Table 1.a Percent of Professional Staff from Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Prof. Staff Prof. Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ___________ ___________ __________ 1 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 17.69% 17.97% .28% 2 GUELPH 16.89% 18.11% 1.22% 3 ALBERTA 22.35% 19.33% -3.03% 4 MCMASTER 18.28% 19.35% 1.08% 5 WESTERN ONTARIO 19.57% 19.49% -.08% 6 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 20.93% 19.88% -1.05% 7 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 21.74% 20.00% -1.74% 8 COLORADO STATE 23.31% 20.34% -2.97% 9 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 18.78% 20.66% 1.88% 10 VPI & SU 19.90% 20.67% .77% 11 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 22.49% 21.14% -1.35% 12 HOUSTON 21.30% 21.40% .10% 13 CHICAGO 21.45% 21.56% .11% 14 NOTRE DAME 22.17% 21.59% -.58% 15 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 22.02% 21.64% -.38% 16 QUEEN'S 22.28% 21.67% -.60% 17 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 21.56% 21.88% .32% 18 UTAH 22.15% 22.01% -.14% 19 YORK 21.34% 22.17% .84% 20 WATERLOO 23.46% 22.22% -1.24% 21 CORNELL 22.15% 22.41% .27% 22 MICHIGAN STATE 21.09% 22.61% 1.52% 23 MICHIGAN 24.28% 22.82% -1.47% 24 IOWA STATE 21.72% 23.11% 1.39% 25 WASHINGTON STATE 22.09% 23.21% 1.12% 26 TEXAS A&M 26.90% 23.26% -3.64% 27 SUNY-STONY BROOK 22.99% 23.32% .32% 28 MINNESOTA 23.13% 23.32% .19% 29 FLORIDA STATE 24.35% 23.33% -1.01% 30 GEORGIA 23.63% 23.35% -.28% 31 LOUISIANA STATE 23.50% 23.42% -.08% 32 TEXAS 23.31% 23.54% .23% 33 KENT STATE 22.61% 23.66% 1.05% 34 RUTGERS 23.95% 23.95% .00% 35 MISSOURI 23.65% 23.98% .33% 36 SASKATCHEWAN 24.42% 24.00% -.42% 37 OHIO STATE 24.88% 24.05% -.83% 38 NEBRASKA 24.20% 24.07% -.13% 39 DELAWARE 23.74% 24.22% .47% 40 PURDUE 24.25% 24.34% .09% 41 MCGILL 25.40% 24.36% -1.04% 42 COLORADO 24.71% 24.41% -.30% 43 NEW MEXICO 23.51% 24.51% 1.00% 44 OREGON 24.55% 24.55% .00% 45 TENNESSEE 24.34% 24.62% .28% 46 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 21.43% 24.71% 3.28% 47 BOSTON 25.10% 24.90% -.20% 48 ARIZONA 23.99% 25.07% 1.08% 49 PITTSBURGH 25.48% 25.41% -.07% 50 HAWAII 25.86% 25.60% -.26% 51 TORONTO 25.16% 25.73% .57% 52 MANITOBA 24.54% 25.89% 1.35% 53 BRITISH COLUMBIA 25.37% 25.94% .57% 54 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 26.94% 25.98% -.95% 55 LAVAL 25.19% 26.48% 1.29% 56 TULANE 28.35% 26.50% -1.85% 57 VIRGINIA 25.35% 26.72% 1.37% 58 MARYLAND 27.08% 26.90% -.18% 59 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 26.81% 26.98% .17% 60 VANDERBILT 28.86% 27.18% -1.68% Table 1.a Percent of Professional Staff from Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Prof. Staff Prof. Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ___________ ___________ __________ 61 DARTMOUTH 27.72% 27.32% -.39% 62 ARIZONA STATE 27.25% 27.42% .18% 63 SUNY-ALBANY 26.97% 27.49% .52% 64 MASSACHUSETTS 28.02% 27.57% -.45% 65 WASHINGTON 27.12% 27.62% .49% 66 AUBURN 26.42% 27.68% 1.26% 67 FLORIDA 27.53% 27.69% .17% 68 CINCINNATI 26.43% 27.74% 1.31% 69 CONNECTICUT 25.78% 27.92% 2.14% 70 JOHNS HOPKINS 28.81% 27.97% -.83% 71 OKLAHOMA 27.96% 28.18% .22% 72 PENNSYLVANIA 27.97% 28.23% .26% 73 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 28.62% 28.27% -.35% 74 MIAMI 28.52% 28.29% -.23% 75 OKLAHOMA STATE 27.72% 28.33% .62% 76 NORTH CAROLINA 28.30% 28.37% .07% 77 SOUTH CAROLINA 29.80% 28.40% -1.39% 78 NORTHWESTERN 27.50% 28.69% 1.19% 79 OHIO . 28.71% . 80 WISCONSIN 28.76% 28.73% -.03% 81 INDIANA 28.60% 28.90% .30% 82 EMORY 29.93% 29.18% -.75% 83 SYRACUSE 28.98% 29.20% .22% 84 KANSAS 31.35% 29.73% -1.62% 85 ALABAMA 31.09% 29.79% -1.30% 86 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 30.97% 30.08% -.88% 87 KENTUCKY 29.72% 30.12% .40% 88 ILLINOIS, URBANA 29.81% 30.13% .32% 89 HOWARD 31.93% 30.20% -1.73% 90 WAYNE STATE 30.77% 30.37% -.40% 91 NEW YORK 31.95% 30.43% -1.52% 92 GEORGETOWN 33.33% 30.77% -2.56% 93 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 26.90% 30.88% 3.98% 94 PRINCETON 30.13% 31.05% .93% 95 STANFORD 29.96% 31.31% 1.34% 96 TEMPLE 31.17% 31.47% .30% 97 DUKE 31.75% 31.71% -.04% 98 COLUMBIA 30.94% 31.89% .95% 99 YALE 31.59% 33.01% 1.42% 100 IOWA 31.21% 33.01% 1.80% 101 BROWN 32.54% 33.47% .93% 102 BRIGHAM YOUNG 34.56% 34.35% -.21% 103 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 33.33% 35.83% 2.50% 104 HARVARD 36.02% 35.91% -.11% 105 ROCHESTER 29.52% 36.67% 7.14% 106 MIT 37.00% 37.73% .72% 107 RICE 37.82% 37.93% .12% 108 SUNY-BUFFALO 37.25% 38.19% .93% 109 GEORGIA TECH 43.33% 42.74% -.60% Mean 26.47% 26.63% .13% StdDev 4.60% 4.71% 1.37% Table 1.b Percent of Professional Staff from Total Staff sorted by Difference in the Percentage between 1995 and 1996 Percent Percent Difference Prof. Staff Prof. Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ___________ ___________ __________ . OHIO . 28.71% . 1 TEXAS A&M 26.90% 23.26% -3.64% 2 ALBERTA 22.35% 19.33% -3.03% 3 COLORADO STATE 23.31% 20.34% -2.97% 4 GEORGETOWN 33.33% 30.77% -2.56% 5 TULANE 28.35% 26.50% -1.85% 6 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 21.74% 20.00% -1.74% 7 HOWARD 31.93% 30.20% -1.73% 8 VANDERBILT 28.86% 27.18% -1.68% 9 KANSAS 31.35% 29.73% -1.62% 10 NEW YORK 31.95% 30.43% -1.52% 11 MICHIGAN 24.28% 22.82% -1.47% 12 SOUTH CAROLINA 29.80% 28.40% -1.39% 13 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 22.49% 21.14% -1.35% 14 ALABAMA 31.09% 29.79% -1.30% 15 WATERLOO 23.46% 22.22% -1.24% 16 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 20.93% 19.88% -1.05% 17 MCGILL 25.40% 24.36% -1.04% 18 FLORIDA STATE 24.35% 23.33% -1.01% 19 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 26.94% 25.98% -.95% 20 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 30.97% 30.08% -.88% 21 JOHNS HOPKINS 28.81% 27.97% -.83% 22 OHIO STATE 24.88% 24.05% -.83% 23 EMORY 29.93% 29.18% -.75% 24 QUEEN'S 22.28% 21.67% -.60% 25 GEORGIA TECH 43.33% 42.74% -.60% 26 NOTRE DAME 22.17% 21.59% -.58% 27 MASSACHUSETTS 28.02% 27.57% -.45% 28 SASKATCHEWAN 24.42% 24.00% -.42% 29 WAYNE STATE 30.77% 30.37% -.40% 30 DARTMOUTH 27.72% 27.32% -.39% 31 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 22.02% 21.64% -.38% 32 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 28.62% 28.27% -.35% 33 COLORADO 24.71% 24.41% -.30% 34 GEORGIA 23.63% 23.35% -.28% 35 HAWAII 25.86% 25.60% -.26% 36 MIAMI 28.52% 28.29% -.23% 37 BRIGHAM YOUNG 34.56% 34.35% -.21% 38 BOSTON 25.10% 24.90% -.20% 39 MARYLAND 27.08% 26.90% -.18% 40 UTAH 22.15% 22.01% -.14% 41 NEBRASKA 24.20% 24.07% -.13% 42 HARVARD 36.02% 35.91% -.11% 43 WESTERN ONTARIO 19.57% 19.49% -.08% 44 LOUISIANA STATE 23.50% 23.42% -.08% 45 PITTSBURGH 25.48% 25.41% -.07% 46 DUKE 31.75% 31.71% -.04% 47 WISCONSIN 28.76% 28.73% -.03% 49 RUTGERS 23.95% 23.95% .00% 49 OREGON 24.55% 24.55% .00% 50 NORTH CAROLINA 28.30% 28.37% .07% 51 PURDUE 24.25% 24.34% .09% 52 HOUSTON 21.30% 21.40% .10% 53 CHICAGO 21.45% 21.56% .11% 54 RICE 37.82% 37.93% .12% 55 FLORIDA 27.53% 27.69% .17% 56 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 26.81% 26.98% .17% 57 ARIZONA STATE 27.25% 27.42% .18% 58 MINNESOTA 23.13% 23.32% .19% 59 OKLAHOMA 27.96% 28.18% .22% 60 SYRACUSE 28.98% 29.20% .22% Table 1.b Percent of Professional Staff from Total Staff sorted by Difference in the Percentage between 1995 and 1996 Percent Percent Difference Prof. Staff Prof. Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ___________ ___________ __________ 61 TEXAS 23.31% 23.54% .23% 62 PENNSYLVANIA 27.97% 28.23% .26% 63 CORNELL 22.15% 22.41% .27% 64 TENNESSEE 24.34% 24.62% .28% 65 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 17.69% 17.97% .28% 66 TEMPLE 31.17% 31.47% .30% 67 INDIANA 28.60% 28.90% .30% 68 SUNY-STONY BROOK 22.99% 23.32% .32% 69 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 21.56% 21.88% .32% 70 ILLINOIS, URBANA 29.81% 30.13% .32% 71 MISSOURI 23.65% 23.98% .33% 72 KENTUCKY 29.72% 30.12% .40% 73 DELAWARE 23.74% 24.22% .47% 74 WASHINGTON 27.12% 27.62% .49% 75 SUNY-ALBANY 26.97% 27.49% .52% 76 BRITISH COLUMBIA 25.37% 25.94% .57% 77 TORONTO 25.16% 25.73% .57% 78 OKLAHOMA STATE 27.72% 28.33% .62% 79 MIT 37.00% 37.73% .72% 80 VPI & SU 19.90% 20.67% .77% 81 YORK 21.34% 22.17% .84% 82 PRINCETON 30.13% 31.05% .93% 83 BROWN 32.54% 33.47% .93% 84 SUNY-BUFFALO 37.25% 38.19% .93% 85 COLUMBIA 30.94% 31.89% .95% 86 NEW MEXICO 23.51% 24.51% 1.00% 87 KENT STATE 22.61% 23.66% 1.05% 88 MCMASTER 18.28% 19.35% 1.08% 89 ARIZONA 23.99% 25.07% 1.08% 90 WASHINGTON STATE 22.09% 23.21% 1.12% 91 NORTHWESTERN 27.50% 28.69% 1.19% 92 GUELPH 16.89% 18.11% 1.22% 93 AUBURN 26.42% 27.68% 1.26% 94 LAVAL 25.19% 26.48% 1.29% 95 CINCINNATI 26.43% 27.74% 1.31% 96 STANFORD 29.96% 31.31% 1.34% 97 MANITOBA 24.54% 25.89% 1.35% 98 VIRGINIA 25.35% 26.72% 1.37% 99 IOWA STATE 21.72% 23.11% 1.39% 100 YALE 31.59% 33.01% 1.42% 101 MICHIGAN STATE 21.09% 22.61% 1.52% 102 IOWA 31.21% 33.01% 1.80% 103 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 18.78% 20.66% 1.88% 104 CONNECTICUT 25.78% 27.92% 2.14% 105 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 33.33% 35.83% 2.50% 106 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 21.43% 24.71% 3.28% 107 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 26.90% 30.88% 3.98% 108 ROCHESTER 29.52% 36.67% 7.14% Mean 26.47% 26.63% .13% StdDev 4.60% 4.71% 1.37% Table 1.c Professional Staff and Total Staff Professional Total Professional Total Staff Staff Staff Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 ____________ _______ ____________ _______ ALABAMA 60 193 56 188 ALBERTA 76 340 63 326 ARIZONA 83 346 92 367 ARIZONA STATE 100 367 99 361 AUBURN 51 193 49 177 BOSTON 63 251 63 253 BRIGHAM YOUNG 103 298 101 294 BRITISH COLUMBIA 104 410 104 401 BROWN 82 252 80 239 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 178 664 177 656 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 52 294 53 295 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 56 249 52 246 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 126 602 128 644 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 36 168 43 174 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 69 320 72 329 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 50 230 50 250 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 61 183 67 187 CHICAGO 74 345 72 334 CINCINNATI 74 280 76 274 COLORADO 63 255 62 254 COLORADO STATE 38 163 36 177 COLUMBIA 177 572 177 555 CONNECTICUT 66 256 67 240 CORNELL 130 587 130 580 DARTMOUTH 51 184 50 183 DELAWARE 52 219 54 223 DUKE 107 337 104 328 EMORY 82 274 82 281 FLORIDA 109 396 108 390 FLORIDA STATE 56 230 56 240 GEORGETOWN 92 276 80 260 GEORGIA 82 347 85 364 GEORGIA TECH 52 120 50 117 GUELPH 25 148 23 127 HARVARD 402 1,116 404 1,125 HAWAII 60 232 53 207 HOUSTON 46 216 46 215 HOWARD 53 166 45 149 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 81 283 80 283 ILLINOIS, URBANA 155 520 160 531 INDIANA 137 479 137 474 IOWA 93 298 102 309 IOWA STATE 48 221 52 225 JOHNS HOPKINS 87 302 87 311 KANSAS 95 303 88 296 KENT STATE 52 230 53 224 KENTUCKY 96 323 100 332 LAVAL 67 266 67 253 LOUISIANA STATE 51 217 52 222 MCGILL 80 315 76 312 MCMASTER 34 186 36 186 MANITOBA 53 216 51 197 MARYLAND 91 336 85 316 MASSACHUSETTS 51 182 51 185 MIT 84 227 83 220 MIAMI 73 256 71 251 MICHIGAN 144 593 149 653 MICHIGAN STATE 58 275 64 283 MINNESOTA 102 441 104 446 MISSOURI 57 241 59 246 NEBRASKA 53 219 52 216 NEW MEXICO 83 353 88 359 Table 1.c Professional Staff and Total Staff Professional Total Professional Total Staff Staff Staff Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 ____________ _______ ____________ _______ NEW YORK 154 482 143 470 NORTH CAROLINA 120 424 120 423 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 66 245 66 254 NORTHWESTERN 110 400 107 373 NOTRE DAME 47 212 49 227 OHIO . . 60 209 OHIO STATE 104 418 101 420 OKLAHOMA 52 186 51 181 OKLAHOMA STATE 51 184 51 180 OREGON 54 220 54 220 PENNSYLVANIA 106 379 107 379 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 120 545 116 536 PITTSBURGH 106 416 108 425 PRINCETON 119 395 118 380 PURDUE 65 268 65 267 QUEEN'S 45 202 44 203 RICE 45 119 44 116 ROCHESTER 62 210 77 210 RUTGERS 108 451 108 451 SASKATCHEWAN 42 172 42 175 SOUTH CAROLINA 73 245 73 257 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 109 352 108 359 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 43 229 50 242 STANFORD 163 544 175 559 SUNY-ALBANY 48 178 47 171 SUNY-BUFFALO 95 255 97 254 SUNY-STONY BROOK 43 187 45 193 SYRACUSE 71 245 73 250 TEMPLE 72 231 73 232 TENNESSEE 65 267 65 264 TEXAS 141 605 141 599 TEXAS A&M 85 316 80 344 TORONTO 154 612 149 579 TULANE 55 194 53 200 UTAH 70 316 70 318 VANDERBILT 86 298 78 287 VIRGINIA 91 359 97 363 VPI & SU 41 206 43 208 WASHINGTON 131 483 132 478 WASHINGTON STATE 38 172 39 168 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 78 290 88 285 WATERLOO 42 179 40 180 WAYNE STATE 80 260 82 270 WESTERN ONTARIO 46 235 46 236 WISCONSIN 155 539 156 543 YALE 193 611 203 615 YORK 51 239 51 230 Mean 84 314 84 313 StdDev 47 149 48 150 Table 2.a Support Staff as a Percent of Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 1 BRIGHAM YOUNG 17.79% 18.03% .24% 2 KENTUCKY 35.91% 34.04% -1.88% 3 SUNY-BUFFALO 36.08% 34.65% -1.43% 4 OKLAHOMA STATE 35.87% 36.11% .24% 5 NORTHWESTERN 34.75% 36.19% 1.44% 6 OHIO . 36.84% . 7 WAYNE STATE 38.85% 37.41% -1.44% 8 KANSAS 39.60% 37.50% -2.10% 9 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 39.76% 38.57% -1.19% 10 ROCHESTER 43.81% 38.57% -5.24% 11 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 38.64% 39.00% .36% 12 MICHIGAN STATE 40.73% 39.22% -1.50% 13 NEW YORK 42.32% 39.36% -2.96% 14 MARYLAND 37.20% 39.87% 2.67% 15 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 41.48% 40.08% -1.40% 16 WISCONSIN 40.45% 40.15% -.30% 17 IOWA 41.28% 40.45% -.82% 18 CINCINNATI 42.14% 40.51% -1.63% 19 KENT STATE 40.87% 40.63% -.24% 20 CONNECTICUT 43.75% 40.83% -2.92% 21 ALABAMA 41.97% 40.96% -1.01% 22 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 44.26% 41.18% -3.09% 23 OKLAHOMA 40.86% 41.44% .58% 24 INDIANA 39.67% 41.56% 1.90% 25 OREGON 41.82% 41.82% .00% 26 BROWN 38.49% 41.84% 3.35% 27 HAWAII 43.97% 42.51% -1.45% 28 OHIO STATE 43.06% 42.62% -.44% 29 MINNESOTA 43.54% 43.05% -.49% 30 HOUSTON 45.37% 45.12% -.25% 31 VPI & SU 49.51% 45.19% -4.32% 32 TEMPLE 46.75% 45.26% -1.49% 33 COLORADO STATE 46.01% 45.76% -.25% 34 MICHIGAN 48.57% 45.79% -2.78% 35 SUNY-STONY BROOK 49.73% 46.11% -3.62% 36 SUNY-ALBANY 44.94% 46.20% 1.26% 37 SOUTH CAROLINA 46.94% 46.30% -.64% 38 ILLINOIS, URBANA 46.73% 46.33% -.40% 39 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 47.62% 46.55% -1.07% 40 GEORGETOWN 44.57% 46.92% 2.36% 41 NEW MEXICO 47.88% 47.35% -.52% 42 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 37.35% 47.56% 10.21% 43 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 48.98% 47.64% -1.34% 44 WASHINGTON 46.79% 47.91% 1.12% 45 COLUMBIA 47.90% 47.93% .03% 46 MASSACHUSETTS 48.90% 48.11% -.79% 47 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 49.00% 48.14% -.87% 48 PENNSYLVANIA 48.55% 48.28% -.26% 49 AUBURN 51.30% 48.59% -2.71% 50 NORTH CAROLINA 49.53% 48.94% -.59% 51 TULANE 46.39% 49.00% 2.61% 52 TEXAS A&M 45.89% 49.13% 3.24% 53 SYRACUSE 51.84% 49.20% -2.64% 54 ARIZONA 50.58% 49.32% -1.26% 55 PITTSBURGH 50.00% 49.41% -.59% 56 VANDERBILT 46.64% 49.48% 2.83% 57 COLORADO 48.63% 49.61% .98% 58 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 53.10% 49.82% -3.28% 59 LOUISIANA STATE 49.77% 50.45% .68% 60 MIT 51.98% 50.45% -1.53% 61 UTAH 50.95% 50.63% -.32% Table 2.a Support Staff as a Percent of Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 62 DELAWARE 51.60% 50.67% -.93% 63 CORNELL 51.45% 51.03% -.41% 64 STANFORD 53.31% 51.16% -2.15% 65 IOWA STATE 51.13% 51.56% .42% 66 FLORIDA STATE 53.91% 51.67% -2.25% 67 RICE 50.42% 51.72% 1.30% 68 MIAMI 52.34% 51.79% -.55% 69 GEORGIA TECH 51.67% 52.14% .47% 70 BOSTON 52.59% 52.17% -.42% 71 HARVARD 52.78% 52.18% -.60% 72 FLORIDA 51.52% 52.31% .79% 73 YALE 52.54% 52.68% .15% 74 DUKE 51.04% 52.74% 1.71% 75 EMORY 54.01% 53.02% -.99% 76 TENNESSEE 52.06% 53.03% .97% 77 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 55.31% 53.19% -2.12% 78 RUTGERS 52.77% 53.22% .44% 79 GEORGIA 52.74% 53.30% .56% 80 WASHINGTON STATE 54.07% 53.57% -.50% 81 VIRGINIA 54.04% 53.99% -.04% 82 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 58.70% 54.00% -4.70% 83 PRINCETON 55.44% 54.21% -1.23% 84 ARIZONA STATE 55.86% 54.29% -1.56% 85 PURDUE 54.10% 54.31% .20% 86 NEBRASKA 53.42% 54.63% 1.20% 87 YORK 57.32% 55.22% -2.10% 88 MISSOURI 55.60% 55.69% .09% 89 CHICAGO 55.94% 55.99% .05% 90 DARTMOUTH 57.07% 57.38% .31% 91 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 56.89% 57.60% .71% 92 JOHNS HOPKINS 56.95% 58.20% 1.25% 93 TORONTO 60.95% 59.41% -1.53% 94 MCGILL 59.68% 59.62% -.07% 95 BRITISH COLUMBIA 61.46% 59.85% -1.61% 96 TEXAS 63.14% 60.77% -2.37% 97 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 61.56% 61.36% -.21% 98 HOWARD 58.43% 61.74% 3.31% 99 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 63.49% 61.75% -1.73% 100 WATERLOO 64.80% 63.89% -.92% 101 MANITOBA 62.96% 64.97% 2.01% 102 NOTRE DAME 66.51% 66.08% -.43% 103 SASKATCHEWAN 69.77% 66.86% -2.91% 104 ALBERTA 67.35% 66.87% -.48% 105 QUEEN'S 67.82% 67.49% -.33% 106 MCMASTER 73.12% 70.43% -2.69% 107 WESTERN ONTARIO 72.77% 72.46% -.31% 108 LAVAL 71.80% 73.12% 1.32% 109 GUELPH 77.03% 74.80% -2.22% Mean 50.36% 49.79% -.45% StdDev 9.43% 9.32% 1.96% Table 2.b Support Staff as a Percent of Total Staff sorted by Difference in Percentage between 1995 and 1996 Percent Percent Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ . OHIO . 36.84% . 1 ROCHESTER 43.81% 38.57% -5.24% 2 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 58.70% 54.00% -4.70% 3 VPI & SU 49.51% 45.19% -4.32% 4 SUNY-STONY BROOK 49.73% 46.11% -3.62% 5 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 53.10% 49.82% -3.28% 6 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 44.26% 41.18% -3.09% 7 NEW YORK 42.32% 39.36% -2.96% 8 CONNECTICUT 43.75% 40.83% -2.92% 9 SASKATCHEWAN 69.77% 66.86% -2.91% 10 MICHIGAN 48.57% 45.79% -2.78% 11 AUBURN 51.30% 48.59% -2.71% 12 MCMASTER 73.12% 70.43% -2.69% 13 SYRACUSE 51.84% 49.20% -2.64% 14 TEXAS 63.14% 60.77% -2.37% 15 FLORIDA STATE 53.91% 51.67% -2.25% 16 GUELPH 77.03% 74.80% -2.22% 17 STANFORD 53.31% 51.16% -2.15% 18 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 55.31% 53.19% -2.12% 19 YORK 57.32% 55.22% -2.10% 20 KANSAS 39.60% 37.50% -2.10% 21 KENTUCKY 35.91% 34.04% -1.88% 22 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 63.49% 61.75% -1.73% 23 CINCINNATI 42.14% 40.51% -1.63% 24 BRITISH COLUMBIA 61.46% 59.85% -1.61% 25 ARIZONA STATE 55.86% 54.29% -1.56% 26 TORONTO 60.95% 59.41% -1.53% 27 MIT 51.98% 50.45% -1.53% 28 MICHIGAN STATE 40.73% 39.22% -1.50% 29 TEMPLE 46.75% 45.26% -1.49% 30 HAWAII 43.97% 42.51% -1.45% 31 WAYNE STATE 38.85% 37.41% -1.44% 32 SUNY-BUFFALO 36.08% 34.65% -1.43% 33 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 41.48% 40.08% -1.40% 34 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 48.98% 47.64% -1.34% 35 ARIZONA 50.58% 49.32% -1.26% 36 PRINCETON 55.44% 54.21% -1.23% 37 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 39.76% 38.57% -1.19% 38 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 47.62% 46.55% -1.07% 39 ALABAMA 41.97% 40.96% -1.01% 40 EMORY 54.01% 53.02% -.99% 41 DELAWARE 51.60% 50.67% -.93% 42 WATERLOO 64.80% 63.89% -.92% 43 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 49.00% 48.14% -.87% 44 IOWA 41.28% 40.45% -.82% 45 MASSACHUSETTS 48.90% 48.11% -.79% 46 SOUTH CAROLINA 46.94% 46.30% -.64% 47 HARVARD 52.78% 52.18% -.60% 48 NORTH CAROLINA 49.53% 48.94% -.59% 49 PITTSBURGH 50.00% 49.41% -.59% 50 MIAMI 52.34% 51.79% -.55% 51 NEW MEXICO 47.88% 47.35% -.52% 52 WASHINGTON STATE 54.07% 53.57% -.50% 53 MINNESOTA 43.54% 43.05% -.49% 54 ALBERTA 67.35% 66.87% -.48% 55 OHIO STATE 43.06% 42.62% -.44% 56 NOTRE DAME 66.51% 66.08% -.43% 57 BOSTON 52.59% 52.17% -.42% 58 CORNELL 51.45% 51.03% -.41% 59 ILLINOIS, URBANA 46.73% 46.33% -.40% 60 QUEEN'S 67.82% 67.49% -.33% Table 2.b Support Staff as a Percent of Total Staff sorted by Difference in Percentage between 1995 and 1996 Percent Percent Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 61 UTAH 50.95% 50.63% -.32% 62 WESTERN ONTARIO 72.77% 72.46% -.31% 63 WISCONSIN 40.45% 40.15% -.30% 64 PENNSYLVANIA 48.55% 48.28% -.26% 65 HOUSTON 45.37% 45.12% -.25% 66 COLORADO STATE 46.01% 45.76% -.25% 67 KENT STATE 40.87% 40.63% -.24% 68 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 61.56% 61.36% -.21% 69 MCGILL 59.68% 59.62% -.07% 70 VIRGINIA 54.04% 53.99% -.04% 71 OREGON 41.82% 41.82% .00% 72 COLUMBIA 47.90% 47.93% .03% 73 CHICAGO 55.94% 55.99% .05% 74 MISSOURI 55.60% 55.69% .09% 75 YALE 52.54% 52.68% .15% 76 PURDUE 54.10% 54.31% .20% 77 OKLAHOMA STATE 35.87% 36.11% .24% 78 BRIGHAM YOUNG 17.79% 18.03% .24% 79 DARTMOUTH 57.07% 57.38% .31% 80 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 38.64% 39.00% .36% 81 IOWA STATE 51.13% 51.56% .42% 82 RUTGERS 52.77% 53.22% .44% 83 GEORGIA TECH 51.67% 52.14% .47% 84 GEORGIA 52.74% 53.30% .56% 85 OKLAHOMA 40.86% 41.44% .58% 86 LOUISIANA STATE 49.77% 50.45% .68% 87 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 56.89% 57.60% .71% 88 FLORIDA 51.52% 52.31% .79% 89 TENNESSEE 52.06% 53.03% .97% 90 COLORADO 48.63% 49.61% .98% 91 WASHINGTON 46.79% 47.91% 1.12% 92 NEBRASKA 53.42% 54.63% 1.20% 93 JOHNS HOPKINS 56.95% 58.20% 1.25% 94 SUNY-ALBANY 44.94% 46.20% 1.26% 95 RICE 50.42% 51.72% 1.30% 96 LAVAL 71.80% 73.12% 1.32% 97 NORTHWESTERN 34.75% 36.19% 1.44% 98 DUKE 51.04% 52.74% 1.71% 99 INDIANA 39.67% 41.56% 1.90% 100 MANITOBA 62.96% 64.97% 2.01% 101 GEORGETOWN 44.57% 46.92% 2.36% 102 TULANE 46.39% 49.00% 2.61% 103 MARYLAND 37.20% 39.87% 2.67% 104 VANDERBILT 46.64% 49.48% 2.83% 105 TEXAS A&M 45.89% 49.13% 3.24% 106 HOWARD 58.43% 61.74% 3.31% 107 BROWN 38.49% 41.84% 3.35% 108 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 37.35% 47.56% 10.21% Mean 50.36% 49.79% -.45% StdDev 9.43% 9.32% 1.96% Table 2.c Support Staff and Total Staff Support Total Support Total Staff Staff Staff Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 _______ _______ _______ _______ ALABAMA 81 193 77 188 ALBERTA 229 340 218 326 ARIZONA 175 346 181 367 ARIZONA STATE 205 367 196 361 AUBURN 99 193 86 177 BOSTON 132 251 132 253 BRIGHAM YOUNG 53 298 53 294 BRITISH COLUMBIA 252 410 240 401 BROWN 97 252 100 239 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 264 664 253 656 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 181 294 181 295 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 93 249 117 246 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 295 602 310 644 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 80 168 81 174 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 177 320 175 329 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 135 230 135 250 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 81 183 77 187 CHICAGO 193 345 187 334 CINCINNATI 118 280 111 274 COLORADO 124 255 126 254 COLORADO STATE 75 163 81 177 COLUMBIA 274 572 266 555 CONNECTICUT 112 256 98 240 CORNELL 302 587 296 580 DARTMOUTH 105 184 105 183 DELAWARE 113 219 113 223 DUKE 172 337 173 328 EMORY 148 274 149 281 FLORIDA 204 396 204 390 FLORIDA STATE 124 230 124 240 GEORGETOWN 123 276 122 260 GEORGIA 183 347 194 364 GEORGIA TECH 62 120 61 117 GUELPH 114 148 95 127 HARVARD 589 1,116 587 1,125 HAWAII 102 232 88 207 HOUSTON 98 216 97 215 HOWARD 97 166 92 149 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 161 283 163 283 ILLINOIS, URBANA 243 520 246 531 INDIANA 190 479 197 474 IOWA 123 298 125 309 IOWA STATE 113 221 116 225 JOHNS HOPKINS 172 302 181 311 KANSAS 120 303 111 296 KENT STATE 94 230 91 224 KENTUCKY 116 323 113 332 LAVAL 191 266 185 253 LOUISIANA STATE 108 217 112 222 MCGILL 188 315 186 312 MCMASTER 136 186 131 186 MANITOBA 136 216 128 197 MARYLAND 125 336 126 316 MASSACHUSETTS 89 182 89 185 MIT 118 227 111 220 MIAMI 134 256 130 251 MICHIGAN 288 593 299 653 MICHIGAN STATE 112 275 111 283 MINNESOTA 192 441 192 446 MISSOURI 134 241 137 246 NEBRASKA 117 219 118 216 NEW MEXICO 169 353 170 359 Table 2.c Support Staff and Total Staff Support Total Support Total Staff Staff Staff Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 _______ _______ _______ _______ NEW YORK 204 482 185 470 NORTH CAROLINA 210 424 207 423 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 120 245 121 254 NORTHWESTERN 139 400 135 373 NOTRE DAME 141 212 150 227 OHIO . . 