59% -.58% 27 MASSACHUSETTS 28.02% 27.57% -.45% 28 SASKATCHEWAN 24.42% 24.00% -.42% 29 WAYNE STATE 30.77% 30.37% -.40% 30 DARTMOUTH 27.72% 27.32% -.39% 31 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 22.02% 21.64% -.38% 32 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 28.62% 28.27% -.35% 33 COLORADO 24.71% 24.41% -.30% 34 GEORGIA 23.63% 23.35% -.28% 35 HAWAII 25.86% 25.60% -.26% 36 MIAMI 28.52% 28.29% -.23% 37 BRIGHAM YOUNG 34.56% 34.35% -.21% 38 BOSTON 25.10% 24.90% -.20% 39 MARYLAND 27.08% 26.90% -.18% 40 UTAH 22.15% 22.01% -.14% 41 NEBRASKA 24.20% 24.07% -.13% 42 HARVARD 36.02% 35.91% -.11% 43 WESTERN ONTARIO 19.57% 19.49% -.08% 44 LOUISIANA STATE 23.50% 23.42% -.08% 45 PITTSBURGH 25.48% 25.41% -.07% 46 DUKE 31.75% 31.71% -.04% 47 WISCONSIN 28.76% 28.73% -.03% 49 RUTGERS 23.95% 23.95% .00% 49 OREGON 24.55% 24.55% .00% 50 NORTH CAROLINA 28.30% 28.37% .07% 51 PURDUE 24.25% 24.34% .09% 52 HOUSTON 21.30% 21.40% .10% 53 CHICAGO 21.45% 21.56% .11% 54 RICE 37.82% 37.93% .12% 55 FLORIDA 27.53% 27.69% .17% 56 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 26.81% 26.98% .17% 57 ARIZONA STATE 27.25% 27.42% .18% 58 MINNESOTA 23.13% 23.32% .19% 59 OKLAHOMA 27.96% 28.18% .22% 60 SYRACUSE 28.98% 29.20% .22% Table 1.b Percent of Professional Staff from Total Staff sorted by Difference in the Percentage between 1995 and 1996 Percent Percent Difference Prof. Staff Prof. Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ___________ ___________ __________ 61 TEXAS 23.31% 23.54% .23% 62 PENNSYLVANIA 27.97% 28.23% .26% 63 CORNELL 22.15% 22.41% .27% 64 TENNESSEE 24.34% 24.62% .28% 65 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 17.69% 17.97% .28% 66 TEMPLE 31.17% 31.47% .30% 67 INDIANA 28.60% 28.90% .30% 68 SUNY-STONY BROOK 22.99% 23.32% .32% 69 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 21.56% 21.88% .32% 70 ILLINOIS, URBANA 29.81% 30.13% .32% 71 MISSOURI 23.65% 23.98% .33% 72 KENTUCKY 29.72% 30.12% .40% 73 DELAWARE 23.74% 24.22% .47% 74 WASHINGTON 27.12% 27.62% .49% 75 SUNY-ALBANY 26.97% 27.49% .52% 76 BRITISH COLUMBIA 25.37% 25.94% .57% 77 TORONTO 25.16% 25.73% .57% 78 OKLAHOMA STATE 27.72% 28.33% .62% 79 MIT 37.00% 37.73% .72% 80 VPI & SU 19.90% 20.67% .77% 81 YORK 21.34% 22.17% .84% 82 PRINCETON 30.13% 31.05% .93% 83 BROWN 32.54% 33.47% .93% 84 SUNY-BUFFALO 37.25% 38.19% .93% 85 COLUMBIA 30.94% 31.89% .95% 86 NEW MEXICO 23.51% 24.51% 1.00% 87 KENT STATE 22.61% 23.66% 1.05% 88 MCMASTER 18.28% 19.35% 1.08% 89 ARIZONA 23.99% 25.07% 1.08% 90 WASHINGTON STATE 22.09% 23.21% 1.12% 91 NORTHWESTERN 27.50% 28.69% 1.19% 92 GUELPH 16.89% 18.11% 1.22% 93 AUBURN 26.42% 27.68% 1.26% 94 LAVAL 25.19% 26.48% 1.29% 95 CINCINNATI 26.43% 27.74% 1.31% 96 STANFORD 29.96% 31.31% 1.34% 97 MANITOBA 24.54% 25.89% 1.35% 98 VIRGINIA 25.35% 26.72% 1.37% 99 IOWA STATE 21.72% 23.11% 1.39% 100 YALE 31.59% 33.01% 1.42% 101 MICHIGAN STATE 21.09% 22.61% 1.52% 102 IOWA 31.21% 33.01% 1.80% 103 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 18.78% 20.66% 1.88% 104 CONNECTICUT 25.78% 27.92% 2.14% 105 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 33.33% 35.83% 2.50% 106 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 21.43% 24.71% 3.28% 107 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 26.90% 30.88% 3.98% 108 ROCHESTER 29.52% 36.67% 7.14% Mean 26.47% 26.63% .13% StdDev 4.60% 4.71% 1.37% Table 1.c Professional Staff and Total Staff Professional Total Professional Total Staff Staff Staff Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 ____________ _______ ____________ _______ ALABAMA 60 193 56 188 ALBERTA 76 340 63 326 ARIZONA 83 346 92 367 ARIZONA STATE 100 367 99 361 AUBURN 51 193 49 177 BOSTON 63 251 63 253 BRIGHAM YOUNG 103 298 101 294 BRITISH COLUMBIA 104 410 104 401 BROWN 82 252 80 239 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 178 664 177 656 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 52 294 53 295 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 56 249 52 246 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 126 602 128 644 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 36 168 43 174 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 69 320 72 329 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 50 230 50 250 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 61 183 67 187 CHICAGO 74 345 72 334 CINCINNATI 74 280 76 274 COLORADO 63 255 62 254 COLORADO STATE 38 163 36 177 COLUMBIA 177 572 177 555 CONNECTICUT 66 256 67 240 CORNELL 130 587 130 580 DARTMOUTH 51 184 50 183 DELAWARE 52 219 54 223 DUKE 107 337 104 328 EMORY 82 274 82 281 FLORIDA 109 396 108 390 FLORIDA STATE 56 230 56 240 GEORGETOWN 92 276 80 260 GEORGIA 82 347 85 364 GEORGIA TECH 52 120 50 117 GUELPH 25 148 23 127 HARVARD 402 1,116 404 1,125 HAWAII 60 232 53 207 HOUSTON 46 216 46 215 HOWARD 53 166 45 149 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 81 283 80 283 ILLINOIS, URBANA 155 520 160 531 INDIANA 137 479 137 474 IOWA 93 298 102 309 IOWA STATE 48 221 52 225 JOHNS HOPKINS 87 302 87 311 KANSAS 95 303 88 296 KENT STATE 52 230 53 224 KENTUCKY 96 323 100 332 LAVAL 67 266 67 253 LOUISIANA STATE 51 217 52 222 MCGILL 80 315 76 312 MCMASTER 34 186 36 186 MANITOBA 53 216 51 197 MARYLAND 91 336 85 316 MASSACHUSETTS 51 182 51 185 MIT 84 227 83 220 MIAMI 73 256 71 251 MICHIGAN 144 593 149 653 MICHIGAN STATE 58 275 64 283 MINNESOTA 102 441 104 446 MISSOURI 57 241 59 246 NEBRASKA 53 219 52 216 NEW MEXICO 83 353 88 359 Table 1.c Professional Staff and Total Staff Professional Total Professional Total Staff Staff Staff Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 ____________ _______ ____________ _______ NEW YORK 154 482 143 470 NORTH CAROLINA 120 424 120 423 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 66 245 66 254 NORTHWESTERN 110 400 107 373 NOTRE DAME 47 212 49 227 OHIO . . 