by administrator
on May 15, 2012
On Friday, May 11, 2012, Judge Orinda Evans released her 350-page opinion in the copyright infringement lawsuit against Georgia State University. This memo summarizes the key rulings in the case and discusses some possible consequences for libraries generally.  issue-brief-gsu-decision-15may12.pdf
by administrator
on May 15, 2012
This memo summarizes the key rulings in the Georgia State University (GSU) lawsuit and discusses some possible consequences for libraries generally. memo_gsudirectors_15may12.pdf
by administrator
on May 01, 2012
Proceedings of the 160th ARL Membership Meeting, May 2012.
mm12sp-butler.pdf
by administrator
on January 24, 2012
Discusses copyright and its problems, why librarians need useable fair use, and the Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries
fair-use-code-slides-lib.pdf
by administrator
on January 24, 2012
Discusses why students need to understand fair use, copyright and its problems, how codes of best practices help
fair-use-code-slides-student.pdf
by administrator
on January 01, 2010
by administrator
on January 01, 2010
Presented at the 157th ARL Membership Meeting, October 2010.
 mm10fall-fairuse.mp3
by administrator
on January 01, 2010
Presented at the 157th ARL Membership Meeting, October 2010.
mm10fall-butler-jaszi.pdf
by administrator
on January 01, 2010
This report summarizes research into the current application of fair use to meet the missions of U.S. academic and research libraries. Sixty-five librarians were interviewed confidentially by telephone for around one hour each. They were asked about their employment of fair use in five key areas of practice: support for teaching and learning, support for scholarship, preservation, exhibition and public outreach, and serving disabled communities. arl_csm_fairusereport.pdf
by administrator
on January 01, 2010
Late last year, Google, the Author's Guild, the American Association of Publishers, and the individual plaintiffs in the lawsuit over Google's massive book digitization program negotiated several revisions to their original Proposed Settlement Agreement (original agreement). The revisions were designed to address concerns raised by the Department of Justice and other critics who advised the court to reject the original agreement. The deadline to file comments on the new Proposed Amended Settlement Agreement (amended agreement) was January 28, 2010. The Department of Justice filed its comments on Thursday, February 4, 2010. This document describes the second round of comments.
gbs-2nd-round-comments10feb10.pdf
|
|