77 209 OHIO STATE 180 418 179 420 OKLAHOMA 76 186 75 181 OKLAHOMA STATE 66 184 65 180 OREGON 92 220 92 220 PENNSYLVANIA 184 379 183 379 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 346 545 331 536 PITTSBURGH 208 416 210 425 PRINCETON 219 395 206 380 PURDUE 145 268 145 267 QUEEN'S 137 202 137 203 RICE 60 119 60 116 ROCHESTER 92 210 81 210 RUTGERS 238 451 240 451 SASKATCHEWAN 120 172 117 175 SOUTH CAROLINA 115 245 119 257 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 136 352 140 359 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 95 229 97 242 STANFORD 290 544 286 559 SUNY-ALBANY 80 178 79 171 SUNY-BUFFALO 92 255 88 254 SUNY-STONY BROOK 93 187 89 193 SYRACUSE 127 245 123 250 TEMPLE 108 231 105 232 TENNESSEE 139 267 140 264 TEXAS 382 605 364 599 TEXAS A&M 145 316 169 344 TORONTO 373 612 344 579 TULANE 90 194 98 200 UTAH 161 316 161 318 VANDERBILT 139 298 142 287 VIRGINIA 194 359 196 363 VPI & SU 102 206 94 208 WASHINGTON 226 483 229 478 WASHINGTON STATE 93 172 90 168 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 154 290 142 285 WATERLOO 116 179 115 180 WAYNE STATE 101 260 101 270 WESTERN ONTARIO 171 235 171 236 WISCONSIN 218 539 218 543 YALE 321 611 324 615 YORK 137 239 127 230 Mean 157 314 155 313 StdDev 80 149 79 150 Table 3.a Student Assistants as a Percentage of Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Student Student in the Assistants Assistants Percentage /Total Staff /Total Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ 1 LAVAL 3.01% .40% -2.61% 2 GEORGIA TECH 5.00% 5.13% .13% 3 GUELPH 6.08% 7.09% 1.01% 4 WESTERN ONTARIO 7.66% 8.05% .39% 5 HOWARD 9.64% 8.05% -1.58% 6 MANITOBA 12.50% 9.14% -3.36% 7 SASKATCHEWAN 5.81% 9.14% 3.33% 8 MCMASTER 8.60% 10.22% 1.61% 9 RICE 11.76% 10.34% -1.42% 10 QUEEN'S 9.90% 10.84% .94% 11 MIT 11.01% 11.82% .80% 12 HARVARD 11.20% 11.91% .71% 13 NOTRE DAME 11.32% 12.33% 1.01% 14 ALBERTA 10.29% 13.80% 3.51% 15 JOHNS HOPKINS 14.24% 13.83% -.41% 16 WATERLOO 11.73% 13.89% 2.16% 17 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 14.49% 14.13% -.35% 18 BRITISH COLUMBIA 13.17% 14.21% 1.04% 19 YALE 15.88% 14.31% -1.57% 20 PRINCETON 14.43% 14.74% .31% 21 TORONTO 13.89% 14.85% .96% 22 DARTMOUTH 15.22% 15.30% .08% 23 DUKE 17.21% 15.55% -1.66% 24 TEXAS 13.55% 15.69% 2.14% 25 MCGILL 14.92% 16.03% 1.11% 26 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 14.50% 16.60% 2.11% 27 STANFORD 16.73% 17.53% .80% 28 EMORY 16.06% 17.79% 1.74% 29 ARIZONA STATE 16.89% 18.28% 1.39% 30 VIRGINIA 20.61% 19.28% -1.33% 31 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 20.00% 19.30% -.70% 32 MIAMI 19.14% 19.92% .78% 33 FLORIDA 20.96% 20.00% -.96% 34 COLUMBIA 21.15% 20.18% -.97% 35 MISSOURI 20.75% 20.33% -.42% 36 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 20.75% 20.68% -.07% 37 NEBRASKA 22.37% 21.30% -1.08% 38 PURDUE 21.64% 21.35% -.29% 39 SYRACUSE 19.18% 21.60% 2.42% 40 GEORGETOWN 22.10% 22.31% .21% 41 TENNESSEE 23.60% 22.35% -1.25% 42 CHICAGO 22.61% 22.46% -.15% 43 YORK 21.34% 22.61% 1.27% 44 NORTH CAROLINA 22.17% 22.70% .53% 45 RUTGERS 23.28% 22.84% -.44% 46 BOSTON 22.31% 22.92% .61% 47 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 22.40% 22.99% .59% 48 WASHINGTON STATE 23.84% 23.21% -.62% 49 TEMPLE 22.08% 23.28% 1.20% 50 VANDERBILT 24.50% 23.34% -1.15% 51 GEORGIA 23.63% 23.35% -.28% 52 PENNSYLVANIA 23.48% 23.48% .00% 53 ILLINOIS, URBANA 23.46% 23.54% .08% 54 AUBURN 22.28% 23.73% 1.45% 55 MASSACHUSETTS 23.08% 24.32% 1.25% 56 WASHINGTON 26.09% 24.48% -1.61% 57 TULANE 25.26% 24.50% -.76% 58 BROWN 28.97% 24.69% -4.28% 59 ROCHESTER 26.67% 24.76% -1.90% 60 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 23.13% 24.92% 1.80% 61 FLORIDA STATE 21.74% 25.00% 3.26% Table 3.a Student Assistants as a Percentage of Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Student Student in the Assistants Assistants Percentage /Total Staff /Total Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ 62 DELAWARE 24.66% 25.11% .45% 63 PITTSBURGH 24.52% 25.18% .66% 64 SOUTH CAROLINA 23.27% 25.29% 2.03% 65 IOWA STATE 27.15% 25.33% -1.82% 66 ARIZONA 25.43% 25.61% .18% 67 COLORADO 26.67% 25.98% -.68% 68 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 19.57% 26.00% 6.43% 69 LOUISIANA STATE 26.73% 26.13% -.60% 70 SUNY-ALBANY 28.09% 26.32% -1.77% 71 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 24.08% 26.38% 2.30% 72 IOWA 27.52% 26.54% -.98% 73 CORNELL 26.41% 26.55% .15% 74 SUNY-BUFFALO 26.67% 27.17% .50% 75 UTAH 26.90% 27.36% .46% 76 TEXAS A&M 27.22% 27.62% .40% 77 NEW MEXICO 28.61% 28.13% -.48% 78 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 30.95% 28.74% -2.22% 79 ALABAMA 26.94% 29.26% 2.31% 80 INDIANA 31.73% 29.54% -2.20% 81 NEW YORK 25.73% 30.21% 4.49% 82 OKLAHOMA 31.18% 30.39% -.80% 83 SUNY-STONY BROOK 27.27% 30.57% 3.30% 84 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 30.40% 30.92% .52% 85 WISCONSIN 30.80% 31.12% .33% 86 CONNECTICUT 30.47% 31.25% .78% 87 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 40.16% 31.30% -8.86% 88 MICHIGAN 27.15% 31.39% 4.24% 89 CINCINNATI 31.43% 31.75% .32% 90 HAWAII 30.17% 31.88% 1.71% 91 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 30.07% 31.99% 1.92% 92 WAYNE STATE 30.38% 32.22% 1.84% 93 KANSAS 29.04% 32.77% 3.73% 94 MARYLAND 35.71% 33.23% -2.49% 95 OHIO STATE 32.06% 33.33% 1.28% 96 HOUSTON 33.33% 33.49% .16% 97 MINNESOTA 33.33% 33.63% .30% 98 OREGON 33.64% 33.64% .00% 99 COLORADO STATE 30.67% 33.90% 3.22% 100 VPI & SU 30.58% 34.13% 3.55% 101 OHIO . 34.45% . 102 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 33.43% 34.45% 1.02% 103 NORTHWESTERN 37.75% 35.12% -2.63% 104 OKLAHOMA STATE 36.41% 35.56% -.86% 105 KENT STATE 36.52% 35.71% -.81% 106 KENTUCKY 34.37% 35.84% 1.48% 107 MICHIGAN STATE 38.18% 38.16% -.02% 108 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 39.74% 39.26% -.48% 109 BRIGHAM YOUNG 47.65% 47.62% -.03% Mean 23.17% 23.58% .31% StdDev 8.59% 8.48% 1.94% Table 3.b Student Assistants as a Percentage of Total Staff sorted by Difference in the Percentage Percent Percent Difference Student Student in the Assistants Assistants Percentage /Total Staff /Total Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ . OHIO . 34.45% . 1 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 40.16% 31.30% -8.86% 2 BROWN 28.97% 24.69% -4.28% 3 MANITOBA 12.50% 9.14% -3.36% 4 NORTHWESTERN 37.75% 35.12% -2.63% 5 LAVAL 3.01% .40% -2.61% 6 MARYLAND 35.71% 33.23% -2.49% 7 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 30.95% 28.74% -2.22% 8 INDIANA 31.73% 29.54% -2.20% 9 ROCHESTER 26.67% 24.76% -1.90% 10 IOWA STATE 27.15% 25.33% -1.82% 11 SUNY-ALBANY 28.09% 26.32% -1.77% 12 DUKE 17.21% 15.55% -1.66% 13 WASHINGTON 26.09% 24.48% -1.61% 14 HOWARD 9.64% 8.05% -1.58% 15 YALE 15.88% 14.31% -1.57% 16 RICE 11.76% 10.34% -1.42% 17 VIRGINIA 20.61% 19.28% -1.33% 18 TENNESSEE 23.60% 22.35% -1.25% 19 VANDERBILT 24.50% 23.34% -1.15% 20 NEBRASKA 22.37% 21.30% -1.08% 21 IOWA 27.52% 26.54% -.98% 22 COLUMBIA 21.15% 20.18% -.97% 23 FLORIDA 20.96% 20.00% -.96% 24 OKLAHOMA STATE 36.41% 35.56% -.86% 25 KENT STATE 36.52% 35.71% -.81% 26 OKLAHOMA 31.18% 30.39% -.80% 27 TULANE 25.26% 24.50% -.76% 28 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 20.00% 19.30% -.70% 29 COLORADO 26.67% 25.98% -.68% 30 WASHINGTON STATE 23.84% 23.21% -.62% 31 LOUISIANA STATE 26.73% 26.13% -.60% 32 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 39.74% 39.26% -.48% 33 NEW MEXICO 28.61% 28.13% -.48% 34 RUTGERS 23.28% 22.84% -.44% 35 MISSOURI 20.75% 20.33% -.42% 36 JOHNS HOPKINS 14.24% 13.83% -.41% 37 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 14.49% 14.13% -.35% 38 PURDUE 21.64% 21.35% -.29% 39 GEORGIA 23.63% 23.35% -.28% 40 CHICAGO 22.61% 22.46% -.15% 41 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 20.75% 20.68% -.07% 42 BRIGHAM YOUNG 47.65% 47.62% -.03% 43 MICHIGAN STATE 38.18% 38.16% -.02% 45 PENNSYLVANIA 23.48% 23.48% .00% 45 OREGON 33.64% 33.64% .00% 46 ILLINOIS, URBANA 23.46% 23.54% .08% 47 DARTMOUTH 15.22% 15.30% .08% 48 GEORGIA TECH 5.00% 5.13% .13% 49 CORNELL 26.41% 26.55% .15% 50 HOUSTON 33.33% 33.49% .16% 51 ARIZONA 25.43% 25.61% .18% 52 GEORGETOWN 22.10% 22.31% .21% 53 MINNESOTA 33.33% 33.63% .30% 54 PRINCETON 14.43% 14.74% .31% 55 CINCINNATI 31.43% 31.75% .32% 56 WISCONSIN 30.80% 31.12% .33% 57 WESTERN ONTARIO 7.66% 8.05% .39% 58 TEXAS A&M 27.22% 27.62% .40% 59 DELAWARE 24.66% 25.11% .45% 60 UTAH 26.90% 27.36% .46% Table 3.b Student Assistants as a Percentage of Total Staff sorted by Difference in the Percentage Percent Percent Difference Student Student in the Assistants Assistants Percentage /Total Staff /Total Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ 61 SUNY-BUFFALO 26.67% 27.17% .50% 62 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 30.40% 30.92% .52% 63 NORTH CAROLINA 22.17% 22.70% .53% 64 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 22.40% 22.99% .59% 65 BOSTON 22.31% 22.92% .61% 66 PITTSBURGH 24.52% 25.18% .66% 67 HARVARD 11.20% 11.91% .71% 68 MIAMI 19.14% 19.92% .78% 69 CONNECTICUT 30.47% 31.25% .78% 70 STANFORD 16.73% 17.53% .80% 71 MIT 11.01% 11.82% .80% 72 QUEEN'S 9.90% 10.84% .94% 73 TORONTO 13.89% 14.85% .96% 74 GUELPH 6.08% 7.09% 1.01% 75 NOTRE DAME 11.32% 12.33% 1.01% 76 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 33.43% 34.45% 1.02% 77 BRITISH COLUMBIA 13.17% 14.21% 1.04% 78 MCGILL 14.92% 16.03% 1.11% 79 TEMPLE 22.08% 23.28% 1.20% 80 MASSACHUSETTS 23.08% 24.32% 1.25% 81 YORK 21.34% 22.61% 1.27% 82 OHIO STATE 32.06% 33.33% 1.28% 83 ARIZONA STATE 16.89% 18.28% 1.39% 84 AUBURN 22.28% 23.73% 1.45% 85 KENTUCKY 34.37% 35.84% 1.48% 86 MCMASTER 8.60% 10.22% 1.61% 87 HAWAII 30.17% 31.88% 1.71% 88 EMORY 16.06% 17.79% 1.74% 89 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 23.13% 24.92% 1.80% 90 WAYNE STATE 30.38% 32.22% 1.84% 91 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 30.07% 31.99% 1.92% 92 SOUTH CAROLINA 23.27% 25.29% 2.03% 93 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 14.50% 16.60% 2.11% 94 TEXAS 13.55% 15.69% 2.14% 95 WATERLOO 11.73% 13.89% 2.16% 96 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 24.08% 26.38% 2.30% 97 ALABAMA 26.94% 29.26% 2.31% 98 SYRACUSE 19.18% 21.60% 2.42% 99 COLORADO STATE 30.67% 33.90% 3.22% 100 FLORIDA STATE 21.74% 25.00% 3.26% 101 SUNY-STONY BROOK 27.27% 30.57% 3.30% 102 SASKATCHEWAN 5.81% 9.14% 3.33% 103 ALBERTA 10.29% 13.80% 3.51% 104 VPI & SU 30.58% 34.13% 3.55% 105 KANSAS 29.04% 32.77% 3.73% 106 MICHIGAN 27.15% 31.39% 4.24% 107 NEW YORK 25.73% 30.21% 4.49% 108 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 19.57% 26.00% 6.43% Mean 23.17% 23.58% .31% StdDev 8.59% 8.48% 1.94% Table 3.c Student Assistants and Total Staff Student Total Student Total Assistants Staff Assistants Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 __________ _______ __________ _______ ALABAMA 52 193 55 188 ALBERTA 35 340 45 326 ARIZONA 88 346 94 367 ARIZONA STATE 62 367 66 361 AUBURN 43 193 42 177 BOSTON 56 251 58 253 BRIGHAM YOUNG 142 298 140 294 BRITISH COLUMBIA 54 410 57 401 BROWN 73 252 59 239 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 222 664 226 656 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 61 294 61 295 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 100 249 77 246 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 181 602 206 644 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 52 168 50 174 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 74 320 82 329 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 45 230 65 250 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 41 183 43 187 CHICAGO 78 345 75 334 CINCINNATI 88 280 87 274 COLORADO 68 255 66 254 COLORADO STATE 50 163 60 177 COLUMBIA 121 572 112 555 CONNECTICUT 78 256 75 240 CORNELL 155 587 154 580 DARTMOUTH 28 184 28 183 DELAWARE 54 219 56 223 DUKE 58 337 51 328 EMORY 44 274 50 281 FLORIDA 83 396 78 390 FLORIDA STATE 50 230 60 240 GEORGETOWN 61 276 58 260 GEORGIA 82 347 85 364 GEORGIA TECH 6 120 6 117 GUELPH 9 148 9 127 HARVARD 125 1,116 134 1,125 HAWAII 70 232 66 207 HOUSTON 72 216 72 215 HOWARD 16 166 12 149 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 41 283 40 283 ILLINOIS, URBANA 122 520 125 531 INDIANA 152 479 140 474 IOWA 82 298 82 309 IOWA STATE 60 221 57 225 JOHNS HOPKINS 43 302 43 311 KANSAS 88 303 97 296 KENT STATE 84 230 80 224 KENTUCKY 111 323 119 332 LAVAL 8 266 1 253 LOUISIANA STATE 58 217 58 222 MCGILL 47 315 50 312 MCMASTER 16 186 19 186 MANITOBA 27 216 18 197 MARYLAND 120 336 105 316 MASSACHUSETTS 42 182 45 185 MIT 25 227 26 220 MIAMI 49 256 50 251 MICHIGAN 161 593 205 653 MICHIGAN STATE 105 275 108 283 MINNESOTA 147 441 150 446 MISSOURI 50 241 50 246 NEBRASKA 49 219 46 216 Table 3.c Student Assistants and Total Staff Student Total Student Total Assistants Staff Assistants Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 __________ _______ __________ _______ NEW MEXICO 101 353 101 359 NEW YORK 124 482 142 470 NORTH CAROLINA 94 424 96 423 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 59 245 67 254 NORTHWESTERN 151 400 131 373 NOTRE DAME 24 212 28 227 OHIO . . 72 209 OHIO STATE 134 418 140 420 OKLAHOMA 58 186 55 181 OKLAHOMA STATE 67 184 64 180 OREGON 74 220 74 220 PENNSYLVANIA 89 379 89 379 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 79 545 89 536 PITTSBURGH 102 416 107 425 PRINCETON 57 395 56 380 PURDUE 58 268 57 267 QUEEN'S 20 202 22 203 RICE 14 119 12 116 ROCHESTER 56 210 52 210 RUTGERS 105 451 103 451 SASKATCHEWAN 10 172 16 175 SOUTH CAROLINA 57 245 65 257 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 107 352 111 359 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 91 229 95 242 STANFORD 91 544 98 559 SUNY-ALBANY 50 178 45 171 SUNY-BUFFALO 68 255 69 254 SUNY-STONY BROOK 51 187 59 193 SYRACUSE 47 245 54 250 TEMPLE 51 231 54 232 TENNESSEE 63 267 59 264 TEXAS 82 605 94 599 TEXAS A&M 86 316 95 344 TORONTO 85 612 86 579 TULANE 49 194 49 200 UTAH 85 316 87 318 VANDERBILT 73 298 67 287 VIRGINIA 74 359 70 363 VPI & SU 63 206 71 208 WASHINGTON 126 483 117 478 WASHINGTON STATE 41 172 39 168 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 58 290 55 285 WATERLOO 21 179 25 180 WAYNE STATE 79 260 87 270 WESTERN ONTARIO 18 235 19 236 WISCONSIN 166 539 169 543 YALE 97 611 88 615 YORK 51 239 52 230 Mean 73 314 74 313 StdDev 40 149 42 150 Table 4.a Ratio of Support to Professional Staff sorted by ratio values in 1996 Number of Number of Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the for each for each Ratios Prof. Staff Prof. Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 1 BRIGHAM YOUNG .51 .52 .01 2 SUNY-BUFFALO .97 .91 -.06 3 ROCHESTER 1.48 1.05 -.43 4 KENTUCKY 1.21 1.13 -.08 5 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 1.33 1.15 -.18 6 GEORGIA TECH 1.19 1.22 .03 7 IOWA 1.32 1.23 -.10 8 WAYNE STATE 1.26 1.23 -.03 9 BROWN 1.18 1.25 .07 10 KANSAS 1.26 1.26 .00 11 NORTHWESTERN 1.26 1.26 .00 12 OKLAHOMA STATE 1.29 1.27 -.02 13 OHIO . 1.28 . 14 NEW YORK 1.32 1.29 -.03 15 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1.25 1.30 .05 16 MIT 1.40 1.34 -.07 17 RICE 1.33 1.36 .03 18 ALABAMA 1.35 1.38 .02 19 WISCONSIN 1.41 1.40 -.01 20 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 1.48 1.43 -.05 21 INDIANA 1.39 1.44 .05 22 TEMPLE 1.50 1.44 -.06 23 HARVARD 1.47 1.45 -.01 24 CINCINNATI 1.59 1.46 -.13 25 CONNECTICUT 1.70 1.46 -.23 26 OKLAHOMA 1.46 1.47 .01 27 MARYLAND 1.37 1.48 .11 28 COLUMBIA 1.55 1.50 -.05 29 GEORGETOWN 1.34 1.53 .19 30 ILLINOIS, URBANA 1.57 1.54 -.03 31 YALE 1.66 1.60 -.07 32 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1.97 1.61 -.36 33 SOUTH CAROLINA 1.58 1.63 .05 34 STANFORD 1.78 1.63 -.14 35 HAWAII 1.70 1.66 -.04 36 DUKE 1.61 1.66 .06 37 SUNY-ALBANY 1.67 1.68 .01 38 SYRACUSE 1.79 1.68 -.10 39 OREGON 1.70 1.70 .00 40 PENNSYLVANIA 1.74 1.71 -.03 41 KENT STATE 1.81 1.72 -.09 42 NORTH CAROLINA 1.75 1.73 -.02 43 MICHIGAN STATE 1.93 1.73 -.20 44 WASHINGTON 1.73 1.73 .01 45 MASSACHUSETTS 1.75 1.75 .00 46 PRINCETON 1.84 1.75 -.09 47 AUBURN 1.94 1.76 -.19 48 OHIO STATE 1.73 1.77 .04 49 EMORY 1.80 1.82 .01 50 VANDERBILT 1.62 1.82 .20 51 MIAMI 1.84 1.83 .00 52 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 1.82 1.83 .02 53 MINNESOTA 1.88 1.85 -.04 54 TULANE 1.64 1.85 .21 55 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 2.22 1.88 -.34 56 FLORIDA 1.87 1.89 .02 57 NEW MEXICO 2.04 1.93 -.10 58 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 2.21 1.94 -.27 59 PITTSBURGH 1.96 1.94 -.02 60 ARIZONA 2.11 1.97 -.14 61 SUNY-STONY BROOK 2.16 1.98 -.19 Table 4.a Ratio of Support to Professional Staff sorted by ratio values in 1996 Number of Number of Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the for each for each Ratios Prof. Staff Prof. Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 62 ARIZONA STATE 2.05 1.98 -.07 63 MICHIGAN 2.00 2.01 .01 64 VIRGINIA 2.13 2.02 -.11 65 COLORADO 1.97 2.03 .06 66 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 1.99 2.04 .05 67 HOWARD 1.83 2.04 .21 68 JOHNS HOPKINS 1.98 2.08 .10 69 DELAWARE 2.17 2.09 -.08 70 BOSTON 2.10 2.10 .00 71 DARTMOUTH 2.06 2.10 .04 72 HOUSTON 2.13 2.11 -.02 73 TEXAS A&M 1.71 2.11 .41 75 LOUISIANA STATE 2.12 2.15 .04 75 TENNESSEE 2.14 2.15 .02 76 VPI & SU 2.49 2.19 -.30 77 FLORIDA STATE 2.21 2.21 .00 78 RUTGERS 2.20 2.22 .02 80 IOWA STATE 2.35 2.23 -.12 80 PURDUE 2.23 2.23 .00 82 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 1.66 2.25 .59 82 COLORADO STATE 1.97 2.25 .28 83 NEBRASKA 2.21 2.27 .06 84 CORNELL 2.32 2.28 -.05 85 GEORGIA 2.23 2.28 .05 86 UTAH 2.30 2.30 .00 88 BRITISH COLUMBIA 2.42 2.31 -.12 88 WASHINGTON STATE 2.45 2.31 -.14 89 TORONTO 2.42 2.31 -.11 90 MISSOURI 2.35 2.32 -.03 91 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 2.34 2.42 .08 92 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2.57 2.43 -.13 93 MCGILL 2.35 2.45 .10 94 YORK 2.69 2.49 -.20 95 MANITOBA 2.57 2.51 -.06 96 TEXAS 2.71 2.58 -.13 97 CHICAGO 2.61 2.60 -.01 98 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2.70 2.70 .00 99 LAVAL 2.85 2.76 -.09 100 SASKATCHEWAN 2.86 2.79 -.07 101 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 2.88 2.85 -.03 102 WATERLOO 2.76 2.88 .11 103 NOTRE DAME 3.00 3.06 .06 104 QUEEN'S 3.04 3.11 .07 105 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 3.48 3.42 -.07 106 ALBERTA 3.01 3.46 .45 107 MCMASTER 4.00 3.64 -.36 108 WESTERN ONTARIO 3.72 3.72 .00 109 GUELPH 4.56 4.13 -.43 Mean 1.99 1.95 -.03 StdDev .63 .61 .15 Table 4.b Ratio of Support to Professional Staff sorted by the Difference in Ratios bt 1995 and 1996 Number of Number of Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the for each for each Ratios Prof. Staff Prof. Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ . OHIO . 1.28 . 1 ROCHESTER 1.48 1.05 -.43 2 GUELPH 4.56 4.13 -.43 3 MCMASTER 4.00 3.64 -.36 4 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1.97 1.61 -.36 5 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 2.22 1.88 -.34 6 VPI & SU 2.49 2.19 -.30 7 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 2.21 1.94 -.27 8 CONNECTICUT 1.70 1.46 -.23 9 MICHIGAN STATE 1.93 1.73 -.20 10 YORK 2.69 2.49 -.20 11 AUBURN 1.94 1.76 -.19 12 SUNY-STONY BROOK 2.16 1.98 -.19 13 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 1.33 1.15 -.18 14 STANFORD 1.78 1.63 -.14 15 ARIZONA 2.11 1.97 -.14 16 WASHINGTON STATE 2.45 2.31 -.14 17 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2.57 2.43 -.13 18 CINCINNATI 1.59 1.46 -.13 19 TEXAS 2.71 2.58 -.13 20 IOWA STATE 2.35 2.23 -.12 21 BRITISH COLUMBIA 2.42 2.31 -.12 22 TORONTO 2.42 2.31 -.11 23 VIRGINIA 2.13 2.02 -.11 24 NEW MEXICO 2.04 1.93 -.10 25 SYRACUSE 1.79 1.68 -.10 26 IOWA 1.32 1.23 -.10 27 PRINCETON 1.84 1.75 -.09 28 KENT STATE 1.81 1.72 -.09 29 LAVAL 2.85 2.76 -.09 30 DELAWARE 2.17 2.09 -.08 31 KENTUCKY 1.21 1.13 -.08 32 SASKATCHEWAN 2.86 2.79 -.07 33 ARIZONA STATE 2.05 1.98 -.07 34 MIT 1.40 1.34 -.07 35 YALE 1.66 1.60 -.07 36 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 3.48 3.42 -.07 37 TEMPLE 1.50 1.44 -.06 38 SUNY-BUFFALO .97 .91 -.06 39 MANITOBA 2.57 2.51 -.06 40 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 1.48 1.43 -.05 41 CORNELL 2.32 2.28 -.05 42 COLUMBIA 1.55 1.50 -.05 43 HAWAII 1.70 1.66 -.04 44 MINNESOTA 1.88 1.85 -.04 45 NEW YORK 1.32 1.29 -.03 46 WAYNE STATE 1.26 1.23 -.03 47 ILLINOIS, URBANA 1.57 1.54 -.03 48 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 2.88 2.85 -.03 49 MISSOURI 2.35 2.32 -.03 50 PENNSYLVANIA 1.74 1.71 -.03 51 NORTH CAROLINA 1.75 1.73 -.02 52 HOUSTON 2.13 2.11 -.02 53 OKLAHOMA STATE 1.29 1.27 -.02 54 PITTSBURGH 1.96 1.94 -.02 55 HARVARD 1.47 1.45 -.01 56 CHICAGO 2.61 2.60 -.01 57 WISCONSIN 1.41 1.40 -.01 58 MIAMI 1.84 1.83 .00 59 NORTHWESTERN 1.26 1.26 .00 60 KANSAS 1.26 1.26 .00 Table 4.b Ratio of Support to Professional Staff sorted by the Difference in Ratios bt 1995 and 1996 Number of Number of Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the for each for each Ratios Prof. Staff Prof. Staff 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 68 OREGON 1.70 1.70 .00 68 MASSACHUSETTS 1.75 1.75 .00 68 BOSTON 2.10 2.10 .00 68 FLORIDA STATE 2.21 2.21 .00 68 PURDUE 2.23 2.23 .00 68 UTAH 2.30 2.30 .00 68 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2.70 2.70 .00 68 WESTERN ONTARIO 3.72 3.72 .00 69 MICHIGAN 2.00 2.01 .01 70 OKLAHOMA 1.46 1.47 .01 71 WASHINGTON 1.73 1.73 .01 72 BRIGHAM YOUNG .51 .52 .01 73 EMORY 1.80 1.82 .01 74 SUNY-ALBANY 1.67 1.68 .01 75 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 1.82 1.83 .02 76 TENNESSEE 2.14 2.15 .02 77 FLORIDA 1.87 1.89 .02 78 RUTGERS 2.20 2.22 .02 79 ALABAMA 1.35 1.38 .02 80 GEORGIA TECH 1.19 1.22 .03 81 RICE 1.33 1.36 .03 82 LOUISIANA STATE 2.12 2.15 .04 83 DARTMOUTH 2.06 2.10 .04 84 OHIO STATE 1.73 1.77 .04 85 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1.25 1.30 .05 86 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 1.99 2.04 .05 87 GEORGIA 2.23 2.28 .05 88 INDIANA 1.39 1.44 .05 89 SOUTH CAROLINA 1.58 1.63 .05 90 DUKE 1.61 1.66 .06 91 NOTRE DAME 3.00 3.06 .06 92 NEBRASKA 2.21 2.27 .06 93 COLORADO 1.97 2.03 .06 94 BROWN 1.18 1.25 .07 95 QUEEN'S 3.04 3.11 .07 96 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 2.34 2.42 .08 97 MCGILL 2.35 2.45 .10 98 JOHNS HOPKINS 1.98 2.08 .10 99 MARYLAND 1.37 1.48 .11 100 WATERLOO 2.76 2.88 .11 101 GEORGETOWN 1.34 1.53 .19 102 VANDERBILT 1.62 1.82 .20 103 TULANE 1.64 1.85 .21 104 HOWARD 1.83 2.04 .21 105 COLORADO STATE 1.97 2.25 .28 106 TEXAS A&M 1.71 2.11 .41 107 ALBERTA 3.01 3.46 .45 108 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 1.66 2.25 .59 Mean 1.99 1.95 -.03 StdDev .63 .61 .15 Table 4.c Professional Staff and Support Staff Support Professional Support Professional Staff Staff Staff Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 _______ ____________ _______ ____________ ALABAMA 81 60 77 56 ALBERTA 229 76 218 63 ARIZONA 175 83 181 92 ARIZONA STATE 205 100 196 99 AUBURN 99 51 86 49 BOSTON 132 63 132 63 BRIGHAM YOUNG 53 103 53 101 BRITISH COLUMBIA 252 104 240 104 BROWN 97 82 100 80 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 264 178 253 177 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 181 52 181 53 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 93 56 117 52 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 295 126 310 128 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 80 36 81 43 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 177 69 175 72 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 135 50 135 50 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 81 61 77 67 CHICAGO 193 74 187 72 CINCINNATI 118 74 111 76 COLORADO 124 63 126 62 COLORADO STATE 75 38 81 36 COLUMBIA 274 177 266 177 CONNECTICUT 112 66 98 67 CORNELL 302 130 296 130 DARTMOUTH 105 51 105 50 DELAWARE 113 52 113 54 DUKE 172 107 173 104 EMORY 148 82 149 82 FLORIDA 204 109 204 108 FLORIDA STATE 124 56 124 56 GEORGETOWN 123 92 122 80 GEORGIA 183 82 194 85 GEORGIA TECH 62 52 61 50 GUELPH 114 25 95 23 HARVARD 589 402 587 404 HAWAII 102 60 88 53 HOUSTON 98 46 97 46 HOWARD 97 53 92 45 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 161 81 163 80 ILLINOIS, URBANA 243 155 246 160 INDIANA 190 137 197 137 IOWA 123 93 125 102 IOWA STATE 113 48 116 52 JOHNS HOPKINS 172 87 181 87 KANSAS 120 95 111 88 KENT STATE 94 52 91 53 KENTUCKY 116 96 113 100 LAVAL 191 67 185 67 LOUISIANA STATE 108 51 112 52 MCGILL 188 80 186 76 MCMASTER 136 34 131 36 MANITOBA 136 53 128 51 MARYLAND 125 91 126 85 MASSACHUSETTS 89 51 89 51 MIT 118 84 111 83 MIAMI 134 73 130 71 MICHIGAN 288 144 299 149 MICHIGAN STATE 112 58 111 64 MINNESOTA 192 102 192 104 MISSOURI 134 57 137 59 NEBRASKA 117 53 118 52 Table 4.c Professional Staff and Support Staff Support Professional Support Professional Staff Staff Staff Staff 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 _______ ____________ _______ ____________ NEW MEXICO 169 83 170 88 NEW YORK 204 154 185 143 NORTH CAROLINA 210 120 207 120 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 120 66 121 66 NORTHWESTERN 139 110 135 107 NOTRE DAME 141 47 150 49 OHIO . . 77 60 OHIO STATE 180 104 179 101 OKLAHOMA 76 52 75 51 OKLAHOMA STATE 66 51 65 51 OREGON 92 54 92 54 PENNSYLVANIA 184 106 183 107 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 346 120 331 116 PITTSBURGH 208 106 210 108 PRINCETON 219 119 206 118 PURDUE 145 65 145 65 QUEEN'S 137 45 137 44 RICE 60 45 60 44 ROCHESTER 92 62 81 77 RUTGERS 238 108 240 108 SASKATCHEWAN 120 42 117 42 SOUTH CAROLINA 115 73 119 73 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 136 109 140 108 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 95 43 97 50 STANFORD 290 163 286 175 SUNY-ALBANY 80 48 79 47 SUNY-BUFFALO 92 95 88 97 SUNY-STONY BROOK 93 43 89 45 SYRACUSE 127 71 123 73 TEMPLE 108 72 105 73 TENNESSEE 139 65 140 65 TEXAS 382 141 364 141 TEXAS A&M 145 85 169 80 TORONTO 373 154 344 149 TULANE 90 55 98 53 UTAH 161 70 161 70 VANDERBILT 139 86 142 78 VIRGINIA 194 91 196 97 VPI & SU 102 41 94 43 WASHINGTON 226 131 229 132 WASHINGTON STATE 93 38 90 39 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 154 78 142 88 WATERLOO 116 42 115 40 WAYNE STATE 101 80 101 82 WESTERN ONTARIO 171 46 171 46 WISCONSIN 218 155 218 156 YALE 321 193 324 203 YORK 137 51 127 51 Mean 157 84 155 84 StdDev 80 47 79 48 Table 5.a Items Loaned over Items Borrowed (ILL) sorted by ratio values in 1996 Number of Number of Difference Items Loaned Items Loaned in the for each for each Ratios Item Borrowed Item Borrowed 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 1 GUELPH .79 .58 -.21 2 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE .68 .67 -.01 3 QUEEN'S .64 .68 .03 4 KENT STATE .77 .70 -.07 5 TENNESSEE .79 .73 -.06 6 PENNSYLVANIA .83 .76 -.08 7 NEBRASKA .65 .78 .13 8 TEMPLE .98 .78 -.20 9 SASKATCHEWAN .91 .83 -.09 10 SOUTH CAROLINA .74 .83 .08 11 BROWN .76 .84 .08 12 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE .85 .91 .06 13 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA .96 .91 -.05 14 BOSTON 1.09 .92 -.17 15 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 1.18 .93 -.25 16 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA .54 .98 .44 17 NEW YORK .84 .98 .14 18 DARTMOUTH 1.11 .98 -.13 19 RUTGERS 1.12 .99 -.13 20 DELAWARE 1.02 1.01 -.01 21 OKLAHOMA 1.85 1.04 -.81 22 WATERLOO 1.43 1.06 -.37 23 YALE 1.04 1.08 .04 24 ARIZONA STATE 1.25 1.09 -.17 25 LOUISIANA STATE 1.17 1.09 -.07 26 TULANE 1.14 1.11 -.03 27 NORTHWESTERN 1.26 1.12 -.14 28 RICE 1.38 1.12 -.26 29 JOHNS HOPKINS 1.33 1.12 -.21 30 OHIO . 1.15 . 31 ILLINOIS, URBANA 1.19 1.17 -.02 32 ALABAMA 1.40 1.22 -.18 33 VANDERBILT 1.24 1.22 -.02 34 BRIGHAM YOUNG 1.41 1.23 -.18 35 NEW MEXICO 1.21 1.23 .02 36 CORNELL 1.26 1.25 -.01 37 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 1.25 1.28 .03 38 GEORGETOWN 1.85 1.29 -.56 39 COLORADO STATE 1.27 1.33 .06 40 OHIO STATE 1.20 1.35 .14 41 VIRGINIA 1.73 1.37 -.36 42 CINCINNATI 1.57 1.41 -.16 43 SYRACUSE 1.40 1.42 .03 44 TEXAS A&M 1.80 1.44 -.36 45 KENTUCKY 1.34 1.45 .11 46 MCMASTER 1.44 1.45 .01 47 HOUSTON 1.38 1.46 .08 48 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 1.96 1.48 -.48 49 HOWARD 1.17 1.55 .38 50 PURDUE 1.87 1.61 -.26 51 COLUMBIA 1.85 1.62 -.23 52 NOTRE DAME 1.67 1.63 -.04 53 TEXAS 1.35 1.66 .30 54 MASSACHUSETTS 1.95 1.70 -.25 55 ARIZONA 2.30 1.70 -.60 56 VPI & SU 2.11 1.73 -.38 57 LAVAL 1.73 1.73 .01 58 IOWA STATE 2.20 1.73 -.47 59 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1.85 1.74 -.11 60 MCGILL 2.27 1.78 -.48 Table 5.a Items Loaned over Items Borrowed (ILL) sorted by ratio values in 1996 Number of Number of Difference Items Loaned Items Loaned in the for each for each Ratios Item Borrowed Item Borrowed 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 61 PRINCETON 1.92 1.82 -.10 62 OKLAHOMA STATE 1.81 1.84 .03 63 KANSAS 1.91 1.85 -.06 64 STANFORD 1.99 1.87 -.12 65 MARYLAND 2.00 1.88 -.12 66 SUNY-ALBANY 1.51 1.88 .37 67 MANITOBA 2.13 1.90 -.23 68 ROCHESTER 2.08 1.92 -.16 69 CHICAGO 2.29 1.93 -.36 70 CONNECTICUT 2.25 1.93 -.32 71 MICHIGAN STATE 1.71 1.98 .27 72 OREGON 2.11 2.04 -.06 73 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 2.55 2.09 -.46 74 INDIANA 1.91 2.10 .19 75 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 1.99 2.19 .20 76 MISSOURI 2.17 2.25 .09 77 COLORADO 2.60 2.31 -.29 78 MICHIGAN 2.08 2.31 .23 79 UTAH 2.21 2.34 .13 80 SUNY-BUFFALO 3.11 2.40 -.70 81 EMORY 2.55 2.52 -.04 82 TORONTO 2.73 2.61 -.12 83 MIT 2.60 2.62 .02 84 BRITISH COLUMBIA 2.78 2.63 -.15 85 IOWA 3.24 2.70 -.55 86 ALBERTA 2.65 2.70 .05 87 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2.95 2.74 -.22 88 MIAMI 2.57 2.76 .19 89 PITTSBURGH 3.33 2.76 -.57 90 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 3.40 2.84 -.56 91 FLORIDA STATE 2.64 2.84 .20 92 HAWAII 2.25 2.92 .67 93 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 2.81 3.20 .39 94 GEORGIA 3.80 3.32 -.48 95 SUNY-STONY BROOK 3.61 3.46 -.15 96 FLORIDA 4.99 3.55 -1.44 97 WAYNE STATE 3.84 3.59 -.25 98 WASHINGTON STATE 3.92 3.64 -.28 99 HARVARD 3.72 3.65 -.07 100 GEORGIA TECH 3.65 4.03 .38 101 YORK 4.23 4.23 .01 102 DUKE 3.33 4.24 .91 103 AUBURN 4.74 4.33 -.40 104 WISCONSIN 4.00 4.37 .37 105 WESTERN ONTARIO 3.13 4.88 1.74 106 NORTH CAROLINA 4.89 5.04 .15 107 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 6.13 5.26 -.87 108 WASHINGTON 8.13 8.06 -.07 109 MINNESOTA 16.31 16.15 -.15 Mean 2.21 2.11 -.09 StdDev 1.84 1.82 .36 Table 5.b Items Loaned over Items Borrowed (ILL) sorted by the difference in the rations bt. 1995 and 1996 Number of Number of Difference Items Loaned Items Loaned in the for each for each Ratios Item Borrowed Item Borrowed 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ . OHIO . 1.15 . 1 FLORIDA 4.99 3.55 -1.44 2 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 6.13 5.26 -.87 3 OKLAHOMA 1.85 1.04 -.81 4 SUNY-BUFFALO 3.11 2.40 -.70 5 ARIZONA 2.30 1.70 -.60 6 PITTSBURGH 3.33 2.76 -.57 7 GEORGETOWN 1.85 1.29 -.56 8 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 3.40 2.84 -.56 9 IOWA 3.24 2.70 -.55 10 MCGILL 2.27 1.78 -.48 11 GEORGIA 3.80 3.32 -.48 12 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 1.96 1.48 -.48 13 IOWA STATE 2.20 1.73 -.47 14 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 2.55 2.09 -.46 15 AUBURN 4.74 4.33 -.40 16 VPI & SU 2.11 1.73 -.38 17 WATERLOO 1.43 1.06 -.37 18 VIRGINIA 1.73 1.37 -.36 19 CHICAGO 2.29 1.93 -.36 20 TEXAS A&M 1.80 1.44 -.36 21 CONNECTICUT 2.25 1.93 -.32 22 COLORADO 2.60 2.31 -.29 23 WASHINGTON STATE 3.92 3.64 -.28 24 PURDUE 1.87 1.61 -.26 25 RICE 1.38 1.12 -.26 26 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 1.18 .93 -.25 27 MASSACHUSETTS 1.95 1.70 -.25 28 WAYNE STATE 3.84 3.59 -.25 29 COLUMBIA 1.85 1.62 -.23 30 MANITOBA 2.13 1.90 -.23 31 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2.95 2.74 -.22 32 GUELPH .79 .58 -.21 33 JOHNS HOPKINS 1.33 1.12 -.21 34 TEMPLE .98 .78 -.20 35 BRIGHAM YOUNG 1.41 1.23 -.18 36 ALABAMA 1.40 1.22 -.18 37 BOSTON 1.09 .92 -.17 38 ARIZONA STATE 1.25 1.09 -.17 39 ROCHESTER 2.08 1.92 -.16 40 CINCINNATI 1.57 1.41 -.16 41 MINNESOTA 16.31 16.15 -.15 42 SUNY-STONY BROOK 3.61 3.46 -.15 43 BRITISH COLUMBIA 2.78 2.63 -.15 44 NORTHWESTERN 1.26 1.12 -.14 45 DARTMOUTH 1.11 .98 -.13 46 RUTGERS 1.12 .99 -.13 47 STANFORD 1.99 1.87 -.12 48 TORONTO 2.73 2.61 -.12 49 MARYLAND 2.00 1.88 -.12 50 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1.85 1.74 -.11 51 PRINCETON 1.92 1.82 -.10 52 SASKATCHEWAN .91 .83 -.09 53 PENNSYLVANIA .83 .76 -.08 54 HARVARD 3.72 3.65 -.07 55 LOUISIANA STATE 1.17 1.09 -.07 56 WASHINGTON 8.13 8.06 -.07 57 KENT STATE .77 .70 -.07 58 OREGON 2.11 2.04 -.06 59 KANSAS 1.91 1.85 -.06 Table 5.b Items Loaned over Items Borrowed (ILL) sorted by the difference in the rations bt. 1995 and 1996 Number of Number of Difference Items Loaned Items Loaned in the for each for each Ratios Item Borrowed Item Borrowed 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 60 TENNESSEE .79 .73 -.06 61 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA .96 .91 -.05 62 NOTRE DAME 1.67 1.63 -.04 63 EMORY 2.55 2.52 -.04 64 TULANE 1.14 1.11 -.03 65 VANDERBILT 1.24 1.22 -.02 66 ILLINOIS, URBANA 1.19 1.17 -.02 67 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE .68 .67 -.01 68 CORNELL 1.26 1.25 -.01 69 DELAWARE 1.02 1.01 -.01 70 LAVAL 1.73 1.73 .01 71 YORK 4.23 4.23 .01 72 MCMASTER 1.44 1.45 .01 73 MIT 2.60 2.62 .02 74 NEW MEXICO 1.21 1.23 .02 75 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 1.25 1.28 .03 76 SYRACUSE 1.40 1.42 .03 77 OKLAHOMA STATE 1.81 1.84 .03 78 QUEEN'S .64 .68 .03 79 YALE 1.04 1.08 .04 80 ALBERTA 2.65 2.70 .05 81 COLORADO STATE 1.27 1.33 .06 82 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE .85 .91 .06 83 BROWN .76 .84 .08 84 HOUSTON 1.38 1.46 .08 85 SOUTH CAROLINA .74 .83 .08 86 MISSOURI 2.17 2.25 .09 87 KENTUCKY 1.34 1.45 .11 88 NEBRASKA .65 .78 .13 89 UTAH 2.21 2.34 .13 90 NEW YORK .84 .98 .14 91 OHIO STATE 1.20 1.35 .14 92 NORTH CAROLINA 4.89 5.04 .15 93 MIAMI 2.57 2.76 .19 94 INDIANA 1.91 2.10 .19 95 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 1.99 2.19 .20 96 FLORIDA STATE 2.64 2.84 .20 97 MICHIGAN 2.08 2.31 .23 98 MICHIGAN STATE 1.71 1.98 .27 99 TEXAS 1.35 1.66 .30 100 WISCONSIN 4.00 4.37 .37 101 SUNY-ALBANY 1.51 1.88 .37 102 HOWARD 1.17 1.55 .38 103 GEORGIA TECH 3.65 4.03 .38 104 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 2.81 3.20 .39 105 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA .54 .98 .44 106 HAWAII 2.25 2.92 .67 107 DUKE 3.33 4.24 .91 108 WESTERN ONTARIO 3.13 4.88 1.74 Mean 2.21 2.11 -.09 StdDev 1.84 1.82 .36 Table 5.c Items Loaned and Items Borrowed (ILL) Items Items Items Items Loaned Borrowed Loaned Borrowed 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 _______ ________ _______ ________ ALABAMA 14,749 10,517 12,709 10,400 ALBERTA 71,411 26,951 72,627 26,872 ARIZONA 36,052 15,662 30,790 18,141 ARIZONA STATE 22,920 18,273 22,676 20,851 AUBURN 19,473 4,112 23,219 5,360 BOSTON 15,765 14,521 15,525 16,919 BRIGHAM YOUNG 26,236 18,568 25,670 20,883 BRITISH COLUMBIA 45,239 16,291 47,685 18,150 BROWN 12,288 16,092 12,988 15,484 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 63,017 21,352 56,195 20,543 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 40,840 14,522 48,946 15,278 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 20,984 24,638 24,418 26,914 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 94,694 15,451 90,941 17,291 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 11,896 17,401 11,791 17,618 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 29,275 24,721 28,131 30,239 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 10,967 20,286 20,256 20,751 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 59,727 23,411 63,693 30,424 CHICAGO 42,671 18,657 41,164 21,376 CINCINNATI 55,831 35,638 61,575 43,623 COLORADO 34,257 13,191 32,700 14,177 COLORADO STATE 28,771 22,639 29,731 22,416 COLUMBIA 31,411 16,937 32,019 19,756 CONNECTICUT 42,015 18,658 41,206 21,308 CORNELL 20,350 16,098 17,045 13,591 DARTMOUTH 15,439 13,938 14,473 14,773 DELAWARE 12,120 11,910 12,880 12,756 DUKE 49,905 15,002 58,656 13,831 EMORY 23,211 9,088 25,667 10,191 FLORIDA 61,965 12,412 44,758 12,616 FLORIDA STATE 36,583 13,840 38,410 13,503 GEORGETOWN 14,296 7,714 13,094 10,120 GEORGIA 34,544 9,089 32,581 9,810 GEORGIA TECH 11,967 3,277 12,130 3,009 GUELPH 3,210 4,065 4,538 7,805 HARVARD 69,661 18,718 71,365 19,563 HAWAII 16,153 7,192 17,643 6,049 HOUSTON 23,372 16,927 27,142 18,569 HOWARD 1,988 1,702 3,870 2,502 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 93,355 74,598 104,117 81,478 ILLINOIS, URBANA 67,752 56,838 62,267 53,066 INDIANA 63,784 33,468 61,005 29,086 IOWA 55,110 16,985 53,947 19,991 IOWA STATE 24,627 11,172 24,564 14,161 JOHNS HOPKINS 27,253 20,502 23,229 20,714 KANSAS 43,042 22,501 43,601 23,546 KENT STATE 20,715 27,057 18,423 26,415 KENTUCKY 33,782 25,182 31,711 21,914 LAVAL 24,787 14,334 24,515 14,134 LOUISIANA STATE 13,345 11,441 15,436 14,124 MCGILL 22,158 9,763 18,440 10,331 MCMASTER 18,749 13,014 20,702 14,260 MANITOBA 22,165 10,403 20,828 10,949 MARYLAND 24,864 12,436 26,173 13,908 MASSACHUSETTS 18,343 9,428 16,966 9,998 MIT 20,267 7,807 23,073 8,823 MIAMI 36,453 14,186 39,507 14,325 MICHIGAN 54,846 26,368 61,028 26,399 MICHIGAN STATE 23,769 13,913 27,939 14,101 MINNESOTA 248,741 15,254 246,800 15,279 MISSOURI 36,900 17,014 37,815 16,777 NEBRASKA 12,661 19,458 13,771 17,734 Table 5.c Items Loaned and Items Borrowed (ILL) Items Items Items Items Loaned Borrowed Loaned Borrowed 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 _______ ________ _______ ________ NEW MEXICO 29,507 24,402 28,240 22,947 NEW YORK 17,137 20,437 20,768 21,222 NORTH CAROLINA 45,312 9,275 46,894 9,304 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 24,144 7,108 19,771 6,966 NORTHWESTERN 30,962 24,528 26,995 24,132 NOTRE DAME 17,595 10,506 18,585 11,377 OHIO . . 