Table 1.a Percent of Professional Staff from Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1997 Percent Percent Difference Prof. Staff Prof. Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 ___________ ___________ __________ 1 VPI & SU 20.67% 18.23% -2.45% 2 GUELPH 18.11% 18.25% .14% 3 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 20.00% 18.60% -1.40% 4 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 17.97% 18.90% .93% 5 MCMASTER 19.35% 19.02% -.34% 6 UTAH 22.01% 19.24% -2.77% 7 ALBERTA 19.33% 19.30% -.02% 8 COLORADO STATE 20.34% 19.43% -.91% 9 NOTRE DAME 21.59% 19.66% -1.93% 10 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 20.66% 20.96% .30% 11 QUEEN'S 21.67% 21.08% -.59% 12 IOWA STATE 23.11% 21.15% -1.97% 13 CHICAGO 21.56% 21.39% -.17% 14 NEW YORK 30.43% 21.56% -8.87% 15 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 19.88% 21.58% 1.70% 16 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 21.88% 21.77% -.12% 17 BOSTON 24.90% 21.89% -3.02% 18 CORNELL 22.41% 21.95% -.47% 19 WESTERN ONTARIO 19.49% 21.95% 2.46% 20 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 21.14% 22.27% 1.13% 21 MICHIGAN STATE 22.61% 22.38% -.23% 22 TEXAS A&M 23.26% 22.47% -.79% 23 MINNESOTA 23.32% 22.48% -.84% 24 HOUSTON 21.40% 22.49% 1.09% 25 TEXAS 23.54% 22.52% -1.02% 26 YORK 22.17% 22.67% .49% 27 NEW MEXICO 24.51% 22.70% -1.81% 28 WATERLOO 22.22% 22.75% .53% 29 WASHINGTON STATE 23.21% 22.77% -.44% 30 COLORADO 24.41% 22.92% -1.49% 31 MISSOURI 23.98% 23.11% -.87% 32 MCGILL 24.36% 23.36% -1.00% 33 SASKATCHEWAN 24.00% 23.67% -.33% 34 OHIO STATE 24.05% 23.88% -.17% 35 RUTGERS 23.95% 23.89% -.05% 36 FLORIDA STATE 23.33% 23.93% .60% 38 GEORGIA 23.35% 23.94% .59% 38 NEBRASKA 24.07% 23.94% -.13% 39 PURDUE 24.34% 23.95% -.39% 40 OREGON 24.55% 24.55% .00% 41 DELAWARE 24.22% 24.66% .44% 42 TORONTO 25.73% 24.84% -.89% 43 MICHIGAN 22.82% 25.21% 2.39% 44 SUNY-STONY BROOK 23.32% 25.27% 1.96% 45 TENNESSEE 24.62% 25.56% .93% 47 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 24.71% 25.58% .87% 47 MANITOBA 25.89% 25.58% -.31% 48 ARIZONA 25.07% 25.63% .57% 49 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 21.64% 25.64% 4.00% 50 HAWAII 25.60% 25.81% .20% 51 OKLAHOMA 28.18% 26.09% -2.09% 52 PITTSBURGH 25.41% 26.10% .69% 53 BRITISH COLUMBIA 25.94% 26.12% .18% 54 OHIO 28.71% 26.19% -2.52% 55 VANDERBILT 27.18% 26.23% -.95% Table 1.a Percent of Professional Staff from Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1997 Percent Percent Difference Prof. Staff Prof. Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 ___________ ___________ __________ 56 WASHINGTON 27.62% 26.27% -1.34% 57 LAVAL 26.48% 26.58% .10% 58 DARTMOUTH 27.32% 27.17% -.15% 59 ARIZONA STATE 27.42% 27.27% -.15% 60 TULANE 26.50% 27.36% .86% 61 VIRGINIA 26.72% 27.45% .72% 62 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 28.27% 27.70% -.57% 63 LOUISIANA STATE 23.42% 27.70% 4.28% 64 SOUTH CAROLINA 28.40% 27.72% -.69% 65 NORTH CAROLINA 28.37% 28.02% -.35% 66 FLORIDA 27.69% 28.03% .34% 67 MASSACHUSETTS 27.57% 28.04% .47% 68 MIAMI 28.29% 28.05% -.24% 69 CINCINNATI 27.74% 28.21% .47% 70 SUNY-ALBANY 27.49% 28.31% .83% 71 INDIANA 28.90% 28.87% -.03% 72 PENNSYLVANIA 28.23% 29.10% .87% 73 AUBURN 27.68% 29.14% 1.46% 74 MARYLAND 26.90% 29.17% 2.27% 75 HOWARD 30.20% 29.41% -.79% 76 NORTHWESTERN 28.69% 29.43% .74% 77 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 25.98% 29.45% 3.47% 78 KENT STATE 23.66% 29.61% 5.95% 79 SYRACUSE 29.20% 29.66% .46% 80 JOHNS HOPKINS 27.97% 29.90% 1.93% 81 CONNECTICUT 27.92% 29.92% 2.00% 82 EMORY 29.18% 30.10% .92% 83 OKLAHOMA STATE 28.33% 30.22% 1.89% 84 KANSAS 29.73% 30.27% .54% 85 WISCONSIN 28.73% 30.37% 1.65% 86 KENTUCKY 30.12% 30.67% .55% 87 ALABAMA 29.79% 30.69% .90% 88 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 26.98% 30.81% 3.82% 89 ILLINOIS, URBANA 30.13% 30.81% .68% 90 TEXAS TECH . 30.93% . 91 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 30.88% 31.14% .26% 92 IOWA 33.01% 31.15% -1.86% 93 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 30.08% 31.48% 1.40% 94 PRINCETON 31.05% 31.51% .46% 95 WAYNE STATE 30.37% 31.54% 1.17% 96 TEMPLE 31.47% 31.58% .11% 97 DUKE 31.71% 31.88% .17% 98 GEORGETOWN 30.77% 31.97% 1.20% 99 COLUMBIA 31.89% 32.26% .37% 100 STANFORD 31.31% 32.65% 1.34% 101 YALE 33.01% 33.11% .11% 102 BRIGHAM YOUNG 34.35% 33.44% -.91% 103 BROWN 33.47% 34.17% .69% 104 HARVARD 35.91% 35.11% -.80% 105 ROCHESTER 36.67% 36.54% -.13% 106 SUNY-BUFFALO 38.19% 37.93% -.26% 107 MIT 37.73% 38.01% .28% 108 RICE 37.93% 38.84% .91% 109 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 35.83% 40.68% 4.85% 110 GEORGIA TECH 42.74% 43.24% .51% Mean 26.63% 26.89% .23% StdDev 4.71% 5.04% 1.72% Table 1.b Percent of Professional Staff from Total Staff sorted by Difference in the Percentage between 1996 and 1997 Percent Percent Difference Prof. Staff Prof. Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 ___________ ___________ __________ . TEXAS TECH . 30.93% . 1 NEW YORK 30.43% 21.56% -8.87% 2 BOSTON 24.90% 21.89% -3.02% 3 UTAH 22.01% 19.24% -2.77% 4 OHIO 28.71% 26.19% -2.52% 5 VPI & SU 20.67% 18.23% -2.45% 6 OKLAHOMA 28.18% 26.09% -2.09% 7 IOWA STATE 23.11% 21.15% -1.97% 8 NOTRE DAME 21.59% 19.66% -1.93% 9 IOWA 33.01% 31.15% -1.86% 10 NEW MEXICO 24.51% 22.70% -1.81% 11 COLORADO 24.41% 22.92% -1.49% 12 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 20.00% 18.60% -1.40% 13 WASHINGTON 27.62% 26.27% -1.34% 14 TEXAS 23.54% 22.52% -1.02% 15 MCGILL 24.36% 23.36% -1.00% 16 VANDERBILT 27.18% 26.23% -.95% 17 COLORADO STATE 20.34% 19.43% -.91% 18 BRIGHAM YOUNG 34.35% 33.44% -.91% 19 TORONTO 25.73% 24.84% -.89% 20 MISSOURI 23.98% 23.11% -.87% 21 MINNESOTA 23.32% 22.48% -.84% 22 HARVARD 35.91% 35.11% -.80% 23 TEXAS A&M 23.26% 22.47% -.79% 24 HOWARD 30.20% 29.41% -.79% 25 SOUTH CAROLINA 28.40% 27.72% -.69% 26 QUEEN'S 21.67% 21.08% -.59% 27 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 28.27% 27.70% -.57% 28 CORNELL 22.41% 21.95% -.47% 29 WASHINGTON STATE 23.21% 22.77% -.44% 30 PURDUE 24.34% 23.95% -.39% 31 NORTH CAROLINA 28.37% 28.02% -.35% 32 MCMASTER 19.35% 19.02% -.34% 33 SASKATCHEWAN 24.00% 23.67% -.33% 34 MANITOBA 25.89% 25.58% -.31% 35 SUNY-BUFFALO 38.19% 37.93% -.26% 36 MIAMI 28.29% 28.05% -.24% 37 MICHIGAN STATE 22.61% 22.38% -.23% 38 CHICAGO 21.56% 21.39% -.17% 39 OHIO STATE 24.05% 23.88% -.17% 40 ARIZONA STATE 27.42% 27.27% -.15% 41 DARTMOUTH 27.32% 27.17% -.15% 42 NEBRASKA 24.07% 23.94% -.13% 43 ROCHESTER 36.67% 36.54% -.13% 44 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 21.88% 21.77% -.12% 45 RUTGERS 23.95% 23.89% -.05% 46 INDIANA 28.90% 28.87% -.03% 47 ALBERTA 19.33% 19.30% -.02% 48 OREGON 24.55% 24.55% .00% 49 LAVAL 26.48% 26.58% .10% 50 YALE 33.01% 33.11% .11% 51 TEMPLE 31.47% 31.58% .11% 52 GUELPH 18.11% 18.25% .14% 53 DUKE 31.71% 31.88% .17% 54 BRITISH COLUMBIA 25.94% 26.12% .18% Table 1.b Percent of Professional Staff from Total Staff sorted by Difference in the Percentage between 1996 and 1997 Percent Percent Difference Prof. Staff Prof. Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 ___________ ___________ __________ 55 HAWAII 25.60% 25.81% .20% 56 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 30.88% 31.14% .26% 57 MIT 37.73% 38.01% .28% 58 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 20.66% 20.96% .30% 59 FLORIDA 27.69% 28.03% .34% 60 COLUMBIA 31.89% 32.26% .37% 61 DELAWARE 24.22% 24.66% .44% 62 PRINCETON 31.05% 31.51% .46% 63 SYRACUSE 29.20% 29.66% .46% 64 CINCINNATI 27.74% 28.21% .47% 65 MASSACHUSETTS 27.57% 28.04% .47% 66 YORK 22.17% 22.67% .49% 67 GEORGIA TECH 42.74% 43.24% .51% 68 WATERLOO 22.22% 22.75% .53% 69 KANSAS 29.73% 30.27% .54% 70 KENTUCKY 30.12% 30.67% .55% 71 ARIZONA 25.07% 25.63% .57% 72 GEORGIA 23.35% 23.94% .59% 73 FLORIDA STATE 23.33% 23.93% .60% 74 ILLINOIS, URBANA 30.13% 30.81% .68% 75 PITTSBURGH 25.41% 26.10% .69% 76 BROWN 33.47% 34.17% .69% 77 VIRGINIA 26.72% 27.45% .72% 78 NORTHWESTERN 28.69% 29.43% .74% 79 SUNY-ALBANY 27.49% 28.31% .83% 80 TULANE 26.50% 27.36% .86% 81 PENNSYLVANIA 28.23% 29.10% .87% 82 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 24.71% 25.58% .87% 83 ALABAMA 29.79% 30.69% .90% 84 RICE 37.93% 38.84% .91% 85 EMORY 29.18% 30.10% .92% 86 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 17.97% 18.90% .93% 87 TENNESSEE 24.62% 25.56% .93% 88 HOUSTON 21.40% 22.49% 1.09% 89 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 21.14% 22.27% 1.13% 90 WAYNE STATE 30.37% 31.54% 1.17% 91 GEORGETOWN 30.77% 31.97% 1.20% 92 STANFORD 31.31% 32.65% 1.34% 93 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 30.08% 31.48% 1.40% 94 AUBURN 27.68% 29.14% 1.46% 95 WISCONSIN 28.73% 30.37% 1.65% 96 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 19.88% 21.58% 1.70% 97 OKLAHOMA STATE 28.33% 30.22% 1.89% 98 JOHNS HOPKINS 27.97% 29.90% 1.93% 99 SUNY-STONY BROOK 23.32% 25.27% 1.96% 100 CONNECTICUT 27.92% 29.92% 2.00% 101 MARYLAND 26.90% 29.17% 2.27% 102 MICHIGAN 22.82% 25.21% 2.39% 103 WESTERN ONTARIO 19.49% 21.95% 2.46% 104 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 25.98% 29.45% 3.47% 105 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 26.98% 30.81% 3.82% 106 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 21.64% 25.64% 4.00% 107 LOUISIANA STATE 23.42% 27.70% 4.28% 108 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 35.83% 40.68% 4.85% 109 KENT STATE 23.66% 29.61% 5.95% Mean 26.63% 26.89% .23% StdDev 4.71% 5.04% 1.72% Table 1.c Professional Staff and Total Staff Professional Total Professional Total Staff Staff Staff Staff 1996 1996 1997 1997 1 2 3 4 ____________ _______ ____________ _______ ALABAMA 56 188 58 189 ALBERTA 63 326 61 316 ARIZONA 92 367 91 355 ARIZONA STATE 99 361 99 363 AUBURN 49 177 51 175 BOSTON 63 253 65 297 BRIGHAM YOUNG 101 294 101 302 BRITISH COLUMBIA 104 401 105 402 BROWN 80 239 82 240 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 177 656 191 620 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 53 295 55 291 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 52 246 53 238 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 128 644 134 621 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 43 174 44 172 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 72 329 69 317 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 50 250 40 215 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 67 187 72 177 CHICAGO 72 334 71 332 CINCINNATI 76 274 77 273 COLORADO 62 254 55 240 COLORADO STATE 36 177 34 175 COLUMBIA 177 555 171 530 CONNECTICUT 67 240 73 244 CORNELL 130 580 124 565 DARTMOUTH 50 183 50 184 DELAWARE 54 223 54 219 DUKE 104 328 117 367 EMORY 82 281 90 299 FLORIDA 108 390 111 396 FLORIDA STATE 56 240 56 234 GEORGETOWN 80 260 86 269 GEORGIA 85 364 85 355 GEORGIA TECH 50 117 48 111 GUELPH 23 127 23 126 HARVARD 404 1,125 415 1,182 HAWAII 53 207 56 217 HOUSTON 46 215 47 209 HOWARD 45 149 50 170 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 80 283 77 278 ILLINOIS, URBANA 160 531 171 555 INDIANA 137 474 138 478 IOWA 102 309 95 305 IOWA STATE 52 225 48 227 JOHNS HOPKINS 87 311 93 311 KANSAS 88 296 89 294 KENT STATE 53 224 69 233 KENTUCKY 100 332 100 326 LAVAL 67 253 63 237 LOUISIANA STATE 52 222 59 213 MCGILL 76 312 64 274 MCMASTER 36 186 31 163 MANITOBA 51 197 55 215 MARYLAND 85 316 91 312 MASSACHUSETTS 51 185 53 189 MIT 83 220 84 221 Table 1.c Professional Staff and Total Staff Professional Total Professional Total Staff Staff Staff Staff 1996 1996 1997 1997 1 2 3 4 ____________ _______ ____________ _______ MIAMI 71 251 69 246 MICHIGAN 149 653 151 599 MICHIGAN STATE 64 283 62 277 MINNESOTA 104 446 98 436 MISSOURI 59 246 55 238 NEBRASKA 52 216 51 213 NEW MEXICO 88 359 79 348 NEW YORK 143 470 94 436 NORTH CAROLINA 120 423 123 439 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 66 254 91 309 NORTHWESTERN 107 373 108 367 NOTRE DAME 49 227 46 234 OHIO 60 209 55 210 OHIO STATE 101 420 101 423 OKLAHOMA 51 181 48 184 OKLAHOMA STATE 51 180 55 182 OREGON 54 220 54 220 PENNSYLVANIA 107 379 110 378 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 116 536 140 546 PITTSBURGH 108 425 101 387 PRINCETON 118 380 121 384 PURDUE 65 267 63 263 QUEEN'S 44 203 39 185 RICE 44 116 47 121 ROCHESTER 77 210 76 208 RUTGERS 108 451 108 452 SASKATCHEWAN 42 175 40 169 SOUTH CAROLINA 73 257 74 267 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 108 359 102 324 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 50 242 48 229 STANFORD 175 559 191 585 SUNY-ALBANY 47 171 47 166 SUNY-BUFFALO 97 254 99 261 SUNY-STONY BROOK 45 193 46 182 SYRACUSE 73 250 78 263 TEMPLE 73 232 72 228 TENNESSEE 65 264 69 270 TEXAS 141 599 134 595 TEXAS A&M 80 344 82 365 TEXAS TECH . . 73 236 TORONTO 149 579 159 640 TULANE 53 200 55 201 UTAH 70 318 71 369 VANDERBILT 78 287 80 305 VIRGINIA 97 363 101 368 VPI & SU 43 208 37 203 WASHINGTON 132 478 134 510 WASHINGTON STATE 39 168 46 202 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 88 285 90 289 WATERLOO 40 180 38 167 WAYNE STATE 82 270 88 279 WESTERN ONTARIO 46 236 45 205 WISCONSIN 156 543 154 507 YALE 203 615 201 607 YORK 51 230 51 225 Mean 84 313 84 312 StdDev 48 150 49 152 Table 2.a Support Staff as a Percent of Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1997 Percent Percent Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 1 BRIGHAM YOUNG 18.03% 17.88% -.15% 2 SUNY-BUFFALO 34.65% 32.57% -2.08% 3 KENT STATE 40.63% 34.33% -6.29% 4 OKLAHOMA STATE 36.11% 34.62% -1.50% 5 KENTUCKY 34.04% 34.97% .93% 6 NORTHWESTERN 36.19% 36.51% .32% 7 OHIO 36.84% 36.67% -.18% 8 KANSAS 37.50% 37.07% -.43% 9 MICHIGAN STATE 39.22% 37.18% -2.04% 10 WISCONSIN 40.15% 38.07% -2.08% 11 TEXAS TECH . 38.14% . 