5. UNDERSTANDING FACTORS
INFLUENCING USE
One of our principal goals is to understand what distinguishes
users from non-users, early adopters from late adopters, and so
on. We have tentatively identified several kinds of variables
that might influence users with regard to adoption of electronic
books. We can broadly divide these into: resource factors (discussed
here), attitude factors (discussed in section 6), and behavior
factors (discussed in section 7).
5.1 Resource Factors
We believe the key resource factor to be possession of, or easy
access to, adequate computer equipment and connections, so that
online books are a reasonable alternative to paper versions. As
noted earlier in a discussion of early research results, we have
two primary methods of studying this factor:
- Asking the question about access to computers with network
connections that was discussed earlier; and
- Developing a detailed profile of the computer resources available
to representative samples of members of the Columbia community.
As described earlier, we used the campus computing survey instrument
in three sweeps through the community, in what we regard as pilot
implementations in Fall 1995 and Winter 1996. The questionnaire
asked respondents for detailed information about their computers.
However, many respondents did not supply the requested data on
computer power, size of hard drive, modem speed, and the like.
Furthermore, observation of developments in the personal computer
marketplace makes it clear that changes in personal computers
will make the top of the original scales on these questionnaires
the bottom of the scales in as little as two years.
Section 7 contains further analyses of the first of these factors.
5.2 Attitude Factors - In-Class Survey
We cannot probe attitude factors easily in a simple survey, whether
in paper or online. We have designed some questions aimed at assessing
whether the respondent thinks that members of his peer group use
and/or prefer electronic access to books and other resources.
On the one hand, this perception of others' preferences might
precede and shape a user's own preferences and behavior. Alternatively,
if use of computer modalities is, as some psychological research
suggests, a very private activity, awareness of the behavior of
others may, in fact, lag the move to using online books.
5.2.1 The In-Class Survey
Examples of such results include the data from Fall 1996 and Spring
1997 in-class surveys of students who were assigned a reading
that was available online for the session during which the survey
was administered. Students who had done the reading were asked
to answer questions about what forms of the book they used, how
long they used that form, where they did that studying, format
preference, reasons for it and impacts, expectations for format
most used by classmates, and the two benchmark questions about
computer access and time online. (See Exhibit 4.) Those who had
not done the assignment were asked to respond only to the last
three questions.
| Exhibit 4. Survey Of Book Use For Course Readings
|
| As part of its effort to serve you better, the Libraries would like to know what methods you used in reading an assignment for this class session. All responses will be kept confidential.
|
A. Did you read the assignment in Kadushin's SUPERVISION IN SOCIAL WORK for this class session?
1. YES (If so, please answer all the questions.) 2. NO (If not, please skip down and answer Questions F-I only.)
|
| B. Following is a list of methods that you might have used in doing this reading. Please tell us about your use of each for this assignment. If you used a method, please tell us for about how long you used it and where you did this reading.
|
| Methods of Reading This Assignment
| Did you use it? (Please circle)
| For about how long? # Hours & # Minutes
| Where (e.g., library, dorm room, lounge, classroom)?
|
| 1. Your own copy of the book
| 1.YES 2.NO |
|
|
|
| 2. A friend's copy of the book
| 1.YES 2.NO |
|
|
|
| 3. A library copy of the book
| 1.YES 2.NO |
|
|
|
| 4. Photocopy from paper copy
| 1.YES 2.NO |
|
|
|
| Using CWeb Online Text:
|
| 5. Reading it directly from CWeb
| 1.YES 2.NO |
|
|
|
| 6. JAKE printout of text
| 1.YES 2.NO |
|
|
|
| 7. Printout using non-JAKE printer
| 1.YES 2.NO |
|
|
|
| 8. Download of online text to disk & reading away from CWeb
| 1.YES 2.NO |
|
|
|
| C. If you used more than one method, which one did you like best? (Please circle the number of the preferred method from the above table.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