48,024 41,853 OHIO STATE 33,285 27,627 62,966 46,745 OKLAHOMA 30,547 16,525 31,632 30,466 OKLAHOMA STATE 22,079 12,182 23,403 12,702 OREGON 23,644 11,230 25,577 12,519 PENNSYLVANIA 23,793 28,556 23,293 30,775 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 36,413 18,297 39,892 18,239 PITTSBURGH 48,231 14,472 39,481 14,280 PRINCETON 19,042 9,895 17,578 9,639 PURDUE 28,962 15,454 26,173 16,231 QUEEN'S 6,829 10,654 8,602 12,728 RICE 6,766 4,904 7,099 6,341 ROCHESTER 28,366 13,623 26,652 13,857 RUTGERS 20,464 18,310 20,007 20,203 SASKATCHEWAN 9,306 10,184 10,111 12,251 SOUTH CAROLINA 14,659 19,690 18,940 22,853 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 13,066 13,618 13,894 15,311 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 34,626 17,700 34,048 23,024 STANFORD 18,209 9,133 20,099 10,745 SUNY-ALBANY 20,190 13,360 28,907 15,341 SUNY-BUFFALO 40,939 13,174 36,634 15,241 SUNY-STONY BROOK 36,302 10,048 34,762 10,042 SYRACUSE 13,143 9,413 15,482 10,876 TEMPLE 11,067 11,253 7,714 9,872 TENNESSEE 19,233 24,271 18,588 25,371 TEXAS 34,344 25,347 35,194 21,224 TEXAS A&M 45,079 25,106 44,991 31,264 TORONTO 25,539 9,365 23,608 9,060 TULANE 12,918 11,355 17,703 15,933 UTAH 29,497 13,342 32,600 13,946 VANDERBILT 15,930 12,807 16,418 13,424 VIRGINIA 46,276 26,765 37,538 27,489 VPI & SU 29,579 14,041 25,720 14,900 WASHINGTON 81,392 10,006 81,010 10,046 WASHINGTON STATE 29,061 7,408 29,190 8,023 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 48,314 26,155 39,658 22,826 WATERLOO 8,833 6,186 8,039 7,598 WAYNE STATE 46,099 12,008 45,467 12,659 WESTERN ONTARIO 11,324 3,616 19,218 3,941 WISCONSIN 98,475 24,604 92,856 21,258 YALE 14,843 14,310 15,477 14,341 YORK 18,537 4,387 17,988 4,249 Mean 32,894 16,382 33,397 17,804 StdDev 28,668 9,696 28,319 10,675 Table 6.a Serials Expenditures as a Percent of Materials Expenditures sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Serials Serials in the Expenditures Expenditures Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ 1 PRINCETON 35.53% 37.34% 1.81% 2 YALE 38.66% 38.69% .03% 3 HARVARD 42.63% 43.74% 1.11% 4 NOTRE DAME 51.65% 45.54% -6.11% 5 STANFORD 46.35% 46.01% -.34% 6 VIRGINIA 52.23% 46.10% -6.13% 7 INDIANA 45.51% 47.57% 2.06% 8 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 60.94% 47.59% -13.35% 9 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 46.08% 48.10% 2.03% 10 JOHNS HOPKINS 45.58% 48.88% 3.30% 11 FLORIDA 55.40% 51.16% -4.24% 12 RICE 52.09% 52.04% -.06% 13 EMORY 51.65% 52.83% 1.18% 14 TEXAS A&M 61.22% 52.98% -8.24% 15 PENNSYLVANIA 52.80% 53.32% .52% 16 BRIGHAM YOUNG 57.70% 53.39% -4.31% 17 IOWA 50.80% 53.48% 2.68% 18 NORTH CAROLINA 52.45% 53.78% 1.33% 19 ARIZONA 49.19% 54.06% 4.87% 20 CHICAGO 55.38% 54.29% -1.08% 21 CORNELL 52.91% 54.47% 1.56% 22 COLORADO 62.68% 54.59% -8.09% 23 NEW YORK 55.39% 54.92% -.47% 24 TORONTO 53.95% 54.95% 1.00% 25 YORK 55.01% 55.12% .11% 26 RUTGERS 66.29% 55.34% -10.94% 27 MCGILL 60.06% 55.44% -4.62% 28 TEXAS 56.91% 56.06% -.85% 29 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 53.79% 56.40% 2.62% 30 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 53.61% 57.07% 3.46% 31 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 61.43% 57.36% -4.07% 32 TULANE 56.61% 57.61% 1.00% 33 ARIZONA STATE 52.62% 57.80% 5.18% 34 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 60.33% 58.02% -2.31% 35 PITTSBURGH 59.31% 58.04% -1.27% 36 WISCONSIN 57.22% 58.40% 1.18% 37 NORTHWESTERN 59.96% 58.74% -1.22% 38 MICHIGAN 58.14% 59.09% .95% 39 GEORGIA 56.73% 59.11% 2.37% 40 MARYLAND 59.93% 59.16% -.77% 41 OREGON 57.08% 59.64% 2.57% 42 DELAWARE 55.04% 59.79% 4.75% 43 ILLINOIS, URBANA 58.39% 59.98% 1.59% 44 ALBERTA 69.09% 60.18% -8.91% 45 BROWN 56.30% 60.45% 4.15% 46 DUKE 57.98% 60.74% 2.76% 47 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 67.42% 61.16% -6.26% 48 DARTMOUTH 62.36% 61.23% -1.13% 49 VPI & SU 59.93% 61.40% 1.48% 50 KANSAS 59.40% 61.83% 2.43% 51 COLUMBIA 59.18% 62.48% 3.30% 52 SUNY-ALBANY 57.73% 62.60% 4.87% 53 MINNESOTA 63.00% 62.95% -.05% 54 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 68.47% 63.16% -5.31% 55 COLORADO STATE 63.46% 63.22% -.24% 56 NEW MEXICO 64.25% 63.32% -.94% 57 SOUTH CAROLINA 55.37% 63.51% 8.14% 58 HOWARD 54.02% 63.66% 9.64% 59 GEORGETOWN 61.61% 64.08% 2.46% 60 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 56.49% 64.22% 7.73% 61 UTAH 60.66% 64.29% 3.63% Table 6.a Serials Expenditures as a Percent of Materials Expenditures sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Serials Serials in the Expenditures Expenditures Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ 62 HOUSTON 53.99% 64.68% 10.69% 63 WATERLOO 62.21% 64.79% 2.58% 64 SUNY-BUFFALO 59.19% 64.92% 5.73% 65 MASSACHUSETTS 63.59% 65.29% 1.69% 66 IOWA STATE 59.58% 65.43% 5.84% 67 MISSOURI 72.27% 65.48% -6.78% 68 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 61.03% 65.70% 4.67% 69 MICHIGAN STATE 62.40% 66.46% 4.06% 70 WAYNE STATE 61.25% 66.69% 5.43% 71 AUBURN 62.63% 66.98% 4.35% 72 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 69.24% 67.00% -2.24% 73 ROCHESTER 70.92% 67.43% -3.49% 74 CINCINNATI 68.01% 68.19% .18% 75 OHIO . 68.19% . 76 KENT STATE 66.69% 68.32% 1.63% 77 VANDERBILT 66.24% 68.41% 2.18% 78 OHIO STATE 65.59% 68.64% 3.06% 79 SUNY-STONY BROOK 58.42% 68.86% 10.44% 80 BRITISH COLUMBIA 59.35% 69.49% 10.13% 81 SYRACUSE 68.41% 69.80% 1.38% 82 FLORIDA STATE 67.60% 70.60% 3.00% 83 GUELPH 66.79% 70.77% 3.98% 84 MANITOBA 71.59% 70.96% -.63% 85 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 65.46% 71.57% 6.11% 86 TENNESSEE 70.31% 71.63% 1.32% 87 TEMPLE 69.17% 71.88% 2.71% 88 QUEEN'S 70.67% 71.90% 1.24% 89 BOSTON 74.34% 72.18% -2.16% 90 GEORGIA TECH 68.95% 72.68% 3.72% 91 KENTUCKY 70.31% 73.01% 2.70% 92 WESTERN ONTARIO 71.47% 73.05% 1.58% 93 LAVAL 77.04% 73.14% -3.89% 94 MIT 64.07% 73.85% 9.78% 95 ALABAMA 80.76% 73.92% -6.84% 96 CONNECTICUT 71.02% 73.95% 2.93% 97 SASKATCHEWAN 79.04% 74.16% -4.87% 98 LOUISIANA STATE 79.56% 74.61% -4.96% 99 WASHINGTON STATE 76.58% 75.07% -1.51% 100 MIAMI 72.72% 75.09% 2.37% 101 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 68.67% 75.36% 6.69% 102 WASHINGTON 68.84% 75.93% 7.08% 103 OKLAHOMA 73.98% 76.36% 2.38% 104 NEBRASKA 72.92% 76.69% 3.77% 105 MCMASTER 70.24% 76.96% 6.73% 106 OKLAHOMA STATE 58.51% 77.27% 18.76% 107 PURDUE 80.98% 80.42% -.56% 108 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 79.91% 82.94% 3.04% 109 HAWAII 57.56% 86.21% 28.65% Mean 61.43% 62.89% 1.42% StdDev 8.96% 9.54% 5.48% Table 6.b Serials Expenditures as a Percent of Materials Expenditures sorted by Difference in the Percentage between 1995 and 1996 Percent Percent Difference Serials Serials in the Expenditures Expenditures Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ . OHIO . 68.19% . 1 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 60.94% 47.59% -13.35% 2 RUTGERS 66.29% 55.34% -10.94% 3 ALBERTA 69.09% 60.18% -8.91% 4 TEXAS A&M 61.22% 52.98% -8.24% 5 COLORADO 62.68% 54.59% -8.09% 6 ALABAMA 80.76% 73.92% -6.84% 7 MISSOURI 72.27% 65.48% -6.78% 8 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 67.42% 61.16% -6.26% 9 VIRGINIA 52.23% 46.10% -6.13% 10 NOTRE DAME 51.65% 45.54% -6.11% 11 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 68.47% 63.16% -5.31% 12 LOUISIANA STATE 79.56% 74.61% -4.96% 13 SASKATCHEWAN 79.04% 74.16% -4.87% 14 MCGILL 60.06% 55.44% -4.62% 15 BRIGHAM YOUNG 57.70% 53.39% -4.31% 16 FLORIDA 55.40% 51.16% -4.24% 17 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 61.43% 57.36% -4.07% 18 LAVAL 77.04% 73.14% -3.89% 19 ROCHESTER 70.92% 67.43% -3.49% 20 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 60.33% 58.02% -2.31% 21 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 69.24% 67.00% -2.24% 22 BOSTON 74.34% 72.18% -2.16% 23 WASHINGTON STATE 76.58% 75.07% -1.51% 24 PITTSBURGH 59.31% 58.04% -1.27% 25 NORTHWESTERN 59.96% 58.74% -1.22% 26 DARTMOUTH 62.36% 61.23% -1.13% 27 CHICAGO 55.38% 54.29% -1.08% 28 NEW MEXICO 64.25% 63.32% -.94% 29 TEXAS 56.91% 56.06% -.85% 30 MARYLAND 59.93% 59.16% -.77% 31 MANITOBA 71.59% 70.96% -.63% 32 PURDUE 80.98% 80.42% -.56% 33 NEW YORK 55.39% 54.92% -.47% 34 STANFORD 46.35% 46.01% -.34% 35 COLORADO STATE 63.46% 63.22% -.24% 36 RICE 52.09% 52.04% -.06% 37 MINNESOTA 63.00% 62.95% -.05% 38 YALE 38.66% 38.69% .03% 39 YORK 55.01% 55.12% .11% 40 CINCINNATI 68.01% 68.19% .18% 41 PENNSYLVANIA 52.80% 53.32% .52% 42 MICHIGAN 58.14% 59.09% .95% 43 TORONTO 53.95% 54.95% 1.00% 44 TULANE 56.61% 57.61% 1.00% 45 HARVARD 42.63% 43.74% 1.11% 46 EMORY 51.65% 52.83% 1.18% 47 WISCONSIN 57.22% 58.40% 1.18% 48 QUEEN'S 70.67% 71.90% 1.24% 49 TENNESSEE 70.31% 71.63% 1.32% 50 NORTH CAROLINA 52.45% 53.78% 1.33% 51 SYRACUSE 68.41% 69.80% 1.38% 52 VPI & SU 59.93% 61.40% 1.48% 53 CORNELL 52.91% 54.47% 1.56% 54 WESTERN ONTARIO 71.47% 73.05% 1.58% 55 ILLINOIS, URBANA 58.39% 59.98% 1.59% 56 KENT STATE 66.69% 68.32% 1.63% 57 MASSACHUSETTS 63.59% 65.29% 1.69% 58 PRINCETON 35.53% 37.34% 1.81% 59 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 46.08% 48.10% 2.03% 60 INDIANA 45.51% 47.57% 2.06% Table 6.b Serials Expenditures as a Percent of Materials Expenditures sorted by Difference in the Percentage between 1995 and 1996 Percent Percent Difference Serials Serials in the Expenditures Expenditures Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ 61 VANDERBILT 66.24% 68.41% 2.18% 62 MIAMI 72.72% 75.09% 2.37% 63 GEORGIA 56.73% 59.11% 2.37% 64 OKLAHOMA 73.98% 76.36% 2.38% 65 KANSAS 59.40% 61.83% 2.43% 66 GEORGETOWN 61.61% 64.08% 2.46% 67 OREGON 57.08% 59.64% 2.57% 68 WATERLOO 62.21% 64.79% 2.58% 69 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 53.79% 56.40% 2.62% 70 IOWA 50.80% 53.48% 2.68% 71 KENTUCKY 70.31% 73.01% 2.70% 72 TEMPLE 69.17% 71.88% 2.71% 73 DUKE 57.98% 60.74% 2.76% 74 CONNECTICUT 71.02% 73.95% 2.93% 75 FLORIDA STATE 67.60% 70.60% 3.00% 76 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 79.91% 82.94% 3.04% 77 OHIO STATE 65.59% 68.64% 3.06% 78 COLUMBIA 59.18% 62.48% 3.30% 79 JOHNS HOPKINS 45.58% 48.88% 3.30% 80 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 53.61% 57.07% 3.46% 81 UTAH 60.66% 64.29% 3.63% 82 GEORGIA TECH 68.95% 72.68% 3.72% 83 NEBRASKA 72.92% 76.69% 3.77% 84 GUELPH 66.79% 70.77% 3.98% 85 MICHIGAN STATE 62.40% 66.46% 4.06% 86 BROWN 56.30% 60.45% 4.15% 87 AUBURN 62.63% 66.98% 4.35% 88 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 61.03% 65.70% 4.67% 89 DELAWARE 55.04% 59.79% 4.75% 90 SUNY-ALBANY 57.73% 62.60% 4.87% 91 ARIZONA 49.19% 54.06% 4.87% 92 ARIZONA STATE 52.62% 57.80% 5.18% 93 WAYNE STATE 61.25% 66.69% 5.43% 94 SUNY-BUFFALO 59.19% 64.92% 5.73% 95 IOWA STATE 59.58% 65.43% 5.84% 96 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 65.46% 71.57% 6.11% 97 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 68.67% 75.36% 6.69% 98 MCMASTER 70.24% 76.96% 6.73% 99 WASHINGTON 68.84% 75.93% 7.08% 100 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 56.49% 64.22% 7.73% 101 SOUTH CAROLINA 55.37% 63.51% 8.14% 102 HOWARD 54.02% 63.66% 9.64% 103 MIT 64.07% 73.85% 9.78% 104 BRITISH COLUMBIA 59.35% 69.49% 10.13% 105 SUNY-STONY BROOK 58.42% 68.86% 10.44% 106 HOUSTON 53.99% 64.68% 10.69% 107 OKLAHOMA STATE 58.51% 77.27% 18.76% 108 HAWAII 57.56% 86.21% 28.65% Mean 61.43% 62.89% 1.42% StdDev 8.96% 9.54% 5.48% Table 6.c Expenditures for Serials and Expenditures for Library Materials Expend. Expend. Expend. Expend Serials Library Serials Library Materials Materials 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 __________ __________ __________ __________ ALABAMA 3,807,389 4,714,384 2,334,678 3,158,503 ALBERTA 4,905,507 7,100,177 4,188,173 6,959,927 ARIZONA 3,331,821 6,773,278 3,938,177 7,284,160 ARIZONA STATE 3,526,618 6,702,115 4,029,942 6,972,105 AUBURN 2,128,030 3,397,720 2,300,173 3,434,125 BOSTON 2,841,590 3,822,624 3,043,404 4,216,387 BRIGHAM YOUNG 2,707,646 4,692,362 2,469,518 4,625,350 BRITISH COLUMBIA 3,801,396 6,404,603 4,867,009 7,004,396 BROWN 2,423,049 4,303,622 2,572,912 4,256,138 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 5,570,902 10,391,411 5,698,927 9,985,658 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 3,205,280 5,959,314 3,566,732 6,323,446 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 2,775,366 4,239,690 3,145,945 4,395,520 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 4,372,088 9,488,562 4,570,964 9,502,100 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 1,864,535 3,090,772 1,885,558 3,249,826 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 3,068,910 5,432,434 3,672,321 5,718,491 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2,607,725 3,808,441 2,142,210 3,391,780 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 3,190,925 3,993,396 3,328,195 4,012,726 CHICAGO 3,953,516 7,139,176 4,210,404 7,754,976 CINCINNATI 3,517,474 5,171,992 3,635,683 5,331,883 COLORADO 4,065,724 6,486,127 4,129,536 7,564,265 COLORADO STATE 2,435,688 3,838,050 2,547,536 4,029,523 COLUMBIA 5,279,788 8,921,823 6,017,383 9,630,835 CONNECTICUT 3,369,797 4,744,639 3,522,638 4,763,339 CORNELL 4,741,247 8,960,279 4,989,490 9,159,829 DARTMOUTH 2,499,261 4,007,647 2,655,370 4,336,681 DELAWARE 2,486,448 4,517,596 2,860,075 4,783,698 DUKE 4,339,966 7,485,402 4,873,710 8,023,516 EMORY 3,397,958 6,578,513 3,749,567 7,097,722 FLORIDA 3,433,955 6,199,018 3,852,794 7,531,201 FLORIDA STATE 3,133,885 4,635,904 3,095,972 4,385,202 GEORGETOWN 3,504,679 5,688,257 3,744,791 5,844,383 GEORGIA 3,566,919 6,287,192 3,981,172 6,735,604 GEORGIA TECH 2,239,764 3,248,252 2,545,641 3,502,671 GUELPH 1,597,381 2,391,697 1,611,864 2,277,516 HARVARD 6,385,130 14,979,412 6,926,565 15,835,910 HAWAII 2,027,218 3,521,668 2,622,242 3,041,572 HOUSTON 2,445,041 4,529,065 2,653,159 4,102,070 HOWARD 2,422,586 4,484,996 2,375,327 3,731,366 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 3,062,726 4,460,201 3,955,649 5,248,983 ILLINOIS, URBANA 4,423,556 7,575,449 4,671,760 7,788,533 INDIANA 3,883,535 8,532,640 3,795,162 7,977,911 IOWA 3,128,181 6,158,143 3,393,307 6,345,483 IOWA STATE 2,794,658 4,690,403 3,298,860 5,042,111 JOHNS HOPKINS 3,305,142 7,251,192 3,742,248 7,655,416 KANSAS 3,050,436 5,135,253 3,250,221 5,256,347 KENT STATE 1,643,670 2,464,487 1,957,190 2,864,561 KENTUCKY 3,279,406 4,664,007 3,571,754 4,892,045 LAVAL 3,059,818 3,971,954 3,416,727 4,671,430 LOUISIANA STATE 2,462,368 3,094,789 2,505,673 3,358,379 MCGILL 2,494,016 4,152,638 2,674,094 4,823,580 MCMASTER 2,406,922 3,426,876 2,741,314 3,561,900 MANITOBA 1,849,343 2,583,184 1,827,275 2,575,068 MARYLAND 2,586,524 4,316,250 3,154,953 5,333,350 MASSACHUSETTS 2,344,313 3,686,380 2,682,027 4,108,093 MIT 2,506,913 3,912,593 2,686,360 3,637,605 MIAMI 3,641,490 5,007,505 4,023,185 5,357,772 MICHIGAN 6,643,092 11,425,541 7,429,048 12,572,215 MICHIGAN STATE 3,162,737 5,068,222 3,676,208 5,531,455 MINNESOTA 5,327,055 8,455,740 5,532,887 8,789,784 MISSOURI 3,260,701 4,512,070 3,356,983 5,126,482 NEBRASKA 2,877,078 3,945,746 3,778,191 4,926,550 Table 6.c Expenditures for Serials and Expenditures for Library Materials Expend. Expend. Expend. Expend Serials Library Serials Library Materials Materials 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 __________ __________ __________ __________ NEW MEXICO 2,722,655 4,237,283 2,889,660 4,563,672 NEW YORK 4,004,430 7,229,620 3,996,291 7,276,221 NORTH CAROLINA 3,981,696 7,591,319 4,633,027 8,614,336 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 2,848,005 4,673,219 2,703,947 5,681,248 NORTHWESTERN 3,528,263 5,884,783 3,801,325 6,471,391 NOTRE DAME 2,352,689 4,554,886 2,740,978 6,018,741 OHIO . . 2,479,478 3,636,202 OHIO STATE 4,810,664 7,334,696 5,423,126 7,900,326 OKLAHOMA 2,910,177 3,933,736 3,144,795 4,118,249 OKLAHOMA STATE 2,210,141 3,777,445 2,695,379 3,488,367 OREGON 2,595,039 4,546,650 2,891,599 4,848,267 PENNSYLVANIA 3,843,116 7,277,987 4,273,724 8,015,076 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 4,793,448 7,803,200 4,614,866 8,045,636 PITTSBURGH 4,295,432 7,241,766 4,358,926 7,510,167 PRINCETON 3,101,297 8,728,953 3,652,629 9,782,213 PURDUE 3,461,103 4,274,152 3,927,457 4,883,768 QUEEN'S 2,529,784 3,579,930 2,790,118 3,880,303 RICE 2,376,755 4,562,526 2,451,168 4,710,551 ROCHESTER 2,838,264 4,002,265 2,800,553 4,153,212 RUTGERS 4,574,152 6,900,379 3,984,669 7,199,786 SASKATCHEWAN 2,683,138 3,394,727 3,091,624 4,168,626 SOUTH CAROLINA 2,189,366 3,953,978 2,986,011 4,701,778 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 3,991,055 6,539,453 4,571,562 6,958,495 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 2,753,284 3,976,174 3,206,095 4,784,989 STANFORD 5,925,033 12,783,018 6,251,297 13,587,712 SUNY-ALBANY 1,941,611 3,363,262 1,987,666 3,175,138 SUNY-BUFFALO 2,838,283 4,795,011 3,021,069 4,653,346 SUNY-STONY BROOK 2,235,389 3,826,375 2,686,717 3,901,705 SYRACUSE 2,419,116 3,535,957 2,471,841 3,541,454 TEMPLE 2,741,647 3,963,746 3,384,928 4,709,398 TENNESSEE 3,452,756 4,910,710 3,563,793 4,975,353 TEXAS 3,848,552 6,763,054 3,996,248 7,128,615 TEXAS A&M 3,166,949 5,172,791 3,264,894 6,162,606 TORONTO 5,242,466 9,716,781 5,529,903 10,063,511 TULANE 2,329,345 4,114,610 2,502,336 4,343,554 UTAH 3,345,540 5,515,472 3,616,895 5,625,839 VANDERBILT 3,267,397 4,932,979 3,607,899 5,273,836 VIRGINIA 4,003,207 7,664,609 3,534,894 7,667,486 VPI & SU 3,087,567 5,152,375 3,185,667 5,188,268 WASHINGTON 6,377,887 9,264,239 6,930,663 9,128,097 WASHINGTON STATE 2,489,084 3,250,286 2,687,409 3,579,743 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 3,746,912 5,557,566 3,882,510 6,348,160 WATERLOO 1,996,332 3,208,803 2,172,314 3,352,852 WAYNE STATE 2,888,156 4,715,203 3,304,123 4,954,820 WESTERN ONTARIO 3,018,526 4,223,301 3,207,713 4,391,205 WISCONSIN 4,647,713 8,122,557 4,695,634 8,040,673 YALE 4,605,000 11,911,000 5,166,000 13,353,000 YORK 2,052,523 3,731,393 2,118,706 3,843,924 Mean 3,307,656 5,581,640 3,544,559 5,869,737 StdDev 1,053,325 2,289,206 1,120,755 2,439,803 Table 7.a Expenditures for Library Materials as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Library Library in the Materials Exp Materials Exp Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 1 HARVARD 21.89% 23.54% 1.65% 2 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 26.98% 25.42% -1.57% 3 YORK 33.30% 26.79% -6.52% 4 NEW MEXICO 27.36% 27.13% -.23% 5 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 31.48% 27.15% -4.33% 6 WISCONSIN 30.40% 28.71% -1.69% 7 MANITOBA 28.44% 28.85% .40% 8 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 30.41% 29.12% -1.29% 9 RUTGERS 29.08% 29.39% .31% 10 KENT STATE 28.34% 29.49% 1.16% 11 HAWAII 29.70% 30.27% .57% 12 CONNECTICUT 31.39% 30.37% -1.02% 13 TEXAS 30.25% 31.25% 1.01% 14 MIT 32.17% 31.48% -.68% 15 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 30.75% 31.69% .94% 16 NEW YORK 29.06% 31.85% 2.79% 17 BROWN 33.03% 31.97% -1.06% 18 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 32.49% 32.01% -.48% 19 STANFORD 32.27% 32.03% -.24% 20 KENTUCKY 33.37% 32.44% -.94% 21 ILLINOIS, URBANA 33.88% 32.54% -1.34% 22 OHIO . 32.81% . 23 TORONTO 33.13% 32.90% -.23% 24 MINNESOTA 34.17% 32.93% -1.24% 25 PENNSYLVANIA 33.55% 33.06% -.49% 26 CORNELL 33.70% 33.18% -.52% 27 COLUMBIA 31.57% 33.30% 1.73% 28 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 32.64% 33.47% .83% 29 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 33.16% 33.84% .69% 30 MARYLAND 29.75% 33.93% 4.18% 31 BOSTON 34.03% 34.17% .14% 32 SUNY-BUFFALO 36.06% 34.26% -1.80% 33 GUELPH 35.53% 34.26% -1.27% 34 INDIANA 38.49% 34.74% -3.75% 35 SYRACUSE 32.77% 34.86% 2.09% 36 BRITISH COLUMBIA 33.37% 34.93% 1.56% 37 SOUTH CAROLINA 31.63% 34.94% 3.31% 38 YALE 32.43% 35.19% 2.75% 39 BRIGHAM YOUNG 36.25% 35.62% -.63% 40 WAYNE STATE 36.02% 35.64% -.37% 41 MCGILL 31.22% 35.78% 4.55% 42 KANSAS 37.60% 35.90% -1.70% 43 GEORGETOWN 36.08% 36.22% .14% 44 ARIZONA STATE 38.32% 36.40% -1.93% 45 IOWA 38.04% 36.42% -1.62% 46 WESTERN ONTARIO 38.45% 36.59% -1.87% 47 MICHIGAN STATE 38.77% 36.80% -1.97% 48 DUKE 36.60% 36.90% .30% 49 VANDERBILT 37.45% 36.91% -.54% 50 ALABAMA 48.32% 36.99% -11.33% 51 WASHINGTON 35.96% 37.03% 1.07% 52 CHICAGO 37.53% 37.09% -.44% 53 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 33.31% 37.26% 3.95% 54 WASHINGTON STATE 35.59% 37.41% 1.82% 55 NORTHWESTERN 34.80% 37.47% 2.66% 56 TEXAS A&M 34.48% 37.54% 3.07% 57 UTAH 39.84% 37.56% -2.27% 58 IOWA STATE 36.39% 37.58% 1.19% 59 WATERLOO 38.05% 37.81% -.24% 60 MICHIGAN 38.14% 37.98% -.16% Table 7.a Expenditures for Library Materials as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Library Library in the Materials Exp Materials Exp Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 61 LAVAL 33.56% 38.04% 4.47% 62 OHIO STATE 36.01% 38.10% 2.09% 63 MASSACHUSETTS 34.57% 38.14% 3.58% 64 LOUISIANA STATE 34.85% 38.34% 3.48% 65 SUNY-STONY BROOK 37.47% 38.48% 1.01% 66 VIRGINIA 40.22% 38.54% -1.68% 67 SUNY-ALBANY 40.57% 38.59% -1.97% 68 PRINCETON 36.05% 38.70% 2.65% 69 PITTSBURGH 38.48% 38.78% .29% 70 ARIZONA 38.40% 38.84% .44% 71 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 36.48% 38.89% 2.40% 72 EMORY 38.25% 39.07% .82% 73 NORTH CAROLINA 37.17% 39.10% 1.93% 74 HOUSTON 39.48% 39.12% -.35% 75 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 37.03% 39.14% 2.11% 76 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 38.57% 39.15% .58% 77 CINCINNATI 39.40% 39.16% -.25% 78 TENNESSEE 38.48% 39.40% .92% 79 DARTMOUTH 36.99% 39.45% 2.46% 80 ALBERTA 39.97% 39.49% -.48% 81 JOHNS HOPKINS 38.51% 39.58% 1.06% 82 QUEEN'S 39.54% 39.71% .17% 83 MIAMI 37.83% 40.04% 2.21% 84 HOWARD 46.92% 40.32% -6.60% 85 TEMPLE 36.01% 40.65% 4.63% 86 MCMASTER 39.34% 40.82% 1.49% 87 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 43.08% 40.85% -2.22% 88 ROCHESTER 40.38% 40.87% .49% 89 PURDUE 38.82% 40.89% 2.07% 90 MISSOURI 40.50% 41.12% .62% 91 AUBURN 40.04% 41.51% 1.47% 92 GEORGIA 41.78% 41.77% -.01% 93 OKLAHOMA STATE 43.31% 41.80% -1.50% 94 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 39.43% 42.00% 2.56% 95 COLORADO STATE 45.30% 42.21% -3.08% 96 DELAWARE 42.67% 42.90% .23% 97 OREGON 41.70% 43.61% 1.91% 98 FLORIDA 38.27% 44.72% 6.45% 99 NEBRASKA 40.84% 45.26% 4.42% 100 GEORGIA TECH 46.31% 45.27% -1.04% 101 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 39.98% 45.32% 5.34% 102 TULANE 43.55% 45.44% 1.89% 103 OKLAHOMA 43.38% 45.45% 2.07% 104 FLORIDA STATE 49.53% 45.54% -3.99% 105 NOTRE DAME 38.71% 46.53% 7.82% 106 VPI & SU 48.10% 47.25% -.85% 107 SASKATCHEWAN 44.40% 47.53% 3.13% 108 COLORADO 40.25% 48.56% 8.32% 109 RICE 50.02% 53.66% 3.64% Mean 36.66% 37.15% .52% StdDev 5.05% 5.29% 2.73% Table 7.b Expenditures for Library Materials as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Difference in Percentage Percent Percent Difference Library Library in the Materials Exp Materials Exp Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ . OHIO . 32.81% . 