60 209 OHIO STATE 104 418 101 420 OKLAHOMA 52 186 51 181 OKLAHOMA STATE 51 184 51 180 OREGON 54 220 54 220 PENNSYLVANIA 106 379 107 379 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 120 545 116 536 PITTSBURGH 106 416 108 425 PRINCETON 119 395 118 380 PURDUE 65 268 65 267 QUEEN'S 45 202 44 203 RICE 45 119 44 116 ROCHESTER 62 210 77 210 RUTGERS 108 451 108 451 SASKATCHEWAN 42 172 42 175 SOUTH CAROLINA 73 245 73 257 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 109 352 108 359 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 43 229 50 242 STANFORD 163 544 175 559 SUNY-ALBANY 48 178 47 171 SUNY-BUFFALO 95 255 97 254 SUNY-STONY BROOK 43 187 45 193 SYRACUSE 71 245 73 250 TEMPLE 72 231 73 232 TENNESSEE 65 267 65 264 TEXAS 141 605 141 599 TEXAS A&M 85 316 80 344 TORONTO 154 612 149 579 TULANE 55 194 53 200 UTAH 70 316 70 318 VANDERBILT 86 298 78 287 VIRGINIA 91 359 97 363 VPI & SU 41 206 43 208 WASHINGTON 131 483 132 478 WASHINGTON STATE 38 172 39 168 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 78 290 88 285 WATERLOO 42 179 40 180 WAYNE STATE 80 260 82 270 WESTERN ONTARIO 46 235 46 236 WISCONSIN 155 539 156 543 YALE 193 611 203 615 YORK 51 239 51 230 Mean 84 314 84 313 StdDev 47 149 48 150 Table 2.a Support Staff as a Percent of Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 1 BRIGHAM YOUNG 17.79% 18.03% .24% 2 KENTUCKY 35.91% 34.04% -1.88% 3 SUNY-BUFFALO 36.08% 34.65% -1.43% 4 OKLAHOMA STATE 35.87% 36.11% .24% 5 NORTHWESTERN 34.75% 36.19% 1.44% 6 OHIO . 36.84% . 7 WAYNE STATE 38.85% 37.41% -1.44% 8 KANSAS 39.60% 37.50% -2.10% 9 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 39.76% 38.57% -1.19% 10 ROCHESTER 43.81% 38.57% -5.24% 11 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 38.64% 39.00% .36% 12 MICHIGAN STATE 40.73% 39.22% -1.50% 13 NEW YORK 42.32% 39.36% -2.96% 14 MARYLAND 37.20% 39.87% 2.67% 15 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 41.48% 40.08% -1.40% 16 WISCONSIN 40.45% 40.15% -.30% 17 IOWA 41.28% 40.45% -.82% 18 CINCINNATI 42.14% 40.51% -1.63% 19 KENT STATE 40.87% 40.63% -.24% 20 CONNECTICUT 43.75% 40.83% -2.92% 21 ALABAMA 41.97% 40.96% -1.01% 22 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 44.26% 41.18% -3.09% 23 OKLAHOMA 40.86% 41.44% .58% 24 INDIANA 39.67% 41.56% 1.90% 25 OREGON 41.82% 41.82% .00% 26 BROWN 38.49% 41.84% 3.35% 27 HAWAII 43.97% 42.51% -1.45% 28 OHIO STATE 43.06% 42.62% -.44% 29 MINNESOTA 43.54% 43.05% -.49% 30 HOUSTON 45.37% 45.12% -.25% 31 VPI & SU 49.51% 45.19% -4.32% 32 TEMPLE 46.75% 45.26% -1.49% 33 COLORADO STATE 46.01% 45.76% -.25% 34 MICHIGAN 48.57% 45.79% -2.78% 35 SUNY-STONY BROOK 49.73% 46.11% -3.62% 36 SUNY-ALBANY 44.94% 46.20% 1.26% 37 SOUTH CAROLINA 46.94% 46.30% -.64% 38 ILLINOIS, URBANA 46.73% 46.33% -.40% 39 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 47.62% 46.55% -1.07% 40 GEORGETOWN 44.57% 46.92% 2.36% 41 NEW MEXICO 47.88% 47.35% -.52% 42 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 37.35% 47.56% 10.21% 43 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 48.98% 47.64% -1.34% 44 WASHINGTON 46.79% 47.91% 1.12% 45 COLUMBIA 47.90% 47.93% .03% 46 MASSACHUSETTS 48.90% 48.11% -.79% 47 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 49.00% 48.14% -.87% 48 PENNSYLVANIA 48.55% 48.28% -.26% 49 AUBURN 51.30% 48.59% -2.71% 50 NORTH CAROLINA 49.53% 48.94% -.59% 51 TULANE 46.39% 49.00% 2.61% 52 TEXAS A&M 45.89% 49.13% 3.24% 53 SYRACUSE 51.84% 49.20% -2.64% 54 ARIZONA 50.58% 49.32% -1.26% 55 PITTSBURGH 50.00% 49.41% -.59% 56 VANDERBILT 46.64% 49.48% 2.83% 57 COLORADO 48.63% 49.61% .98% 58 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 53.10% 49.82% -3.28% 59 LOUISIANA STATE 49.77% 50.45% .68% 60 MIT 51.98% 50.45% -1.53% 61 UTAH 50.95% 50.63% -.32% Table 2.a Support Staff as a Percent of Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 62 DELAWARE 51.60% 50.67% -.93% 63 CORNELL 51.45% 51.03% -.41% 64 STANFORD 53.31% 51.16% -2.15% 65 IOWA STATE 51.13% 51.56% .42% 66 FLORIDA STATE 53.91% 51.67% -2.25% 67 RICE 50.42% 51.72% 1.30% 68 MIAMI 52.34% 51.79% -.55% 69 GEORGIA TECH 51.67% 52.14% .47% 70 BOSTON 52.59% 52.17% -.42% 71 HARVARD 52.78% 52.18% -.60% 72 FLORIDA 51.52% 52.31% .79% 73 YALE 52.54% 52.68% .15% 74 DUKE 51.04% 52.74% 1.71% 75 EMORY 54.01% 53.02% -.99% 76 TENNESSEE 52.06% 53.03% .97% 77 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 55.31% 53.19% -2.12% 78 RUTGERS 52.77% 53.22% .44% 79 GEORGIA 52.74% 53.30% .56% 80 WASHINGTON STATE 54.07% 53.57% -.50% 81 VIRGINIA 54.04% 53.99% -.04% 82 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 58.70% 54.00% -4.70% 83 PRINCETON 55.44% 54.21% -1.23% 84 ARIZONA STATE 55.86% 54.29% -1.56% 85 PURDUE 54.10% 54.31% .20% 86 NEBRASKA 53.42% 54.63% 1.20% 87 YORK 57.32% 55.22% -2.10% 88 MISSOURI 55.60% 55.69% .09% 89 CHICAGO 55.94% 55.99% .05% 90 DARTMOUTH 57.07% 57.38% .31% 91 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 56.89% 57.60% .71% 92 JOHNS HOPKINS 56.95% 58.20% 1.25% 93 TORONTO 60.95% 59.41% -1.53% 94 MCGILL 59.68% 59.62% -.07% 95 BRITISH COLUMBIA 61.46% 59.85% -1.61% 96 TEXAS 63.14% 60.77% -2.37% 97 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 61.56% 61.36% -.21% 98 HOWARD 58.43% 61.74% 3.31% 99 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 63.49% 61.75% -1.73% 100 WATERLOO 64.80% 63.89% -.92% 101 MANITOBA 62.96% 64.97% 2.01% 102 NOTRE DAME 66.51% 66.08% -.43% 103 SASKATCHEWAN 69.77% 66.86% -2.91% 104 ALBERTA 67.35% 66.87% -.48% 105 QUEEN'S 67.82% 67.49% -.33% 106 MCMASTER 73.12% 70.43% -2.69% 107 WESTERN ONTARIO 72.77% 72.46% -.31% 108 LAVAL 71.80% 73.12% 1.32% 109 GUELPH 77.03% 74.80% -2.22% Mean 50.36% 49.79% -.45% StdDev 9.43% 9.32% 1.96% Table 2.b Support Staff as a Percent of Total Staff sorted by Difference in Percentage between 1995 and 1996 Percent Percent Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ . OHIO . 36.84% . 