|
D. Why did you like that method best? (Please circle the numbers of all the reasons that apply.)
1. Less costly 2. Easy to get to 3. Easy to read 4. Always available 5. Easy to copy 6. Easy to search for words or concepts 7. Easy to annotate/take notes 8. Other reasons:
|
| E. What were the impacts on your work of using the method you liked best? (Please circle the numbers of all that apply.) 1. I learned better. 2. I learned faster. 3. Learning was more fun. 4. I was more likely to do the assignment. 5. Reading the assignment was more difficult. 6. Doing the assignment was faster. 7. Doing the assignment was slower. 8. Other impacts:
|
| F. Which of these methods of reading this assignment do you think was most used by your classmates? (Please circle the number of the method from the above table.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
|
| G. Is there a computer connected to the campus network (by modem or direct link) that you can use whenever you want? (Please circle.) 1. YES 2. NO
|
| H. About how many hours per week do you spend in each of the following online activities?
_____ Email _____ Listservs and Newsgroups ______ CLIO Plus
_____ Scholarly Text, Image or Numeric Data Sources ______ Other WWWeb
|
I. Your insights into your experience and preferences in using various book formats are valuable:
Thank you for your assistance with this study.
|
Form 8, 9/96: Distribution Date: 4/29/97 Course: SOCW T7134
In Fall 1996, most of this surveying (67 percent of a total of
439 responses) was done in sections of Columbia College's Contemporary
Civilization course for which some of the readings are available
in the Past Masters set of humanities texts. However, those
students are expected to use the assigned editions of the readings
and to bring a copy to class for use during the discussion. This
may well have biased students' choices in methods of reading the
assignments. About 16 percent of the cases in the sample came
from graduate Social Work classes and 17 percent from a large
upper level undergraduate political theory class.
In Spring 1997, the Contemporary Civilization course was the source
of 106 (44 percent) of the 239 respondents. Two political science
courses, one undergraduate and one graduate level, were the source
of another 17 respondents (7 percent). Four graduate Social Work
courses were the source of the remaining 116 respondents (49 percent).
5.2.2 Methods of Studying A Class Reading
Some students had not done the reading for the course session
in which the surveying was done. Some others reported using more
than one method.
Table 31. Methods of Reading This Assignment: Whole Sample Fall 1996 And Spring 1997
| Fall 1996
| Spring 1997
|
| Methods of Reading This Assignment
| Count
| % of Responses
| Count
| % of Responses
|
| Used Own Copy | 269
| 70% | 141
| 73% |
| Used Friend's Copy |
54 | 14%
| 20 | 10%
|
| Used Library Copy | 33
| 8% | 17
| 9% |
| Used Photocopy | 11
| 3% | 17
| 9% |
| Reading it directly from CWeb
| 0 | 0%
| 0 | 0%
|
| JAKE printout of text |
10 | 3%
| 16 | 8%
|
| Printout using non-JAKE printer
| 4 | 1%
| 4 | 2%
|
| Download of online text to disk & reading away from CWeb
| 5 | 1%
| 1 | *%
|
| Total | 386
| 100% | 216
| 100% |
This table shows that, in Fall 1996, 70 percent of the responses
reported using one's own copy of the text. The next most common
method was to use a friend's copy (14%). The shares for those
two modes are insignificantly different in Spring 1997.
The questionnaire gives four alternative means of Using CWeb
Online Text:
Reading it directly from CWeb
JAKE printout of text
Printout using non-JAKE printer
Download of online text to disk & reading away from CWeb
In Fall 1996, there were 19 reports (5 percent) of printing out
or downloading from the CWeb books, but none of reading directly
from CWeb. In 89 percent of those cases, the respondent was not
in a Contemporary Civilization class. In Spring 1997, about 11
percent of responses reported using some form of the online text,
but again none reported reading on screen.