1 ALABAMA 48.32% 36.99% -11.33% 2 HOWARD 46.92% 40.32% -6.60% 3 YORK 33.30% 26.79% -6.52% 4 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 31.48% 27.15% -4.33% 5 FLORIDA STATE 49.53% 45.54% -3.99% 6 INDIANA 38.49% 34.74% -3.75% 7 COLORADO STATE 45.30% 42.21% -3.08% 8 UTAH 39.84% 37.56% -2.27% 9 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 43.08% 40.85% -2.22% 10 SUNY-ALBANY 40.57% 38.59% -1.97% 11 MICHIGAN STATE 38.77% 36.80% -1.97% 12 ARIZONA STATE 38.32% 36.40% -1.93% 13 WESTERN ONTARIO 38.45% 36.59% -1.87% 14 SUNY-BUFFALO 36.06% 34.26% -1.80% 15 KANSAS 37.60% 35.90% -1.70% 16 WISCONSIN 30.40% 28.71% -1.69% 17 VIRGINIA 40.22% 38.54% -1.68% 18 IOWA 38.04% 36.42% -1.62% 19 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 26.98% 25.42% -1.57% 20 OKLAHOMA STATE 43.31% 41.80% -1.50% 21 ILLINOIS, URBANA 33.88% 32.54% -1.34% 22 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 30.41% 29.12% -1.29% 23 GUELPH 35.53% 34.26% -1.27% 24 MINNESOTA 34.17% 32.93% -1.24% 25 BROWN 33.03% 31.97% -1.06% 26 GEORGIA TECH 46.31% 45.27% -1.04% 27 CONNECTICUT 31.39% 30.37% -1.02% 28 KENTUCKY 33.37% 32.44% -.94% 29 VPI & SU 48.10% 47.25% -.85% 30 MIT 32.17% 31.48% -.68% 31 BRIGHAM YOUNG 36.25% 35.62% -.63% 32 VANDERBILT 37.45% 36.91% -.54% 33 CORNELL 33.70% 33.18% -.52% 34 PENNSYLVANIA 33.55% 33.06% -.49% 35 ALBERTA 39.97% 39.49% -.48% 36 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 32.49% 32.01% -.48% 37 CHICAGO 37.53% 37.09% -.44% 38 WAYNE STATE 36.02% 35.64% -.37% 39 HOUSTON 39.48% 39.12% -.35% 40 CINCINNATI 39.40% 39.16% -.25% 41 WATERLOO 38.05% 37.81% -.24% 42 STANFORD 32.27% 32.03% -.24% 43 NEW MEXICO 27.36% 27.13% -.23% 44 TORONTO 33.13% 32.90% -.23% 45 MICHIGAN 38.14% 37.98% -.16% 46 GEORGIA 41.78% 41.77% -.01% 47 BOSTON 34.03% 34.17% .14% 48 GEORGETOWN 36.08% 36.22% .14% 49 QUEEN'S 39.54% 39.71% .17% 50 DELAWARE 42.67% 42.90% .23% 51 PITTSBURGH 38.48% 38.78% .29% 52 DUKE 36.60% 36.90% .30% 53 RUTGERS 29.08% 29.39% .31% 54 MANITOBA 28.44% 28.85% .40% 55 ARIZONA 38.40% 38.84% .44% 56 ROCHESTER 40.38% 40.87% .49% 57 HAWAII 29.70% 30.27% .57% 58 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 38.57% 39.15% .58% 59 MISSOURI 40.50% 41.12% .62% Table 7.b Expenditures for Library Materials as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Difference in Percentage Percent Percent Difference Library Library in the Materials Exp Materials Exp Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 60 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 33.16% 33.84% .69% 61 EMORY 38.25% 39.07% .82% 62 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 32.64% 33.47% .83% 63 TENNESSEE 38.48% 39.40% .92% 64 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 30.75% 31.69% .94% 65 SUNY-STONY BROOK 37.47% 38.48% 1.01% 66 TEXAS 30.25% 31.25% 1.01% 67 JOHNS HOPKINS 38.51% 39.58% 1.06% 68 WASHINGTON 35.96% 37.03% 1.07% 69 KENT STATE 28.34% 29.49% 1.16% 70 IOWA STATE 36.39% 37.58% 1.19% 71 AUBURN 40.04% 41.51% 1.47% 72 MCMASTER 39.34% 40.82% 1.49% 73 BRITISH COLUMBIA 33.37% 34.93% 1.56% 74 HARVARD 21.89% 23.54% 1.65% 75 COLUMBIA 31.57% 33.30% 1.73% 76 WASHINGTON STATE 35.59% 37.41% 1.82% 77 TULANE 43.55% 45.44% 1.89% 78 OREGON 41.70% 43.61% 1.91% 79 NORTH CAROLINA 37.17% 39.10% 1.93% 80 OKLAHOMA 43.38% 45.45% 2.07% 81 PURDUE 38.82% 40.89% 2.07% 82 SYRACUSE 32.77% 34.86% 2.09% 83 OHIO STATE 36.01% 38.10% 2.09% 84 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 37.03% 39.14% 2.11% 85 MIAMI 37.83% 40.04% 2.21% 86 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 36.48% 38.89% 2.40% 87 DARTMOUTH 36.99% 39.45% 2.46% 88 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 39.43% 42.00% 2.56% 89 PRINCETON 36.05% 38.70% 2.65% 90 NORTHWESTERN 34.80% 37.47% 2.66% 91 YALE 32.43% 35.19% 2.75% 92 NEW YORK 29.06% 31.85% 2.79% 93 TEXAS A&M 34.48% 37.54% 3.07% 94 SASKATCHEWAN 44.40% 47.53% 3.13% 95 SOUTH CAROLINA 31.63% 34.94% 3.31% 96 LOUISIANA STATE 34.85% 38.34% 3.48% 97 MASSACHUSETTS 34.57% 38.14% 3.58% 98 RICE 50.02% 53.66% 3.64% 99 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 33.31% 37.26% 3.95% 100 MARYLAND 29.75% 33.93% 4.18% 101 NEBRASKA 40.84% 45.26% 4.42% 102 LAVAL 33.56% 38.04% 4.47% 103 MCGILL 31.22% 35.78% 4.55% 104 TEMPLE 36.01% 40.65% 4.63% 105 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 39.98% 45.32% 5.34% 106 FLORIDA 38.27% 44.72% 6.45% 107 NOTRE DAME 38.71% 46.53% 7.82% 108 COLORADO 40.25% 48.56% 8.32% Mean 36.66% 37.15% .52% StdDev 5.05% 5.29% 2.73% Table 7.c Expenditures for Library Materials and Total Expenditures Exp Total Exp Total Library Exp Library Exp Materials Materials 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 __________ ____________ __________ ____________ ALABAMA 4,714,384 9,757,358 3,158,503 8,539,134 ALBERTA 7,100,177 17,761,796 6,959,927 17,622,878 ARIZONA 6,773,278 17,637,809 7,284,160 18,752,887 ARIZONA STATE 6,702,115 17,488,050 6,972,105 19,155,280 AUBURN 3,397,720 8,485,071 3,434,125 8,272,354 BOSTON 3,822,624 11,232,608 4,216,387 12,338,206 BRIGHAM YOUNG 4,692,362 12,944,597 4,625,350 12,985,681 BRITISH COLUMBIA 6,404,603 19,194,791 7,004,396 20,052,667 BROWN 4,303,622 13,029,954 4,256,138 13,314,756 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 10,391,411 34,171,985 9,985,658 34,293,434 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 5,959,314 16,092,917 6,323,446 16,155,660 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 4,239,690 13,787,954 4,395,520 13,870,378 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 9,488,562 35,165,206 9,502,100 37,384,937 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 3,090,772 8,013,599 3,249,826 8,300,639 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 5,432,434 16,721,016 5,718,491 17,865,595 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 3,808,441 12,096,080 3,391,780 12,492,592 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 3,993,396 9,270,672 4,012,726 9,822,453 CHICAGO 7,139,176 19,023,479 7,754,976 20,906,976 CINCINNATI 5,171,992 13,125,605 5,331,883 13,616,852 COLORADO 6,486,127 16,116,253 7,564,265 15,576,781 COLORADO STATE 3,838,050 8,473,249 4,029,523 9,546,112 COLUMBIA 8,921,823 28,257,080 9,630,835 28,917,183 CONNECTICUT 4,744,639 15,115,080 4,763,339 15,682,284 CORNELL 8,960,279 26,584,624 9,159,829 27,603,034 DARTMOUTH 4,007,647 10,834,685 4,336,681 10,991,740 DELAWARE 4,517,596 10,587,563 4,783,698 11,151,864 DUKE 7,485,402 20,450,617 8,023,516 21,742,656 EMORY 6,578,513 17,198,062 7,097,722 18,165,894 FLORIDA 6,199,018 16,196,622 7,531,201 16,840,598 FLORIDA STATE 4,635,904 9,360,165 4,385,202 9,629,236 GEORGETOWN 5,688,257 15,767,477 5,844,383 16,135,696 GEORGIA 6,287,192 15,048,986 6,735,604 16,125,303 GEORGIA TECH 3,248,252 7,014,306 3,502,671 7,736,966 GUELPH 2,391,697 6,731,876 2,277,516 6,647,294 HARVARD 14,979,412 68,417,472 15,835,910 67,271,257 HAWAII 3,521,668 11,856,393 3,041,572 10,046,787 HOUSTON 4,529,065 11,473,203 4,102,070 10,485,426 HOWARD 4,484,996 9,559,412 3,731,366 9,254,816 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 4,460,201 13,388,297 5,248,983 14,085,898 ILLINOIS, URBANA 7,575,449 22,357,366 7,788,533 23,934,783 INDIANA 8,532,640 22,167,698 7,977,911 22,965,123 IOWA 6,158,143 16,189,279 6,345,483 17,423,528 IOWA STATE 4,690,403 12,888,831 5,042,111 13,417,884 JOHNS HOPKINS 7,251,192 18,828,056 7,655,416 19,343,986 KANSAS 5,135,253 13,657,901 5,256,347 14,640,696 KENT STATE 2,464,487 8,697,610 2,864,561 9,712,757 KENTUCKY 4,664,007 13,975,198 4,892,045 15,081,506 LAVAL 3,971,954 11,835,042 4,671,430 12,281,877 LOUISIANA STATE 3,094,789 8,879,203 3,358,379 8,760,005 MCGILL 4,152,638 13,299,751 4,823,580 13,482,730 MCMASTER 3,426,876 8,711,368 3,561,900 8,725,065 MANITOBA 2,583,184 9,081,580 2,575,068 8,927,252 MARYLAND 4,316,250 14,510,075 5,333,350 15,719,663 MASSACHUSETTS 3,686,380 10,664,166 4,108,093 10,769,749 MIT 3,912,593 12,163,704 3,637,605 11,554,114 MIAMI 5,007,505 13,236,373 5,357,772 13,380,873 MICHIGAN 11,425,541 29,959,778 12,572,215 33,101,829 MICHIGAN STATE 5,068,222 13,072,723 5,531,455 15,029,566 MINNESOTA 8,455,740 24,746,720 8,789,784 26,696,016 MISSOURI 4,512,070 11,142,123 5,126,482 12,468,461 NEBRASKA 3,945,746 9,661,672 4,926,550 10,885,813 Table 7.c Expenditures for Library Materials and Total Expenditures Exp Total Exp Total Library Exp Library Exp Materials Materials 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 __________ ____________ __________ ____________ NEW MEXICO 4,237,283 15,484,477 4,563,672 16,820,232 NEW YORK 7,229,620 24,879,960 7,276,221 22,847,502 NORTH CAROLINA 7,591,319 20,420,528 8,614,336 22,030,930 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 4,673,219 11,850,782 5,681,248 13,528,175 NORTHWESTERN 5,884,783 16,908,944 6,471,391 17,272,299 NOTRE DAME 4,554,886 11,767,561 6,018,741 12,936,200 OHIO . . 3,636,202 11,082,226 OHIO STATE 7,334,696 20,369,013 7,900,326 20,733,898 OKLAHOMA 3,933,736 9,068,922 4,118,249 9,062,040 OKLAHOMA STATE 3,777,445 8,722,663 3,488,367 8,344,677 OREGON 4,546,650 10,903,757 4,848,267 11,118,319 PENNSYLVANIA 7,277,987 21,691,144 8,015,076 24,241,866 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 7,803,200 23,907,299 8,045,636 24,039,187 PITTSBURGH 7,241,766 18,817,347 7,510,167 19,366,751 PRINCETON 8,728,953 24,212,986 9,782,213 25,277,041 PURDUE 4,274,152 11,009,634 4,883,768 11,943,093 QUEEN'S 3,579,930 9,053,810 3,880,303 9,770,937 RICE 4,562,526 9,120,875 4,710,551 8,778,724 ROCHESTER 4,002,265 9,911,140 4,153,212 10,161,137 RUTGERS 6,900,379 23,728,039 7,199,786 24,494,063 SASKATCHEWAN 3,394,727 7,646,012 4,168,626 8,771,183 SOUTH CAROLINA 3,953,978 12,500,862 4,701,778 13,455,071 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 6,539,453 19,723,715 6,958,495 20,560,601 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 3,976,174 9,944,444 4,784,989 10,557,991 STANFORD 12,783,018 39,616,529 13,587,712 42,424,434 SUNY-ALBANY 3,363,262 8,290,971 3,175,138 8,227,613 SUNY-BUFFALO 4,795,011 13,297,920 4,653,346 13,583,223 SUNY-STONY BROOK 3,826,375 10,211,269 3,901,705 10,140,289 SYRACUSE 3,535,957 10,789,575 3,541,454 10,157,983 TEMPLE 3,963,746 11,006,688 4,709,398 11,586,124 TENNESSEE 4,910,710 12,763,084 4,975,353 12,627,672 TEXAS 6,763,054 22,358,324 7,128,615 22,808,245 TEXAS A&M 5,172,791 15,003,095 6,162,606 16,414,550 TORONTO 9,716,781 29,328,934 10,063,511 30,587,234 TULANE 4,114,610 9,448,539 4,343,554 9,559,005 UTAH 5,515,472 13,845,233 5,625,839 14,977,554 VANDERBILT 4,932,979 13,171,893 5,273,836 14,287,980 VIRGINIA 7,664,609 19,055,013 7,667,486 19,893,696 VPI & SU 5,152,375 10,712,160 5,188,268 10,981,470 WASHINGTON 9,264,239 25,765,220 9,128,097 24,650,961 WASHINGTON STATE 3,250,286 9,133,102 3,579,743 9,568,501 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 5,557,566 15,233,483 6,348,160 16,324,638 WATERLOO 3,208,803 8,432,742 3,352,852 8,867,830 WAYNE STATE 4,715,203 13,091,792 4,954,820 13,900,575 WESTERN ONTARIO 4,223,301 10,983,203 4,391,205 12,002,400 WISCONSIN 8,122,557 26,720,142 8,040,673 28,003,243 YALE 11,911,000 36,723,000 13,353,000 37,949,600 YORK 3,731,393 11,204,921 3,843,924 14,350,322 Mean 5,581,640 15,842,490 5,869,737 16,410,576 StdDev 2,289,206 8,541,030 2,439,803 8,702,370 Table 8.a Binding Expenditures as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Binding Binding in the Expend. Expend. Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 _______ _______ __________ 1 LAVAL .69% .14% -.55% 2 ALBERTA .48% .62% .13% 3 RICE .50% .63% .13% 4 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS .71% .63% -.07% 5 CORNELL .94% .68% -.26% 6 JOHNS HOPKINS .76% .70% -.06% 7 WISCONSIN .94% .70% -.24% 8 WATERLOO 1.02% .71% -.32% 9 SASKATCHEWAN .91% .73% -.18% 10 BRITISH COLUMBIA .85% .75% -.10% 11 OHIO . .79% . 12 TEXAS .95% .80% -.15% 13 SUNY-STONY BROOK 1.15% .83% -.32% 14 SYRACUSE .83% .84% .01% 15 TEXAS A&M .78% .88% .10% 16 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 1.00% .88% -.12% 17 WAYNE STATE .99% .88% -.11% 18 HOWARD 1.20% .88% -.32% 19 WASHINGTON 1.29% .91% -.38% 20 PURDUE 1.08% .92% -.16% 21 ROCHESTER 1.14% .92% -.22% 22 TULANE 1.33% .93% -.40% 23 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 1.19% .94% -.25% 24 CINCINNATI .99% .94% -.05% 25 TORONTO .90% .94% .05% 26 SUNY-ALBANY .95% .97% .02% 27 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 1.24% .99% -.25% 28 KENTUCKY .80% 1.00% .20% 29 NOTRE DAME .99% 1.01% .02% 30 WASHINGTON STATE 1.04% 1.01% -.03% 31 MICHIGAN 1.09% 1.01% -.08% 32 MIAMI 1.17% 1.01% -.16% 33 HOUSTON .71% 1.02% .31% 34 RUTGERS .98% 1.03% .04% 35 TENNESSEE 1.02% 1.03% .01% 36 ARIZONA STATE 1.13% 1.03% -.11% 37 EMORY .99% 1.03% .04% 38 DELAWARE 1.09% 1.03% -.06% 39 MCMASTER 1.07% 1.04% -.03% 40 MISSOURI .88% 1.04% .16% 41 YORK 1.34% 1.05% -.29% 42 NEW MEXICO 1.03% 1.07% .04% 43 OKLAHOMA 1.16% 1.07% -.09% 44 NORTHWESTERN 1.00% 1.07% .07% 45 SUNY-BUFFALO 1.19% 1.10% -.09% 46 IOWA 1.08% 1.10% .02% 47 QUEEN'S 1.51% 1.12% -.39% 48 GUELPH 1.06% 1.13% .07% 49 LOUISIANA STATE .21% 1.13% .91% 50 DUKE 1.15% 1.13% -.02% 51 MANITOBA 1.33% 1.14% -.19% 52 GEORGIA TECH 1.07% 1.14% .06% 53 MASSACHUSETTS 1.26% 1.14% -.12% 54 WESTERN ONTARIO 1.18% 1.17% -.01% 55 MARYLAND 1.30% 1.18% -.11% 56 OHIO STATE 1.31% 1.19% -.12% 57 YALE 1.18% 1.19% .01% 58 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1.11% 1.21% .10% 59 IOWA STATE 1.32% 1.21% -.11% 60 NORTH CAROLINA 1.37% 1.22% -.16% 61 PENNSYLVANIA 1.36% 1.23% -.13% Table 8.a Binding Expenditures as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Binding Binding in the Expend. Expend. Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 _______ _______ __________ 62 COLORADO 1.53% 1.23% -.29% 63 AUBURN 1.28% 1.24% -.04% 64 OREGON 1.30% 1.27% -.03% 65 OKLAHOMA STATE .97% 1.28% .31% 66 KENT STATE .98% 1.32% .33% 67 UTAH 1.95% 1.33% -.62% 68 KANSAS 1.27% 1.34% .07% 69 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2.03% 1.35% -.68% 70 FLORIDA 1.13% 1.35% .22% 71 VANDERBILT 1.26% 1.37% .11% 72 GEORGETOWN 1.24% 1.37% .13% 73 TEMPLE 1.33% 1.37% .04% 74 ILLINOIS, URBANA .94% 1.37% .43% 75 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 1.28% 1.40% .12% 76 SOUTH CAROLINA 1.36% 1.40% .04% 77 STANFORD 1.32% 1.40% .09% 78 INDIANA 1.28% 1.41% .14% 79 ARIZONA 1.49% 1.41% -.07% 80 HARVARD 1.44% 1.42% -.03% 81 MCGILL 1.35% 1.45% .10% 82 BRIGHAM YOUNG 1.37% 1.49% .12% 83 NEBRASKA 1.43% 1.52% .09% 84 MINNESOTA 1.92% 1.54% -.38% 85 BOSTON 1.44% 1.55% .12% 86 BROWN 1.60% 1.58% -.03% 87 MIT 1.59% 1.58% .00% 88 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 1.59% 1.59% .00% 89 VPI & SU 1.52% 1.59% .07% 90 VIRGINIA 1.19% 1.62% .43% 91 GEORGIA 1.85% 1.63% -.22% 92 PITTSBURGH 1.74% 1.66% -.08% 93 COLORADO STATE 1.71% 1.68% -.04% 94 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 1.73% 1.69% -.04% 95 HAWAII 2.02% 1.73% -.29% 96 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 1.78% 1.74% -.04% 97 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 1.51% 1.83% .32% 98 MICHIGAN STATE 2.03% 1.87% -.15% 99 CHICAGO 1.98% 1.88% -.10% 100 DARTMOUTH 1.37% 1.89% .52% 101 CONNECTICUT 1.75% 1.93% .18% 102 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 1.90% 1.98% .08% 103 PRINCETON 2.08% 2.12% .04% 104 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 2.19% 2.22% .03% 105 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2.19% 2.23% .03% 106 FLORIDA STATE 2.34% 2.28% -.06% 107 COLUMBIA 2.26% 2.46% .20% 108 ALABAMA 1.26% 2.77% 1.51% 109 NEW YORK 1.72% 2.80% 1.07% Mean 1.28% 1.27% .00% StdDev .40% .45% .29% Table 8.b Binding Expenditures as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Difference in Percentage Percent Percent Difference Binding Binding in the Expend. Expend. Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 _______ _______ __________ . OHIO . .79% . 1 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2.03% 1.35% -.68% 2 UTAH 1.95% 1.33% -.62% 3 LAVAL .69% .14% -.55% 4 TULANE 1.33% .93% -.40% 5 QUEEN'S 1.51% 1.12% -.39% 6 WASHINGTON 1.29% .91% -.38% 7 MINNESOTA 1.92% 1.54% -.38% 8 SUNY-STONY BROOK 1.15% .83% -.32% 9 HOWARD 1.20% .88% -.32% 10 WATERLOO 1.02% .71% -.32% 11 COLORADO 1.53% 1.23% -.29% 12 HAWAII 2.02% 1.73% -.29% 13 YORK 1.34% 1.05% -.29% 14 CORNELL .94% .68% -.26% 15 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 1.19% .94% -.25% 16 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 1.24% .99% -.25% 17 WISCONSIN .94% .70% -.24% 18 ROCHESTER 1.14% .92% -.22% 19 GEORGIA 1.85% 1.63% -.22% 20 MANITOBA 1.33% 1.14% -.19% 21 SASKATCHEWAN .91% .73% -.18% 22 PURDUE 1.08% .92% -.16% 23 NORTH CAROLINA 1.37% 1.22% -.16% 24 MIAMI 1.17% 1.01% -.16% 25 MICHIGAN STATE 2.03% 1.87% -.15% 26 TEXAS .95% .80% -.15% 27 PENNSYLVANIA 1.36% 1.23% -.13% 28 OHIO STATE 1.31% 1.19% -.12% 29 MASSACHUSETTS 1.26% 1.14% -.12% 30 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 1.00% .88% -.12% 31 MARYLAND 1.30% 1.18% -.11% 32 IOWA STATE 1.32% 1.21% -.11% 33 ARIZONA STATE 1.13% 1.03% -.11% 34 WAYNE STATE .99% .88% -.11% 35 BRITISH COLUMBIA .85% .75% -.10% 36 CHICAGO 1.98% 1.88% -.10% 37 SUNY-BUFFALO 1.19% 1.10% -.09% 38 OKLAHOMA 1.16% 1.07% -.09% 39 PITTSBURGH 1.74% 1.66% -.08% 40 MICHIGAN 1.09% 1.01% -.08% 41 ARIZONA 1.49% 1.41% -.07% 42 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS .71% .63% -.07% 43 JOHNS HOPKINS .76% .70% -.06% 44 FLORIDA STATE 2.34% 2.28% -.06% 45 DELAWARE 1.09% 1.03% -.06% 46 CINCINNATI .99% .94% -.05% 47 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 1.78% 1.74% -.04% 48 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 1.73% 1.69% -.04% 49 AUBURN 1.28% 1.24% -.04% 50 COLORADO STATE 1.71% 1.68% -.04% 51 MCMASTER 1.07% 1.04% -.03% 52 BROWN 1.60% 1.58% -.03% 53 WASHINGTON STATE 1.04% 1.01% -.03% 54 HARVARD 1.44% 1.42% -.03% 55 OREGON 1.30% 1.27% -.03% 56 DUKE 1.15% 1.13% -.02% 57 WESTERN ONTARIO 1.18% 1.17% -.01% 58 MIT 1.59% 1.58% .00% 59 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 1.59% 1.59% .00% 60 TENNESSEE 1.02% 1.03% .01% Table 8.b Binding Expenditures as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Difference in Percentage Percent Percent Difference Binding Binding in the Expend. Expend. Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 _______ _______ __________ 61 SYRACUSE .83% .84% .01% 62 YALE 1.18% 1.19% .01% 63 IOWA 1.08% 1.10% .02% 64 NOTRE DAME .99% 1.01% .02% 65 SUNY-ALBANY .95% .97% .02% 66 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2.19% 2.23% .03% 67 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 2.19% 2.22% .03% 68 TEMPLE 1.33% 1.37% .04% 69 PRINCETON 2.08% 2.12% .04% 70 SOUTH CAROLINA 1.36% 1.40% .04% 71 NEW MEXICO 1.03% 1.07% .04% 72 RUTGERS .98% 1.03% .04% 73 EMORY .99% 1.03% .04% 74 TORONTO .90% .94% .05% 75 GEORGIA TECH 1.07% 1.14% .06% 76 KANSAS 1.27% 1.34% .07% 77 GUELPH 1.06% 1.13% .07% 78 VPI & SU 1.52% 1.59% .07% 79 NORTHWESTERN 1.00% 1.07% .07% 80 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 1.90% 1.98% .08% 81 NEBRASKA 1.43% 1.52% .09% 82 STANFORD 1.32% 1.40% .09% 83 MCGILL 1.35% 1.45% .10% 84 TEXAS A&M .78% .88% .10% 85 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1.11% 1.21% .10% 86 VANDERBILT 1.26% 1.37% .11% 87 BOSTON 1.44% 1.55% .12% 88 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 1.28% 1.40% .12% 89 BRIGHAM YOUNG 1.37% 1.49% .12% 90 GEORGETOWN 1.24% 1.37% .13% 91 ALBERTA .48% .62% .13% 92 RICE .50% .63% .13% 93 INDIANA 1.28% 1.41% .14% 94 MISSOURI .88% 1.04% .16% 95 CONNECTICUT 1.75% 1.93% .18% 96 KENTUCKY .80% 1.00% .20% 97 COLUMBIA 2.26% 2.46% .20% 98 FLORIDA 1.13% 1.35% .22% 99 OKLAHOMA STATE .97% 1.28% .31% 100 HOUSTON .71% 1.02% .31% 101 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 1.51% 1.83% .32% 102 KENT STATE .98% 1.32% .33% 103 ILLINOIS, URBANA .94% 1.37% .43% 104 VIRGINIA 1.19% 1.62% .43% 105 DARTMOUTH 1.37% 1.89% .52% 106 LOUISIANA STATE .21% 1.13% .91% 107 NEW YORK 1.72% 2.80% 1.07% 108 ALABAMA 1.26% 2.77% 1.51% Mean 1.28% 1.27% .00% StdDev .40% .45% .29% Table 8.c Binding Expenditures and Total Ependitures Expenditures Total Expenditures Total for Binding Expenditures for Binding Expenditures 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ALABAMA 123,128 9,757,358 236,696 8,539,134 ALBERTA 85,905 17,761,796 108,709 17,622,878 ARIZONA 262,389 17,637,809 265,011 18,752,887 ARIZONA STATE 198,206 17,488,050 196,790 19,155,280 AUBURN 108,554 8,485,071 102,571 8,272,354 BOSTON 161,466 11,232,608 191,674 12,338,206 BRIGHAM YOUNG 176,900 12,944,597 193,559 12,985,681 BRITISH COLUMBIA 162,939 19,194,791 149,486 20,052,667 BROWN 208,791 13,029,954 209,730 13,314,756 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 750,059 34,171,985 764,589 34,293,434 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 243,125 16,092,917 295,450 16,155,660 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 176,319 13,787,954 193,724 13,870,378 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 558,942 35,165,206 593,182 37,384,937 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 175,213 8,013,599 184,375 8,300,639 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 298,327 16,721,016 311,480 17,865,595 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 245,081 12,096,080 168,037 12,492,592 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 114,940 9,270,672 97,030 9,822,453 CHICAGO 376,015 19,023,479 393,118 20,906,976 CINCINNATI 130,345 13,125,605 128,518 13,616,852 COLORADO 246,094 16,116,253 192,130 15,576,781 COLORADO STATE 145,000 8,473,249 160,000 9,546,112 COLUMBIA 639,664 28,257,080 712,758 28,917,183 CONNECTICUT 263,857 15,115,080 302,060 15,682,284 CORNELL 250,909 26,584,624 188,776 27,603,034 DARTMOUTH 148,355 10,834,685 208,201 10,991,740 DELAWARE 115,404 10,587,563 115,404 11,151,864 DUKE 235,028 20,450,617 246,362 21,742,656 EMORY 169,925 17,198,062 187,291 18,165,894 FLORIDA 182,921 16,196,622 227,975 16,840,598 FLORIDA STATE 218,961 9,360,165 219,425 9,629,236 GEORGETOWN 195,119 15,767,477 220,494 16,135,696 GEORGIA 278,715 15,048,986 263,516 16,125,303 GEORGIA TECH 75,260 7,014,306 87,937 7,736,966 GUELPH 71,385 6,731,876 74,842 6,647,294 HARVARD 987,126 68,417,472 952,411 67,271,257 HAWAII 239,592 11,856,393 173,552 10,046,787 HOUSTON 81,103 11,473,203 106,917 10,485,426 HOWARD 115,137 9,559,412 81,794 9,254,816 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 159,532 13,388,297 132,339 14,085,898 ILLINOIS, URBANA 210,975 22,357,366 327,705 23,934,783 INDIANA 282,661 22,167,698 324,296 22,965,123 IOWA 175,563 16,189,279 191,621 17,423,528 IOWA STATE 170,399 12,888,831 162,895 13,417,884 JOHNS HOPKINS 143,596 18,828,056 135,535 19,343,986 KANSAS 173,918 13,657,901 195,963 14,640,696 KENT STATE 85,418 8,697,610 127,770 9,712,757 KENTUCKY 112,252 13,975,198 151,199 15,081,506 LAVAL 81,240 11,835,042 17,153 12,281,877 LOUISIANA STATE 19,076 8,879,203 98,973 8,760,005 MCGILL 179,848 13,299,751 195,416 13,482,730 MCMASTER 93,206 8,711,368 90,912 8,725,065 MANITOBA 120,713 9,081,580 101,376 8,927,252 MARYLAND 188,232 14,510,075 186,195 15,719,663 MASSACHUSETTS 134,867 10,664,166 123,006 10,769,749 MIT 193,061 12,163,704 182,938 11,554,114 MIAMI 154,996 13,236,373 135,803 13,380,873 MICHIGAN 326,268 29,959,778 335,466 33,101,829 MICHIGAN STATE 264,848 13,072,723 281,710 15,029,566 MINNESOTA 474,857 24,746,720 411,360 26,696,016 MISSOURI 97,975 11,142,123 130,184 12,468,461 NEBRASKA 138,540 9,661,672 165,388 10,885,813 Table 8.c Binding Expenditures and Total Ependitures Expenditures Total Expenditures Total for Binding Expenditures for Binding Expenditures 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ NEW MEXICO 159,416 15,484,477 179,925 16,820,232 NEW YORK 428,884 24,879,960 638,931 22,847,502 NORTH CAROLINA 280,531 20,420,528 267,894 22,030,930 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 118,425 11,850,782 118,981 13,528,175 NORTHWESTERN 168,993 16,908,944 185,313 17,272,299 NOTRE DAME 116,933 11,767,561 130,697 12,936,200 OHIO . . 