12 CINCINNATI 40.51% 39.19% -1.32% 13 MARYLAND 39.87% 39.42% -.45% 14 WAYNE STATE 37.41% 39.78% 2.38% 15 ROCHESTER 38.57% 39.90% 1.33% 16 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 38.57% 40.48% 1.92% 17 HAWAII 42.51% 41.01% -1.50% 18 INDIANA 41.56% 41.21% -.35% 19 BROWN 41.84% 41.25% -.59% 20 CONNECTICUT 40.83% 41.39% .56% 21 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 40.08% 41.48% 1.40% 22 OREGON 41.82% 41.82% .00% 23 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 39.00% 42.28% 3.29% 24 IOWA 40.45% 42.30% 1.84% 25 SUNY-STONY BROOK 46.11% 42.31% -3.81% 26 ALABAMA 40.96% 42.33% 1.37% 27 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 41.18% 42.37% 1.20% 28 OHIO STATE 42.62% 42.55% -.07% 29 OKLAHOMA 41.44% 42.93% 1.50% 30 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 47.64% 43.69% -3.95% 31 ILLINOIS, URBANA 46.33% 44.50% -1.82% 32 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 48.14% 44.93% -3.21% 33 HOUSTON 45.12% 44.98% -.14% 34 GEORGETOWN 46.92% 44.98% -1.94% 35 TEMPLE 45.26% 45.18% -.08% 36 WASHINGTON 47.91% 45.69% -2.22% 37 MINNESOTA 43.05% 45.87% 2.82% 38 VANDERBILT 49.48% 46.23% -3.25% 39 COLORADO STATE 45.76% 46.29% .52% 40 SOUTH CAROLINA 46.30% 46.44% .14% 41 PITTSBURGH 49.41% 46.51% -2.90% 42 DUKE 52.74% 46.59% -6.15% 43 BOSTON 52.17% 46.80% -5.37% 44 NORTH CAROLINA 48.94% 46.92% -2.01% 46 MASSACHUSETTS 48.11% 47.09% -1.02% 46 PENNSYLVANIA 48.28% 47.09% -1.20% 47 SYRACUSE 49.20% 47.15% -2.05% 48 TULANE 49.00% 47.26% -1.74% 49 LOUISIANA STATE 50.45% 47.42% -3.03% 50 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 47.56% 47.48% -.08% 51 SUNY-ALBANY 46.20% 47.59% 1.39% 52 VPI & SU 45.19% 47.78% 2.59% 53 AUBURN 48.59% 48.00% -.59% 54 HOWARD 61.74% 48.24% -13.51% 55 COLUMBIA 47.93% 48.30% .37% Table 2.a Support Staff as a Percent of Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1997 Percent Percent Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 56 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 49.82% 48.79% -1.04% 57 MICHIGAN 45.79% 49.25% 3.46% 58 ARIZONA 49.32% 49.30% -.02% 59 TEXAS A&M 49.13% 49.59% .46% 60 NEW MEXICO 47.35% 50.00% 2.65% 61 HARVARD 52.18% 50.17% -2.01% 62 MIT 50.45% 50.23% -.23% 64 MIAMI 51.79% 50.41% -1.39% 64 UTAH 50.63% 50.41% -.22% 65 RICE 51.72% 50.41% -1.31% 66 COLORADO 49.61% 50.42% .81% 67 STANFORD 51.16% 50.94% -.22% 68 CORNELL 51.03% 50.97% -.06% 69 IOWA STATE 51.56% 51.10% -.45% 70 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 54.00% 51.16% -2.84% 71 YALE 52.68% 51.24% -1.45% 72 WASHINGTON STATE 53.57% 51.49% -2.09% 73 DELAWARE 50.67% 51.60% .93% 74 FLORIDA 52.31% 51.77% -.54% 75 TENNESSEE 53.03% 52.59% -.44% 76 RUTGERS 53.22% 52.65% -.56% 77 GEORGIA TECH 52.14% 53.15% 1.02% 78 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 46.55% 53.49% 6.94% 79 PRINCETON 54.21% 53.65% -.56% 80 VIRGINIA 53.99% 53.80% -.19% 81 EMORY 53.02% 54.18% 1.16% 82 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 53.19% 54.26% 1.07% 83 CHICAGO 55.99% 54.52% -1.47% 84 MISSOURI 55.69% 54.62% -1.07% 85 NEBRASKA 54.63% 54.93% .30% 87 FLORIDA STATE 51.67% 55.56% 3.89% 87 YORK 55.22% 55.56% .34% 88 PURDUE 54.31% 55.89% 1.59% 89 NEW YORK 39.36% 56.19% 16.83% 90 GEORGIA 53.30% 56.90% 3.60% 91 ARIZONA STATE 54.29% 57.02% 2.73% 92 JOHNS HOPKINS 58.20% 57.23% -.96% 93 DARTMOUTH 57.38% 57.61% .23% 94 TORONTO 59.41% 57.66% -1.76% 95 BRITISH COLUMBIA 59.85% 57.71% -2.14% 96 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 57.60% 58.63% 1.04% 97 MCGILL 59.62% 59.12% -.49% 98 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 61.36% 59.45% -1.91% 99 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 61.75% 60.62% -1.13% 100 WATERLOO 63.89% 62.87% -1.01% 101 TEXAS 60.77% 64.03% 3.27% 102 MANITOBA 64.97% 64.19% -.79% 103 ALBERTA 66.87% 66.46% -.42% 104 NOTRE DAME 66.08% 66.67% .59% 105 QUEEN'S 67.49% 67.57% .08% 106 SASKATCHEWAN 66.86% 68.05% 1.19% 107 WESTERN ONTARIO 72.46% 68.78% -3.68% 108 MCMASTER 70.43% 69.94% -.49% 109 LAVAL 73.12% 73.00% -.13% 110 GUELPH 74.80% 74.60% -.20% Mean 49.79% 49.39% -.30% StdDev 9.32% 9.26% 2.90% Table 2.b Support Staff as a Percent of Total Staff sorted by Difference in Percentage between 1996 and 1997 Percent Percent Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ . TEXAS TECH . 38.14% . 1 HOWARD 61.74% 48.24% -13.51% 2 KENT STATE 40.63% 34.33% -6.29% 3 DUKE 52.74% 46.59% -6.15% 4 BOSTON 52.17% 46.80% -5.37% 5 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 47.64% 43.69% -3.95% 6 SUNY-STONY BROOK 46.11% 42.31% -3.81% 7 WESTERN ONTARIO 72.46% 68.78% -3.68% 8 VANDERBILT 49.48% 46.23% -3.25% 9 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 48.14% 44.93% -3.21% 10 LOUISIANA STATE 50.45% 47.42% -3.03% 11 PITTSBURGH 49.41% 46.51% -2.90% 12 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 54.00% 51.16% -2.84% 13 WASHINGTON 47.91% 45.69% -2.22% 14 BRITISH COLUMBIA 59.85% 57.71% -2.14% 15 WASHINGTON STATE 53.57% 51.49% -2.09% 16 WISCONSIN 40.15% 38.07% -2.08% 17 SUNY-BUFFALO 34.65% 32.57% -2.08% 18 SYRACUSE 49.20% 47.15% -2.05% 19 MICHIGAN STATE 39.22% 37.18% -2.04% 20 NORTH CAROLINA 48.94% 46.92% -2.01% 21 HARVARD 52.18% 50.17% -2.01% 22 GEORGETOWN 46.92% 44.98% -1.94% 23 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 61.36% 59.45% -1.91% 24 ILLINOIS, URBANA 46.33% 44.50% -1.82% 25 TORONTO 59.41% 57.66% -1.76% 26 TULANE 49.00% 47.26% -1.74% 27 HAWAII 42.51% 41.01% -1.50% 28 OKLAHOMA STATE 36.11% 34.62% -1.50% 29 CHICAGO 55.99% 54.52% -1.47% 30 YALE 52.68% 51.24% -1.45% 31 MIAMI 51.79% 50.41% -1.39% 32 CINCINNATI 40.51% 39.19% -1.32% 33 RICE 51.72% 50.41% -1.31% 34 PENNSYLVANIA 48.28% 47.09% -1.20% 35 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 61.75% 60.62% -1.13% 36 MISSOURI 55.69% 54.62% -1.07% 37 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 49.82% 48.79% -1.04% 38 MASSACHUSETTS 48.11% 47.09% -1.02% 39 WATERLOO 63.89% 62.87% -1.01% 40 JOHNS HOPKINS 58.20% 57.23% -.96% 41 MANITOBA 64.97% 64.19% -.79% 42 BROWN 41.84% 41.25% -.59% 43 AUBURN 48.59% 48.00% -.59% 44 PRINCETON 54.21% 53.65% -.56% 45 RUTGERS 53.22% 52.65% -.56% 46 FLORIDA 52.31% 51.77% -.54% 47 MCMASTER 70.43% 69.94% -.49% 48 MCGILL 59.62% 59.12% -.49% 49 IOWA STATE 51.56% 51.10% -.45% 50 MARYLAND 39.87% 39.42% -.45% 51 TENNESSEE 53.03% 52.59% -.44% 52 KANSAS 37.50% 37.07% -.43% 53 ALBERTA 66.87% 66.46% -.42% 54 INDIANA 41.56% 41.21% -.35% Table 2.b Support Staff as a Percent of Total Staff sorted by Difference in Percentage between 1996 and 1997 Percent Percent Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the from Total from Total Percentage Staff Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 55 MIT 50.45% 50.23% -.23% 56 STANFORD 51.16% 50.94% -.22% 57 UTAH 50.63% 50.41% -.22% 58 GUELPH 74.80% 74.60% -.20% 59 VIRGINIA 53.99% 53.80% -.19% 60 OHIO 36.84% 36.67% -.18% 61 BRIGHAM YOUNG 18.03% 17.88% -.15% 62 HOUSTON 45.12% 44.98% -.14% 63 LAVAL 73.12% 