1 ROCHESTER 43.81% 38.57% -5.24% 2 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 58.70% 54.00% -4.70% 3 VPI & SU 49.51% 45.19% -4.32% 4 SUNY-STONY BROOK 49.73% 46.11% -3.62% 5 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 53.10% 49.82% -3.28% 6 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 44.26% 41.18% -3.09% 7 NEW YORK 42.32% 39.36% -2.96% 8 CONNECTICUT 43.75% 40.83% -2.92% 9 SASKATCHEWAN 69.77% 66.86% -2.91% 10 MICHIGAN 48.57% 45.79% -2.78% 11 AUBURN 51.30% 48.59% -2.71% 12 MCMASTER 73.12% 70.43% -2.69% 13 SYRACUSE 51.84% 49.20% -2.64% 14 TEXAS 63.14% 60.77% -2.37% 15 FLORIDA STATE 53.91% 51.67% -2.25% 16 GUELPH 77.03% 74.80% -2.22% 17 STANFORD 53.31% 51.16% -2.15% 18 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 55.31% 53.19% -2.12% 19 YORK 57.32% 55.22% -2.10% 20 KANSAS 39.60% 37.50% -2.10% 21 KENTUCKY 35.91% 34.04% -1.88% 22 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 63.49% 61.75% -1.73% 23 CINCINNATI 42.14% 40.51% -1.63% 24 BRITISH COLUMBIA 61.46% 59.85% -1.61% 25 ARIZONA STATE 55.86% 54.29% -1.56% 26 TORONTO 60.95% 59.41% -1.53% 27 MIT 51.98% 50.45% -1.53% 28 MICHIGAN STATE 40.73% 39.22% -1.50% 29 TEMPLE 46.75% 45.26% -1.49% 30 HAWAII 43.97% 42.51% -1.45% 31 WAYNE STATE 38.85% 37.41% -1.44% 32 SUNY-BUFFALO 36.08% 34.65% -1.43% 33 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 41.48% 40.08% -1.40% 34 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 48.98% 47.64% -1.34% 35 ARIZONA 50.58% 49.32% -1.26% 36 PRINCETON 55.44% 54.21% -1.23% 37 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 39.76% 38.57% -1.19% 38 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 47.62% 46.55% -1.07% 39 ALABAMA 41.97% 40.96% -1.01% 40 EMORY 54.01% 53.02% -.99% 41 DELAWARE 51.60% 50.67% -.93% 42 WATERLOO 64.80% 63.89% -.92% 43 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 49.00% 48.14% -.87% 44 IOWA 41.28% 40.45% -.82% 45 MASSACHUSETTS 48.90% 48.11% -.79% 46 SOUTH CAROLINA 46.94% 46.30% -.64% 47 HARVARD 52.78% 52.18% -.60% 48 NORTH CAROLINA 49.53% 48.94% -.59% 49 PITTSBURGH 50.00% 49.41% -.59% 50 MIAMI 52.34% 51.79% -.55% 51 NEW MEXICO 47.88% 47.35% -.52% 52 WASHINGTON STATE 54.07% 53.57% -.50% 53 MINNESOTA 43.54% 43.05% -.49% 54 ALBERTA 67.35% 66.87% -.48% 55 OHIO STATE 43.06% 42.62% -.44% 56 NOTRE DAME 66.51% 66.08% -.43% 57 BOSTON 52.59% 52.17% -.42% 58 CORNELL 51.45% 51.03% -.41% 59 ILLINOIS, URBANA 46.73% 46.33% -.40% 60 QUEEN'S 67.82% 67.49% -.33% Table 2.b Support Staff as a Percent of Total Staff sorted by Difference in Percentage between 1995 and 1996 Percent Percent Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 61 UTAH 50.95% 50.63% -.32% 62 WESTERN ONTARIO 72.77% 72.46% -.31% 63 WISCONSIN 40.45% 40.15% -.30% 64 PENNSYLVANIA 48.55% 48.28% -.26% 65 HOUSTON 45.37% 45.12% -.25% 66 COLORADO STATE 46.01% 45.76% -.25% 67 KENT STATE 40.87% 40.63% -.24% 68 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 61.56% 61.36% -.21% 69 MCGILL 59.68% 59.62% -.07% 70 VIRGINIA 54.04% 53.99% -.04% 71 OREGON 41.82% 41.82% .00% 72 COLUMBIA 47.90% 47.93% .03% 73 CHICAGO 55.94% 55.99% .05% 74 MISSOURI 55.60% 55.69% .09% 75 YALE 52.54% 52.68% .15% 76 PURDUE 54.10% 54.31% .20% 77 OKLAHOMA STATE 35.87% 36.11% .24% 78 BRIGHAM YOUNG 17.79% 18.03% .24% 79 DARTMOUTH 57.07% 57.38% .31% 80 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 38.64% 39.00% .36% 81 IOWA STATE 51.13% 51.56% .42% 82 RUTGERS 52.77% 53.22% .44% 83 GEORGIA TECH 51.67% 52.14% .47% 84 GEORGIA 52.74% 53.30% .56% 85 OKLAHOMA 40.86% 41.44% .58% 86 LOUISIANA STATE 49.77% 50.45% .68% 87 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 56.89% 57.60% .71% 88 FLORIDA 51.52% 52.31% .79% 89 TENNESSEE 52.06% 53.03% .97% 90 COLORADO 48.63% 49.61% .98% 91 WASHINGTON 46.79% 47.91% 1.12% 92 NEBRASKA 53.42% 54.63% 1.20% 93 JOHNS HOPKINS 56.95% 58.20% 1.25% 94 SUNY-ALBANY 44.94% 46.20% 1.26% 95 RICE 50.42% 51.72% 1.30% 96 LAVAL 71.80% 73.12% 1.32% 97 NORTHWESTERN 34.75% 36.19% 1.44% 98 DUKE 51.04% 52.74% 1.71% 99 INDIANA 39.67% 41.56% 1.90% 100 MANITOBA 62.96% 64.97% 2.01% 101 GEORGETOWN 44.57% 46.92% 2.36% 102 TULANE 46.39% 49.00% 2.61% 103 MARYLAND 37.20% 39.87% 2.67% 104 VANDERBILT 46.64% 49.48% 2.83% 105 TEXAS A&M 45.89% 49.13% 3.24% 106 HOWARD 58.43% 61.74% 3.31% 107 BROWN 38.49% 41.84% 3.35% 108 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 37.35% 47.56% 10.21% Mean 50.36% 49.79% -.45% StdDev 9.43% 9.32% 1.96% Table 2.c Support Staff and Total Staff Support Total Support Total Staff Staff Staff Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 _______ _______ _______ _______ ALABAMA 81 193 77 188 ALBERTA 229 340 218 326 ARIZONA 175 346 181 367 ARIZONA STATE 205 367 196 361 AUBURN 99 193 86 177 BOSTON 132 251 132 253 BRIGHAM YOUNG 53 298 53 294 BRITISH COLUMBIA 252 410 240 401 BROWN 97 252 100 239 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 264 664 253 656 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 181 294 181 295 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 93 249 117 246 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 295 602 310 644 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 80 168 81 174 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 177 320 175 329 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 135 230 135 250 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 81 183 77 187 CHICAGO 193 345 187 334 CINCINNATI 118 280 111 274 COLORADO 124 255 126 254 COLORADO STATE 75 163 81 177 COLUMBIA 274 572 266 555 CONNECTICUT 112 256 98 240 CORNELL 302 587 296 580 DARTMOUTH 105 184 105 183 DELAWARE 113 219 113 223 DUKE 172 337 173 328 EMORY 148 274 149 281 FLORIDA 204 396 204 390 FLORIDA STATE 124 230 124 240 GEORGETOWN 123 276 122 260 GEORGIA 183 347 194 364 GEORGIA TECH 62 120 61 117 GUELPH 114 148 95 127 HARVARD 589 1,116 587 1,125 HAWAII 102 232 88 207 HOUSTON 98 216 97 215 HOWARD 97 166 92 149 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 161 283 163 283 ILLINOIS, URBANA 243 520 246 531 INDIANA 190 479 197 474 IOWA 123 298 125 309 IOWA STATE 113 221 116 225 JOHNS HOPKINS 172 302 181 311 KANSAS 120 303 111 296 KENT STATE 94 230 91 224 KENTUCKY 116 323 113 332 LAVAL 191 266 185 253 LOUISIANA STATE 108 217 112 222 MCGILL 188 315 186 312 MCMASTER 136 186 131 186 MANITOBA 136 216 128 197 MARYLAND 125 336 126 316 MASSACHUSETTS 89 182 89 185 MIT 118 227 111 220 MIAMI 134 256 130 251 MICHIGAN 288 593 299 653 MICHIGAN STATE 112 275 111 283 MINNESOTA 192 441 192 446 MISSOURI 134 241 137 246 NEBRASKA 117 219 118 216 NEW MEXICO 169 353 170 359 Table 2.c Support Staff and Total Staff Support Total Support Total Staff Staff Staff Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 _______ _______ _______ _______ NEW YORK 204 482 185 470 NORTH CAROLINA 210 424 207 423 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 120 245 121 254 NORTHWESTERN 139 400 135 373 NOTRE DAME 141 212 150 227 OHIO . . 