87,043 11,082,226 OHIO STATE 267,063 20,369,013 246,311 20,733,898 OKLAHOMA 104,906 9,068,922 97,004 9,062,040 OKLAHOMA STATE 84,897 8,722,663 106,888 8,344,677 OREGON 141,355 10,903,757 141,299 11,118,319 PENNSYLVANIA 295,542 21,691,144 297,781 24,241,866 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 454,799 23,907,299 476,401 24,039,187 PITTSBURGH 327,300 18,817,347 321,010 19,366,751 PRINCETON 503,151 24,212,986 534,987 25,277,041 PURDUE 118,807 11,009,634 109,597 11,943,093 QUEEN'S 136,967 9,053,810 109,594 9,770,937 RICE 45,193 9,120,875 55,300 8,778,724 ROCHESTER 113,205 9,911,140 93,865 10,161,137 RUTGERS 233,306 23,728,039 251,279 24,494,063 SASKATCHEWAN 69,764 7,646,012 64,197 8,771,183 SOUTH CAROLINA 170,322 12,500,862 188,556 13,455,071 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 219,195 19,723,715 249,427 20,560,601 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 171,705 9,944,444 178,037 10,557,991 STANFORD 521,284 39,616,529 594,828 42,424,434 SUNY-ALBANY 78,617 8,290,971 79,848 8,227,613 SUNY-BUFFALO 158,485 13,297,920 149,123 13,583,223 SUNY-STONY BROOK 117,633 10,211,269 84,000 10,140,289 SYRACUSE 89,779 10,789,575 85,504 10,157,983 TEMPLE 146,558 11,006,688 158,508 11,586,124 TENNESSEE 129,968 12,763,084 129,584 12,627,672 TEXAS 212,301 22,358,324 183,034 22,808,245 TEXAS A&M 116,834 15,003,095 144,086 16,414,550 TORONTO 263,381 29,328,934 288,923 30,587,234 TULANE 125,331 9,448,539 88,922 9,559,005 UTAH 270,086 13,845,233 198,682 14,977,554 VANDERBILT 165,600 13,171,893 195,037 14,287,980 VIRGINIA 227,115 19,055,013 322,785 19,893,696 VPI & SU 162,711 10,712,160 174,651 10,981,470 WASHINGTON 332,810 25,765,220 224,885 24,650,961 WASHINGTON STATE 95,015 9,133,102 96,950 9,568,501 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 107,716 15,233,483 103,555 16,324,638 WATERLOO 86,160 8,432,742 62,548 8,867,830 WAYNE STATE 129,499 13,091,792 122,834 13,900,575 WESTERN ONTARIO 129,105 10,983,203 140,365 12,002,400 WISCONSIN 250,807 26,720,142 196,799 28,003,243 YALE 432,000 36,723,000 451,000 37,949,600 YORK 149,613 11,204,921 150,370 14,350,322 Mean 207,660 15,842,490 213,467 16,410,576 StdDev 145,718 8,541,030 153,872 8,702,370 Table 9.a Salary Expenditures as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Total Total in the Salaries Salaries Percentage Expend. Expend. 1995 1996 1 2 3 ________ ________ __________ 1 RICE 33.98% 34.78% .79% 2 VPI & SU 39.82% 36.54% -3.27% 3 OKLAHOMA STATE 35.23% 37.17% 1.94% 4 MISSOURI 44.92% 39.12% -5.80% 5 HOUSTON 35.47% 39.16% 3.69% 6 OHIO . 39.45% . 7 EMORY 38.80% 39.96% 1.16% 8 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 44.82% 40.30% -4.52% 9 OKLAHOMA 39.74% 40.45% .71% 10 GEORGIA TECH 41.22% 40.45% -.77% 11 TEXAS A&M 41.35% 41.29% -.06% 12 COLORADO STATE 45.41% 41.57% -3.84% 13 JOHNS HOPKINS 41.74% 41.76% .02% 14 NOTRE DAME 44.16% 41.82% -2.34% 15 DUKE 44.72% 42.63% -2.09% 16 COLORADO 39.35% 42.77% 3.42% 17 TULANE 42.23% 43.12% .89% 18 ARIZONA 45.90% 43.19% -2.71% 19 SOUTH CAROLINA 42.80% 43.21% .41% 20 UTAH 43.62% 43.27% -.36% 21 IOWA STATE 42.00% 43.28% 1.28% 22 YORK 55.19% 43.30% -11.90% 23 CHICAGO 46.12% 43.31% -2.82% 24 MIAMI 45.94% 43.32% -2.63% 25 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 46.93% 43.40% -3.53% 26 AUBURN 45.79% 43.71% -2.08% 27 NEBRASKA 47.52% 43.85% -3.67% 28 MICHIGAN 47.15% 43.99% -3.16% 29 FLORIDA STATE 41.40% 43.99% 2.59% 30 VANDERBILT 46.02% 44.14% -1.88% 31 ARIZONA STATE 47.09% 44.56% -2.52% 32 YALE 45.95% 44.73% -1.22% 33 DARTMOUTH 44.89% 44.86% -.03% 34 SASKATCHEWAN 48.73% 44.92% -3.81% 35 OREGON 43.86% 44.95% 1.09% 36 PENNSYLVANIA 47.76% 45.06% -2.70% 37 DELAWARE 46.74% 45.21% -1.53% 38 ROCHESTER 47.25% 45.52% -1.72% 39 VIRGINIA 45.26% 45.62% .36% 40 PURDUE 48.14% 45.65% -2.49% 41 KANSAS 47.56% 45.65% -1.91% 42 BROWN 45.43% 45.74% .31% 43 ALABAMA 38.98% 45.77% 6.79% 44 TEMPLE 52.48% 45.85% -6.63% 45 HOWARD 46.52% 46.10% -.42% 46 GEORGIA 46.09% 46.28% .20% 47 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 46.99% 46.48% -.52% 48 NORTH CAROLINA 49.73% 46.55% -3.18% 49 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 45.83% 46.65% .83% 50 PITTSBURGH 45.48% 47.05% 1.56% 51 TENNESSEE 46.06% 47.17% 1.11% 52 OHIO STATE 47.03% 47.43% .40% 53 MINNESOTA 49.06% 47.44% -1.62% 54 CINCINNATI 47.39% 47.53% .14% 55 IOWA 48.09% 47.60% -.49% 56 WASHINGTON STATE 48.98% 47.71% -1.27% 57 ALBERTA 49.65% 47.73% -1.92% 58 GEORGETOWN 48.14% 47.73% -.40% 59 KENTUCKY 47.82% 47.79% -.02% 60 SYRACUSE 44.69% 47.84% 3.14% 61 INDIANA 48.92% 47.86% -1.07% Table 9.a Salary Expenditures as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Total Total in the Salaries Salaries Percentage Expend. Expend. 1995 1996 1 2 3 ________ ________ __________ 62 MICHIGAN STATE 51.48% 47.89% -3.59% 63 WAYNE STATE 48.57% 47.96% -.61% 64 SUNY-ALBANY 48.58% 48.11% -.47% 65 BOSTON 50.29% 48.26% -2.03% 66 STANFORD 48.86% 48.64% -.22% 67 NORTHWESTERN 48.42% 48.70% .29% 68 CORNELL 50.66% 49.06% -1.60% 69 PRINCETON 49.89% 49.49% -.40% 70 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 50.33% 49.70% -.63% 71 FLORIDA 50.19% 49.81% -.37% 72 BRIGHAM YOUNG 48.25% 49.85% 1.60% 73 MARYLAND 49.15% 49.98% .83% 74 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 49.84% 50.00% .16% 75 LOUISIANA STATE 50.73% 50.00% -.74% 76 WESTERN ONTARIO 53.76% 50.30% -3.46% 77 SUNY-BUFFALO 51.70% 50.33% -1.37% 78 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 50.47% 50.38% -.09% 79 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 50.99% 50.70% -.29% 80 NEW MEXICO 50.94% 51.07% .13% 81 CONNECTICUT 53.01% 51.21% -1.80% 82 QUEEN'S 53.68% 51.43% -2.25% 83 WISCONSIN 52.81% 51.87% -.95% 84 KENT STATE 57.72% 52.02% -5.70% 85 SUNY-STONY BROOK 54.21% 52.07% -2.14% 86 NEW YORK 50.04% 52.11% 2.07% 87 HARVARD 50.04% 52.12% 2.08% 88 MASSACHUSETTS 54.02% 52.21% -1.81% 89 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 46.89% 52.27% 5.38% 90 ILLINOIS, URBANA 52.20% 52.46% .26% 91 BRITISH COLUMBIA 56.12% 52.52% -3.60% 92 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 52.24% 52.74% .50% 93 COLUMBIA 53.37% 52.85% -.53% 94 MCMASTER 53.69% 53.03% -.66% 95 MIT 51.67% 53.39% 1.72% 96 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 53.22% 53.42% .20% 97 GUELPH 54.79% 53.64% -1.15% 98 WASHINGTON 48.63% 53.73% 5.10% 99 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 52.32% 53.96% 1.63% 100 TEXAS 56.45% 54.27% -2.18% 101 WATERLOO 53.56% 54.48% .92% 102 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 55.18% 55.45% .27% 103 LAVAL 60.13% 56.51% -3.63% 104 MCGILL 59.41% 56.71% -2.69% 105 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 49.47% 57.60% 8.13% 106 HAWAII 57.66% 59.20% 1.54% 107 MANITOBA 60.75% 60.68% -.07% 108 TORONTO 61.40% 61.10% -.29% 109 RUTGERS 63.61% 62.21% -1.40% Mean 48.49% 47.73% -.69% StdDev 5.43% 5.28% 2.61% Table 9.b Salary Expenditures as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Difference in Percentage Percent Percent Difference Total Total in the Salaries Salaries Percentage Expend. Expend. 1995 1996 1 2 3 ________ ________ __________ . OHIO . 39.45% . 1 YORK 55.19% 43.30% -11.90% 2 TEMPLE 52.48% 45.85% -6.63% 3 MISSOURI 44.92% 39.12% -5.80% 4 KENT STATE 57.72% 52.02% -5.70% 5 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 44.82% 40.30% -4.52% 6 COLORADO STATE 45.41% 41.57% -3.84% 7 SASKATCHEWAN 48.73% 44.92% -3.81% 8 NEBRASKA 47.52% 43.85% -3.67% 9 LAVAL 60.13% 56.51% -3.63% 10 BRITISH COLUMBIA 56.12% 52.52% -3.60% 11 MICHIGAN STATE 51.48% 47.89% -3.59% 12 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 46.93% 43.40% -3.53% 13 WESTERN ONTARIO 53.76% 50.30% -3.46% 14 VPI & SU 39.82% 36.54% -3.27% 15 NORTH CAROLINA 49.73% 46.55% -3.18% 16 MICHIGAN 47.15% 43.99% -3.16% 17 CHICAGO 46.12% 43.31% -2.82% 18 ARIZONA 45.90% 43.19% -2.71% 19 PENNSYLVANIA 47.76% 45.06% -2.70% 20 MCGILL 59.41% 56.71% -2.69% 21 MIAMI 45.94% 43.32% -2.63% 22 ARIZONA STATE 47.09% 44.56% -2.52% 23 PURDUE 48.14% 45.65% -2.49% 24 NOTRE DAME 44.16% 41.82% -2.34% 25 QUEEN'S 53.68% 51.43% -2.25% 26 TEXAS 56.45% 54.27% -2.18% 27 SUNY-STONY BROOK 54.21% 52.07% -2.14% 28 DUKE 44.72% 42.63% -2.09% 29 AUBURN 45.79% 43.71% -2.08% 30 BOSTON 50.29% 48.26% -2.03% 31 ALBERTA 49.65% 47.73% -1.92% 32 KANSAS 47.56% 45.65% -1.91% 33 VANDERBILT 46.02% 44.14% -1.88% 34 MASSACHUSETTS 54.02% 52.21% -1.81% 35 CONNECTICUT 53.01% 51.21% -1.80% 36 ROCHESTER 47.25% 45.52% -1.72% 37 MINNESOTA 49.06% 47.44% -1.62% 38 CORNELL 50.66% 49.06% -1.60% 39 DELAWARE 46.74% 45.21% -1.53% 40 RUTGERS 63.61% 62.21% -1.40% 41 SUNY-BUFFALO 51.70% 50.33% -1.37% 42 WASHINGTON STATE 48.98% 47.71% -1.27% 43 YALE 45.95% 44.73% -1.22% 44 GUELPH 54.79% 53.64% -1.15% 45 INDIANA 48.92% 47.86% -1.07% 46 WISCONSIN 52.81% 51.87% -.95% 47 GEORGIA TECH 41.22% 40.45% -.77% 48 LOUISIANA STATE 50.73% 50.00% -.74% 49 MCMASTER 53.69% 53.03% -.66% 50 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 50.33% 49.70% -.63% 51 WAYNE STATE 48.57% 47.96% -.61% 52 COLUMBIA 53.37% 52.85% -.53% 53 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 46.99% 46.48% -.52% 54 IOWA 48.09% 47.60% -.49% 55 SUNY-ALBANY 48.58% 48.11% -.47% 56 HOWARD 46.52% 46.10% -.42% 57 GEORGETOWN 48.14% 47.73% -.40% 58 PRINCETON 49.89% 49.49% -.40% 59 FLORIDA 50.19% 49.81% -.37% Table 9.b Salary Expenditures as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Difference in Percentage Percent Percent Difference Total Total in the Salaries Salaries Percentage Expend. Expend. 1995 1996 1 2 3 ________ ________ __________ 60 UTAH 43.62% 43.27% -.36% 61 TORONTO 61.40% 61.10% -.29% 62 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 50.99% 50.70% -.29% 63 STANFORD 48.86% 48.64% -.22% 64 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 50.47% 50.38% -.09% 65 MANITOBA 60.75% 60.68% -.07% 66 TEXAS A&M 41.35% 41.29% -.06% 67 DARTMOUTH 44.89% 44.86% -.03% 68 KENTUCKY 47.82% 47.79% -.02% 69 JOHNS HOPKINS 41.74% 41.76% .02% 70 NEW MEXICO 50.94% 51.07% .13% 71 CINCINNATI 47.39% 47.53% .14% 72 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 49.84% 50.00% .16% 73 GEORGIA 46.09% 46.28% .20% 74 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 53.22% 53.42% .20% 75 ILLINOIS, URBANA 52.20% 52.46% .26% 76 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 55.18% 55.45% .27% 77 NORTHWESTERN 48.42% 48.70% .29% 78 BROWN 45.43% 45.74% .31% 79 VIRGINIA 45.26% 45.62% .36% 80 OHIO STATE 47.03% 47.43% .40% 81 SOUTH CAROLINA 42.80% 43.21% .41% 82 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 52.24% 52.74% .50% 83 OKLAHOMA 39.74% 40.45% .71% 84 RICE 33.98% 34.78% .79% 85 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 45.83% 46.65% .83% 86 MARYLAND 49.15% 49.98% .83% 87 TULANE 42.23% 43.12% .89% 88 WATERLOO 53.56% 54.48% .92% 89 OREGON 43.86% 44.95% 1.09% 90 TENNESSEE 46.06% 47.17% 1.11% 91 EMORY 38.80% 39.96% 1.16% 92 IOWA STATE 42.00% 43.28% 1.28% 93 HAWAII 57.66% 59.20% 1.54% 94 PITTSBURGH 45.48% 47.05% 1.56% 95 BRIGHAM YOUNG 48.25% 49.85% 1.60% 96 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 52.32% 53.96% 1.63% 97 MIT 51.67% 53.39% 1.72% 98 OKLAHOMA STATE 35.23% 37.17% 1.94% 99 NEW YORK 50.04% 52.11% 2.07% 100 HARVARD 50.04% 52.12% 2.08% 101 FLORIDA STATE 41.40% 43.99% 2.59% 102 SYRACUSE 44.69% 47.84% 3.14% 103 COLORADO 39.35% 42.77% 3.42% 104 HOUSTON 35.47% 39.16% 3.69% 105 WASHINGTON 48.63% 53.73% 5.10% 106 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 46.89% 52.27% 5.38% 107 ALABAMA 38.98% 45.77% 6.79% 108 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 49.47% 57.60% 8.13% Mean 48.49% 47.73% -.69% StdDev 5.43% 5.28% 2.61% Table 9.c Expenditures for Salaries and Total Expenditures Total Total Total Total Salaries Expenditures Salaries Expenditures 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 ___________ ____________ ___________ ____________ ALABAMA 3,803,486 9,757,358 3,908,622 8,539,134 ALBERTA 8,818,459 17,761,796 8,411,149 17,622,878 ARIZONA 8,095,713 17,637,809 8,098,855 18,752,887 ARIZONA STATE 8,234,472 17,488,050 8,536,261 19,155,280 AUBURN 3,885,038 8,485,071 3,615,846 8,272,354 BOSTON 5,648,800 11,232,608 5,954,040 12,338,206 BRIGHAM YOUNG 6,245,656 12,944,597 6,473,226 12,985,681 BRITISH COLUMBIA 10,772,682 19,194,791 10,531,865 20,052,667 BROWN 5,920,028 13,029,954 6,090,392 13,314,756 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 18,856,258 34,171,985 19,015,914 34,293,434 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 7,546,462 16,092,917 8,445,160 16,155,660 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 7,214,202 13,787,954 7,483,935 13,870,378 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 17,700,118 35,165,206 18,580,160 37,384,937 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 4,085,997 8,013,599 4,208,096 8,300,639 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 8,735,793 16,721,016 9,422,464 17,865,595 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 5,983,841 12,096,080 7,196,046 12,492,592 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 4,248,361 9,270,672 4,582,326 9,822,453 CHICAGO 8,774,075 19,023,479 9,054,158 20,906,976 CINCINNATI 6,220,446 13,125,605 6,472,406 13,616,852 COLORADO 6,340,965 16,116,253 6,661,418 15,576,781 COLORADO STATE 3,847,849 8,473,249 3,968,345 9,546,112 COLUMBIA 15,082,147 28,257,080 15,282,540 28,917,183 CONNECTICUT 8,012,109 15,115,080 8,030,796 15,682,284 CORNELL 13,467,765 26,584,624 13,541,675 27,603,034 DARTMOUTH 4,863,296 10,834,685 4,930,757 10,991,740 DELAWARE 4,948,961 10,587,563 5,042,223 11,151,864 DUKE 9,145,877 20,450,617 9,268,438 21,742,656 EMORY 6,673,223 17,198,062 7,258,805 18,165,894 FLORIDA 8,128,968 16,196,622 8,389,078 16,840,598 FLORIDA STATE 3,875,442 9,360,165 4,236,026 9,629,236 GEORGETOWN 7,590,059 15,767,477 7,702,209 16,135,696 GEORGIA 6,935,398 15,048,986 7,463,307 16,125,303 GEORGIA TECH 2,891,490 7,014,306 3,129,805 7,736,966 GUELPH 3,688,319 6,731,876 3,565,665 6,647,294 HARVARD 34,235,575 68,417,472 35,061,457 67,271,257 HAWAII 6,836,347 11,856,393 5,947,996 10,046,787 HOUSTON 4,069,747 11,473,203 4,106,288 10,485,426 HOWARD 4,446,899 9,559,412 4,266,554 9,254,816 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 6,756,986 13,388,297 7,096,363 14,085,898 ILLINOIS, URBANA 11,670,067 22,357,366 12,555,528 23,934,783 INDIANA 10,845,297 22,167,698 10,990,647 22,965,123 IOWA 7,786,113 16,189,279 8,293,572 17,423,528 IOWA STATE 5,412,784 12,888,831 5,807,144 13,417,884 JOHNS HOPKINS 7,858,580 18,828,056 8,077,585 19,343,986 KANSAS 6,496,125 13,657,901 6,684,156 14,640,696 KENT STATE 5,020,200 8,697,610 5,052,235 9,712,757 KENTUCKY 6,682,473 13,975,198 7,208,019 15,081,506 LAVAL 7,116,971 11,835,042 6,939,961 12,281,877 LOUISIANA STATE 4,504,670 8,879,203 4,379,797 8,760,005 MCGILL 7,900,808 13,299,751 7,646,423 13,482,730 MCMASTER 4,676,836 8,711,368 4,626,493 8,725,065 MANITOBA 5,517,033 9,081,580 5,416,716 8,927,252 MARYLAND 7,131,870 14,510,075 7,856,657 15,719,663 MASSACHUSETTS 5,760,629 10,664,166 5,622,623 10,769,749 MIT 6,284,575 12,163,704 6,168,294 11,554,114 MIAMI 6,081,035 13,236,373 5,795,984 13,380,873 MICHIGAN 14,125,147 29,959,778 14,559,917 33,101,829 MICHIGAN STATE 6,729,845 13,072,723 7,198,041 15,029,566 MINNESOTA 12,139,577 24,746,720 12,663,381 26,696,016 MISSOURI 5,005,147 11,142,123 4,877,900 12,468,461 NEBRASKA 4,591,525 9,661,672 4,773,223 10,885,813 Table 9.c Expenditures for Salaries and Total Expenditures Total Total Total Total Salaries Expenditures Salaries Expenditures 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 ___________ ____________ ___________ ____________ NEW MEXICO 7,887,344 15,484,477 8,590,422 16,820,232 NEW YORK 12,449,067 24,879,960 11,905,693 22,847,502 NORTH CAROLINA 10,154,927 20,420,528 10,255,434 22,030,930 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 5,311,106 11,850,782 5,451,693 13,528,175 NORTHWESTERN 8,186,601 16,908,944 8,411,838 17,272,299 NOTRE DAME 5,196,227 11,767,561 5,409,632 12,936,200 OHIO . . 4,371,898 11,082,226 OHIO STATE 9,579,031 20,369,013 9,834,452 20,733,898 OKLAHOMA 3,604,082 9,068,922 3,665,655 9,062,040 OKLAHOMA STATE 3,073,124 8,722,663 3,101,427 8,344,677 OREGON 4,782,259 10,903,757 4,997,499 11,118,319 PENNSYLVANIA 10,360,634 21,691,144 10,923,785 24,241,866 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 12,723,790 23,907,299 12,841,710 24,039,187 PITTSBURGH 8,558,637 18,817,347 9,111,379 19,366,751 PRINCETON 12,080,731 24,212,986 12,510,638 25,277,041 PURDUE 5,300,563 11,009,634 5,452,317 11,943,093 QUEEN'S 4,860,156 9,053,810 5,025,636 9,770,937 RICE 3,099,412 9,120,875 3,052,807 8,778,724 ROCHESTER 4,682,785 9,911,140 4,625,745 10,161,137 RUTGERS 15,092,732 23,728,039 15,236,585 24,494,063 SASKATCHEWAN 3,725,908 7,646,012 3,940,440 8,771,183 SOUTH CAROLINA 5,350,478 12,500,862 5,814,317 13,455,071 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 9,830,076 19,723,715 10,279,648 20,560,601 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 4,673,378 9,944,444 4,906,976 10,557,991 STANFORD 19,355,450 39,616,529 20,633,693 42,424,434 SUNY-ALBANY 4,027,806 8,290,971 3,958,061 8,227,613 SUNY-BUFFALO 6,874,774 13,297,920 6,836,033 13,583,223 SUNY-STONY BROOK 5,535,131 10,211,269 5,280,147 10,140,289 SYRACUSE 4,821,976 10,789,575 4,859,128 10,157,983 TEMPLE 5,776,179 11,006,688 5,312,273 11,586,124 TENNESSEE 5,878,390 12,763,084 5,955,991 12,627,672 TEXAS 12,621,076 22,358,324 12,377,812 22,808,245 TEXAS A&M 6,203,720 15,003,095 6,777,685 16,414,550 TORONTO 18,006,514 29,328,934 18,689,138 30,587,234 TULANE 3,990,355 9,448,539 4,121,871 9,559,005 UTAH 6,039,979 13,845,233 6,480,272 14,977,554 VANDERBILT 6,062,156 13,171,893 6,306,699 14,287,980 VIRGINIA 8,623,597 19,055,013 9,075,391 19,893,696 VPI & SU 4,265,182 10,712,160 4,012,769 10,981,470 WASHINGTON 12,529,653 25,765,220 13,245,347 24,650,961 WASHINGTON STATE 4,473,626 9,133,102 4,565,284 9,568,501 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 7,148,763 15,233,483 7,084,422 16,324,638 WATERLOO 4,516,775 8,432,742 4,831,153 8,867,830 WAYNE STATE 6,358,451 13,091,792 6,666,623 13,900,575 WESTERN ONTARIO 5,904,349 10,983,203 6,037,334 12,002,400 WISCONSIN 14,111,916 26,720,142 14,524,446 28,003,243 YALE 16,874,900 36,723,000 16,974,000 37,949,600 YORK 6,184,393 11,204,921 6,213,065 14,350,322 Mean 7,765,859 15,842,490 7,933,589 16,410,576 StdDev 4,488,239 8,541,030 4,613,220 8,702,370 Table 10.a Operating Expenditures as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Operating Exp. Operating Exp in the Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 ______________ _____________ __________ 1 FLORIDA 10.41% 4.11% -6.30% 2 TORONTO 4.58% 5.05% .48% 3 MCMASTER 5.91% 5.11% -.80% 4 LAVAL 5.62% 5.32% -.30% 5 MCGILL 8.02% 6.06% -1.96% 6 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 11.29% 6.52% -4.78% 7 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 14.57% 6.76% -7.81% 8 SASKATCHEWAN 5.96% 6.82% .86% 9 WATERLOO 7.36% 7.01% -.36% 10 RUTGERS 6.33% 7.37% 1.05% 11 COLORADO 18.88% 7.44% -11.44% 12 QUEEN'S 5.27% 7.73% 2.47% 13 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 8.26% 7.93% -.32% 14 FLORIDA STATE 6.73% 8.19% 1.46% 15 WASHINGTON 14.12% 8.33% -5.80% 16 MASSACHUSETTS 10.15% 8.51% -1.64% 17 SUNY-STONY BROOK 7.17% 8.62% 1.45% 18 HAWAII 10.62% 8.80% -1.82% 19 MANITOBA 9.48% 9.34% -.13% 20 NEBRASKA 10.20% 9.38% -.83% 21 PRINCETON 11.98% 9.69% -2.29% 22 OREGON 13.15% 10.17% -2.97% 23 GEORGIA 10.28% 10.31% .03% 24 TULANE 12.89% 10.51% -2.38% 25 LOUISIANA STATE 14.20% 10.53% -3.66% 26 NOTRE DAME 16.14% 10.65% -5.50% 27 DELAWARE 9.50% 10.86% 1.36% 28 RICE 15.50% 10.94% -4.56% 29 GUELPH 8.62% 10.97% 2.35% 30 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 12.24% 11.13% -1.11% 31 COLUMBIA 12.79% 11.38% -1.41% 32 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 15.02% 11.42% -3.61% 33 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 9.86% 11.51% 1.65% 34 BRITISH COLUMBIA 9.66% 11.80% 2.14% 35 WESTERN ONTARIO 6.61% 11.94% 5.33% 36 TEMPLE 10.18% 12.13% 1.96% 37 ALBERTA 9.89% 12.16% 2.27% 38 SUNY-ALBANY 9.91% 12.33% 2.43% 39 CINCINNATI 12.21% 12.37% .16% 40 TENNESSEE 14.45% 12.41% -2.04% 41 PITTSBURGH 14.29% 12.52% -1.78% 42 PURDUE 11.95% 12.54% .58% 43 ROCHESTER 11.23% 12.68% 1.45% 44 HOWARD 5.36% 12.70% 7.34% 45 NORTHWESTERN 15.78% 12.76% -3.02% 46 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 15.65% 12.96% -2.69% 47 OKLAHOMA 15.73% 13.03% -2.69% 48 BRIGHAM YOUNG 14.13% 13.04% -1.09% 49 NORTH CAROLINA 11.72% 13.13% 1.41% 50 GEORGIA TECH 11.40% 13.14% 1.74% 51 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 12.22% 13.20% .99% 52 NEW YORK 19.18% 13.25% -5.93% 53 OHIO STATE 15.65% 13.28% -2.38% 54 MICHIGAN STATE 7.72% 13.43% 5.70% 55 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 13.48% 13.51% .02% 56 AUBURN 12.89% 13.54% .65% 57 MIT 14.58% 13.55% -1.03% 58 ILLINOIS, URBANA 12.98% 13.63% .66% 59 TEXAS 12.35% 13.67% 1.32% 60 DARTMOUTH 16.76% 13.79% -2.96% 61 WASHINGTON STATE 14.39% 13.86% -.53% Table 10.a Operating Expenditures as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Percentage in 1996 Percent Percent Difference Operating Exp. Operating Exp in the Percentage 1995 1996 1 2 3 ______________ _____________ __________ 62 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 17.02% 13.90% -3.12% 63 VIRGINIA 13.33% 14.22% .89% 64 SUNY-BUFFALO 11.05% 14.32% 3.27% 65 ALABAMA 11.44% 14.47% 3.03% 66 COLORADO STATE 7.58% 14.54% 6.96% 67 VPI & SU 10.57% 14.62% 4.06% 68 GEORGETOWN 14.55% 14.68% .13% 69 IOWA 12.78% 14.88% 2.10% 70 MARYLAND 19.81% 14.91% -4.90% 71 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 15.89% 14.95% -.95% 72 WAYNE STATE 14.43% 15.51% 1.09% 73 MIAMI 15.06% 15.63% .57% 74 INDIANA 11.31% 15.99% 4.68% 75 BOSTON 14.24% 16.02% 1.77% 76 SYRACUSE 21.70% 16.46% -5.25% 77 CONNECTICUT 13.86% 16.49% 2.63% 78 ARIZONA 14.21% 16.56% 2.35% 79 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 14.75% 16.83% 2.08% 80 MICHIGAN 13.63% 17.02% 3.39% 81 CORNELL 14.69% 17.07% 2.38% 82 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 15.88% 17.08% 1.20% 83 KANSAS 13.56% 17.10% 3.54% 84 KENT STATE 12.96% 17.18% 4.21% 85 VANDERBILT 15.27% 17.58% 2.32% 86 CHICAGO 14.37% 17.72% 3.35% 87 UTAH 14.59% 17.85% 3.26% 88 IOWA STATE 20.29% 17.93% -2.36% 89 STANFORD 17.56% 17.93% .37% 90 JOHNS HOPKINS 18.99% 17.97% -1.02% 91 ARIZONA STATE 13.46% 18.01% 4.55% 92 MINNESOTA 14.86% 18.10% 3.24% 93 WISCONSIN 15.85% 18.72% 2.87% 94 MISSOURI 13.70% 18.72% 5.01% 95 KENTUCKY 18.01% 18.77% .76% 96 YALE 20.44% 18.90% -1.54% 97 DUKE 17.53% 19.34% 1.81% 98 OKLAHOMA STATE 20.49% 19.75% -.74% 99 EMORY 21.96% 19.94% -2.02% 100 TEXAS A&M 23.39% 20.29% -3.11% 101 SOUTH CAROLINA 24.21% 20.44% -3.77% 102 PENNSYLVANIA 17.32% 20.65% 3.33% 103 HOUSTON 24.35% 20.70% -3.65% 104 BROWN 19.93% 20.72% .78% 105 NEW MEXICO 20.67% 20.73% .06% 106 HARVARD 26.62% 22.92% -3.70% 107 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 21.09% 23.30% 2.20% 108 OHIO . 