<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> 
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.arl.org/sparc/bm.assets/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title>SPARC - News &amp;amp; Media</title> 
    <description>SPARC News.</description> 
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:29:21 UT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Big Medium 2.0.8</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <link>http://www.arl.org/sparc/media/index.shtml</link>
    <atom:link href="http://www.arl.org/sparc/media/bm~feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

    <item>
    <title>University of Pittsburgh Joins Boycott Elsevier</title>
    <description>

</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:29:18 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.utimes.pitt.edu/?p=19679</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11248</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>
    <category>
        Advocacy
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>Is the Open Science Revolution for Real?</title>
    <description>
David Dobbs, &lt;em&gt;Wired &lt;/em&gt;blog, February 3, 2012
</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:10:58 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/is-the-open-science-revolution-for-real/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11227</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>Tiptoeing Toward the Tipping Point</title>
    <description>
&lt;p&gt;Barbara Fister, &lt;em&gt;Library Journal&lt;/em&gt;, February 2, 2012&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The Association of American Publishers (AAP) has done academic librarians a huge favor. When it publicly got behind the &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; style=&quot; text-decoration: underline; &quot; href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.3699:&quot;&gt;Research Works Act&lt;/a&gt;, it accomplished something librarians have been trying to do for decades. It turned a lot of scholars into open access activists.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:52:19 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2012/02/opinion/barbara-fister/tiptoeing-toward-the-tipping-point-peer-to-peer-review/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11224</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>
    <category>
        Advocacy
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>Scientific Publishing: The Price of Information</title>
    <description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Economist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;After all, publishers need academics more than academics need publishers. And incumbents often look invulnerable until they suddenly fall. Beware, then, the Academic spring.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:03:55 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.economist.com/node/21545974</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11223</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>The NIH Public Access Policy</title>
    <description>
NIH puts out comprehensive information on Open Access Policies.
</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:07:08 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://publicaccess.nih.gov/public_access_policy_implications_2012.pdf</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11218</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>Thousands of Scientists Vow to Boycott Elsevier to Protest Journal Prices</title>
    <description>
Jop de Vrieze, &lt;em&gt;ScienceInsider&lt;/em&gt;, February 1, 2012
</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:44:27 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/02/thousands-of-scientists-vow-to-b.html?ref=hp</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11215</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>
    <category>
        News &amp; Media/SPARC in the News
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>Journal Publishing Reform</title>
    <description>
A collection of links to information, opinion, activism, and other issues concerning the practices of research journal publishers.
</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:29:56 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php?title=Journal_publishing_reform</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11212</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>
    <category>
        Advocacy
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>Petition Targeting Elsevier’s Business Practices Begins to Snowball</title>
    <description>
Michael Kelley, &lt;em&gt;The Library Journal&lt;/em&gt;, January 31, 2012
</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:26:49 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2012/01/publishing/petition-targeting-elseviers-business-practices-begins-to-snowball/http://</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11211</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>
    <category>
        Advocacy
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>ASPB Does Not Endorse the Research Works Act</title>
    <description>

</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:45:54 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://my.aspb.org/resource/group/6d461cb9-5b79-4571-a164-924fa40395a5/docs/aspb_statement_re_rwa-final.pdf</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11198</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>
    <category>
        Advocacy
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>Elsevier's Publishing Model Might be About to Go Up in Smoke</title>
    <description>

</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:42:24 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/01/28/elseviers-publishing-model-might-be-about-to-go-up-in-smoke/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11197</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>Your Comments on Access to Federally Funded Scientific Research Results</title>
    <description>

</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:38:07 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/01/30/your-comments-access-federally-funded-scientific-research-results</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11194</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>
    <category>
        Advocacy
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>Researchers Taking a Stand Against Elsevier</title>
    <description>

</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:53:42 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://thecostofknowledge.com/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11192</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>
    <category>
        Advocacy
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>SOPA's Killer Cousin You've Probably Never Heard About</title>
    <description>
Abdulrahman El-Sayed,&amp;#160;&lt;em&gt;The Huffington Post&lt;/em&gt;, January 26, 2012&amp;#160;
</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:28:35 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/abdulrahman-m-elsayed/nih-funded-research_b_1232881.html?ref=tw</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11186</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>UK Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology Policy Briefing on Open Access</title>
    <description>
Chandrika Nath,&lt;em&gt; Parliament&lt;/em&gt;, January 25, 2012
</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:38:37 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/POST-PN-397</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11184</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>


    </item>

    <item>
    <title>SPARC Responds to White House RFI</title>
    <description>
On January 12, 2012 SPARC submitted the following comments in response to the White&amp;#160;House Office of Science and Technology Policy&apos;s (OSTP)&amp;#160;Request for Public Information&amp;#160;on public access to scholarly articles.&amp;#160;
</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:18:36 UT</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.arl.org/sparc/media/sparc-responds-to-white-house-rfi.shtml</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">26dcad34a129342ec248209da133647b-11143</guid>

    <category>
        News &amp; Media
    </category>


    </item>

</channel> 
</rss>