73.00% -.13% 64 TEMPLE 45.26% 45.18% -.08% 65 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 47.56% 47.48% -.08% 66 OHIO STATE 42.62% 42.55% -.07% 67 CORNELL 51.03% 50.97% -.06% 68 ARIZONA 49.32% 49.30% -.02% 69 OREGON 41.82% 41.82% .00% 70 QUEEN'S 67.49% 67.57% .08% 71 SOUTH CAROLINA 46.30% 46.44% .14% 72 DARTMOUTH 57.38% 57.61% .23% 73 NEBRASKA 54.63% 54.93% .30% 74 NORTHWESTERN 36.19% 36.51% .32% 75 YORK 55.22% 55.56% .34% 76 COLUMBIA 47.93% 48.30% .37% 77 TEXAS A&M 49.13% 49.59% .46% 78 COLORADO STATE 45.76% 46.29% .52% 79 CONNECTICUT 40.83% 41.39% .56% 80 NOTRE DAME 66.08% 66.67% .59% 81 COLORADO 49.61% 50.42% .81% 82 DELAWARE 50.67% 51.60% .93% 83 KENTUCKY 34.04% 34.97% .93% 84 GEORGIA TECH 52.14% 53.15% 1.02% 85 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 57.60% 58.63% 1.04% 86 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 53.19% 54.26% 1.07% 87 EMORY 53.02% 54.18% 1.16% 88 SASKATCHEWAN 66.86% 68.05% 1.19% 89 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 41.18% 42.37% 1.20% 90 ROCHESTER 38.57% 39.90% 1.33% 91 ALABAMA 40.96% 42.33% 1.37% 92 SUNY-ALBANY 46.20% 47.59% 1.39% 93 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 40.08% 41.48% 1.40% 94 OKLAHOMA 41.44% 42.93% 1.50% 95 PURDUE 54.31% 55.89% 1.59% 96 IOWA 40.45% 42.30% 1.84% 97 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 38.57% 40.48% 1.92% 98 WAYNE STATE 37.41% 39.78% 2.38% 99 VPI & SU 45.19% 47.78% 2.59% 100 NEW MEXICO 47.35% 50.00% 2.65% 101 ARIZONA STATE 54.29% 57.02% 2.73% 102 MINNESOTA 43.05% 45.87% 2.82% 103 TEXAS 60.77% 64.03% 3.27% 104 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 39.00% 42.28% 3.29% 105 MICHIGAN 45.79% 49.25% 3.46% 106 GEORGIA 53.30% 56.90% 3.60% 107 FLORIDA STATE 51.67% 55.56% 3.89% 108 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 46.55% 53.49% 6.94% 109 NEW YORK 39.36% 56.19% 16.83% Mean 49.79% 49.39% -.30% StdDev 9.32% 9.26% 2.90% Table 2.c Support Staff and Total Staff Support Total Support Total Staff Staff Staff Staff 1996 1996 1997 1997 1 2 3 4 _______ _______ _______ _______ ALABAMA 77 188 80 189 ALBERTA 218 326 210 316 ARIZONA 181 367 175 355 ARIZONA STATE 196 361 207 363 AUBURN 86 177 84 175 BOSTON 132 253 139 297 BRIGHAM YOUNG 53 294 54 302 BRITISH COLUMBIA 240 401 232 402 BROWN 100 239 99 240 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 253 656 251 620 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 181 295 173 291 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 117 246 113 238 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 310 644 279 621 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 81 174 92 172 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 175 329 172 317 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 135 250 110 215 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 77 187 75 177 CHICAGO 187 334 181 332 CINCINNATI 111 274 107 273 COLORADO 126 254 121 240 COLORADO STATE 81 177 81 175 COLUMBIA 266 555 256 530 CONNECTICUT 98 240 101 244 CORNELL 296 580 288 565 DARTMOUTH 105 183 106 184 DELAWARE 113 223 113 219 DUKE 173 328 171 367 EMORY 149 281 162 299 FLORIDA 204 390 205 396 FLORIDA STATE 124 240 130 234 GEORGETOWN 122 260 121 269 GEORGIA 194 364 202 355 GEORGIA TECH 61 117 59 111 GUELPH 95 127 94 126 HARVARD 587 1,125 593 1,182 HAWAII 88 207 89 217 HOUSTON 97 215 94 209 HOWARD 92 149 82 170 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 163 283 163 278 ILLINOIS, URBANA 246 531 247 555 INDIANA 197 474 197 478 IOWA 125 309 129 305 IOWA STATE 116 225 116 227 JOHNS HOPKINS 181 311 178 311 KANSAS 111 296 109 294 KENT STATE 91 224 80 233 KENTUCKY 113 332 114 326 LAVAL 185 253 173 237 LOUISIANA STATE 112 222 101 213 MCGILL 186 312 162 274 MCMASTER 131 186 114 163 MANITOBA 128 197 138 215 MARYLAND 126 316 123 312 MASSACHUSETTS 89 185 89 189 MIT 111 220 111 221 Table 2.c Support Staff and Total Staff Support Total Support Total Staff Staff Staff Staff 1996 1996 1997 1997 1 2 3 4 _______ _______ _______ _______ MIAMI 130 251 124 246 MICHIGAN 299 653 295 599 MICHIGAN STATE 111 283 103 277 MINNESOTA 192 446 200 436 MISSOURI 137 246 130 238 NEBRASKA 118 216 117 213 NEW MEXICO 170 359 174 348 NEW YORK 185 470 245 436 NORTH CAROLINA 207 423 206 439 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 121 254 135 309 NORTHWESTERN 135 373 134 367 NOTRE DAME 150 227 156 234 OHIO 77 209 77 210 OHIO STATE 179 420 180 423 OKLAHOMA 75 181 79 184 OKLAHOMA STATE 65 180 63 182 OREGON 92 220 92 220 PENNSYLVANIA 183 379 178 378 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 331 536 331 546 PITTSBURGH 210 425 180 387 PRINCETON 206 380 206 384 PURDUE 145 267 147 263 QUEEN'S 137 203 125 185 RICE 60 116 61 121 ROCHESTER 81 210 83 208 RUTGERS 240 451 238 452 SASKATCHEWAN 117 175 115 169 SOUTH CAROLINA 119 257 124 267 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 140 359 137 324 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 97 242 95 229 STANFORD 286 559 298 585 SUNY-ALBANY 79 171 79 166 SUNY-BUFFALO 88 254 85 261 SUNY-STONY BROOK 89 193 77 182 SYRACUSE 123 250 124 263 TEMPLE 105 232 103 228 TENNESSEE 140 264 142 270 TEXAS 364 599 381 595 TEXAS A&M 169 344 181 365 TEXAS TECH . . 90 236 TORONTO 344 579 369 640 TULANE 98 200 95 201 UTAH 161 318 186 369 VANDERBILT 142 287 141 305 VIRGINIA 196 363 198 368 VPI & SU 94 208 97 203 WASHINGTON 229 478 233 510 WASHINGTON STATE 90 168 104 202 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 142 285 141 289 WATERLOO 115 180 105 167 WAYNE STATE 101 270 111 279 WESTERN ONTARIO 171 236 141 205 WISCONSIN 218 543 193 507 YALE 324 615 311 607 YORK 127 230 125 225 Mean 155 313 154 312 StdDev 79 150 80 152 Table 3.a Student Assistants as a Percentage of Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1997 Percent Percent Difference Student Student in the Assistants Assistants Percentage /Total Staff /Total Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ 1 LAVAL .40% .42% .03% 2 GEORGIA TECH 5.13% 3.60% -1.52% 3 GUELPH 7.09% 7.14% .06% 4 SASKATCHEWAN 9.14% 8.28% -.86% 5 WESTERN ONTARIO 8.05% 9.27% 1.22% 6 MANITOBA 9.14% 10.23% 1.10% 7 RICE 10.34% 10.74% .40% 8 MCMASTER 10.22% 11.04% .83% 9 QUEEN'S 10.84% 11.35% .51% 10 MIT 11.82% 11.76% -.05% 11 JOHNS HOPKINS 13.83% 12.86% -.96% 12 TEXAS 15.69% 13.45% -2.25% 13 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 14.13% 13.67% -.47% 14 NOTRE DAME 12.33% 13.68% 1.34% 15 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 16.60% 13.74% -2.87% 16 ALBERTA 13.80% 14.24% .44% 17 WATERLOO 13.89% 14.37% .48% 18 HARVARD 11.91% 14.72% 2.81% 19 PRINCETON 14.74% 14.84% .11% 20 DARTMOUTH 15.30% 15.22% -.08% 21 YALE 14.31% 15.65% 1.34% 22 ARIZONA STATE 18.28% 15.70% -2.58% 23 EMORY 17.79% 15.72% -2.07% 24 BRITISH COLUMBIA 14.21% 16.17% 1.95% 25 STANFORD 17.53% 16.41% -1.12% 26 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 22.99% 