Google Books Litigation Family Tree
Terms:2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Image, Image, Image, Image, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Publications
A New Day for Website Archiving 2.0
Memorandum discussing legal issues in website archiving.
band-new-day-for-archiving-2.0-23feb12.pdf
Terms:2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Text, Text, Text, Text
Golan v. Holder: A Farewell to Constitutional Challenges to Copyright Laws
On January 13, 2012, the Supreme Court by a 6-2 vote affirmed the Tenth Circuit decision in Golan v. Holder. The case concerned the constitutionality of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA), which restored copyright in foreign works that had entered into the public domain because the copyright owners had failed to comply with formalities such as notice; or because the U.S. did not have copyright treaties in place with the country at the time the work was created (e.g., the Soviet Union) golan_summary_06feb12.pdf
Terms:2005–2009, 2005–2009, 2005–2009, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Court Cases, Court Cases, Court Cases, Court Cases, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Orphan Works, Orphan Works, Orphan Works, Orphan Works, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text
Membership Meeting 2011 (Spring): WIPO AND LIBRARIES
Presented at the 158th ARL Membership Meeting, May 2011.
mm11sp-band.pdf
Terms:2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, ARL Membership Meeting, ARL Membership Meeting, ARL Membership Meeting, ARL Membership Meeting, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Proceedings, Proceedings, Proceedings, Proceedings, Publications, Slide, Slide, Slide, Slide
A Guide For the Perplexed Part IV: The Rejection of the Google Books Settlement
On March 22, 2011, Judge Denny Chin rejected the proposed settlement in copyright infringement litigation over the Google Library Project. Judge Chin found that the settlement was not "fair, reasonable, and adequate" as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Judge Chin issued the decision over a year after the fairness hearing he conducted. His opinion agrees in large measure with the objections to the settlement asserted by the U.S. Department of Justice at the hearing and in its written submissions. This paper discusses the opinion and where it leaves Google Books Search.
guide-for-perplexed-part4-apr11.pdf
Terms:2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Court Cases, Court Cases, Court Cases, Court Cases, Court Cases, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Report, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text
GBS March Madness: Paths Forward for the Google Books Settlement
This chart attempts to diagram some of the possible paths forward following the fairness hearing on the Google Books Settlement. gbs-march-madness-diagram-final.pdf
Terms:2005–2009, 2005–2009, 2005–2009, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Tricia Donovan, Tricia Donovan, Tricia Donovan, Tricia Donovan
Issue Brief: Streaming of Films for Educational Purposes
Terms:2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, Brandon Butler, Brandon Butler, Brandon Butler, Brandon Butler, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Fair Use, Fair Use, Fair Use, Fair Use, Issue Brief, Issue Brief, Issue Brief, Issue Brief, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Kenneth D. Crews, Kenneth D. Crews, Kenneth D. Crews, Kenneth D. Crews, Peter Jaszi, Peter Jaszi, Peter Jaszi, Peter Jaszi, Publications, Text, Text, Text, Text
The Impact of the Supreme Court's Decision in Costco v. Omega on Libraries
On December 13, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Costco v. Omega in a manner that eliminated none of the uncertainty caused by the lower court's ruling in that case. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had ruled that the copyright law's "first sale doctrine" did not apply to copies manufactured abroad. This ruling cast doubt on a library's ability to circulate books and other materials manufactured outside of the United States.
lca-costco-31jan11.pdf
Terms:2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Court Cases, Court Cases, Court Cases, Court Cases, First Sale, First Sale, First Sale, First Sale, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Text, Text, Text, Text
A Guide for the Perplexed Part III: The Amended Settlement Agreement
On Friday, November 13, 2009, Google, the Authors Guild, and the Association of American Publishers filed an Amended Settlement Agreement (ASA) in the copyright infringement litigation concerning the Google Library Project. The amendments proposed by the parties are designed to address objections made by the U.S. Department of Justice and copyright holders to the original proposed settlement agreement. While many of the amendments will have little direct impact on libraries, the ASA significantly reduces the scope of the settlement because it excludes most books published outside of the United States. This paper describes the ASA's major changes, with emphasis on those changes relevant to libraries.
guide-for-perplexed-part3-nov09.pdf
Terms:2005–2009, 2005–2009, 2005–2009, 2005–2009, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Court Cases, Court Cases, Court Cases, Court Cases, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Text, Text, Text, Text
A Guide for the Perplexed Part II: The Amended Google-Michigan Agreement
On May 20, 2009, Google and the University of Michigan (Michigan) entered into an amendment that expanded the 2004 agreement that allowed Google to scan books in the Michigan library for inclusion in Google's search database. The new agreement (the Amendment) addresses the provisions of the proposed settlement agreement between Google and the plaintiffs in the Google Book Search litigation.
google-michigan-12jun09.pdf
Terms:2005–2009, 2005–2009, 2005–2009, 2005–2009, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Jonathan Band, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Report, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text
|
|