26.95% . 109 YORK 10.17% 28.87% 18.70% Mean 13.56% 13.85% .17% StdDev 4.54% 4.67% 3.64% Table 10.b Operating Expenditures as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Difference in the Percentage Percent Percent Difference Operating Operating Expend. Expend. 1995 1996 1 2 3 _________ _________ __________ . OHIO . 26.95% . 1 COLORADO 18.88% 7.44% -11.44% 2 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 14.57% 6.76% -7.81% 3 FLORIDA 10.41% 4.11% -6.30% 4 NEW YORK 19.18% 13.25% -5.93% 5 WASHINGTON 14.12% 8.33% -5.80% 6 NOTRE DAME 16.14% 10.65% -5.50% 7 SYRACUSE 21.70% 16.46% -5.25% 8 MARYLAND 19.81% 14.91% -4.90% 9 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 11.29% 6.52% -4.78% 10 RICE 15.50% 10.94% -4.56% 11 SOUTH CAROLINA 24.21% 20.44% -3.77% 12 HARVARD 26.62% 22.92% -3.70% 13 LOUISIANA STATE 14.20% 10.53% -3.66% 14 HOUSTON 24.35% 20.70% -3.65% 15 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 15.02% 11.42% -3.61% 16 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 17.02% 13.90% -3.12% 17 TEXAS A&M 23.39% 20.29% -3.11% 18 NORTHWESTERN 15.78% 12.76% -3.02% 19 OREGON 13.15% 10.17% -2.97% 20 DARTMOUTH 16.76% 13.79% -2.96% 21 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 15.65% 12.96% -2.69% 22 OKLAHOMA 15.73% 13.03% -2.69% 23 TULANE 12.89% 10.51% -2.38% 24 OHIO STATE 15.65% 13.28% -2.38% 25 IOWA STATE 20.29% 17.93% -2.36% 26 PRINCETON 11.98% 9.69% -2.29% 27 TENNESSEE 14.45% 12.41% -2.04% 28 EMORY 21.96% 19.94% -2.02% 29 MCGILL 8.02% 6.06% -1.96% 30 HAWAII 10.62% 8.80% -1.82% 31 PITTSBURGH 14.29% 12.52% -1.78% 32 MASSACHUSETTS 10.15% 8.51% -1.64% 33 YALE 20.44% 18.90% -1.54% 34 COLUMBIA 12.79% 11.38% -1.41% 35 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 12.24% 11.13% -1.11% 36 BRIGHAM YOUNG 14.13% 13.04% -1.09% 37 MIT 14.58% 13.55% -1.03% 38 JOHNS HOPKINS 18.99% 17.97% -1.02% 39 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 15.89% 14.95% -.95% 40 NEBRASKA 10.20% 9.38% -.83% 41 MCMASTER 5.91% 5.11% -.80% 42 OKLAHOMA STATE 20.49% 19.75% -.74% 43 WASHINGTON STATE 14.39% 13.86% -.53% 44 WATERLOO 7.36% 7.01% -.36% 45 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 8.26% 7.93% -.32% 46 LAVAL 5.62% 5.32% -.30% 47 MANITOBA 9.48% 9.34% -.13% 48 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 13.48% 13.51% .02% 49 GEORGIA 10.28% 10.31% .03% 50 NEW MEXICO 20.67% 20.73% .06% 51 GEORGETOWN 14.55% 14.68% .13% 52 CINCINNATI 12.21% 12.37% .16% 53 STANFORD 17.56% 17.93% .37% 54 TORONTO 4.58% 5.05% .48% 55 MIAMI 15.06% 15.63% .57% 56 PURDUE 11.95% 12.54% .58% 57 AUBURN 12.89% 13.54% .65% 58 ILLINOIS, URBANA 12.98% 13.63% .66% 59 KENTUCKY 18.01% 18.77% .76% 60 BROWN 19.93% 20.72% .78% Table 10.b Operating Expenditures as a Percent of Total Expenditures sorted by Difference in the Percentage Percent Percent Difference Operating Operating Expend. Expend. 1995 1996 1 2 3 _________ _________ __________ 61 SASKATCHEWAN 5.96% 6.82% .86% 62 VIRGINIA 13.33% 14.22% .89% 63 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 12.22% 13.20% .99% 64 RUTGERS 6.33% 7.37% 1.05% 65 WAYNE STATE 14.43% 15.51% 1.09% 66 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 15.88% 17.08% 1.20% 67 TEXAS 12.35% 13.67% 1.32% 68 DELAWARE 9.50% 10.86% 1.36% 69 NORTH CAROLINA 11.72% 13.13% 1.41% 70 ROCHESTER 11.23% 12.68% 1.45% 71 SUNY-STONY BROOK 7.17% 8.62% 1.45% 72 FLORIDA STATE 6.73% 8.19% 1.46% 73 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 9.86% 11.51% 1.65% 74 GEORGIA TECH 11.40% 13.14% 1.74% 75 BOSTON 14.24% 16.02% 1.77% 76 DUKE 17.53% 19.34% 1.81% 77 TEMPLE 10.18% 12.13% 1.96% 78 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 14.75% 16.83% 2.08% 79 IOWA 12.78% 14.88% 2.10% 80 BRITISH COLUMBIA 9.66% 11.80% 2.14% 81 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 21.09% 23.30% 2.20% 82 ALBERTA 9.89% 12.16% 2.27% 83 VANDERBILT 15.27% 17.58% 2.32% 84 ARIZONA 14.21% 16.56% 2.35% 85 GUELPH 8.62% 10.97% 2.35% 86 CORNELL 14.69% 17.07% 2.38% 87 SUNY-ALBANY 9.91% 12.33% 2.43% 88 QUEEN'S 5.27% 7.73% 2.47% 89 CONNECTICUT 13.86% 16.49% 2.63% 90 WISCONSIN 15.85% 18.72% 2.87% 91 ALABAMA 11.44% 14.47% 3.03% 92 MINNESOTA 14.86% 18.10% 3.24% 93 UTAH 14.59% 17.85% 3.26% 94 SUNY-BUFFALO 11.05% 14.32% 3.27% 95 PENNSYLVANIA 17.32% 20.65% 3.33% 96 CHICAGO 14.37% 17.72% 3.35% 97 MICHIGAN 13.63% 17.02% 3.39% 98 KANSAS 13.56% 17.10% 3.54% 99 VPI & SU 10.57% 14.62% 4.06% 100 KENT STATE 12.96% 17.18% 4.21% 101 ARIZONA STATE 13.46% 18.01% 4.55% 102 INDIANA 11.31% 15.99% 4.68% 103 MISSOURI 13.70% 18.72% 5.01% 104 WESTERN ONTARIO 6.61% 11.94% 5.33% 105 MICHIGAN STATE 7.72% 13.43% 5.70% 106 COLORADO STATE 7.58% 14.54% 6.96% 107 HOWARD 5.36% 12.70% 7.34% 108 YORK 10.17% 28.87% 18.70% Mean 13.56% 13.85% .17% StdDev 4.54% 4.67% 3.64% Table 10.c Operating Expenditures and Total Expenditures Operating Total Operating Total Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ALABAMA 1,116,360 9,757,358 1,235,313 8,539,134 ALBERTA 1,757,255 17,761,796 2,143,093 17,622,878 ARIZONA 2,506,429 17,637,809 3,104,861 18,752,887 ARIZONA STATE 2,353,257 17,488,050 3,450,124 19,155,280 AUBURN 1,093,759 8,485,071 1,119,812 8,272,354 BOSTON 1,599,718 11,232,608 1,976,105 12,338,206 BRIGHAM YOUNG 1,829,679 12,944,597 1,693,546 12,985,681 BRITISH COLUMBIA 1,854,568 19,194,791 2,366,921 20,052,667 BROWN 2,597,513 13,029,954 2,758,496 13,314,756 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 4,174,257 34,171,985 4,527,273 34,293,434 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 2,344,016 16,092,917 1,091,604 16,155,660 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 2,157,743 13,787,954 1,797,199 13,870,378 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 7,417,584 35,165,206 8,709,495 37,384,937 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 661,617 8,013,599 658,342 8,300,639 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2,254,462 16,721,016 2,413,160 17,865,595 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2,058,717 12,096,080 1,736,729 12,492,592 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 913,975 9,270,672 1,130,371 9,822,453 CHICAGO 2,734,213 19,023,479 3,704,724 20,906,976 CINCINNATI 1,602,822 13,125,605 1,684,045 13,616,852 COLORADO 3,043,067 16,116,253 1,158,968 15,576,781 COLORADO STATE 642,350 8,473,249 1,388,244 9,546,112 COLUMBIA 3,613,446 28,257,080 3,291,050 28,917,183 CONNECTICUT 2,094,475 15,115,080 2,586,089 15,682,284 CORNELL 3,905,671 26,584,624 4,712,754 27,603,034 DARTMOUTH 1,815,387 10,834,685 1,516,101 10,991,740 DELAWARE 1,005,602 10,587,563 1,210,539 11,151,864 DUKE 3,584,310 20,450,617 4,204,340 21,742,656 EMORY 3,776,401 17,198,062 3,622,076 18,165,894 FLORIDA 1,685,715 16,196,622 692,344 16,840,598 FLORIDA STATE 629,858 9,360,165 788,583 9,629,236 GEORGETOWN 2,294,042 15,767,477 2,368,610 16,135,696 GEORGIA 1,547,681 15,048,986 1,662,876 16,125,303 GEORGIA TECH 799,304 7,014,306 1,016,553 7,736,966 GUELPH 580,475 6,731,876 729,271 6,647,294 HARVARD 18,215,359 68,417,472 15,421,479 67,271,257 HAWAII 1,258,786 11,856,393 883,667 10,046,787 HOUSTON 2,793,288 11,473,203 2,170,151 10,485,426 HOWARD 512,380 9,559,412 1,175,102 9,254,816 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 2,011,578 13,388,297 1,608,213 14,085,898 ILLINOIS, URBANA 2,900,875 22,357,366 3,263,017 23,934,783 INDIANA 2,507,100 22,167,698 3,672,269 22,965,123 IOWA 2,069,460 16,189,279 2,592,852 17,423,528 IOWA STATE 2,615,245 12,888,831 2,405,734 13,417,884 JOHNS HOPKINS 3,574,688 18,828,056 3,475,450 19,343,986 KANSAS 1,852,605 13,657,901 2,504,230 14,640,696 KENT STATE 1,127,505 8,697,610 1,668,191 9,712,757 KENTUCKY 2,516,466 13,975,198 2,830,243 15,081,506 LAVAL 664,877 11,835,042 653,332 12,281,877 LOUISIANA STATE 1,260,668 8,879,203 922,856 8,760,005 MCGILL 1,066,457 13,299,751 817,311 13,482,730 MCMASTER 514,450 8,711,368 445,760 8,725,065 MANITOBA 860,651 9,081,580 834,092 8,927,252 MARYLAND 2,873,723 14,510,075 2,343,461 15,719,663 MASSACHUSETTS 1,082,290 10,664,166 916,027 10,769,749 MIT 1,773,475 12,163,704 1,565,277 11,554,114 MIAMI 1,992,837 13,236,373 2,091,314 13,380,873 MICHIGAN 4,082,822 29,959,778 5,634,231 33,101,829 MICHIGAN STATE 1,009,808 13,072,723 2,018,360 15,029,566 MINNESOTA 3,676,546 24,746,720 4,831,491 26,696,016 MISSOURI 1,526,931 11,142,123 2,333,895 12,468,461 NEBRASKA 985,861 9,661,672 1,020,652 10,885,813 Table 10.c Operating Expenditures and Total Expenditures Operating Total Operating Total Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ NEW MEXICO 3,200,434 15,484,477 3,486,213 16,820,232 NEW YORK 4,772,389 24,879,960 3,026,657 22,847,502 NORTH CAROLINA 2,393,751 20,420,528 2,893,266 22,030,930 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 1,748,032 11,850,782 2,276,253 13,528,175 NORTHWESTERN 2,668,567 16,908,944 2,203,757 17,272,299 NOTRE DAME 1,899,515 11,767,561 1,377,130 12,936,200 OHIO . . 2,987,083 11,082,226 OHIO STATE 3,188,223 20,369,013 2,752,809 20,733,898 OKLAHOMA 1,426,198 9,068,922 1,181,132 9,062,040 OKLAHOMA STATE 1,787,197 8,722,663 1,647,995 8,344,677 OREGON 1,433,493 10,903,757 1,131,254 11,118,319 PENNSYLVANIA 3,756,981 21,691,144 5,005,224 24,241,866 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 2,925,510 23,907,299 2,675,440 24,039,187 PITTSBURGH 2,689,644 18,817,347 2,424,195 19,366,751 PRINCETON 2,900,151 24,212,986 2,449,203 25,277,041 PURDUE 1,316,112 11,009,634 1,497,411 11,943,093 QUEEN'S 476,757 9,053,810 755,404 9,770,937 RICE 1,413,744 9,120,875 960,066 8,778,724 ROCHESTER 1,112,885 9,911,140 1,288,315 10,161,137 RUTGERS 1,501,622 23,728,039 1,806,413 24,494,063 SASKATCHEWAN 455,612 7,646,012 597,921 8,771,183 SOUTH CAROLINA 3,026,084 12,500,862 2,750,420 13,455,071 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 3,134,991 19,723,715 3,073,031 20,560,601 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 1,123,187 9,944,444 687,989 10,557,991 STANFORD 6,956,777 39,616,529 7,608,201 42,424,434 SUNY-ALBANY 821,286 8,290,971 1,014,566 8,227,613 SUNY-BUFFALO 1,469,650 13,297,920 1,944,721 13,583,223 SUNY-STONY BROOK 732,130 10,211,269 874,437 10,140,289 SYRACUSE 2,341,863 10,789,575 1,671,897 10,157,983 TEMPLE 1,120,205 11,006,688 1,405,945 11,586,124 TENNESSEE 1,844,016 12,763,084 1,566,744 12,627,672 TEXAS 2,761,893 22,358,324 3,118,784 22,808,245 TEXAS A&M 3,509,750 15,003,095 3,330,173 16,414,550 TORONTO 1,342,257 29,328,934 1,545,661 30,587,234 TULANE 1,218,243 9,448,539 1,004,658 9,559,005 UTAH 2,019,696 13,845,233 2,672,761 14,977,554 VANDERBILT 2,011,158 13,171,893 2,512,408 14,287,980 VIRGINIA 2,539,692 19,055,013 2,828,034 19,893,696 VPI & SU 1,131,892 10,712,160 1,605,782 10,981,470 WASHINGTON 3,638,518 25,765,220 2,052,632 24,650,961 WASHINGTON STATE 1,314,175 9,133,102 1,326,524 9,568,501 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 2,419,438 15,233,483 2,788,501 16,324,638 WATERLOO 621,006 8,432,742 621,277 8,867,830 WAYNE STATE 1,888,639 13,091,792 2,156,298 13,900,575 WESTERN ONTARIO 726,448 10,983,203 1,433,496 12,002,400 WISCONSIN 4,234,862 26,720,142 5,241,325 28,003,243 YALE 7,505,100 36,723,000 7,171,600 37,949,600 YORK 1,139,522 11,204,921 4,142,962 14,350,322 Mean 2,287,331 15,842,490 2,393,782 16,410,576 StdDev 2,040,969 8,541,030 1,937,549 8,702,370 Table 11.a Unit Price of Monographs sorted by Unit Price for 1996 Unit Unit Price Price Difference Monographs Monographs in the Unit Price 1995 1996 1 2 3 __________ __________ __________ . CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY . . . . CALIFORNIA, DAVIS . . . . COLUMBIA . . . . CORNELL . . . . EMORY . . . . FLORIDA STATE . . . . HARVARD . . . . MICHIGAN . . . . NORTHWESTERN . . . . OHIO . . . . PENNSYLVANIA STATE . . . . PITTSBURGH . . . . PRINCETON . . . . RICE $46.93 . . . STANFORD . . . . UTAH . . . . VANDERBILT . . . . WESTERN ONTARIO $37.69 . . 1 HOWARD $34.79 $24.99 -$9.80 2 HAWAII $31.97 $26.31 -$5.66 3 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO $33.56 $27.70 -$5.85 4 BRITISH COLUMBIA $47.50 $28.88 -$18.62 5 SUNY-BUFFALO $46.76 $28.97 -$17.79 6 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES $33.43 $29.46 -$3.96 7 CONNECTICUT $34.78 $32.04 -$2.74 8 YALE $30.77 $32.51 $1.74 9 YORK $33.41 $33.06 -$.36 10 FLORIDA $36.21 $33.55 -$2.66 11 SUNY-STONY BROOK $46.55 $35.10 -$11.45 12 LAVAL $34.25 $35.26 $1.02 13 GEORGIA $42.89 $35.97 -$6.93 14 BOSTON $36.41 $36.04 -$.37 15 ILLINOIS, URBANA $23.07 $36.58 $13.52 16 ALABAMA $41.05 $37.06 -$4.00 17 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA $39.85 $37.24 -$2.61 18 MASSACHUSETTS $36.77 $37.28 $.52 19 TORONTO $38.53 $37.83 -$.71 20 COLORADO $33.84 $37.98 $4.14 21 OKLAHOMA $44.02 $37.99 -$6.04 22 DARTMOUTH $54.47 $38.99 -$15.48 23 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS $40.49 $39.05 -$1.44 24 NORTH CAROLINA $39.62 $39.13 -$.49 25 ARIZONA STATE $41.60 $39.91 -$1.68 26 HOUSTON $45.32 $39.95 -$5.37 27 SUNY-ALBANY $40.07 $40.20 $.13 28 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE $46.24 $40.26 -$5.98 29 NORTH CAROLINA STATE $39.35 $40.40 $1.04 30 NEW YORK $42.76 $40.84 -$1.93 31 SOUTH CAROLINA $34.79 $40.90 $6.11 32 WISCONSIN $37.22 $41.05 $3.83 33 ARIZONA $41.56 $41.06 -$.50 34 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA $37.75 $41.43 $3.67 35 TEMPLE $46.74 $41.72 -$5.03 36 TENNESSEE $34.46 $42.01 $7.56 37 MIAMI $29.07 $42.42 $13.35 38 KANSAS $45.63 $43.78 -$1.86 39 COLORADO STATE $48.65 $43.89 -$4.76 40 MCMASTER $43.50 $44.28 $.79 41 AUBURN $43.84 $44.65 $.80 42 INDIANA $37.65 $44.91 $7.26 Table 11.a Unit Price of Monographs sorted by Unit Price for 1996 Unit Unit Price Price Difference Monographs Monographs in the Unit Price 1995 1996 1 2 3 __________ __________ __________ 43 SYRACUSE $39.18 $45.26 $6.08 44 PENNSYLVANIA $47.75 $45.49 -$2.26 45 IOWA $48.30 $45.57 -$2.73 46 MIT $50.04 $45.70 -$4.34 47 RUTGERS $49.86 $45.81 -$4.05 48 OHIO STATE $44.98 $46.45 $1.47 49 OREGON $44.42 $46.49 $2.06 50 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO $43.37 $46.66 $3.28 51 VPI & SU $53.03 $46.73 -$6.30 52 NEW MEXICO $37.15 $46.79 $9.63 53 VIRGINIA $37.53 $46.90 $9.37 54 OKLAHOMA STATE $39.89 $47.28 $7.39 55 WASHINGTON STATE $34.77 $47.60 $12.84 56 TEXAS $47.53 $47.68 $.15 57 NEBRASKA $47.52 $47.75 $.23 58 CINCINNATI $60.35 $48.50 -$11.84 59 CASE WESTERN RESERVE $57.42 $48.59 -$8.83 60 QUEEN'S $49.32 $48.65 -$.67 61 BRIGHAM YOUNG $35.81 $48.96 $13.15 62 ROCHESTER $46.79 $49.87 $3.08 63 IOWA STATE $52.94 $49.92 -$3.02 64 MCGILL $46.73 $50.23 $3.49 65 JOHNS HOPKINS $53.87 $50.48 -$3.39 66 NOTRE DAME $57.39 $50.57 -$6.83 67 WATERLOO $55.28 $51.03 -$4.25 68 GUELPH $50.75 $51.42 $.68 69 MARYLAND $47.87 $51.55 $3.68 70 KENTUCKY $44.06 $51.68 $7.62 71 CHICAGO $44.26 $52.92 $8.66 72 MANITOBA $47.34 $53.84 $6.50 73 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS $43.72 $53.98 $10.26 74 GEORGETOWN $49.91 $54.05 $4.14 75 WASHINGTON $67.75 $54.63 -$13.12 76 TULANE $43.72 $55.24 $11.52 77 KENT STATE $61.01 $55.77 -$5.23 78 MICHIGAN STATE $53.71 $55.92 $2.21 79 DUKE $50.43 $56.41 $5.98 80 SASKATCHEWAN $49.66 $56.68 $7.02 81 DELAWARE $60.94 $57.71 -$3.23 82 BROWN $59.28 $58.36 -$.92 83 TEXAS A&M $55.42 $59.91 $4.49 84 PURDUE $45.27 $63.47 $18.20 85 LOUISIANA STATE $55.94 $64.27 $8.33 86 WAYNE STATE $64.98 $65.04 $.06 87 MINNESOTA . $65.41 . 88 GEORGIA TECH $59.91 $66.23 $6.33 89 MISSOURI $47.12 $67.34 $20.22 90 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE $47.56 $67.71 $20.15 91 ALBERTA $79.18 $72.64 -$6.54 Mean $45.07 $45.93 $.58 StdDev $9.23 $10.08 $7.56 Table 11.b Unit price of Monographs sorted by Difference in Unit Prices between 1995 and 1996 Unit Unit Difference Price Price in the for for Unit Monographs Monographs Price for 1995 1996 Monographs 1 2 3 __________ __________ __________ . CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY . . . . CALIFORNIA, DAVIS . . . . COLUMBIA . . . . CORNELL . . . . EMORY . . . . FLORIDA STATE . . . . HARVARD . . . . MICHIGAN . . . . NORTHWESTERN . . . . OHIO . . . . PENNSYLVANIA STATE . . . . PITTSBURGH . . . . PRINCETON . . . . RICE $46.93 . . . STANFORD . . . . UTAH . . . . VANDERBILT . . . . WESTERN ONTARIO $37.69 . . . MINNESOTA . $65.41 . 