SPEC Kit 330 explores the scope of accreditation standards,the data provided by research libraries to meet the requirements of accrediting bodies, and which library staff participate in preparing reports and site visits. The survey results may help libraries identify and understand what standards exist, and how their contributions lead to successful accreditation and reaccreditation for their parent institutions. Additionally, this survey sought to identify how deeply ARL libraries are involved in the accreditation process at the institutional level. As libraries strive to establish their impact and value in higher education, this measure is one way to gauge how institutional leaders perceive their libraries’ contributions. This SPEC Kit includes examples of programmatic and regional accrediting agency reports from respondents and descriptions of the accreditation process.
This publication is available for purchase in both online and print versions. Download the spec-kit-purchase-options-2013.pdf for complete pricing and purchase options information.
Link to the online SPEC Kit 330 on the ARL Digital Publications website.
Terms:2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, Assessment, Holly Mercer, Library Administration, Michael Maciel, Publications, SPEC Kit, Text
Terms:Diversity, Diversity, Diversity, Diversity, Diversity, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Publications, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text
This report analyzes salary data for all professional staff working in the 126 ARL member libraries during 2011-2012. Data are reported for 9,910 professional staff in the 115 university libraries and for 4,046 professional staff in the 11 non-university libraries.
This publication is available for purchase in both online and print versions. Download the arl-salary-survey-purchase-options-2013.pdf for complete pricing and purchase options information.
Link to the online ARL Annual Salary Survey 2011-2012 on the ARL Digital Publications website.
Terms:2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, Assessment, Martha Kyrillidou, Publications, Salary Survey, Shaneka Morris, Shaneka Morris, Shaneka Morris, Shaneka Morris, Text, Workforce
In this issue, Eugenia Kim, 2010 ARL CEP Fellow, recounts her experience working as an intern, providing support for the Data Curation Profiles (DCP) project led by the Purdue University Libraries. Kiyomi Deards, 2009 ARL Diversity Scholar, provides an update on ARL efforts to recruit students from diverse backgrounds into science and technology roles in academic and research libraries. Former LCDP Fellow, Steve Adams, discusses a relatively new but important area of practice and inquiry—the Science of Team Science—and how librarians can and should insinuate themselves into the research process and be vital members of scientific research teams.
 synergy-issue-9.pdf
Terms:2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, Diversity, Diversity, Diversity, Diversity, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Publications, Synergy, Synergy, Synergy, Synergy, Text, Text, Text, Text
SPEC Kit 329 explores the tools, workflow, and policies special collections and archives staff use to process, manage, and provide access to born-digital materials they collect. It also looks at which staff process and manage born-digital materials and how they acquire the skills they need for these activities, and how libraries have responded to the challenges that managing born-digital materials present. It includes documentation from respondents that describe digital specialists’ job responsibilities, collection policies, gift/purchase agreements, format policies, and workflows.
This publication is available for purchase in both online and print versions. Download the spec-kit-purchase-options-2013.pdf for complete pricing and purchase options information.
Link to the online SPEC Kit 329 on the ARL Digital Publications website.
Terms:2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, Ben Goldman, Cynthia Ghering, Jackie R. Esposito, Lisa Schmidt, Michael Shallcross, Michelle Belden, Nancy Deromedi, Naomi L. Nelson, Publications, Research Collections, Seth Shaw, SPEC Kit, Special Collections and Archives, Text, Tim Pyatt
The nearly 3000 undersigned national, state, and local organizations—representing the hundreds of millions of Americans who support and benefit from nondefense discretionary (NDD) programs—strongly urge a balanced approach to deficit reduction that does not include further cuts to NDD programs, which have already done their part to reduce the deficit.
ndd-letter-12july2012.pdf
Terms:2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, Federal Funding, Federal Funding, Federal Funding, Letter, Letter, Letter, Publications, Text, Text, Text
Does the approach of creating a code of best practices, anchored in professional practice, actually work to expand the utility of fair use? What has happened to others who used codes of best practices to gain access to their rights? This document describes specific examples of success with using codes of best practice.
fair-use-codes-success.pdf
Terms:2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, Code of Best Practices in Fair Use, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Fair Use, Fair Use, Fair Use, Fair Use, Publications, Report, Text, Text, Text, Text
The Association of Research Libraries (ARL) joined the American Library Association (ALA) and the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), who all work collectively as the Library Copyright Alliance (LCA), to file an amicus curiae brief with the Supreme Court of the United States in support of petitioner Supap Kirtsaeng in the case Kirtsaeng v. Wiley & Sons.
lca-kirtsaeng-brief-3july2012.pdf
Terms:2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, Amicus Brief, Amicus Brief, Amicus Brief, Amicus Brief, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Fair Use, Fair Use, Fair Use, First Sale, First Sale, First Sale, First Sale, Publications, Text, Text, Text, Text
SPEC Kit 328 gathers information about what collaborative teaching and learning tools are currently being offered to users in ARL member libraries. It covers questions on which kinds of tools are offered, how many, and why, where they are located, who may use them, the sources of funding, who provides training and support, and what techniques are used to promote and evaluate the tools. For the purpose of this survey, “collaborative teaching and learning tools” are limited to the equipment, devices, or systems being offered to research library users in a self-service environment including, but not limited to, the following: interactive whiteboards (IWBs, e.g., SMART Board), touchscreen tablet computers (e.g., iPads), classroom/audience response system (e.g., clickers), interactive learning centers (e.g., TouchTables), and Wii gaming systems. This SPEC Kit includes documentation from respondents that describe available equipment and services, loan policies, instructions for using equipment, and materials promoting the services.
This publication is available for purchase in both online and print versions. Download the spec-kit-purchase-options-2013.pdf for complete pricing and purchase options information.
Link to the online SPEC Kit 328 on the ARL Digital Publications website.
Terms:2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, Library Administration, Library Administration, Library Administration, Library Administration, Library Services, Library Services, Library Services, Library Services, Marilyn N. Ochoa, Marilyn N. Ochoa, Marilyn N. Ochoa, Marilyn N. Ochoa, Publications, Space, Facilities, and Services, Space, Facilities, and Services, Space, Facilities, and Services, Space, Facilities, and Services, SPEC Kit, SPEC Kit, SPEC Kit, SPEC Kit, Text, Text, Text, Text, Thomas Caswell, Thomas Caswell, Thomas Caswell, Thomas Caswell
|
|