5.2.3 Preferences for Studying Class Reading
There were far fewer responses (119 in Fall 1996 and 88 in Spring
1997) as to the preferred mode of studying. In both semesters
about two thirds of respondents reported that reading their own
copy was preferred.
Table 32. Preferred Method Reading This Assignment: Whole Sample Fall 1996 and Spring 1997
| Fall 1996
| Spring 1997
|
| Preferred Method of Reading Assignment
| Count
| % of Cases
| Count
| % of Cases
|
| Own Copy | 83
| 67% | 56
| 64% |
| Friend's Copy | 9
| 8% | 6
| 7% |
| Library Copy | 10
| 8% | 6
| 7% |
| Photocopy | 7
| 6% | 8
| 9% |
| Reading it directly from CWeb
| 2 | 2%
| 7 | 8%
|
| JAKE printout of text |
7 | 6%
| 6 | 7%
|
| Printout using non-JAKE printer
| 3 | 2%
| 5 | 6%
|
| Download of online text to disk & reading away from CWeb
| 3 | 2%
| 1 | 1%
|
| Total Responses |
124 | 101% | 95 |
109% |
| Total Cases Responding
| 119 |
| 88 |
|
| Note: Detail may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
|
5.2.4 Reasons for Preference
As the following table shows, in both semesters, the three strongest
reasons for preference were always available, easy to
annotate, and easy to read, with the last two reasons
switching position between the semesters.
Table 33. Reason for Preferred Method: Whole Sample Fall 1996 and Spring 1997
| Fall 1996
| Spring 1997
|
| Reasons for Preference
| Count
| % of Cases
| Count
| % of Cases
|
| Less Costly | 60
| 22% | 33
| 23% |
| Easy to get to | 0
| 0% | 0
| 0% |
| Easy to Read | 104
| 38% | 70
| 48% |
| Always Available | 199
| 72% | 108
| 74% |
| Easy to Copy | 21
| 8% | 20
| 14% |
| Easy to Search for Words
| 30 | 11%
| 15 | 10%
|
| Easy to Annotate | 135
| 49% | 57
| 39% |
| Other Reasons | 25
| 9% | 16
| 11% |
| Total Responses |
574 | 209% | 319 |
219% |
| Total Cases Responding
| 276 |
| 146 |
|
| Note: Respondents could give more than one reason for their preference.
|
At present, these attributes are possessed
only by a personal copy or photocopies from print copies or printouts
from electronic copies. (Online books are always available,
but one assumes that ready physical access to a computer does
not meet the criterion always as students interpreted it
here.)
The cross-tabulation of preferred method of use and reasons for
that preference produces logically consistent results. For example,
all of the respondents who gave Printout using non-JAKE printer
or Download of online text to disk and reading away from
CWeb as their preferred method gave less costly as
one of their reasons while few of the those preferring their own
copy gave that reason.
Table 34. Preferred Method & Reason for Preferred Method: Whole Sample Spring 1997 - Row Percentages
| Reason for Preference
|
| Preferred Method
| Less Costly
| Easy to Read
| Always Available
| Easy to Copy
| Easy to Search
| Easy to Annotate
| Other
|
| Own Copy | 8%
| 47% | 83%
| 7% | 9%
| 41% | 11%
|
| Friend's Copy | 75%
| 25% | 75%
| 0% | 0%
| 25% | 0%
|
| Library Copy | 25%
| 25% | 50%
| 25% | 25%
| 0% | 25%
|
| Photocopy | 50%
| 50% | 33%
| 33% | 0%
| 17% | 0%
|
| On CWeb | 60%
| 20% | 80%
| 20% | 40%
| 0% | 0%
|
| JAKE Printout | 50%
| 67% | 83%
| 83% | 0%
| 17% | 0%
|
| Other Printout | 100%
| 20% | 60%
| 60% | 20%
| 20% | 0%
|
| Download to Disk | 100%
| 0% | 100%
| 100% | 0%
| 0% | 0%
|
| Total | 24%
| 44% | 75%
| 16% | 12%
| 33% | 9%
|
| Note: Easy to Get To was another reason offered but no one chose it in either semester.
|
So we have a consistent picture of what makes a mode good, preferred,
and used. In other words, our student respondents are behaving
rationally.