77 209 OHIO STATE 180 418 179 420 OKLAHOMA 76 186 75 181 OKLAHOMA STATE 66 184 65 180 OREGON 92 220 92 220 PENNSYLVANIA 184 379 183 379 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 346 545 331 536 PITTSBURGH 208 416 210 425 PRINCETON 219 395 206 380 PURDUE 145 268 145 267 QUEEN'S 137 202 137 203 RICE 60 119 60 116 ROCHESTER 92 210 81 210 RUTGERS 238 451 240 451 SASKATCHEWAN 120 172 117 175 SOUTH CAROLINA 115 245 119 257 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 136 352 140 359 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 95 229 97 242 STANFORD 290 544 286 559 SUNY-ALBANY 80 178 79 171 SUNY-BUFFALO 92 255 88 254 SUNY-STONY BROOK 93 187 89 193 SYRACUSE 127 245 123 250 TEMPLE 108 231 105 232 TENNESSEE 139 267 140 264 TEXAS 382 605 364 599 TEXAS A&M 145 316 169 344 TORONTO 373 612 344 579 TULANE 90 194 98 200 UTAH 161 316 161 318 VANDERBILT 139 298 142 287 VIRGINIA 194 359 196 363 VPI & SU 102 206 94 208 WASHINGTON 226 483 229 478 WASHINGTON STATE 93 172 90 168 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 154 290 142 285 WATERLOO 116 179 115 180 WAYNE STATE 101 260 101 270 WESTERN ONTARIO 171 235 171 236 WISCONSIN 218 539 218 543 YALE 321 611 324 615 YORK 137 239 127 230 Mean 157 314 155 313 StdDev 80 149 79 150 Table 3.a Student Assistants as a Percentage of Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Student Student in the Assistants Assistants Percentage /Total Staff /Total Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ 1 LAVAL 3.01% .40% -2.61% 2 GEORGIA TECH 5.00% 5.13% .13% 3 GUELPH 6.08% 7.09% 1.01% 4 WESTERN ONTARIO 7.66% 8.05% .39% 5 HOWARD 9.64% 8.05% -1.58% 6 MANITOBA 12.50% 9.14% -3.36% 7 SASKATCHEWAN 5.81% 9.14% 3.33% 8 MCMASTER 8.60% 10.22% 1.61% 9 RICE 11.76% 10.34% -1.42% 10 QUEEN'S 9.90% 10.84% .94% 11 MIT 11.01% 11.82% .80% 12 HARVARD 11.20% 11.91% .71% 13 NOTRE DAME 11.32% 12.33% 1.01% 14 ALBERTA 10.29% 13.80% 3.51% 15 JOHNS HOPKINS 14.24% 13.83% -.41% 16 WATERLOO 11.73% 13.89% 2.16% 17 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 14.49% 14.13% -.35% 18 BRITISH COLUMBIA 13.17% 14.21% 1.04% 19 YALE 15.88% 14.31% -1.57% 20 PRINCETON 14.43% 14.74% .31% 21 TORONTO 13.89% 14.85% .96% 22 DARTMOUTH 15.22% 15.30% .08% 23 DUKE 17.21% 15.55% -1.66% 24 TEXAS 13.55% 15.69% 2.14% 25 MCGILL 14.92% 16.03% 1.11% 26 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 14.50% 16.60% 2.11% 27 STANFORD 16.73% 17.53% .80% 28 EMORY 16.06% 17.79% 1.74% 29 ARIZONA STATE 16.89% 18.28% 1.39% 30 VIRGINIA 20.61% 19.28% -1.33% 31 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 20.00% 19.30% -.70% 32 MIAMI 19.14% 19.92% .78% 33 FLORIDA 20.96% 20.00% -.96% 34 COLUMBIA 21.15% 20.18% -.97% 35 MISSOURI 20.75% 20.33% -.42% 36 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 20.75% 20.68% -.07% 37 NEBRASKA 22.37% 21.30% -1.08% 38 PURDUE 21.64% 21.35% -.29% 39 SYRACUSE 19.18% 21.60% 2.42% 40 GEORGETOWN 22.10% 22.31% .21% 41 TENNESSEE 23.60% 22.35% -1.25% 42 CHICAGO 22.61% 22.46% -.15% 43 YORK 21.34% 22.61% 1.27% 44 NORTH CAROLINA 22.17% 22.70% .53% 45 RUTGERS 23.28% 22.84% -.44% 46 BOSTON 22.31% 22.92% .61% 47 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 22.40% 22.99% .59% 48 WASHINGTON STATE 23.84% 23.21% -.62% 49 TEMPLE 22.08% 23.28% 1.20% 50 VANDERBILT 24.50% 23.34% -1.15% 51 GEORGIA 23.63% 23.35% -.28% 52 PENNSYLVANIA 23.48% 23.48% .00% 53 ILLINOIS, URBANA 23.46% 23.54% .08% 54 AUBURN 22.28% 23.73% 1.45% 55 MASSACHUSETTS 23.08% 24.32% 1.25% 56 WASHINGTON 26.09% 24.48% -1.61% 57 TULANE 25.26% 24.50% -.76% 58 BROWN 28.97% 24.69% -4.28% 59 ROCHESTER 26.67% 24.76% -1.90% 60 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 23.13% 24.92% 1.80% 61 FLORIDA STATE 21.74% 25.00% 3.26% Table 3.a Student Assistants as a Percentage of Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Student Student in the Assistants Assistants Percentage /Total Staff /Total Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ 62 DELAWARE 24.66% 25.11% .45% 63 PITTSBURGH 24.52% 25.18% .66% 64 SOUTH CAROLINA 23.27% 25.29% 2.03% 65 IOWA STATE 27.15% 25.33% -1.82% 66 ARIZONA 25.43% 25.61% .18% 67 COLORADO 26.67% 25.98% -.68% 68 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 19.57% 26.00% 6.43% 69 LOUISIANA STATE 26.73% 26.13% -.60% 70 SUNY-ALBANY 28.09% 26.32% -1.77% 71 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 24.08% 26.38% 2.30% 72 IOWA 27.52% 26.54% -.98% 73 CORNELL 26.41% 26.55% .15% 74 SUNY-BUFFALO 26.67% 27.17% .50% 75 UTAH 26.90% 27.36% .46% 76 TEXAS A&M 27.22% 27.62% .40% 77 NEW MEXICO 28.61% 28.13% -.48% 78 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 30.95% 28.74% -2.22% 79 ALABAMA 26.94% 29.26% 2.31% 80 INDIANA 31.73% 29.54% -2.20% 81 NEW YORK 25.73% 30.21% 4.49% 82 OKLAHOMA 31.18% 30.39% -.80% 83 SUNY-STONY BROOK 27.27% 30.57% 3.30% 84 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 30.40% 30.92% .52% 85 WISCONSIN 30.80% 31.12% .33% 86 CONNECTICUT 30.47% 31.25% .78% 87 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 40.16% 31.30% -8.86% 88 MICHIGAN 27.15% 31.39% 4.24% 89 CINCINNATI 31.43% 31.75% .32% 90 HAWAII 30.17% 31.88% 1.71% 91 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 30.07% 31.99% 1.92% 92 WAYNE STATE 30.38% 32.22% 1.84% 93 KANSAS 29.04% 32.77% 3.73% 94 MARYLAND 35.71% 33.23% -2.49% 95 OHIO STATE 32.06% 33.33% 1.28% 96 HOUSTON 33.33% 33.49% .16% 97 MINNESOTA 33.33% 33.63% .30% 98 OREGON 33.64% 33.64% .00% 99 COLORADO STATE 30.67% 33.90% 3.22% 100 VPI & SU 30.58% 34.13% 3.55% 101 OHIO . 34.45% . 