Publishing Support for Small Print-Based Publishers: Options for ARL Libraries
This report summarizes the results of a project to investigate options that research libraries have for providing publishing support to small, print-based publishers.
pub-support_7mar11.pdf
Terms:2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, Judy Luther, Judy Luther, Judy Luther, Judy Luther, Library Publishing, Library Publishing, Library Publishing, Library Publishing, October Ivins, October Ivins, October Ivins, October Ivins, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Scholarly Communication, Scholarly Communication, Scholarly Communication, Scholarly Communication, Text, Text, Text, Text
Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic Libraries
This is a code of best practices in fair use devised specifically by and for the academic and research library community. It enhances the ability of librarians to rely on fair use by documenting the considered views of the library community about best practices in fair use, drawn from the actual practices and experience of the library community itself.
A PDF is available here code-of-best-practices-fair-use.pdf
Print copies are also available for $2.00 each plus shipping & handling.
Terms:2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, Code of Best Practices in Fair Use, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Fair Use, Fair Use, Fair Use, Fair Use, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Text, Text, Text, Text
MINES for Libraries Final Report
This final report of a ground-breaking study summarizes findings on 34,000 randomly captured uses of electronic resources over a 12-month period from the 21 members of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL). The results show the increasing value derived from the use of digital content, the emerging use of digital resources in the humanities, and the soaring use of e-resources from off-campus locations.
mines-for-libraries-final-report.pdf
Terms:2005–2009, 2005–2009, 2005–2009, 2005–2009, Assessment, Assessment, Assessment, Assessment, Brinley Franklin, Brinley Franklin, Brinley Franklin, Brinley Franklin, Martha Kyrillidou, Martha Kyrillidou, Martha Kyrillidou, Martha Kyrillidou, MINES for Libraries, MINES for Libraries, MINES for Libraries, MINES for Libraries, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Terry Plum, Terry Plum, Terry Plum, Terry Plum, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Text, Toni Olshen, Toni Olshen, Toni Olshen, Toni Olshen
Transforming Special Collections in the Digital Age Working Group
Charge developed in collaboration with the Chairs of TRL Steering Committee and of the Working Group, and with input from the Executive Committee. Endorsed by Executive Committee Feb 11, 2010 scwg-charge-final-11feb10.pdf
Terms:2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Research Collections, Research Collections, Research Collections, Research Collections, Special Collections and Archives, Special Collections and Archives, Special Collections and Archives, Special Collections and Archives, Text, Text, Text, Text
Preparing for the Future Scenario Planning Process: Findings from Internal Data Gathering
In April and May of 2010, Stratus and ARL conducted interviews, focus groups and a survey of ARL members and external thinkers on the future of research libraries and the strategic challenges they face. This report is a summary of the findings from that process, including a draft strategic focus that captures the scope of thinking of the ARL membership that participated in this effort.
scenarios-data-gathering-summary-aug10.pdf
Terms:2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, Planning and Visioning, Planning and Visioning, Planning and Visioning, Planning and Visioning, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Scenario Planning, Scenario Planning, Scenario Planning, Scenario Planning, Susan Stickley, Susan Stickley, Susan Stickley, Susan Stickley, Text, Text, Text, Text
Principles to Guide Vendor/Publisher Relations in Large-Scale Digitization Projects of Special Collections Materials
Principles endorsed by the Association of Research Libraries Board of Directors on July 26, 2010. principles_large_scale_digitization.pdf
Terms:2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, Digitization, Digitization, Digitization, Digitization, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Research Collections, Research Collections, Research Collections, Research Collections, Special Collections and Archives, Special Collections and Archives, Special Collections and Archives, Special Collections and Archives, Text, Text, Text, Text
ARL Profiles: Emerging Themes
Terms:2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, Ann Snowman, Ann Snowman, Ann Snowman, Assessment, Bryan Skib, Bryan Skib, Bryan Skib, Bryan Skib, Patrick Reakes, Patrick Reakes, Patrick Reakes, Patrick Reakes, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Robert Fox, Robert Fox, Robert Fox, Robert Fox, Text, Text, Text, Text
Year Two of the "Great Recession": Surviving the Present by Building the Future
This is a longer version of the April 2010 ARL Membership Meeting budget presentation by Charles B. Lowry.
year-two-great-recession-report.pdf
Terms:2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, Charles B. Lowry, Charles B. Lowry, Charles B. Lowry, Charles B. Lowry, Library Administration, Library Administration, Library Administration, Library Administration, Planning and Visioning, Planning and Visioning, Planning and Visioning, Planning and Visioning, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Text, Text, Text, Text
Fair Use Challenges in Academic and Research Libraries
This report summarizes research into the current application of fair use to meet the missions of U.S. academic and research libraries. Sixty-five librarians were interviewed confidentially by telephone for around one hour each. They were asked about their employment of fair use in five key areas of practice: support for teaching and learning, support for scholarship, preservation, exhibition and public outreach, and serving disabled communities. arl_csm_fairusereport.pdf
Terms:2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, Brandon Butler, Brandon Butler, Brandon Butler, Brandon Butler, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Fair Use, Fair Use, Fair Use, Fair Use, Patricia Aufderheide, Patricia Aufderheide, Patricia Aufderheide, Patricia Aufderheide, Peter Jaszi, Peter Jaszi, Peter Jaszi, Peter Jaszi, Prudence S. Adler, Prudence S. Adler, Prudence S. Adler, Prudence S. Adler, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Text, Text, Text, Text
The Google Books Settlement: Second Round Comments
Late last year, Google, the Author's Guild, the American Association of Publishers, and the individual plaintiffs in the lawsuit over Google's massive book digitization program negotiated several revisions to their original Proposed Settlement Agreement (original agreement). The revisions were designed to address concerns raised by the Department of Justice and other critics who advised the court to reject the original agreement. The deadline to file comments on the new Proposed Amended Settlement Agreement (amended agreement) was January 28, 2010. The Department of Justice filed its comments on Thursday, February 4, 2010. This document describes the second round of comments.
gbs-2nd-round-comments10feb10.pdf
Terms:2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, Brandon Butler, Brandon Butler, Brandon Butler, Brandon Butler, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Copyright, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Google Books, Publications, Report, Report, Report, Report, Text, Text, Text, Text
|
|