5.2.5 Impact of Preferred Method
As the following table shows, when asked what the impact of the
various possible modes was, a majority of the students selected
more likely to do the assignment. Learned better
and doing assignment faster ranked second and third, being
cited by about one third of the students.
Table 35. Nature of Impact of Preferred Method: Whole Sample Fall 1996 and Spring 1997
| Fall 1996
| Spring 1997
|
| Impact of Preferred Method
| Count
| % of Cases
| Count
| % of Cases
|
| Learned Better | 92
| 34% | 51
| 34% |
| Learned Faster | 51
| 19% | 27
| 18% |
| Learning More Fun | 16
| 6% | 13
| 9% |
| More Likely To Do Assignment
| 154 | 57%
| 82 | 54%
|
| Reading More Difficult |
8 | 3%
| 1 | 1%
|
| Doing Assignment Faster
| 85 | 31%
| 56 | 37%
|
| Doing Assignment Slower
| 12 | 4%
| 2 | 1%
|
| Other Impacts | 29
| 11% | 21
| 14% |
| Total Responses |
447 | 165%
| 253 | 168% |
| Total Cases Responding
| 271 |
| 152 |
|
| Note: Detail may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
|
These are again entirely rational bases
for preferring some particular mode, when we note that a student's
role is to get assignments done and to learn.
5.2.6 Comparison of Personal Behavior and Perception of Others' Behavior
Students were asked what method they thought most of their classmates
used in order to learn whether they perceived a shift to using
the online materials. In Fall 1996, 81 percent of respondents
chose own copy, and 14 percent chose library copy.
In Spring 1997, these values were 80 percent and eight percent,
respectively. This contrasts with the reality that 70 percent
(73 percent in Spring 1997) used their own copies, 14 percent
(ten percent) used a friend's copy and eight percent (nine percent)
used a library copy.
Interestingly, while none of the respondents had used the CWeb
book directly to do this assignment, in both survey periods almost
two percent (five or six students) gave that response to this
question. In the fall, another nine students (two percent) and,
in the spring, another 13 students (six percent) thought that
their classmates had used some form of print copy or downloaded
file from CWeb. Thus, students are over-estimating their colleagues'
propensity to read directly from CWeb and under-estimating their
propensity to read printed copy and downloaded files from CWeb.
Table 36. In-Class Surveys: Personal Behavior and Perception of Methods Used by Classmates to Read This Assignment: Whole Sample Fall 1996 and Spring 1997
| Fall 1996
| Spring 1997
|
| Methods of Reading This Assignment
| Own Behavior
| Perception of Others' Behavior
| Own Behavior
| Perception of Others' Behavior
|
| Used Own Copy | 74%
| 81% | 73%
| 80% |
| Used Friend's Copy |
15% | 7%
| 10% | 4%
|
| Used Library Copy |
9% | 14%
| 9% | 8%
|
| Used Photocopy | 3%
| 4% | 9%
| 7% |
| CWeb Directly | 0%
| 2% | 0%
| 2% |
| Used JAKE Print Copy |
3% | 1%
| 8% | 5%
|
| Used Other Print Copy |
1% | *%
| 2% | 1%
|
| Used Download Copy |
1% | 1%
| *% | *%
|
| Note: * Less than .5%.
|
At the present time, there is not sufficient
penetration of the market by the online modes for us to draw any
meaningful conclusions about leading and lagging impacts. Results
of this survey in Fall 1997, particularly in Social Work classes,
should give some indication of trends as students will have had
more time in which to gain awareness of the availability and attributes of the online format.
[Table of Contents] [Next Page]