102 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 33.43% 34.45% 1.02% 103 NORTHWESTERN 37.75% 35.12% -2.63% 104 OKLAHOMA STATE 36.41% 35.56% -.86% 105 KENT STATE 36.52% 35.71% -.81% 106 KENTUCKY 34.37% 35.84% 1.48% 107 MICHIGAN STATE 38.18% 38.16% -.02% 108 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 39.74% 39.26% -.48% 109 BRIGHAM YOUNG 47.65% 47.62% -.03% Mean 23.17% 23.58% .31% StdDev 8.59% 8.48% 1.94% Table 3.b Student Assistants as a Percentage of Total Staff sorted by Difference in the Percentage Percent Percent Difference Student Student in the Assistants Assistants Percentage /Total Staff /Total Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ . OHIO . 34.45% . 1 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 40.16% 31.30% -8.86% 2 BROWN 28.97% 24.69% -4.28% 3 MANITOBA 12.50% 9.14% -3.36% 4 NORTHWESTERN 37.75% 35.12% -2.63% 5 LAVAL 3.01% .40% -2.61% 6 MARYLAND 35.71% 33.23% -2.49% 7 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 30.95% 28.74% -2.22% 8 INDIANA 31.73% 29.54% -2.20% 9 ROCHESTER 26.67% 24.76% -1.90% 10 IOWA STATE 27.15% 25.33% -1.82% 11 SUNY-ALBANY 28.09% 26.32% -1.77% 12 DUKE 17.21% 15.55% -1.66% 13 WASHINGTON 26.09% 24.48% -1.61% 14 HOWARD 9.64% 8.05% -1.58% 15 YALE 15.88% 14.31% -1.57% 16 RICE 11.76% 10.34% -1.42% 17 VIRGINIA 20.61% 19.28% -1.33% 18 TENNESSEE 23.60% 22.35% -1.25% 19 VANDERBILT 24.50% 23.34% -1.15% 20 NEBRASKA 22.37% 21.30% -1.08% 21 IOWA 27.52% 26.54% -.98% 22 COLUMBIA 21.15% 20.18% -.97% 23 FLORIDA 20.96% 20.00% -.96% 24 OKLAHOMA STATE 36.41% 35.56% -.86% 25 KENT STATE 36.52% 35.71% -.81% 26 OKLAHOMA 31.18% 30.39% -.80% 27 TULANE 25.26% 24.50% -.76% 28 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 20.00% 19.30% -.70% 29 COLORADO 26.67% 25.98% -.68% 30 WASHINGTON STATE 23.84% 23.21% -.62% 31 LOUISIANA STATE 26.73% 26.13% -.60% 32 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 39.74% 39.26% -.48% 33 NEW MEXICO 28.61% 28.13% -.48% 34 RUTGERS 23.28% 22.84% -.44% 35 MISSOURI 20.75% 20.33% -.42% 36 JOHNS HOPKINS 14.24% 13.83% -.41% 37 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 14.49% 14.13% -.35% 38 PURDUE 21.64% 21.35% -.29% 39 GEORGIA 23.63% 23.35% -.28% 40 CHICAGO 22.61% 22.46% -.15% 41 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 20.75% 20.68% -.07% 42 BRIGHAM YOUNG 47.65% 47.62% -.03% 43 MICHIGAN STATE 38.18% 38.16% -.02% 45 PENNSYLVANIA 23.48% 23.48% .00% 45 OREGON 33.64% 33.64% .00% 46 ILLINOIS, URBANA 23.46% 23.54% .08% 47 DARTMOUTH 15.22% 15.30% .08% 48 GEORGIA TECH 5.00% 5.13% .13% 49 CORNELL 26.41% 26.55% .15% 50 HOUSTON 33.33% 33.49% .16% 51 ARIZONA 25.43% 25.61% .18% 52 GEORGETOWN 22.10% 22.31% .21% 53 MINNESOTA 33.33% 33.63% .30% 54 PRINCETON 14.43% 14.74% .31% 55 CINCINNATI 31.43% 31.75% .32% 56 WISCONSIN 30.80% 31.12% .33% 57 WESTERN ONTARIO 7.66% 8.05% .39% 58 TEXAS A&M 27.22% 27.62% .40% 59 DELAWARE 24.66% 25.11% .45% 60 UTAH 26.90% 27.36% .46% Table 3.b Student Assistants as a Percentage of Total Staff sorted by Difference in the Percentage Percent Percent Difference Student Student in the Assistants Assistants Percentage /Total Staff /Total Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ 61 SUNY-BUFFALO 26.67% 27.17% .50% 62 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 30.40% 30.92% .52% 63 NORTH CAROLINA 22.17% 22.70% .53% 64 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 22.40% 22.99% .59% 65 BOSTON 22.31% 22.92% .61% 66 PITTSBURGH 24.52% 25.18% .66% 67 HARVARD 11.20% 11.91% .71% 68 MIAMI 19.14% 19.92% .78% 69 CONNECTICUT 30.47% 31.25% .78% 70 STANFORD 16.73% 17.53% .80% 71 MIT 11.01% 11.82% .80% 72 QUEEN'S 9.90% 10.84% .94% 73 TORONTO 13.89% 14.85% .96% 74 GUELPH 6.08% 7.09% 1.01% 75 NOTRE DAME 11.32% 12.33% 1.01% 76 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 33.43% 34.45% 1.02% 77 BRITISH COLUMBIA 13.17% 14.21% 1.04% 78 MCGILL 14.92% 16.03% 1.11% 79 TEMPLE 22.08% 23.28% 1.20% 80 MASSACHUSETTS 23.08% 24.32% 1.25% 81 YORK 21.34% 22.61% 1.27% 82 OHIO STATE 32.06% 33.33% 1.28% 83 ARIZONA STATE 16.89% 18.28% 1.39% 84 AUBURN 22.28% 23.73% 1.45% 85 KENTUCKY 34.37% 35.84% 1.48% 86 MCMASTER 8.60% 10.22% 1.61% 87 HAWAII 30.17% 31.88% 1.71% 88 EMORY 16.06% 17.79% 1.74% 89 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 23.13% 24.92% 1.80% 90 WAYNE STATE 30.38% 32.22% 1.84% 91 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 30.07% 31.99% 1.92% 92 SOUTH CAROLINA 23.27% 25.29% 2.03% 93 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 14.50% 16.60% 2.11% 94 TEXAS 13.55% 15.69% 2.14% 95 WATERLOO 11.73% 13.89% 2.16% 96 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 24.08% 26.38% 2.30% 97 ALABAMA 26.94% 29.26% 2.31% 98 SYRACUSE 19.18% 21.60% 2.42% 99 COLORADO STATE 30.67% 33.90% 3.22% 100 FLORIDA STATE 21.74% 25.00% 3.26% 101 SUNY-STONY BROOK 27.27% 30.57% 3.30% 102 SASKATCHEWAN 5.81% 9.14% 3.33% 103 ALBERTA 10.29% 13.80% 3.51% 104 VPI & SU 30.58% 34.13% 3.55% 105 KANSAS 29.04% 32.77% 3.73% 106 MICHIGAN 27.15% 31.39% 4.24% 107 NEW YORK 25.73% 30.21% 4.49% 108 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 19.57% 26.00% 6.43% Mean 23.17% 23.58% .31% StdDev 8.59% 8.48% 1.94% Table 3.c Student Assistants and Total Staff Student Total Student Total Assistants Staff Assistants Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 __________ _______ __________ _______ ALABAMA 52 193 55 188 ALBERTA 35 340 45 326 ARIZONA 88 346 94 367 ARIZONA STATE 62 367 66 361 AUBURN 43 193 42 177 BOSTON 56 251 58 253 BRIGHAM YOUNG 142 298 140 294 BRITISH COLUMBIA 54 410 57 401 BROWN 73 252 59 239 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 222 664 226 656 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 61 294 61 295 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 100 249 77 246 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 181 602 206 644 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 52 168 50 174 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 74 320 82 329 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 45 230 65 250 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 41 183 43 187 CHICAGO 78 345 75 334 CINCINNATI 88 280 87 274 COLORADO 68 255 66 254 COLORADO STATE 50 163 60 177 COLUMBIA 121 572 112 555 CONNECTICUT 78 256 75 240 CORNELL 155 587 154 580 DARTMOUTH 28 184 28 183 DELAWARE 54 219 56 223 DUKE 58 337 51 328 EMORY 44 