16.95% -6.05% 27 TORONTO 14.85% 17.50% 2.65% 28 MCGILL 16.03% 17.52% 1.49% 29 VIRGINIA 19.28% 18.75% -.53% 30 GEORGIA 23.35% 19.15% -4.20% 31 COLUMBIA 20.18% 19.43% -.75% 32 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 19.30% 20.07% .77% 33 PURDUE 21.35% 20.15% -1.20% 34 FLORIDA 20.00% 20.20% .20% 35 FLORIDA STATE 25.00% 20.51% -4.49% 36 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 28.74% 20.93% -7.81% 37 NEBRASKA 21.30% 21.13% -.17% 38 DUKE 15.55% 21.53% 5.98% 39 MIAMI 19.92% 21.54% 1.62% 40 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 20.68% 21.65% .97% 41 YORK 22.61% 21.78% -.83% 42 TENNESSEE 22.35% 21.85% -.50% 43 NEW YORK 30.21% 22.25% -7.97% 44 MISSOURI 20.33% 22.27% 1.94% 45 HOWARD 8.05% 22.35% 14.30% 46 AUBURN 23.73% 22.86% -.87% 47 GEORGETOWN 22.31% 23.05% .74% 48 SYRACUSE 21.60% 23.19% 1.59% 49 TEMPLE 23.28% 23.25% -.03% 50 RUTGERS 22.84% 23.45% .61% 51 ROCHESTER 24.76% 23.56% -1.20% 52 DELAWARE 25.11% 23.74% -1.37% 53 PENNSYLVANIA 23.48% 23.81% .33% 54 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 24.92% 23.97% -.95% 56 CHICAGO 22.46% 24.10% 1.64% Table 3.a Student Assistants as a Percentage of Total Staff sorted by Percentage in 1997 Percent Percent Difference Student Student in the Assistants Assistants Percentage /Total Staff /Total Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ 56 SUNY-ALBANY 26.32% 24.10% -2.22% 57 BROWN 24.69% 24.58% -.10% 58 ILLINOIS, URBANA 23.54% 24.68% 1.14% 59 MASSACHUSETTS 24.32% 24.87% .54% 60 LOUISIANA STATE 26.13% 24.88% -1.24% 61 NORTH CAROLINA 22.70% 25.06% 2.36% 62 ARIZONA 25.61% 25.07% -.54% 63 TULANE 24.50% 25.37% .87% 64 MICHIGAN 31.39% 25.54% -5.85% 65 WASHINGTON STATE 23.21% 25.74% 2.53% 66 SOUTH CAROLINA 25.29% 25.84% .55% 67 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 30.92% 26.23% -4.68% 68 IOWA 26.54% 26.56% .02% 69 COLORADO 25.98% 26.67% .68% 70 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 26.38% 26.86% .48% 71 ALABAMA 29.26% 26.98% -2.27% 72 CORNELL 26.55% 27.08% .53% 73 NEW MEXICO 28.13% 27.30% -.83% 74 PITTSBURGH 25.18% 27.39% 2.21% 75 VANDERBILT 23.34% 27.54% 4.20% 76 IOWA STATE 25.33% 27.75% 2.42% 77 TEXAS A&M 27.62% 27.95% .33% 78 WASHINGTON 24.48% 28.04% 3.56% 79 WAYNE STATE 32.22% 28.67% -3.55% 80 CONNECTICUT 31.25% 28.69% -2.56% 81 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 34.45% 28.71% -5.74% 82 SUNY-BUFFALO 27.17% 29.50% 2.34% 83 INDIANA 29.54% 29.92% .38% 84 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 26.00% 30.23% 4.23% 85 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 31.30% 30.25% -1.05% 86 UTAH 27.36% 30.35% 2.99% 87 TEXAS TECH . 30.93% . 88 OKLAHOMA 30.39% 30.98% .59% 89 BOSTON 22.92% 31.31% 8.39% 90 MARYLAND 33.23% 31.41% -1.82% 91 WISCONSIN 31.12% 31.56% .43% 92 MINNESOTA 33.63% 31.65% -1.98% 93 SUNY-STONY BROOK 30.57% 32.42% 1.85% 94 HOUSTON 33.49% 32.54% -.95% 95 CINCINNATI 31.75% 32.60% .85% 96 KANSAS 32.77% 32.65% -.12% 97 HAWAII 31.88% 33.18% 1.30% 98 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 31.99% 33.49% 1.51% 99 OHIO STATE 33.33% 33.57% .24% 100 OREGON 33.64% 33.64% .00% 101 VPI & SU 34.13% 33.99% -.14% 102 NORTHWESTERN 35.12% 34.06% -1.06% 103 COLORADO STATE 33.90% 34.29% .39% 104 KENTUCKY 35.84% 34.36% -1.49% 105 OKLAHOMA STATE 35.56% 35.16% -.39% 106 KENT STATE 35.71% 36.05% .34% 107 OHIO 34.45% 37.14% 2.69% 108 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 39.26% 37.55% -1.70% 109 MICHIGAN STATE 38.16% 40.43% 2.27% 110 BRIGHAM YOUNG 47.62% 48.68% 1.06% Mean 23.58% 23.72% .07% StdDev 8.48% 8.28% 2.79% Table 3.b Student Assistants as a Percentage of Total Staff sorted by Difference in the Percentage Percent Percent Difference Student Student in the Assistants Assistants Percentage /Total Staff /Total Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ . TEXAS TECH . 30.93% . 1 NEW YORK 30.21% 22.25% -7.97% 2 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 28.74% 20.93% -7.81% 3 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 22.99% 16.95% -6.05% 4 MICHIGAN 31.39% 25.54% -5.85% 5 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 34.45% 28.71% -5.74% 6 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 30.92% 26.23% -4.68% 7 FLORIDA STATE 25.00% 20.51% -4.49% 8 GEORGIA 23.35% 19.15% -4.20% 9 WAYNE STATE 32.22% 28.67% -3.55% 10 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 16.60% 13.74% -2.87% 11 ARIZONA STATE 18.28% 15.70% -2.58% 12 CONNECTICUT 31.25% 28.69% -2.56% 13 ALABAMA 29.26% 26.98% -2.27% 14 TEXAS 15.69% 13.45% -2.25% 15 SUNY-ALBANY 26.32% 24.10% -2.22% 16 EMORY 17.79% 15.72% -2.07% 17 MINNESOTA 33.63% 31.65% -1.98% 18 MARYLAND 33.23% 31.41% -1.82% 19 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 39.26% 37.55% -1.70% 20 GEORGIA TECH 5.13% 3.60% -1.52% 21 KENTUCKY 35.84% 34.36% -1.49% 22 DELAWARE 25.11% 23.74% -1.37% 23 LOUISIANA STATE 26.13% 24.88% -1.24% 24 ROCHESTER 24.76% 23.56% -1.20% 25 PURDUE 21.35% 20.15% -1.20% 26 STANFORD 17.53% 16.41% -1.12% 27 NORTHWESTERN 35.12% 34.06% -1.06% 28 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 31.30% 30.25% -1.05% 29 JOHNS HOPKINS 13.83% 12.86% -.96% 30 HOUSTON 33.49% 32.54% -.95% 31 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 24.92% 23.97% -.95% 32 AUBURN 23.73% 22.86% -.87% 33 SASKATCHEWAN 9.14% 8.28% -.86% 34 NEW MEXICO 28.13% 27.30% -.83% 35 YORK 22.61% 21.78% -.83% 36 COLUMBIA 20.18% 19.43% -.75% 37 ARIZONA 25.61% 25.07% -.54% 38 VIRGINIA 19.28% 18.75% -.53% 39 TENNESSEE 22.35% 21.85% -.50% 40 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 14.13% 13.67% -.47% 41 OKLAHOMA STATE 35.56% 35.16% -.39% 42 NEBRASKA 21.30% 21.13% -.17% 43 VPI & SU 34.13% 33.99% -.14% 44 KANSAS 32.77% 32.65% -.12% 45 BROWN 24.69% 24.58% -.10% 46 DARTMOUTH 15.30% 15.22% -.08% 47 MIT 11.82% 11.76% -.05% 48 TEMPLE 23.28% 23.25% -.03% 49 OREGON 33.64% 33.64% .00% 50 IOWA 26.54% 26.56% .02% 51 LAVAL .40% .42% .03% 52 GUELPH 7.09% 7.14% .06% 53 PRINCETON 14.74% 14.84% .11% 54 FLORIDA 20.00% 20.20% .20% Table 3.b Student Assistants as a Percentage of Total Staff sorted by Difference in the Percentage Percent Percent Difference Student Student in the Assistants Assistants Percentage /Total Staff /Total Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 ____________ ____________ __________ 55 OHIO STATE 33.33% 33.57% .24% 56 PENNSYLVANIA 23.48% 23.81% .33% 57 TEXAS A&M 27.62% 27.95% .33% 58 KENT STATE 35.71% 36.05% .34% 59 INDIANA 29.54% 29.92% .38% 60 COLORADO STATE 33.90% 34.29% .39% 61 RICE 10.34% 10.74% .40% 62 WISCONSIN 31.12% 31.56% .43% 63 ALBERTA 13.80% 14.24% .44% 64 WATERLOO 13.89% 14.37% .48% 65 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 26.38% 26.86% .48% 66 QUEEN'S 10.84% 11.35% .51% 67 CORNELL 26.55% 27.08% .53% 68 MASSACHUSETTS 24.32% 24.87% .54% 69 SOUTH CAROLINA 25.29% 25.84% .55% 70 OKLAHOMA 30.39% 30.98% .59% 71 RUTGERS 22.84% 23.45% .61% 