1 BRITISH COLUMBIA $47.50 $28.88 -$18.62 2 SUNY-BUFFALO $46.76 $28.97 -$17.79 3 DARTMOUTH $54.47 $38.99 -$15.48 4 WASHINGTON $67.75 $54.63 -$13.12 5 CINCINNATI $60.35 $48.50 -$11.84 6 SUNY-STONY BROOK $46.55 $35.10 -$11.45 7 HOWARD $34.79 $24.99 -$9.80 8 CASE WESTERN RESERVE $57.42 $48.59 -$8.83 9 GEORGIA $42.89 $35.97 -$6.93 10 NOTRE DAME $57.39 $50.57 -$6.83 11 ALBERTA $79.18 $72.64 -$6.54 12 VPI & SU $53.03 $46.73 -$6.30 13 OKLAHOMA $44.02 $37.99 -$6.04 14 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE $46.24 $40.26 -$5.98 15 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO $33.56 $27.70 -$5.85 16 HAWAII $31.97 $26.31 -$5.66 17 HOUSTON $45.32 $39.95 -$5.37 18 KENT STATE $61.01 $55.77 -$5.23 19 TEMPLE $46.74 $41.72 -$5.03 20 COLORADO STATE $48.65 $43.89 -$4.76 21 MIT $50.04 $45.70 -$4.34 22 WATERLOO $55.28 $51.03 -$4.25 23 RUTGERS $49.86 $45.81 -$4.05 24 ALABAMA $41.05 $37.06 -$4.00 25 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES $33.43 $29.46 -$3.96 26 JOHNS HOPKINS $53.87 $50.48 -$3.39 27 DELAWARE $60.94 $57.71 -$3.23 28 IOWA STATE $52.94 $49.92 -$3.02 29 CONNECTICUT $34.78 $32.04 -$2.74 30 IOWA $48.30 $45.57 -$2.73 31 FLORIDA $36.21 $33.55 -$2.66 32 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA $39.85 $37.24 -$2.61 33 PENNSYLVANIA $47.75 $45.49 -$2.26 34 NEW YORK $42.76 $40.84 -$1.93 35 KANSAS $45.63 $43.78 -$1.86 36 ARIZONA STATE $41.60 $39.91 -$1.68 37 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS $40.49 $39.05 -$1.44 38 BROWN $59.28 $58.36 -$.92 39 TORONTO $38.53 $37.83 -$.71 40 QUEEN'S $49.32 $48.65 -$.67 41 ARIZONA $41.56 $41.06 -$.50 42 NORTH CAROLINA $39.62 $39.13 -$.49 Table 11.b Unit price of Monographs sorted by Difference in Unit Prices between 1995 and 1996 Unit Unit Difference Price Price in the for for Unit Monographs Monographs Price for 1995 1996 Monographs 1 2 3 __________ __________ __________ 43 BOSTON $36.41 $36.04 -$.37 44 YORK $33.41 $33.06 -$.36 45 WAYNE STATE $64.98 $65.04 $.06 46 SUNY-ALBANY $40.07 $40.20 $.13 47 TEXAS $47.53 $47.68 $.15 48 NEBRASKA $47.52 $47.75 $.23 49 MASSACHUSETTS $36.77 $37.28 $.52 50 GUELPH $50.75 $51.42 $.68 51 MCMASTER $43.50 $44.28 $.79 52 AUBURN $43.84 $44.65 $.80 53 LAVAL $34.25 $35.26 $1.02 54 NORTH CAROLINA STATE $39.35 $40.40 $1.04 55 OHIO STATE $44.98 $46.45 $1.47 56 YALE $30.77 $32.51 $1.74 57 OREGON $44.42 $46.49 $2.06 58 MICHIGAN STATE $53.71 $55.92 $2.21 59 ROCHESTER $46.79 $49.87 $3.08 60 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO $43.37 $46.66 $3.28 61 MCGILL $46.73 $50.23 $3.49 62 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA $37.75 $41.43 $3.67 63 MARYLAND $47.87 $51.55 $3.68 64 WISCONSIN $37.22 $41.05 $3.83 65 GEORGETOWN $49.91 $54.05 $4.14 66 COLORADO $33.84 $37.98 $4.14 67 TEXAS A&M $55.42 $59.91 $4.49 68 DUKE $50.43 $56.41 $5.98 69 SYRACUSE $39.18 $45.26 $6.08 70 SOUTH CAROLINA $34.79 $40.90 $6.11 71 GEORGIA TECH $59.91 $66.23 $6.33 72 MANITOBA $47.34 $53.84 $6.50 73 SASKATCHEWAN $49.66 $56.68 $7.02 74 INDIANA $37.65 $44.91 $7.26 75 OKLAHOMA STATE $39.89 $47.28 $7.39 76 TENNESSEE $34.46 $42.01 $7.56 77 KENTUCKY $44.06 $51.68 $7.62 78 LOUISIANA STATE $55.94 $64.27 $8.33 79 CHICAGO $44.26 $52.92 $8.66 80 VIRGINIA $37.53 $46.90 $9.37 81 NEW MEXICO $37.15 $46.79 $9.63 82 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS $43.72 $53.98 $10.26 83 TULANE $43.72 $55.24 $11.52 84 WASHINGTON STATE $34.77 $47.60 $12.84 85 BRIGHAM YOUNG $35.81 $48.96 $13.15 86 MIAMI $29.07 $42.42 $13.35 87 ILLINOIS, URBANA $23.07 $36.58 $13.52 88 PURDUE $45.27 $63.47 $18.20 89 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE $47.56 $67.71 $20.15 90 MISSOURI $47.12 $67.34 $20.22 Mean $45.07 $45.93 $.58 StdDev $9.23 $10.08 $7.56 Table 11.c Expenditures for Monographs and Number of Monographs Bought Expend. Number of Expend. Number of for Monographs for Monographs Monographs Purchased Monographs Purchased 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 __________ __________ __________ __________ ALABAMA 849,983 20,704 767,082 20,699 ALBERTA 2,098,446 26,502 2,581,632 35,538 ARIZONA 2,271,056 54,651 2,075,566 50,555 ARIZONA STATE 2,524,034 60,679 2,569,212 64,371 AUBURN 1,200,679 27,387 1,063,712 23,826 BOSTON 807,916 22,188 720,008 19,979 BRIGHAM YOUNG 1,629,379 45,497 2,004,248 40,935 BRITISH COLUMBIA 2,603,206 54,805 1,577,302 54,610 BROWN 1,760,573 29,700 1,593,226 27,302 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 4,820,509 . 4,286,731 . CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 2,158,763 . 2,340,876 . CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 930,295 19,560 1,123,578 16,594 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 4,626,820 138,406 4,398,432 149,279 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 1,189,320 25,719 1,176,402 29,221 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2,125,391 63,336 1,720,588 62,104 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 1,046,390 26,261 1,249,570 33,558 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 755,797 13,163 658,107 13,544 CHICAGO 3,130,534 70,728 3,478,010 65,718 CINCINNATI 1,352,611 22,414 1,430,040 29,483 COLORADO 1,375,934 40,657 1,937,682 51,020 COLORADO STATE 1,040,583 21,387 1,116,096 25,428 COLUMBIA 3,642,035 . 3,613,452 . CONNECTICUT 760,150 21,855 660,693 20,623 CORNELL 3,160,831 . 3,144,674 . DARTMOUTH 1,204,213 22,109 1,343,680 34,461 DELAWARE 2,031,148 33,332 1,923,623 33,332 DUKE 2,785,624 55,237 2,774,272 49,181 EMORY 2,600,277 . 2,725,579 . FLORIDA 1,611,199 44,493 1,420,657 42,341 FLORIDA STATE 1,240,301 . 1,113,724 . GEORGETOWN 1,557,584 31,205 1,647,707 30,485 GEORGIA 1,978,176 46,118 2,221,191 61,757 GEORGIA TECH 836,240 13,959 776,973 11,731 GUELPH 781,780 15,406 601,001 11,688 HARVARD 6,812,121 . 6,735,483 . HAWAII 1,169,329 36,573 249,168 9,471 HOUSTON 1,332,179 29,392 1,003,623 25,120 HOWARD 510,994 14,688 478,084 19,130 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 1,179,997 27,206 1,240,417 26,586 ILLINOIS, URBANA 2,816,353 122,100 2,446,576 66,878 INDIANA 2,789,650 74,088 2,537,587 56,500 IOWA 1,947,605 40,322 1,915,660 42,040 IOWA STATE 1,367,578 25,831 1,311,117 26,262 JOHNS HOPKINS 2,210,214 41,027 2,035,885 40,327 KANSAS 1,907,306 41,797 1,724,828 39,402 KENT STATE 740,376 12,136 782,758 14,035 KENTUCKY 758,871 17,223 888,816 17,198 LAVAL 824,828 24,085 901,354 25,560 LOUISIANA STATE 617,998 11,048 852,706 13,268 MCGILL 1,179,924 25,248 1,530,766 30,477 MCMASTER 994,185 22,856 779,400 17,600 MANITOBA 683,180 14,432 696,883 12,944 MARYLAND 1,570,230 32,800 1,922,149 37,288 MASSACHUSETTS 1,102,541 29,987 1,185,661 31,801 MIT 810,847 16,204 769,102 16,830 MIAMI 974,562 33,528 1,043,452 24,600 MICHIGAN 4,027,084 . 4,352,773 . MICHIGAN STATE 1,824,967 33,981 1,740,983 31,136 MINNESOTA 2,400,963 . 2,353,557 35,980 MISSOURI 1,210,802 25,695 1,769,499 26,276 NEBRASKA 836,958 17,614 905,579 18,965 Table 11.c Expenditures for Monographs and Number of Monographs Bought Expend. Number of Expend. Number of for Monographs for Monographs Monographs Purchased Monographs Purchased 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 __________ __________ __________ __________ NEW MEXICO 1,122,473 30,214 1,383,344 29,568 NEW YORK 2,628,655 61,468 2,800,572 68,580 NORTH CAROLINA 2,512,574 63,414 2,487,381 63,560 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 1,343,398 34,138 1,737,901 43,022 NORTHWESTERN 1,749,385 . 1,882,871 . NOTRE DAME 1,684,199 29,345 1,921,252 37,994 OHIO . . 1,050,229 . OHIO STATE 2,289,620 50,902 2,477,200 53,333 OKLAHOMA 772,111 17,539 690,324 18,173 OKLAHOMA STATE 861,151 21,588 686,219 14,513 OREGON 1,424,639 32,070 1,373,363 29,543 PENNSYLVANIA 2,580,008 54,033 2,708,593 59,542 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 2,344,870 . 2,610,151 . PITTSBURGH 2,297,156 . 2,287,475 . PRINCETON 4,076,055 . 4,478,534 . PURDUE 813,049 17,959 956,311 15,066 QUEEN'S 1,030,985 20,904 1,060,851 21,804 RICE 1,605,393 34,211 1,722,081 . ROCHESTER 913,716 19,527 1,053,683 21,128 RUTGERS 1,397,097 28,020 1,639,607 35,788 SASKATCHEWAN 695,299 14,002 972,246 17,153 SOUTH CAROLINA 1,298,460 37,328 1,444,015 35,308 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 2,245,862 59,486 1,972,213 47,608 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 788,497 19,474 706,481 18,091 STANFORD 6,857,985 . 7,336,415 . SUNY-ALBANY 792,524 19,777 795,480 19,789 SUNY-BUFFALO 1,265,703 27,066 1,024,859 35,371 SUNY-STONY BROOK 1,031,795 22,164 699,390 19,925 SYRACUSE 695,490 17,751 685,086 15,138 TEMPLE 1,156,318 24,737 1,132,154 27,139 TENNESSEE 1,364,516 39,602 1,273,088 30,302 TEXAS 2,163,527 45,521 2,265,511 47,512 TEXAS A&M 1,257,768 22,694 1,826,079 30,479 TORONTO 4,474,315 116,113 4,533,608 119,847 TULANE 1,231,673 28,173 1,287,055 23,301 UTAH 2,057,830 . 1,927,772 . VANDERBILT 1,365,575 . 1,314,645 . VIRGINIA 2,472,529 65,884 2,733,676 58,286 VPI & SU 991,350 18,693 1,015,318 21,726 WASHINGTON 2,886,352 42,604 2,197,434 40,227 WASHINGTON STATE 696,997 20,048 821,364 17,255 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1,122,620 25,678 1,315,720 24,375 WATERLOO 1,031,235 18,655 877,793 17,202 WAYNE STATE 1,426,157 21,947 1,305,299 20,069 WESTERN ONTARIO 1,204,775 31,962 1,183,492 . WISCONSIN 2,547,877 68,450 2,407,929 58,660 YALE 3,511,000 114,095 3,544,000 108,999 YORK 1,202,130 35,976 1,177,014 35,603 Mean 1,781,223 35,984 1,786,902 35,341 StdDev 1,165,187 24,025 1,183,191 22,965 Table 12.a Unit Price for Serials sorted by Unit Price in 1996 Unit Unit Difference Price Price in the for for Unit Serials Serials Price for 1995 1996 Serials 1 2 3 _______ _______ __________ . CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY . . . . CALIFORNIA, DAVIS . . . . CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES . . . . CHICAGO . . . . CINCINNATI . . . . CORNELL . . . . DUKE . . . . FLORIDA STATE . . . . GEORGIA . . . . GUELPH $217.30 . . . HARVARD . . . . ILLINOIS, URBANA . . . . MISSOURI . . . . NORTHWESTERN . . . . NOTRE DAME . . . . OHIO . . . . OKLAHOMA STATE $180.38 . . . PENNSYLVANIA . . . . PITTSBURGH . . . . PRINCETON $102.70 . . . RUTGERS . . . . SOUTH CAROLINA . . . . STANFORD . . . . SUNY-ALBANY . . . . WASHINGTON STATE . . . . WATERLOO . . . . YALE . . . . YORK . . . 1 INDIANA $138.77 $136.42 -$2.35 2 NEW YORK $142.18 $139.04 -$3.14 3 WISCONSIN $136.71 $140.49 $3.78 4 VIRGINIA $169.43 $141.74 -$27.69 5 TEXAS $140.38 $146.87 $6.50 6 HAWAII $90.82 $147.71 $56.89 7 GEORGETOWN $143.39 $149.31 $5.93 8 COLUMBIA $139.88 $149.45 $9.58 9 DARTMOUTH $149.01 $157.86 $8.86 10 SYRACUSE $165.03 $160.83 -$4.19 11 MINNESOTA $156.25 $164.68 $8.43 12 HOWARD $226.66 $168.39 -$58.27 13 TULANE . $170.02 . 14 IOWA $162.16 $174.98 $12.82 15 BOSTON $163.50 $176.07 $12.57 16 TORONTO $165.01 $180.38 $15.37 17 ARIZONA $155.66 $181.63 $25.98 18 KANSAS $164.27 $181.74 $17.47 19 SUNY-BUFFALO $164.29 $182.54 $18.25 20 HOUSTON $170.22 $185.10 $14.88 21 ARIZONA STATE $163.68 $185.13 $21.45 22 WASHINGTON $172.24 $189.03 $16.78 23 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA $237.58 $191.49 -$46.09 24 TEXAS A&M $224.62 $191.86 -$32.76 25 OKLAHOMA $174.71 $194.66 $19.95 26 LOUISIANA STATE $207.74 $195.91 -$11.83 27 WAYNE STATE $176.81 $203.56 $26.75 28 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA . $209.02 . 29 MICHIGAN $184.75 $211.15 $26.40 30 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS $198.75 $212.66 $13.90 31 NORTH CAROLINA $179.41 $213.58 $34.17 32 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS $181.83 $213.80 $31.97 33 ALBERTA $242.56 $214.02 -$28.54 Table 12.a Unit Price for Serials sorted by Unit Price in 1996 Unit Unit Difference Price Price in the for for Unit Serials Serials Price for 1995 1996 Serials 1 2 3 _______ _______ __________ 34 FLORIDA $182.66 $215.92 $33.26 35 EMORY $201.50 $216.03 $14.52 36 TENNESSEE $214.42 $218.56 $4.14 37 IOWA STATE $192.20 $218.92 $26.71 38 PENNSYLVANIA STATE $219.04 $219.06 $.02 39 CONNECTICUT $193.39 $219.25 $25.86 40 MARYLAND $173.10 $219.46 $46.36 41 MANITOBA $200.36 $219.55 $19.18 42 OHIO STATE $193.95 $222.89 $28.94 43 COLORADO $223.87 $225.08 $1.21 44 VANDERBILT $200.75 $227.50 $26.75 45 MCGILL $203.79 $229.75 $25.96 46 NEW MEXICO $223.77 $235.58 $11.81 47 ALABAMA $383.54 $238.06 -$145.48 48 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO $187.05 $238.43 $51.38 49 JOHNS HOPKINS $211.68 $243.37 $31.69 50 VPI & SU $240.97 $245.30 $4.33 51 NORTH CAROLINA STATE $322.54 $250.78 -$71.75 52 KENTUCKY $232.61 $251.05 $18.44 53 BROWN $236.86 $251.19 $14.33 54 MASSACHUSETTS $220.35 $251.88 $31.53 55 QUEEN'S $205.94 $253.05 $47.11 56 KENT STATE $209.92 $253.06 $43.14 57 MIAMI $229.94 $254.07 $24.13 58 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE $251.29 $255.05 $3.76 59 OREGON $211.29 $256.76 $45.47 60 BRIGHAM YOUNG $287.01 $259.84 -$27.17 61 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO $203.03 $260.91 $57.88 62 WESTERN ONTARIO $245.83 $275.08 $29.25 63 MICHIGAN STATE $235.67 $277.85 $42.17 64 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE . $278.77 . 65 COLORADO STATE $275.03 $282.28 $7.24 66 UTAH $251.75 $284.97 $33.22 67 MIT $277.71 $291.65 $13.93 68 AUBURN $264.52 $294.18 $29.66 69 CASE WESTERN RESERVE $270.49 $299.22 $28.73 70 NEBRASKA $229.74 $303.91 $74.17 71 DELAWARE $193.50 $304.88 $111.38 72 RICE $267.26 $307.09 $39.83 73 ROCHESTER $300.09 $313.40 $13.31 74 LAVAL $242.94 $317.48 $74.54 75 PURDUE $279.80 $319.05 $39.25 76 TEMPLE $244.44 $323.85 $79.41 77 MCMASTER $241.10 $324.53 $83.43 78 SUNY-STONY BROOK $272.41 $330.67 $58.26 79 BRITISH COLUMBIA $249.83 $343.04 $93.21 80 SASKATCHEWAN $314.44 $355.65 $41.20 81 GEORGIA TECH $365.38 $413.32 $47.94 Mean $210.71 $231.51 $19.58 StdDev $53.54 $58.43 $36.18 Table 12.b Unit Price for Serials sorted by Difference in Unit Price between 1995 and 1996 Unit Unit Difference Price Price in the for for Unit Serials Serials Price for 1995 1996 Serials 1 2 3 _______ _______ __________ . CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY . . . . CALIFORNIA, DAVIS . . . . CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES . . . . CHICAGO . . . . CINCINNATI . . . . CORNELL . . . . DUKE . . . . FLORIDA STATE . . . . GEORGIA . . . . GUELPH $217.30 . . . HARVARD . . . . ILLINOIS, URBANA . . . . MISSOURI . . . . NORTHWESTERN . . . . NOTRE DAME . . . . OHIO . . . . OKLAHOMA STATE $180.38 . . . PENNSYLVANIA . . . . PITTSBURGH . . . . PRINCETON $102.70 . . . RUTGERS . . . . SOUTH CAROLINA . . . . STANFORD . . . . SUNY-ALBANY . . . . WASHINGTON STATE . . . . WATERLOO . . . . YALE . . . . YORK . . . . TULANE . $170.02 . . SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA . $209.02 . . CALIFORNIA, IRVINE . $278.77 . 1 ALABAMA $383.54 $238.06 -$145.48 2 NORTH CAROLINA STATE $322.54 $250.78 -$71.75 3 HOWARD $226.66 $168.39 -$58.27 4 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA $237.58 $191.49 -$46.09 5 TEXAS A&M $224.62 $191.86 -$32.76 6 ALBERTA $242.56 $214.02 -$28.54 7 VIRGINIA $169.43 $141.74 -$27.69 8 BRIGHAM YOUNG $287.01 $259.84 -$27.17 9 LOUISIANA STATE $207.74 $195.91 -$11.83 10 SYRACUSE $165.03 $160.83 -$4.19 11 NEW YORK $142.18 $139.04 -$3.14 12 INDIANA $138.77 $136.42 -$2.35 13 PENNSYLVANIA STATE $219.04 $219.06 $.02 14 COLORADO $223.87 $225.08 $1.21 15 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE $251.29 $255.05 $3.76 16 WISCONSIN $136.71 $140.49 $3.78 17 TENNESSEE $214.42 $218.56 $4.14 18 VPI & SU $240.97 $245.30 $4.33 19 GEORGETOWN $143.39 $149.31 $5.93 20 TEXAS $140.38 $146.87 $6.50 21 COLORADO STATE $275.03 $282.28 $7.24 22 MINNESOTA $156.25 $164.68 $8.43 23 DARTMOUTH $149.01 $157.86 $8.86 24 COLUMBIA $139.88 $149.45 $9.58 25 NEW MEXICO $223.77 $235.58 $11.81 26 BOSTON $163.50 $176.07 $12.57 27 IOWA $162.16 $174.98 $12.82 28 ROCHESTER $300.09 $313.40 $13.31 29 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS $198.75 $212.66 $13.90 30 MIT $277.71 $291.65 $13.93 Table 12.b Unit Price for Serials sorted by Difference in Unit Price between 1995 and 1996 Unit Unit Difference Price Price in the for for Unit Serials Serials Price for 1995 1996 Serials 1 2 3 _______ _______ __________ 31 BROWN $236.86 $251.19 $14.33 32 EMORY $201.50 $216.03 $14.52 33 HOUSTON $170.22 $185.10 $14.88 34 TORONTO $165.01 $180.38 $15.37 35 WASHINGTON $172.24 $189.03 $16.78 36 KANSAS $164.27 $181.74 $17.47 37 SUNY-BUFFALO $164.29 $182.54 $18.25 38 KENTUCKY $232.61 $251.05 $18.44 39 MANITOBA $200.36 $219.55 $19.18 40 OKLAHOMA $174.71 $194.66 $19.95 41 ARIZONA STATE $163.68 $185.13 $21.45 42 MIAMI $229.94 $254.07 $24.13 43 CONNECTICUT $193.39 $219.25 $25.86 44 MCGILL $203.79 $229.75 $25.96 45 ARIZONA $155.66 $181.63 $25.98 46 MICHIGAN $184.75 $211.15 $26.40 47 IOWA STATE $192.20 $218.92 $26.71 48 WAYNE STATE $176.81 $203.56 $26.75 49 VANDERBILT $200.75 $227.50 $26.75 50 CASE WESTERN RESERVE $270.49 $299.22 $28.73 51 OHIO STATE $193.95 $222.89 $28.94 52 WESTERN ONTARIO $245.83 $275.08 $29.25 53 AUBURN $264.52 $294.18 $29.66 54 MASSACHUSETTS $220.35 $251.88 $31.53 55 JOHNS HOPKINS $211.68 $243.37 $31.69 56 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS $181.83 $213.80 $31.97 57 UTAH $251.75 $284.97 $33.22 58 FLORIDA $182.66 $215.92 $33.26 59 NORTH CAROLINA $179.41 $213.58 $34.17 60 PURDUE $279.80 $319.05 $39.25 61 RICE $267.26 $307.09 $39.83 62 SASKATCHEWAN $314.44 $355.65 $41.20 63 MICHIGAN STATE $235.67 $277.85 $42.17 64 KENT STATE $209.92 $253.06 $43.14 65 OREGON $211.29 $256.76 $45.47 66 MARYLAND $173.10 $219.46 $46.36 67 QUEEN'S $205.94 $253.05 $47.11 68 GEORGIA TECH $365.38 $413.32 $47.94 69 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO $187.05 $238.43 $51.38 70 HAWAII $90.82 $147.71 $56.89 71 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO $203.03 $260.91 $57.88 72 SUNY-STONY BROOK $272.41 $330.67 $58.26 73 NEBRASKA $229.74 $303.91 $74.17 74 LAVAL $242.94 $317.48 $74.54 75 TEMPLE $244.44 $323.85 $79.41 76 MCMASTER $241.10 $324.53 $83.43 77 BRITISH COLUMBIA $249.83 $343.04 $93.21 78 DELAWARE $193.50 $304.88 $111.38 Mean $210.71 $231.51 $19.58 StdDev $53.54 $58.43 $36.18 Table 12.c Expenditures for Serials and Number of Paid Subscriptions Expend. Number of Expend. Number of for Serials for Serials Serials Purchased Serials Purchased 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 __________ __________ __________ __________ ALABAMA 3,807,389 9,927 2,334,678 9,807 ALBERTA 4,905,507 20,224 4,188,173 19,569 ARIZONA 3,331,821 21,405 3,938,177 21,682 ARIZONA STATE 3,526,618 21,546 4,029,942 21,768 AUBURN 2,128,030 8,045 2,300,173 7,819 BOSTON 2,841,590 17,380 3,043,404 17,285 BRIGHAM YOUNG 2,707,646 9,434 2,469,518 9,504 BRITISH COLUMBIA 3,801,396 15,216 4,867,009 14,188 BROWN 2,423,049 10,230 2,572,912 10,243 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 5,570,902 . 5,698,927 . CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 3,205,280 . 3,566,732 . CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 2,775,366 . 3,145,945 11,285 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 4,372,088 . 4,570,964 . CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 1,864,535 7,420 1,885,558 7,393 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 3,068,910 16,407 3,672,321 15,402 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2,607,725 10,976 2,142,210 11,187 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 3,190,925 11,797 3,328,195 11,123 CHICAGO 3,953,516 . 4,210,404 . CINCINNATI 3,517,474 . 3,635,683 . COLORADO 4,065,724 18,161 4,129,536 18,347 COLORADO STATE 2,435,688 8,856 2,547,536 9,025 COLUMBIA 5,279,788 37,746 6,017,383 40,263 CONNECTICUT 3,369,797 17,425 3,522,638 16,067 CORNELL 4,741,247 . 4,989,490 . DARTMOUTH 2,499,261 16,773 2,655,370 16,821 DELAWARE 2,486,448 12,850 2,860,075 9,381 DUKE 4,339,966 . 4,873,710 . EMORY 3,397,958 16,863 3,749,567 17,357 FLORIDA 3,433,955 18,800 3,852,794 17,844 FLORIDA STATE 3,133,885 . 3,095,972 . GEORGETOWN 3,504,679 24,442 3,744,791 25,080 GEORGIA 3,566,919 . 3,981,172 . GEORGIA TECH 2,239,764 6,130 2,545,641 6,159 GUELPH 1,597,381 7,351 1,611,864 . HARVARD 6,385,130 . 6,926,565 . HAWAII 2,027,218 22,322 2,622,242 17,753 HOUSTON 2,445,041 14,364 2,653,159 14,334 HOWARD 2,422,586 10,688 2,375,327 14,106 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 3,062,726 15,085 3,955,649 15,161 ILLINOIS, URBANA 4,423,556 . 4,671,760 . INDIANA 3,883,535 27,985 3,795,162 27,820 IOWA 3,128,181 19,291 3,393,307 19,393 IOWA STATE 2,794,658 14,540 3,298,860 15,069 JOHNS HOPKINS 3,305,142 15,614 3,742,248 15,377 KANSAS 3,050,436 18,570 3,250,221 17,884 KENT STATE 1,643,670 7,830 1,957,190 7,734 KENTUCKY 3,279,406 14,098 3,571,754 14,227 LAVAL 3,059,818 12,595 3,416,727 10,762 LOUISIANA STATE 2,462,368 11,853 2,505,673 12,790 MCGILL 2,494,016 12,238 2,674,094 11,639 MCMASTER 2,406,922 9,983 2,741,314 8,447 MANITOBA 1,849,343 9,230 1,827,275 8,323 MARYLAND 2,586,524 14,942 3,154,953 14,376 MASSACHUSETTS 2,344,313 10,639 2,682,027 10,648 MIT 2,506,913 9,027 2,686,360 9,211 MIAMI 3,641,490 15,837 4,023,185 15,835 MICHIGAN 6,643,092 35,958 7,429,048 35,184 MICHIGAN STATE 3,162,737 13,420 3,676,208 13,231 MINNESOTA 5,327,055 34,094 5,532,887 33,598 MISSOURI 3,260,701 . 3,356,983 . NEBRASKA 2,877,078 12,523 3,778,191 12,432 Table 12.c Expenditures for Serials and Number of Paid Subscriptions Expend. Number of Expend. Number of for Serials for Serials Serials Purchased Serials Purchased 1995 1995 1996 1996 1 2 3 4 __________ __________ __________ __________ NEW MEXICO 2,722,655 12,167 2,889,660 12,266 NEW YORK 4,004,430 28,164 3,996,291 28,741 NORTH CAROLINA 3,981,696 22,193 4,633,027 21,692 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 2,848,005 8,830 2,703,947 10,782 NORTHWESTERN 3,528,263 . 3,801,325 . NOTRE DAME 2,352,689 . 2,740,978 . OHIO . . 2,479,478 . OHIO STATE 4,810,664 24,804 5,423,126 24,331 OKLAHOMA 2,910,177 16,657 3,144,795 16,155 OKLAHOMA STATE 2,210,141 12,253 2,695,379 . OREGON 2,595,039 12,282 2,891,599 11,262 PENNSYLVANIA 3,843,116 . 4,273,724 . PENNSYLVANIA STATE 4,793,448 21,884 4,614,866 21,067 PITTSBURGH 4,295,432 . 4,358,926 . PRINCETON 3,101,297 30,199 3,652,629 . PURDUE 3,461,103 12,370 3,927,457 12,310 QUEEN'S 2,529,784 12,284 2,790,118 11,026 RICE 2,376,755 8,893 2,451,168 7,982 ROCHESTER 2,838,264 9,458 2,800,553 8,936 RUTGERS 4,574,152 . 3,984,669 . SASKATCHEWAN 2,683,138 8,533 3,091,624 8,693 SOUTH CAROLINA 2,189,366 . 2,986,011 . SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 3,991,055 . 4,571,562 21,871 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 2,753,284 15,142 3,206,095 14,996 STANFORD 5,925,033 . 6,251,297 . SUNY-ALBANY 1,941,611 . 1,987,666 . SUNY-BUFFALO 2,838,283 17,276 3,021,069 16,550 SUNY-STONY BROOK 2,235,389 8,206 2,686,717 8,125 SYRACUSE 2,419,116 14,659 2,471,841 15,369 TEMPLE 2,741,647 11,216 3,384,928 10,452 TENNESSEE 3,452,756 16,103 3,563,793 16,306 TEXAS 3,848,552 27,416 3,996,248 27,209 TEXAS A&M 3,166,949 14,099 3,264,894 17,017 TORONTO 5,242,466 31,770 5,529,903 30,657 TULANE 2,329,345 . 2,502,336 14,718 UTAH 3,345,540 13,289 3,616,895 12,692 VANDERBILT 3,267,397 16,276 3,607,899 15,859 VIRGINIA 4,003,207 23,628 3,534,894 24,940 VPI & SU 3,087,567 12,813 3,185,667 12,987 WASHINGTON 6,377,887 37,028 6,930,663 36,665 WASHINGTON STATE 2,489,084 . 2,687,409 . WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 3,746,912 18,852 3,882,510 18,257 WATERLOO 1,996,332 . 2,172,314 . WAYNE STATE 2,888,156 16,335 3,304,123 16,232 WESTERN ONTARIO 3,018,526 12,279 3,207,713 11,661 WISCONSIN 4,647,713 33,997 4,695,634 33,424 YALE 4,605,000 . 5,166,000 . YORK 2,052,523 . 2,118,706 . Mean 3,307,656 16,413 3,544,559 16,187 StdDev 1,053,325 7,509 1,120,755 7,373