274 50 281 FLORIDA 83 396 78 390 FLORIDA STATE 50 230 60 240 GEORGETOWN 61 276 58 260 GEORGIA 82 347 85 364 GEORGIA TECH 6 120 6 117 GUELPH 9 148 9 127 HARVARD 125 1,116 134 1,125 HAWAII 70 232 66 207 HOUSTON 72 216 72 215 HOWARD 16 166 12 149 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 41 283 40 283 ILLINOIS, URBANA 122 520 125 531 INDIANA 152 479 140 474 IOWA 82 298 82 309 IOWA STATE 60 221 57 225 JOHNS HOPKINS 43 302 43 311 KANSAS 88 303 97 296 KENT STATE 84 230 80 224 KENTUCKY 111 323 119 332 LAVAL 8 266 1 253 LOUISIANA STATE 58 217 58 222 MCGILL 47 315 50 312 MCMASTER 16 186 19 186 MANITOBA 27 216 18 197 MARYLAND 120 336 105 316 MASSACHUSETTS 42 182 45 185 MIT 25 227 26 220 MIAMI 49 256 50 251 MICHIGAN 161 593 205 653 MICHIGAN STATE 105 275 108 283 MINNESOTA 147 441 150 446 MISSOURI 50 241 50 246 NEBRASKA 49 219 46 216 Table 3.c Student Assistants and Total Staff Student Total Student Total Assistants Staff Assistants Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 __________ _______ __________ _______ NEW MEXICO 101 353 101 359 NEW YORK 124 482 142 470 NORTH CAROLINA 94 424 96 423 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 59 245 67 254 NORTHWESTERN 151 400 131 373 NOTRE DAME 24 212 28 227 OHIO . . 72 209 OHIO STATE 134 418 140 420 OKLAHOMA 58 186 55 181 OKLAHOMA STATE 67 184 64 180 OREGON 74 220 74 220 PENNSYLVANIA 89 379 89 379 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 79 545 89 536 PITTSBURGH 102 416 107 425 PRINCETON 57 395 56 380 PURDUE 58 268 57 267 QUEEN'S 20 202 22 203 RICE 14 119 12 116 ROCHESTER 56 210 52 210 RUTGERS 105 451 103 451 SASKATCHEWAN 10 172 16 175 SOUTH CAROLINA 57 245 65 257 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 107 352 111 359 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 91 229 95 242 STANFORD 91 544 98 559 SUNY-ALBANY 50 178 45 171 SUNY-BUFFALO 68 255 69 254 SUNY-STONY BROOK 51 187 59 193 SYRACUSE 47 245 54 250 TEMPLE 51 231 54 232 TENNESSEE 63 267 59 264 TEXAS 82 605 94 599 TEXAS A&M 86 316 95 344 TORONTO 85 612 86 579 TULANE 49 194 49 200 UTAH 85 316 87 318 VANDERBILT 73 298 67 287 VIRGINIA 74 359 70 363 VPI & SU 63 206 71 208 WASHINGTON 126 483 117 478 WASHINGTON STATE 41 172 39 168 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 58 290 55 285 WATERLOO 21 179 25 180 WAYNE STATE 79 260 87 270 WESTERN ONTARIO 18 235 19 236 WISCONSIN 166 539 169 543 YALE 97 611 88 615 YORK 51 239 52 230 Mean 73 314 74 313 StdDev 40 149 42 150 Table 4.a Ratio of Support to Professional Staff sorted by ratio values in 1996 Number of Number of Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the for each for each Ratios Prof. Staff Prof. Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 1 BRIGHAM YOUNG .51 .52 .01 2 SUNY-BUFFALO .97 .91 -.06 3 ROCHESTER 1.48 1.05 -.43 4 KENTUCKY 1.21 1.13 -.08 5 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 1.33 1.15 -.18 6 GEORGIA TECH 1.19 1.22 .03 7 IOWA 1.32 1.23 -.10 8 WAYNE STATE 1.26 1.23 -.03 9 BROWN 1.18 1.25 .07 10 KANSAS 1.26 1.26 .00 11 NORTHWESTERN 1.26 1.26 .00 12 OKLAHOMA STATE 1.29 1.27 -.02 13 OHIO . 1.28 . 14 NEW YORK 1.32 1.29 -.03 15 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1.25 1.30 .05 16 MIT 1.40 1.34 -.07 17 RICE 1.33 1.36 .03 18 ALABAMA 1.35 1.38 .02 19 WISCONSIN 1.41 1.40 -.01 20 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 1.48 1.43 -.05 21 INDIANA 1.39 1.44 .05 22 TEMPLE 1.50 1.44 -.06 23 HARVARD 1.47 1.45 -.01 24 CINCINNATI 1.59 1.46 -.13 25 CONNECTICUT 1.70 1.46 -.23 26 OKLAHOMA 1.46 1.47 .01 27 MARYLAND 1.37 1.48 .11 28 COLUMBIA 1.55 1.50 -.05 29 GEORGETOWN 1.34 1.53 .19 30 ILLINOIS, URBANA 1.57 1.54 -.03 31 YALE 1.66 1.60 -.07 32 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1.97 1.61 -.36 33 SOUTH CAROLINA 1.58 1.63 .05 34 STANFORD 1.78 1.63 -.14 35 HAWAII 1.70 1.66 -.04 36 DUKE 1.61 1.66 .06 37 SUNY-ALBANY 1.67 1.68 .01 38 SYRACUSE 1.79 1.68 -.10 39 OREGON 1.70 1.70 .00 40 PENNSYLVANIA 1.74 1.71 -.03 41 KENT STATE 1.81 1.72 -.09 42 NORTH CAROLINA 1.75 1.73 -.02 43 MICHIGAN STATE 1.93 1.73 -.20 44 WASHINGTON 1.73 1.73 .01 45 MASSACHUSETTS 1.75 1.75 .00 46 PRINCETON 1.84 1.75 -.09 47 AUBURN 1.94 1.76 -.19 48 OHIO STATE 1.73 1.77 .04 49 EMORY 1.80 1.82 .01 50 VANDERBILT 1.62 1.82 .20 51 MIAMI 1.84 1.83 .00 52 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 1.82 1.83 .02 53 MINNESOTA 1.88 1.85 -.04 54 TULANE 1.64 1.85 .21 55 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 2.22 1.88 -.34 56 FLORIDA 1.87 1.89 .02 57 NEW MEXICO 2.04 1.93 -.10 58 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 2.21 1.94 -.27 59 PITTSBURGH 1.96 1.94 -.02 60 ARIZONA 2.11 1.97 -.14 61 SUNY-STONY BROOK 2.16 1.98 -.19 Table 4.a Ratio of Support to Professional Staff sorted by ratio values in 1996 Number of Number of Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the for each for each Ratios Prof. Staff Prof. Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 62 ARIZONA STATE 2.05 1.98 -.07 63 MICHIGAN 2.00 2.01 .01 64 VIRGINIA 2.13 2.02 -.11 65 COLORADO 1.97 2.03 .06 66 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 1.99 2.04 .05 67 HOWARD 1.83 2.04 .21 68 JOHNS HOPKINS 1.98 2.08 .10 69 DELAWARE 2.17 2.09 -.08 70 BOSTON 2.10 2.10 .00 71 DARTMOUTH 2.06 2.10 .04 72 HOUSTON 2.13 2.11 -.02 73 TEXAS A&M 1.71 2.11 .41 75 LOUISIANA STATE 2.12 2.15 .04 75 TENNESSEE 2.14 2.15 .02 76 VPI & SU 2.49 2.19 -.30 77 FLORIDA STATE 2.21 2.21 .00 78 RUTGERS 2.20 2.22 .02 80 IOWA STATE 2.35 2.23 -.12 80 PURDUE 2.23 2.23 .00 82 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 1.66 2.25 .59 82 COLORADO STATE 1.97 2.25 .28 83 NEBRASKA 2.21 2.27 .06 84 CORNELL 2.32 2.28 -.05 85 GEORGIA 2.23 2.28 .05 86 UTAH 2.30 2.30 .00 88 BRITISH COLUMBIA 2.42 2.31 -.12 88 WASHINGTON STATE 2.45 2.31 -.14 89 TORONTO 2.42 2.31 -.11 90 MISSOURI 2.35 2.32 -.03 91 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 2.34 2.42 .08 92 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2.57 2.43 -.13 93 MCGILL 2.35 2.45 .10 94 YORK 2.69 2.49 -.20 95 MANITOBA 2.57 2.51 -.06 96 TEXAS 2.71 2.58 -.13 97 CHICAGO 2.61 2.60 -.01 98 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2.70 2.70 .00 99 LAVAL 2.85 2.76 -.09 100 SASKATCHEWAN 2.86 2.79 -.07 101 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 2.88 2.85 -.03 102 WATERLOO 2.76 2.88 .11 103 NOTRE DAME 3.00 3.06 .06 104 QUEEN'S 3.04 3.11 .07 105 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 3.48 3.42 -.07 106 ALBERTA 3.01 3.46 .45 107 MCMASTER 4.00 3.64 -.36 108 WESTERN ONTARIO 3.72 3.72 .00 109 GUELPH 4.56 4.13 -.43 Mean 1.99 1.95 -.03 StdDev .63 .61 .15 Table 4.b Ratio of Support to Professional Staff sorted by the Difference in Ratios bt 1995 and 1996 Number of Number of Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the for each for each Ratios Prof. Staff Prof. Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ . OHIO . 1.28 . 1 ROCHESTER 1.48 1.05 -.43 2 GUELPH 4.56 4.13 -.43 3 MCMASTER 4.00 3.64 -.36 4 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1.97 1.61 -.36 5 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 2.22 1.88 -.34 6 VPI & SU 2.49 2.19 -.30 7 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 2.21 1.94 -.27 8 CONNECTICUT 1.70 1.46 -.23 9 MICHIGAN STATE 1.93 1.73 -.20 10 YORK 2.69 2.49 -.20 11 AUBURN 1.94 1.76 -.19 12 SUNY-STONY BROOK 2.16 1.98 -.19 13 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 1.33 1.15 -.18 14 STANFORD 1.78 1.63 -.14 15 ARIZONA 2.11 1.97 -.14 16 WASHINGTON STATE 2.45 2.31 -.14 17 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2.57 2.43 -.13 18 CINCINNATI 1.59 1.46 -.13 19 TEXAS 2.71 2.58 -.13 20 IOWA STATE 2.35 2.23 -.12 21 BRITISH COLUMBIA 2.42 2.31 -.12 22 TORONTO 2.42 2.31 -.11 23 VIRGINIA 2.13 2.02 -.11 24 NEW MEXICO 2.04 1.93 -.10 25 SYRACUSE 1.79 1.68 -.10 26 IOWA 1.32 1.23 -.10 27 PRINCETON 1.84 1.75 -.09 28 KENT STATE 1.81 1.72 -.09 29 LAVAL 2.85 2.76 -.09 30 DELAWARE 2.17 2.09 -.08 31 KENTUCKY 1.21 1.13 -.08 32 SASKATCHEWAN 2.86 2.79 -.07 33 ARIZONA STATE 2.05 1.98 -.07 34 MIT 1.40 1.34 -.07 35 YALE 1.66 1.60 -.07 36 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 3.48 3.42 -.07 37 TEMPLE 1.50 1.44 -.06 38 SUNY-BUFFALO .97 .91 -.06 39 MANITOBA 2.57 2.51 -.06 40 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 1.48 1.43 -.05 41 CORNELL 2.32 2.28 -.05 42 COLUMBIA 1.55 1.50 -.05 43 HAWAII 1.70 1.66 -.04 44 MINNESOTA 1.88 1.85 -.04 45 NEW YORK 1.32 1.29 -.03 46 WAYNE STATE 1.26 1.23 -.03 47 ILLINOIS, URBANA 1.57 1.54 -.03 48 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 2.88 2.85 -.03 49 MISSOURI 2.35 2.32 -.03 50 PENNSYLVANIA 1.74 1.71 -.03 51 NORTH CAROLINA 1.75 1.73 -.02 52 HOUSTON 2.13 2.11 -.02 53 OKLAHOMA STATE 1.29 1.27 -.02 54 PITTSBURGH 1.96 1.94 -.02 55 HARVARD 1.47 1.45 -.01 56 CHICAGO 2.61 2.60 -.01 57 WISCONSIN 1.41 1.40 -.01 58 MIAMI 1.84 1.83 .00 59 NORTHWESTERN 1.26 1.26 .00 60 KANSAS 1.26 1.26 .00 Table 4.b Ratio of Support to Professional Staff sorted by the Difference in Ratios bt 1995 and 1996 Number of Number of Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the for each for each Ratios Prof. Staff Prof. Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 68 OREGON 1.70 1.70 .00 68 MASSACHUSETTS 1.75 1.75 .00 68 BOSTON 2.10 2.10 .00 68 FLORIDA STATE 2.21 2.21 .00 68 PURDUE 2.23 2.23 .00 68 UTAH 2.30 2.30 .00 68 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2.70 2.70 .00 68 WESTERN ONTARIO 3.72 3.72 .00 69 MICHIGAN 2.00 2.01 .01 70 OKLAHOMA 1.46 1.47 .01 71 WASHINGTON 1.73 1.73 .01 72 BRIGHAM YOUNG .51 .52 .01 73 EMORY 1.80 1.82 .01 74 SUNY-ALBANY 1.67 1.68 .01 75 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 1.82 1.83 .02 76 TENNESSEE 2.14 2.15 .02 77 FLORIDA 1.87 1.89 .02 78 RUTGERS 2.20 2.22 .02 79 ALABAMA 1.35 1.38 .02 80 GEORGIA TECH 1.19 1.22 .03 81 RICE 1.33 1.36 .03 82 LOUISIANA STATE 2.12 2.15 .04 83 DARTMOUTH 2.06 2.10 .04 84 OHIO STATE 1.73 1.77 .04 85 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1.25 1.30 .05 86 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 1.99 2.04 .05 87 GEORGIA 2.23 2.28 .05 88 INDIANA 1.39 1.44 .05 89 SOUTH CAROLINA 1.58 1.63 .05 90 DUKE 1.61 1.66 .06 91 NOTRE DAME 3.00 3.06 .06 92 NEBRASKA 2.21 2.27 .06 93 COLORADO 1.97 2.03 .06 94 BROWN 1.18 1.25 .07 95 QUEEN'S 3.04 3.11 .07 96 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 2.34 2.42 .08 97 MCGILL 2.35 2.45 .10 98 JOHNS HOPKINS 1.98 2.08 .10 99 MARYLAND 1.37 1.48 .11 100 WATERLOO 2.76 2.88 .11 101 GEORGETOWN 1.34 1.53 .19 102 VANDERBILT 1.62 1.82 .20 103 TULANE 1.64 1.85 .21 104 HOWARD 1.83 2.04 .21 105 COLORADO STATE 1.97 2.25 .28 106 TEXAS A&M 1.71 2.11 .41 107 ALBERTA 3.01 3.46 .45 108 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 1.66 2.25 .59 Mean 1.99 1.95 -.03 StdDev .63 .61 .15 Table 4.c Professional Staff and Support Staff Support Professional Support Professional Staff Staff Staff Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 _______ ____________ _______ ____________ ALABAMA 81 60 77 56 ALBERTA 229 76 218 63 ARIZONA 175 83 181 92 ARIZONA STATE 205 100 196 99 AUBURN 99 51 86 49 BOSTON 132 63 132 63 BRIGHAM YOUNG 53 103 53 101 BRITISH COLUMBIA 252 104 240 104 BROWN 97 82 100 80 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 264 178 253 177 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 181 52 181 53 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 93 56 117 52 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 295 126 310 128 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 80 36 81 43 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 177 69 175 72 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 135 50 135 50 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 81 61 77 67 CHICAGO 193 74 187 72 CINCINNATI 118 74 111 76 COLORADO 124 63 126 62 COLORADO STATE 75 38 81 36 COLUMBIA 274 177 266 177 CONNECTICUT 112 66 98 67 CORNELL 302 130 296 130 DARTMOUTH 105 51 105 50 DELAWARE 113 52 113 54 DUKE 172 107 173 104 EMORY 148 82 149 82 FLORIDA 204 109 204 108 FLORIDA STATE 124 56 124 56 GEORGETOWN 123 92 122 80 GEORGIA 183 82 194 85 GEORGIA TECH 62 52 61 50 GUELPH 114 25 95 23 HARVARD 589 402 587 404 HAWAII 102 60 88 53 HOUSTON 98 46 97 46 