HomeNews

2014

Net Neutrality Principles

On July 10, 2014, ARL along with 10 other higher education and library organizations released a joint set of Net Neutrality Principles they recommend form the basis of an upcoming Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decision to protect the openness of the Internet. The groups believe network neutrality protections are essential to protecting freedom of speech, educational achievement, and economic growth.

pdfhigher-ed-libraries-net-neutrality-principles-10July2014.pdf

pdfhigher-ed-libraries-net-neutrality-press-release-and-principles-10July2014.pdf

 
 

Letter to FCC in Protecting an Open Internet

A May 13, 2014 ex parte to the Federal Communications Commission concerning preserving a protecting the open Internet in support of education, research, and innovation.

pdfletter-ALA-ARL-EDU-to-FCC-final-12may2014.pdf

 
 

White v. West Publishing 2014 Decision

In July 2014, the district court issued its full memorandum and order in White v. West Publishing, explaining that three of four fair use factors weighed in favor of a finding of fair use while the remaining factor was neutral. 

pdfWhite-v-west-publishing-decision-3jul2014.pdf

 
 

Authors Guild v. HathiTrust Decision (June 2014)

On June 10, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the lower court decision in Authors Guild v. HathiTrust in favor of HathiTrust Digital Library. 

pdfagvhathitrust-decision-jun2014.pdf

 
 

LCA Amicus Brief in Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. Appeal

On July 8, 2014, the Library Copyright Association filed an amicus brief for Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

pdfamicus-GoogleBooksAppeal-final-8jul2014.pdf

 

 
 

AAU-ARL Prospectus for an Institutionally Funded First-Book Subvention

The Association of American Universities (AAU) and the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) are working together, through a Task Force on Scholarly Communication, to ensure a robust system of scholarly communication in the humanities and qualitative social sciences. The task force seeks to address the economic challenges facing scholarly monograph publishing and to exploit digital communication technologies to move the academy towards a sustainable, innovative, and open system for supporting humanistic research.

Specifically, the task force intends to address the inability of a market model to adequately support research monograph publication based primarily on scholarly merit. This prospectus describes a faculty title subvention designed to ensure the long-term economic viability of foundational scholarly monographic publishing, while promoting the emergence of innovative digital models:

 pdfaau-arl-prospectus-for-institutionally-funded-first-book-subvention-june2014.pdf

This prospectus is based on “A Rational System for Funding Scholarly Monographs,” a white paper prepared for the task force in November 2012 by Raym Crow of Chain Bridge Group:

pdfaau-arl-white-paper-rational-system-for-funding-scholarly-monographs-2012.pdf 

 
 

Memo to ARL and SPARC Members re SPARC Administrative Agreement with New Venture Fund

Memo to ARL and SPARC members informing them of SPARC's new administrative agreement with New Venture Fund (NVF), a fiscal sponsorship organization located in Washington, DC

pdfARL-SPARC-member-message-17june2014.pdf

 
 

Letter to Senate Leadership on USA FREEDOM Process

Letter from ARL and 23 other organizations to US Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, Chairmen Patrick J. Leahy, and Dianne Feinstein, and Ranking Members Churck Grassley and Saxby Chambliss showing concern over the USA FREEDOM bill changes made in the House and the breadth of the surveillance that the bill could be read to authorize.

pdfltr-Senate-leadership-USA-Freedom-12jun2014.pdf

 
     
Page 2 of 4
 
 

Partners

Coalition for Networked Information Logo
Library Copyright Alliance Logo
The Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) Logo