72 COLORADO 25.98% 26.67% .68% 73 GEORGETOWN 22.31% 23.05% .74% 74 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 19.30% 20.07% .77% 75 MCMASTER 10.22% 11.04% .83% 76 CINCINNATI 31.75% 32.60% .85% 77 TULANE 24.50% 25.37% .87% 78 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 20.68% 21.65% .97% 79 BRIGHAM YOUNG 47.62% 48.68% 1.06% 80 MANITOBA 9.14% 10.23% 1.10% 81 ILLINOIS, URBANA 23.54% 24.68% 1.14% 82 WESTERN ONTARIO 8.05% 9.27% 1.22% 83 HAWAII 31.88% 33.18% 1.30% 84 NOTRE DAME 12.33% 13.68% 1.34% 85 YALE 14.31% 15.65% 1.34% 86 MCGILL 16.03% 17.52% 1.49% 87 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 31.99% 33.49% 1.51% 88 SYRACUSE 21.60% 23.19% 1.59% 89 MIAMI 19.92% 21.54% 1.62% 90 CHICAGO 22.46% 24.10% 1.64% 91 SUNY-STONY BROOK 30.57% 32.42% 1.85% 92 MISSOURI 20.33% 22.27% 1.94% 93 BRITISH COLUMBIA 14.21% 16.17% 1.95% 94 PITTSBURGH 25.18% 27.39% 2.21% 95 MICHIGAN STATE 38.16% 40.43% 2.27% 96 SUNY-BUFFALO 27.17% 29.50% 2.34% 97 NORTH CAROLINA 22.70% 25.06% 2.36% 98 IOWA STATE 25.33% 27.75% 2.42% 99 WASHINGTON STATE 23.21% 25.74% 2.53% 100 TORONTO 14.85% 17.50% 2.65% 101 OHIO 34.45% 37.14% 2.69% 102 HARVARD 11.91% 14.72% 2.81% 103 UTAH 27.36% 30.35% 2.99% 104 WASHINGTON 24.48% 28.04% 3.56% 105 VANDERBILT 23.34% 27.54% 4.20% 106 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 26.00% 30.23% 4.23% 107 DUKE 15.55% 21.53% 5.98% 108 BOSTON 22.92% 31.31% 8.39% 109 HOWARD 8.05% 22.35% 14.30% Mean 23.58% 23.72% .07% StdDev 8.48% 8.28% 2.79% Table 3.c Student Assistants and Total Staff Student Total Student Total Assistants Staff Assistants Staff 1996 1996 1997 1997 1 2 3 4 __________ _______ __________ _______ ALABAMA 55 188 51 189 ALBERTA 45 326 45 316 ARIZONA 94 367 89 355 ARIZONA STATE 66 361 57 363 AUBURN 42 177 40 175 BOSTON 58 253 93 297 BRIGHAM YOUNG 140 294 147 302 BRITISH COLUMBIA 57 401 65 402 BROWN 59 239 59 240 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 226 656 178 620 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 61 295 63 291 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 77 246 72 238 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 206 644 208 621 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 50 174 36 172 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 82 329 76 317 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 65 250 65 215 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 43 187 30 177 CHICAGO 75 334 80 332 CINCINNATI 87 274 89 273 COLORADO 66 254 64 240 COLORADO STATE 60 177 60 175 COLUMBIA 112 555 103 530 CONNECTICUT 75 240 70 244 CORNELL 154 580 153 565 DARTMOUTH 28 183 28 184 DELAWARE 56 223 52 219 DUKE 51 328 79 367 EMORY 50 281 47 299 FLORIDA 78 390 80 396 FLORIDA STATE 60 240 48 234 GEORGETOWN 58 260 62 269 GEORGIA 85 364 68 355 GEORGIA TECH 6 117 4 111 GUELPH 9 127 9 126 HARVARD 134 1,125 174 1,182 HAWAII 66 207 72 217 HOUSTON 72 215 68 209 HOWARD 12 149 38 170 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 40 283 38 278 ILLINOIS, URBANA 125 531 137 555 INDIANA 140 474 143 478 IOWA 82 309 81 305 IOWA STATE 57 225 63 227 JOHNS HOPKINS 43 311 40 311 KANSAS 97 296 96 294 KENT STATE 80 224 84 233 KENTUCKY 119 332 112 326 LAVAL 1 253 1 237 LOUISIANA STATE 58 222 53 213 MCGILL 50 312 48 274 MCMASTER 19 186 18 163 MANITOBA 18 197 22 215 MARYLAND 105 316 98 312 MASSACHUSETTS 45 185 47 189 MIT 26 220 26 221 Table 3.c Student Assistants and Total Staff Student Total Student Total Assistants Staff Assistants Staff 1996 1996 1997 1997 1 2 3 4 __________ _______ __________ _______ MIAMI 50 251 53 246 MICHIGAN 205 653 153 599 MICHIGAN STATE 108 283 112 277 MINNESOTA 150 446 138 436 MISSOURI 50 246 53 238 NEBRASKA 46 216 45 213 NEW MEXICO 101 359 95 348 NEW YORK 142 470 97 436 NORTH CAROLINA 96 423 110 439 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 67 254 83 309 NORTHWESTERN 131 373 125 367 NOTRE DAME 28 227 32 234 OHIO 72 209 78 210 OHIO STATE 140 420 142 423 OKLAHOMA 55 181 57 184 OKLAHOMA STATE 64 180 64 182 OREGON 74 220 74 220 PENNSYLVANIA 89 379 90 378 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 89 536 75 546 PITTSBURGH 107 425 106 387 PRINCETON 56 380 57 384 PURDUE 57 267 53 263 QUEEN'S 22 203 21 185 RICE 12 116 13 121 ROCHESTER 52 210 49 208 RUTGERS 103 451 106 452 SASKATCHEWAN 16 175 14 169 SOUTH CAROLINA 65 257 69 267 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 111 359 85 324 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 95 242 86 229 STANFORD 98 559 96 585 SUNY-ALBANY 45 171 40 166 SUNY-BUFFALO 69 254 77 261 SUNY-STONY BROOK 59 193 59 182 SYRACUSE 54 250 61 263 TEMPLE 54 232 53 228 TENNESSEE 59 264 59 270 TEXAS 94 599 80 595 TEXAS A&M 95 344 102 365 TEXAS TECH . . 73 236 TORONTO 86 579 112 640 TULANE 49 200 51 201 UTAH 87 318 112 369 VANDERBILT 67 287 84 305 VIRGINIA 70 363 69 368 VPI & SU 71 208 69 203 WASHINGTON 117 478 143 510 WASHINGTON STATE 39 168 52 202 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 55 285 58 289 WATERLOO 25 180 24 167 WAYNE STATE 87 270 80 279 WESTERN ONTARIO 19 236 19 205 WISCONSIN 169 543 160 507 YALE 88 615 95 607 YORK 52 230 49 225 Mean 74 313 74 312 StdDev 42 150 39 152 Table 4.a Ratio of Support to Professional Staff sorted by ratio values in 1997 Number of Number of Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the for each for each Ratios Prof. Staff Prof. Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 1 BRIGHAM YOUNG .52 .53 .01 2 SUNY-BUFFALO .91 .86 -.05 3 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 1.15 1.04 -.11 4 ROCHESTER 1.05 1.09 .04 5 KENTUCKY 1.13 1.14 .01 6 OKLAHOMA STATE 1.27 1.15 -.13 7 KENT STATE 1.72 1.16 -.56 8 BROWN 1.25 1.21 -.04 9 KANSAS 1.26 1.22 -.04 10 GEORGIA TECH 1.22 1.23 .01 11 TEXAS TECH . 1.23 . 12 NORTHWESTERN 1.26 1.24 -.02 13 WISCONSIN 1.40 1.25 -.14 14 WAYNE STATE 1.23 1.26 .03 15 RICE 1.36 1.30 -.07 16 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 1.43 1.31 -.12 17 MIT 1.34 1.32 -.02 18 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1.30 1.34 .05 19 MARYLAND 1.48 1.35 -.13 20 IOWA 1.23 1.36 .13 21 ALABAMA 1.38 1.38 .00 22 CONNECTICUT 1.46 1.38 -.08 23 CINCINNATI 1.46 1.39 -.07 24 OHIO 1.28 1.40 .12 25 GEORGETOWN 1.53 1.41 -.12 26 INDIANA 1.44 1.43 -.01 27 HARVARD 1.45 1.43 -.02 28 TEMPLE 1.44 1.43 -.01 29 ILLINOIS, URBANA 1.54 1.44 -.09 30 DUKE 1.66 1.46 -.20 31 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 1.83 1.48 -.35 32 COLUMBIA 1.50 1.50 -.01 33 YALE 1.60 1.55 -.05 34 STANFORD 1.63 1.56 -.07 35 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1.61 1.57 -.05 36 HAWAII 1.66 1.59 -.07 37 SYRACUSE 1.68 1.59 -.10 38 PENNSYLVANIA 1.71 1.62 -.09 39 HOWARD 2.04 1.64 -.40 40 OKLAHOMA 1.47 1.65 .18 41 AUBURN 1.76 1.65 -.11 42 MICHIGAN STATE 1.73 1.66 -.07 43 SUNY-STONY BROOK 1.98 1.67 -.30 44 NORTH CAROLINA 1.73 1.67 -.05 45 SOUTH CAROLINA 1.63 1.68 .05 46 MASSACHUSETTS 1.75 1.68 -.07 47 SUNY-ALBANY 1.68 1.68 .00 48 PRINCETON 1.75 1.70 -.04 49 OREGON 1.70 1.70 .00 50 LOUISIANA STATE 2.15 1.71 -.44 51 TULANE 1.85 1.73 -.12 52 WASHINGTON 1.73 1.74 .00 53 VANDERBILT 1.82 1.76 -.06 55 OHIO STATE 1.77 1.78 .01 55 PITTSBURGH 1.94 1.78 -.16 Table 4.a Ratio of Support to Professional Staff sorted by ratio values in 1997 Number of Number of Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the for each for each Ratios Prof. Staff Prof. Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 56 MIAMI 1.83 1.80 -.03 57 EMORY 1.82 1.80 -.02 58 FLORIDA 1.89 1.85 -.04 59 JOHNS HOPKINS 2.08 1.91 -.17 60 ARIZONA 1.97 1.92 -.04 61 MICHIGAN 2.01 1.95 -.05 62 VIRGINIA 2.02 1.96 -.06 63 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 1.94 1.98 .04 64 HOUSTON 2.11 2.00 -.11 65 MINNESOTA 1.85 2.04 .19 66 TENNESSEE 2.15 2.06 -.10 67 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 2.42 2.08 -.34 69 ARIZONA STATE 1.98 2.09 .11 69 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 1.88 2.09 .21 70 DELAWARE 2.09 2.09 .00 71 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 2.04 2.12 .08 72 DARTMOUTH 2.10 2.12 .02 73 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 2.25 2.13 -.12 74 BOSTON 2.10 2.14 .04 75 COLORADO 2.03 2.20 .17 76 NEW MEXICO 1.93 2.20 .27 77 RUTGERS 2.22 2.20 -.02 78 TEXAS A&M 2.11 2.21 .09 79 BRITISH COLUMBIA 2.31 2.21 -.10 80 WASHINGTON STATE 2.31 2.26 -.05 81 NEBRASKA 2.27 2.29 .02 82 TORONTO 2.31 2.32 .01 83 FLORIDA STATE 2.21 2.32 .11 84 CORNELL 2.28 2.32 .05 85 PURDUE 2.23 2.33 .10 86 MISSOURI 2.32 2.36 .04 87 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 2.85 2.36 -.49 88 GEORGIA 2.28 2.38 .09 89 COLORADO STATE 2.25 2.38 .13 90 IOWA STATE 2.23 2.42 .19 91 YORK 2.49 2.45 -.04 92 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2.43 2.49 .06 93 MANITOBA 2.51 2.51 .00 94 MCGILL 2.45 2.53 .08 95 CHICAGO 2.60 2.55 -.05 96 NEW YORK 1.29 2.61 1.31 97 UTAH 2.30 2.62 .32 98 VPI & SU 2.19 2.62 .44 99 LAVAL 2.76 2.75 -.02 100 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2.70 2.75 .05 101 WATERLOO 2.88 2.76 -.11 102 TEXAS 2.58 2.84 .26 103 SASKATCHEWAN 2.79 2.88 .09 104 WESTERN ONTARIO 3.72 3.13 -.58 105 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 3.42 3.15 -.27 106 QUEEN'S 3.11 3.21 .09 107 NOTRE DAME 3.06 3.39 .33 108 ALBERTA 3.46 3.44 -.02 109 MCMASTER 3.64 3.68 .04 110 GUELPH 4.13 4.09 -.04 Mean 1.95 1.93 -.02 StdDev .61 .63 .21 Table 4.b Ratio of Support to Professional Staff sorted by the Difference in Ratios bt 1996 and 1997 Number of Number of Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the for each for each Ratios Prof. Staff Prof. Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ . TEXAS TECH . 1.23 . 1 WESTERN ONTARIO 3.72 3.13 -.58 2 KENT STATE 1.72 1.16 -.56 3 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 2.85 2.36 -.49 4 LOUISIANA STATE 2.15 1.71 -.44 5 HOWARD 2.04 1.64 -.40 6 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 1.83 1.48 -.35 7 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 2.42 2.08 -.34 8 SUNY-STONY BROOK 1.98 1.67 -.30 9 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 3.42 3.15 -.27 10 DUKE 1.66 1.46 -.20 11 JOHNS HOPKINS 2.08 1.91 -.17 12 PITTSBURGH 1.94 1.78 -.16 13 WISCONSIN 1.40 1.25 -.14 14 MARYLAND 1.48 1.35 -.13 15 OKLAHOMA STATE 1.27 1.15 -.13 16 TULANE 1.85 1.73 -.12 17 GEORGETOWN 1.53 1.41 -.12 18 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 2.25 2.13 -.12 19 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 1.43 1.31 -.12 20 WATERLOO 2.88 2.76 -.11 21 HOUSTON 2.11 2.00 -.11 22 AUBURN 1.76 1.65 -.11 23 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 1.15 1.04 -.11 24 BRITISH COLUMBIA 2.31 2.21 -.10 25 TENNESSEE 2.15 2.06 -.10 26 SYRACUSE 1.68 1.59 -.10 27 ILLINOIS, URBANA 1.54 1.44 -.09 28 PENNSYLVANIA 1.71 1.62 -.09 29 CONNECTICUT 1.46 1.38 -.08 30 STANFORD 1.63 1.56 -.07 31 MICHIGAN STATE 1.73 1.66 -.07 32 HAWAII 1.66 1.59 -.07 33 CINCINNATI 1.46 1.39 -.07 34 MASSACHUSETTS 1.75 1.68 -.07 35 RICE 1.36 1.30 -.07 36 VIRGINIA 2.02 1.96 -.06 37 VANDERBILT 1.82 1.76 -.06 38 MICHIGAN 2.01 1.95 -.05 39 NORTH CAROLINA 1.73 1.67 -.05 40 YALE 1.60 1.55 -.05 41 SUNY-BUFFALO .91 .86 -.05 42 CHICAGO 2.60 2.55 -.05 43 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1.61 1.57 -.05 44 WASHINGTON STATE 2.31 2.26 -.05 45 ARIZONA 1.97 1.92 -.04 46 GUELPH 4.13 4.09 -.04 47 PRINCETON 1.75 1.70 -.04 48 BROWN 1.25 1.21 -.04 49 FLORIDA 1.89 1.85 -.04 50 YORK 2.49 2.45 -.04 51 KANSAS 1.26 1.22 -.04 52 MIAMI 1.83 1.80 -.03 53 HARVARD 1.45 1.43 -.02 54 NORTHWESTERN 1.26 1.24 -.02 Table 4.b Ratio of Support to Professional Staff sorted by the Difference in Ratios bt 1996 and 1997 Number of Number of Difference Support Staff Support Staff in the for each for each Ratios Prof. Staff Prof. Staff 1996 1997 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 55 RUTGERS 2.22 2.20 -.02 56 ALBERTA 3.46 3.44 -.02 57 EMORY 1.82 1.80 -.02 58 MIT 1.34 1.32 -.02 59 LAVAL 2.76 2.75 -.02 60 INDIANA 1.44 1.43 -.01 61 TEMPLE 1.44 1.43 -.01 62 COLUMBIA 1.50 1.50 -.01 63 MANITOBA 2.51 2.51 .00 66 SUNY-ALBANY 1.68 1.68 .00 66 OREGON 1.70 1.70 .00 66 DELAWARE 2.09 2.09 .00 67 WASHINGTON 1.73 1.74 .00 68 ALABAMA 1.38 1.38 .00 69 GEORGIA TECH 1.22 1.23 .01 71 BRIGHAM YOUNG .52 .53 .01 71 OHIO STATE 1.77 1.78 .01 72 KENTUCKY 1.13 1.14 .01 73 TORONTO 2.31 2.32 .01 74 DARTMOUTH 2.10 2.12 .02 75 NEBRASKA 2.27 2.29 .02 76 WAYNE STATE 1.23 1.26 .03 77 MCMASTER 3.64 3.68 .04 78 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 1.94 1.98 .04 79 ROCHESTER 1.05 1.09 .04 80 MISSOURI 2.32 2.36 .04 81 BOSTON 2.10 2.14 .04 82 SOUTH CAROLINA 1.63 1.68 .05 83 CORNELL 2.28 2.32 .05 84 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1.30 1.34 .05 85 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 2.70 2.75 .05 86 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2.43 2.49 .06 87 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 2.04 2.12 .08 88 MCGILL 2.45 2.53 .08 89 SASKATCHEWAN 2.79 2.88 .09 90 QUEEN'S 3.11 3.21 .09 91 GEORGIA 2.28 2.38 .09 92 TEXAS A&M 2.11 2.21 .09 93 PURDUE 2.23 2.33 .10 94 FLORIDA STATE 2.21 2.32 .11 95 ARIZONA STATE 1.98 2.09 .11 96 OHIO 1.28 1.40 .12 97 COLORADO STATE 2.25 2.38 .13 98 IOWA 1.23 1.36 .13 99 COLORADO 2.03 2.20 .17 100 OKLAHOMA 1.47 1.65 .18 101 IOWA STATE 2.23 2.42 .19 102 MINNESOTA 1.85 2.04 .19 103 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 1.88 2.09 .21 104 TEXAS 2.58 2.84 .26 105 NEW MEXICO 1.93 2.20 .27 106 UTAH 2.30 2.62 .32 107 NOTRE DAME 3.06 3.39 .33 108 VPI & SU 2.19 2.62 .44 109 NEW YORK 1.29 2.61 1.31 Mean 1.95 1.93 -.02 StdDev .61 .63 .21 Table 4.c Professional Staff and Support Staff Support Professional Support Professional Staff Staff Staff Staff 1996 1996 1997 1997 1 2 3 4 _______ ____________ _______ ____________ ALABAMA 77 56 80 58 ALBERTA 218 63 