HOWARD 97 53 92 45 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 161 81 163 80 ILLINOIS, URBANA 243 155 246 160 INDIANA 190 137 197 137 IOWA 123 93 125 102 IOWA STATE 113 48 116 52 JOHNS HOPKINS 172 87 181 87 KANSAS 120 95 111 88 KENT STATE 94 52 91 53 KENTUCKY 116 96 113 100 LAVAL 191 67 185 67 LOUISIANA STATE 108 51 112 52 MCGILL 188 80 186 76 MCMASTER 136 34 131 36 MANITOBA 136 53 128 51 MARYLAND 125 91 126 85 MASSACHUSETTS 89 51 89 51 MIT 118 84 111 83 MIAMI 134 73 130 71 MICHIGAN 288 144 299 149 MICHIGAN STATE 112 58 111 64 MINNESOTA 192 102 192 104 MISSOURI 134 57 137 59 NEBRASKA 117 53 118 52 Table 4.c Professional Staff and Support Staff Support Professional Support Professional Staff Staff Staff Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 _______ ____________ _______ ____________ NEW MEXICO 169 83 170 88 NEW YORK 204 154 185 143 NORTH CAROLINA 210 120 207 120 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 120 66 121 66 NORTHWESTERN 139 110 135 107 NOTRE DAME 141 47 150 49 OHIO . . 77 60 OHIO STATE 180 104 179 101 OKLAHOMA 76 52 75 51 OKLAHOMA STATE 66 51 65 51 OREGON 92 54 92 54 PENNSYLVANIA 184 106 183 107 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 346 120 331 116 PITTSBURGH 208 106 210 108 PRINCETON 219 119 206 118 PURDUE 145 65 145 65 QUEEN'S 137 45 137 44 RICE 60 45 60 44 ROCHESTER 92 62 81 77 RUTGERS 238 108 240 108 SASKATCHEWAN 120 42 117 42 SOUTH CAROLINA 115 73 119 73 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 136 109 140 108 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 95 43 97 50 STANFORD 290 163 286 175 SUNY-ALBANY 80 48 79 47 SUNY-BUFFALO 92 95 88 97 SUNY-STONY BROOK 93 43 89 45 SYRACUSE 127 71 123 73 TEMPLE 108 72 105 73 TENNESSEE 139 65 140 65 TEXAS 382 141 364 141 TEXAS A&M 145 85 169 80 TORONTO 373 154 344 149 TULANE 90 55 98 53 UTAH 161 70 161 70 VANDERBILT 139 86 142 78 VIRGINIA 194 91 196 97 VPI & SU 102 41 94 43 WASHINGTON 226 131 229 132 WASHINGTON STATE 93 38 90 39 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 154 78 142 88 WATERLOO 116 42 115 40 WAYNE STATE 101 80 101 82 WESTERN ONTARIO 171 46 171 46 WISCONSIN 218 155 218 156 YALE 321 193 324 203 YORK 137 51 127 51 Mean 157 84 155 84 StdDev 80 47 79 48 Table 5.a Items Loaned over Items Borrowed (ILL) sorted by ratio values in 1996 Number of Number of Difference Items Loaned Items Loaned in the for each for each Ratios Item Borrowed Item Borrowed 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 1 GUELPH .79 .58 -.21 2 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE .68 .67 -.01 3 QUEEN'S .64 .68 .03 4 KENT STATE .77 .70 -.07 5 TENNESSEE .79 .73 -.06 6 PENNSYLVANIA .83 .76 -.08 7 NEBRASKA .65 .78 .13 8 TEMPLE .98 .78 -.20 9 SASKATCHEWAN .91 .83 -.09 10 SOUTH CAROLINA .74 .83 .08 11 BROWN .76 .84 .08 12 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE .85 .91 .06 13 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA .96 .91 -.05 14 BOSTON 1.09 .92 -.17 15 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 1.18 .93 -.25 16 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA .54 .98 .44 17 NEW YORK .84 .98 .14 18 DARTMOUTH 1.11 .98 -.13 19 RUTGERS 1.12 .99 -.13 20 DELAWARE 1.02 1.01 -.01 21 OKLAHOMA 1.85 1.04 -.81 22 WATERLOO 1.43 1.06 -.37 23 YALE 1.04 1.08 .04 24 ARIZONA STATE 1.25 1.09 -.17 25 LOUISIANA STATE 1.17 1.09 -.07 26 TULANE 1.14 1.11 -.03 27 NORTHWESTERN 1.26 1.12 -.14 28 RICE 1.38 1.12 -.26 29 JOHNS HOPKINS 1.33 1.12 -.21 30 OHIO . 1.15 . 31 ILLINOIS, URBANA 1.19 1.17 -.02 32 ALABAMA 1.40 1.22 -.18 33 VANDERBILT 1.24 1.22 -.02 34 BRIGHAM YOUNG 1.41 1.23 -.18 35 NEW MEXICO 1.21 1.23 .02 36 CORNELL 1.26 1.25 -.01 37 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 1.25 1.28 .03 38 GEORGETOWN 1.85 1.29 -.56 39 COLORADO STATE 1.27 1.33 .06 40 OHIO STATE 1.20 1.35 .14 41 VIRGINIA 1.73 1.37 -.36 42 CINCINNATI 1.57 1.41 -.16 43 SYRACUSE 1.40 1.42 .03 44 TEXAS A&M 1.80 1.44 -.36 45 KENTUCKY 1.34 1.45 .11 46 MCMASTER 1.44 1.45 .01 47 HOUSTON 1.38 1.46 .08 48 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 1.96 1.48 -.48 49 HOWARD 1.17 1.55 .38 50 PURDUE 1.87 1.61 -.26 51 COLUMBIA 1.85 1.62 -.23 52 NOTRE DAME 1.67 1.63 -.04 53 TEXAS 1.35 1.66 .30 54 MASSACHUSETTS 1.95 1.70 -.25 55 ARIZONA 2.30 1.70 -.60 56 VPI & SU 2.11 1.73 -.38 57 LAVAL 1.73 1.73 .01 58 IOWA STATE 2.20 1.73 -.47 59 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1.85 1.74 -.11 60 MCGILL 2.27 1.78 -.48 Table 5.a Items Loaned over Items Borrowed (ILL) sorted by ratio values in 1996 Number of Number of Difference Items Loaned Items Loaned in the for each for each Ratios Item Borrowed Item Borrowed 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 61 PRINCETON 1.92 1.82 -.10 62 OKLAHOMA STATE 1.81 1.84 .03 63 KANSAS 1.91 1.85 -.06 64 STANFORD 1.99 1.87 -.12 65 MARYLAND 2.00 1.88 -.12 66 SUNY-ALBANY 1.51 1.88 .37 67 MANITOBA 2.13 1.90 -.23 68 ROCHESTER 2.08 1.92 -.16 69 CHICAGO 2.29 1.93 -.36 70 CONNECTICUT 2.25 1.93 -.32 71 MICHIGAN STATE 1.71 1.98 .27 72 OREGON 2.11 2.04 -.06 73 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 2.55 2.09 -.46 74 INDIANA 1.91 2.10 .19 75 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 1.99 2.19 .20 76 MISSOURI 2.17 2.25 .09 77 COLORADO 2.60 2.31 -.29 78 MICHIGAN 2.08 2.31 .23 79 UTAH 2.21 2.34 .13 80 SUNY-BUFFALO 3.11 2.40 -.70 81 EMORY 2.55 2.52 -.04 82 TORONTO 2.73 2.61 -.12 83 MIT 2.60 2.62 .02 84 BRITISH COLUMBIA 2.78 2.63 -.15 85 IOWA 3.24 2.70 -.55 86 ALBERTA 2.65 2.70 .05 87 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2.95 2.74 -.22 88 MIAMI 2.57 2.76 .19 89 PITTSBURGH 3.33 2.76 -.57 90 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 3.40 2.84 -.56 91 FLORIDA STATE 2.64 2.84 .20 92 HAWAII 2.25 2.92 .67 93 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 2.81 3.20 .39 94 GEORGIA 3.80 3.32 -.48 95 SUNY-STONY BROOK 3.61 3.46 -.15 96 FLORIDA 4.99 3.55 -1.44 97 WAYNE STATE 3.84 3.59 -.25 98 WASHINGTON STATE 3.92 3.64 -.28 99 HARVARD 3.72 3.65 -.07 100 GEORGIA TECH 3.65 4.03 .38 101 YORK 4.23 4.23 .01 102 DUKE 3.33 4.24 .91 103 AUBURN 4.74 4.33 -.40 104 WISCONSIN