210 61 ARIZONA 181 92 175 91 ARIZONA STATE 196 99 207 99 AUBURN 86 49 84 51 BOSTON 132 63 139 65 BRIGHAM YOUNG 53 101 54 101 BRITISH COLUMBIA 240 104 232 105 BROWN 100 80 99 82 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 253 177 251 191 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 181 53 173 55 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 117 52 113 53 CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES 310 128 279 134 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE 81 43 92 44 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 175 72 172 69 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA 135 50 110 40 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 77 67 75 72 CHICAGO 187 72 181 71 CINCINNATI 111 76 107 77 COLORADO 126 62 121 55 COLORADO STATE 81 36 81 34 COLUMBIA 266 177 256 171 CONNECTICUT 98 67 101 73 CORNELL 296 130 288 124 DARTMOUTH 105 50 106 50 DELAWARE 113 54 113 54 DUKE 173 104 171 117 EMORY 149 82 162 90 FLORIDA 204 108 205 111 FLORIDA STATE 124 56 130 56 GEORGETOWN 122 80 121 86 GEORGIA 194 85 202 85 GEORGIA TECH 61 50 59 48 GUELPH 95 23 94 23 HARVARD 587 404 593 415 HAWAII 88 53 89 56 HOUSTON 97 46 94 47 HOWARD 92 45 82 50 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 163 80 163 77 ILLINOIS, URBANA 246 160 247 171 INDIANA 197 137 197 138 IOWA 125 102 129 95 IOWA STATE 116 52 116 48 JOHNS HOPKINS 181 87 178 93 KANSAS 111 88 109 89 KENT STATE 91 53 80 69 KENTUCKY 113 100 114 100 LAVAL 185 67 173 63 LOUISIANA STATE 112 52 101 59 MCGILL 186 76 162 64 MCMASTER 131 36 114 31 MANITOBA 128 51 138 55 MARYLAND 126 85 123 91 MASSACHUSETTS 89 51 89 53 MIT 111 83 111 84 Table 4.c Professional Staff and Support Staff Support Professional Support Professional Staff Staff Staff Staff 1996 1996 1997 1997 1 2 3 4 _______ ____________ _______ ____________ MIAMI 130 71 124 69 MICHIGAN 299 149 295 151 MICHIGAN STATE 111 64 103 62 MINNESOTA 192 104 200 98 MISSOURI 137 59 130 55 NEBRASKA 118 52 117 51 NEW MEXICO 170 88 174 79 NEW YORK 185 143 245 94 NORTH CAROLINA 207 120 206 123 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 121 66 135 91 NORTHWESTERN 135 107 134 108 NOTRE DAME 150 49 156 46 OHIO 77 60 77 55 OHIO STATE 179 101 180 101 OKLAHOMA 75 51 79 48 OKLAHOMA STATE 65 51 63 55 OREGON 92 54 92 54 PENNSYLVANIA 183 107 178 110 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 331 116 331 140 PITTSBURGH 210 108 180 101 PRINCETON 206 118 206 121 PURDUE 145 65 147 63 QUEEN'S 137 44 125 39 RICE 60 44 61 47 ROCHESTER 81 77 83 76 RUTGERS 240 108 238 108 SASKATCHEWAN 117 42 115 40 SOUTH CAROLINA 119 73 124 74 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 140 108 137 102 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 97 50 95 48 STANFORD 286 175 298 191 SUNY-ALBANY 79 47 79 47 SUNY-BUFFALO 88 97 85 99 SUNY-STONY BROOK 89 45 77 46 SYRACUSE 123 73 124 78 TEMPLE 105 73 103 72 TENNESSEE 140 65 142 69 TEXAS 364 141 381 134 TEXAS A&M 169 80 181 82 TEXAS TECH . . 90 73 TORONTO 344 149 369 159 TULANE 98 53 95 55 UTAH 161 70 186 71 VANDERBILT 142 78 141 80 VIRGINIA 196 97 198 101 VPI & SU 94 43 97 37 WASHINGTON 229 132 233 134 WASHINGTON STATE 90 39 104 46 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 142 88 141 90 WATERLOO 115 40 105 38 WAYNE STATE 101 82 111 88 WESTERN ONTARIO 171 46 141 45 WISCONSIN 218 156 193 154 YALE 324 203 311 201 YORK 127 51 125 51 Mean 155 84 154 84 StdDev 79 48 80 49 Table 5.a Items Loaned over Items Borrowed (ILL) sorted by ratio values in 1997 Number of Number of Difference Items Loaned Items Loaned in the for each for each Ratios Item Borrowed Item Borrowed 1996 1997 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 1 GUELPH .58 .51 -.07 2 CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE .67 .66 -.01 3 SOUTH CAROLINA .83 .68 -.15 4 CALIFORNIA, IRVINE .91 .70 -.21 5 TEXAS TECH . .70 . 6 PENNSYLVANIA .76 .76 .00 7 KENT STATE .70 .79 .09 8 TENNESSEE .73 .80 .07 9 BROWN .84 .82 -.02 10 LOUISIANA STATE 1.09 .83 -.27 11 BOSTON .92 .84 -.08 12 RICE 1.12 .85 -.27 13 DARTMOUTH .98 .90 -.08 14 DELAWARE 1.01 .91 -.10 15 QUEEN'S .68 .93 .25 16 RUTGERS .99 .97 -.02 17 SASKATCHEWAN .83 .98 .16 18 ILLINOIS, CHICAGO 1.28 1.01 -.27 19 NEBRASKA .78 1.01 .24 20 NEW YORK .98 1.03 .05 21 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA .91 1.03 .13 22 CINCINNATI 1.41 1.04 -.37 23 ALABAMA 1.22 1.07 -.15 24 TEMPLE .78 1.07 .29 25 OKLAHOMA 1.04 1.08 .04 26 CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA .98 1.08 .11 27 COLORADO STATE 1.33 1.12 -.21 28 YALE 1.08 1.12 .04 29 ARIZONA 1.70 1.15 -.54 30 ARIZONA STATE 1.09 1.19 .10 31 TULANE 1.11 1.20 .09 32 SUNY-ALBANY 1.88 1.20 -.68 33 JOHNS HOPKINS 1.12 1.23 .11 34 WATERLOO 1.06 1.25 .19 35 OHIO 1.15 1.26 .11 36 CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO .93 1.27 .34 37 ILLINOIS, URBANA 1.17 1.28 .10 38 VIRGINIA 1.37 1.28 -.09 39 TEXAS A&M 1.44 1.31 -.12 40 NORTHWESTERN 1.12 1.34 .22 41 OHIO STATE 1.35 1.38 .04 42 OKLAHOMA STATE 1.84 1.41 -.44 43 VANDERBILT 1.22 1.41 .19 44 KENTUCKY 1.45 1.44 -.01 45 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS 1.48 1.46 -.01 46 NEW MEXICO 1.23 1.46 .23 47 WASHINGTON STATE 3.64 1.47 -2.17 48 PURDUE 1.61 1.47 -.14 49 ROCHESTER 1.92 1.48 -.44 50 SYRACUSE 1.42 1.53 .10 51 BRIGHAM YOUNG 1.23 1.53 .30 52 COLUMBIA 1.62 1.55 -.07 53 TEXAS 1.66 1.57 -.08 54 MCMASTER 1.45 1.59 .14 55 MARYLAND 1.88 1.60 -.29 Table 5.a Items Loaned over Items Borrowed (ILL) sorted by ratio values in 1997 Number of Number of Difference Items Loaned Items Loaned in the for each for each Ratios Item Borrowed Item Borrowed 1996 1997 1 2 3 _____________ _____________ __________ 56 VPI & SU 1.73 1.60 -.13 57 WASHINGTON U.-ST. LOUIS 1.74 1.61 -.12 58 HARVARD 3.65 1.62 -2.03 59 MCGILL 1.78 1.62 -.16 60 HOUSTON 1.46 1.63 .17 61 NOTRE DAME 1.63 1.64 .01 62 NORTH CAROLINA STATE 2.84 1.65 -1.18 63 MANITOBA 1.90 1.67 -.24 64 CORNELL 1.25 1.67 .42 65 PRINCETON 1.82 1.75 -.08 66 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 2.09 1.75 -.34 67 CONNECTICUT 1.93 1.75 -.18 68 IOWA STATE 1.73 1.78 .04 69 MIT 2.62 1.85 -.77 70 EMORY 2.52 1.86 -.66 71 LAVAL 1.73 1.86 .13 72 GEORGETOWN 1.29 1.88 .59 73 MISSOURI 2.25 1.92 -.34 74 STANFORD 1.87 1.93 .06 75 INDIANA 2.10 1.99 -.11 76 COLORADO 2.31 2.00 -.31 77 PENNSYLVANIA STATE 2.19 2.01 -.18 78 KANSAS 1.85 2.01 .16 79 CHICAGO 1.93 2.01 .08 80 MASSACHUSETTS 1.70 2.08 .38 81 UTAH 2.34 2.11 -.22 82 MICHIGAN STATE 1.98 2.18 .20 83 OREGON 2.04 2.19 .15 84 CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2.74 2.20 -.54 85 FLORIDA STATE 2.84 2.26 -.59 86 MICHIGAN 2.31 2.29 -.02 87 BRITISH COLUMBIA 2.63 2.30 -.33 88 SUNY-BUFFALO 2.40 2.40 -.01 89 ALBERTA 2.70 2.44 -.26 90 CALIFORNIA, DAVIS 3.20 2.52 -.68 91 AUBURN 4.33 2.57 -1.76 92 IOWA 2.70 2.58 -.12 93 HOWARD 1.55 2.67 1.12 94 PITTSBURGH 2.76 2.71 -.06 95 MIAMI 2.76 2.72 -.04